[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / animu / di / leftpol / mde / nep / tacos / vg ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 53rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - egenerates

August 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: 053bb4b1ccd58dd⋯.jpg (101.62 KB, 667x1000, 667:1000, hitler's second book.jpg)

44ec77  No.12132109

Surely you all know of "Mein Kampf", and the better among you have even read it, but it wasn't Hitler's only written work. Untitled by AH, and released only as "Hitler's Second Book" is a shorter, but equally as eloquent, and linguistically exact document of Hitler's thought process in the 1920's. The bulk of the work concerns foreign policy, and serves to clarify Hitler's rationale for some seemingly baffling convictions he had in regards to Italy and England. Indeed, he presents points that are hard to argue against even in hindsight.

As with a few other high profile works relevant to this board's interests, I have recorded the entirety of the book in my voice and made it available for download here:

https://mega.nz/#F!nVRlxCrR!TvWPLk33Iz19wNar5py4qQ

Another anon has taken it upon himself to upload my efforts to:

https://archive.org/details/@audiobooksanon

I'm sure he'll add "HSB" as soon as he's aware I've finished it.

35bb85  No.12132120

I have his third book


199e65  No.12132177

>>12132109

>I have recorded the entirety of the book in my voice

Do you sound like R.C. Bray?

I hope you sound like R.C. Bray.


44ec77  No.12132185

>>12132177

No, I'm just some fag on the internet with the will to read aloud. My newer recordings are superior to my old, but my voice is hardly ideal. I've changed my diet and breathing habits to improve the quality of my narration. Hopefully some people here will enjoy it.


4d1fcf  No.12132200

>>12132185

fair enough, RC Bray is a master story teller and narrator.

http://audiobookbay.nl/audio-books/after-it-happened-publishers-pack-books-1-2-devon-c-ford/


4d1fcf  No.12132202


44ec77  No.12132213

>>12132200

>>12132202

I'll look into him, maybe it will help my future readings.


5877e6  No.12132217

File: 059153da7bc2688⋯.png (12.1 KB, 500x236, 125:59, amIdoinitright.PNG)

>>12132109

>https://mega.nz/#F!nVRlxCrR!TvWPLk33Iz19wNar5py4qQ

zank you for ze books!

I have no idea how I'm going to read all these, but at least I have them!


b6a6a6  No.12132228

>>12132109

>https://mega.nz/#F!nVRlxCrR!TvWPLk33Iz19wNar5py4qQ

Please Torrent or IPFS it please. >>12020142 and also >>>/pdfs/9265


44ec77  No.12132234

>>12132217

You're welcome.

>>12132228

Feel free to put the files anywhere you like. Be aware I am rerecording "Hilter's War" and "The Destruction of Dresden" due to my own dissatisfaction with the quality.


b6a6a6  No.12132235

>>12132234

The issue is that MEGA really likes to delete content, especially when (((they))) want it


62aff9  No.12132242

>>12132213

give him a listen


44ec77  No.12132287

>>12132235

I understand. If it becomes an issue I'll upload somewhere else. My internet is powered by a stationary bicycle, though. In my village we have to take turns riding it to stay online, and even when I'm pedaling it's not that fast, I prefer to let other people mass distribute.

>>12132242

Will do.


84b182  No.12132288

Not convinced it was actually him.


44ec77  No.12132300

>>12132288

Why's that? Have you read it?


ccf6db  No.12133349

>>12132109

>https://archive.org/details/@audiobooksanon

Thanks, anon, absolute lad.


dc1f55  No.12133392

>>12132235

I uploaded the HD TGSNT at least two years ago, and the link still works and is posted pretty often.


cb74b2  No.12133398

>>12132109

Good stuff, anon. Glad there's someone else making audiobooks besides that disinformation anon. I wouldn't be surprised if that other faggot was polvol2. They behaved eerily similar and disappeared at the same time when polvol2 got banned.


d5fe92  No.12133436

>>12133428

>whiteknighting a proven spammer


d5fe92  No.12133452

>>12133442

CM said he had the same IP hash as a BLUMPFF spammer.

>MUH REDDIT

>MUH CIVNAT

Funny how you can tell these things from a 4 word post.


fcf2e1  No.12133474

>>12133428

> the board was completely taken over

actually I think it was by law enforcement, there is a huge investigation going on now, we're all going to be hung by our necks until we are dead.


d5fe92  No.12133508

>>12133481

>more crying


f6aa91  No.12133518

>>12133508

>can't reply

>has no argument

>can't refute anything that was said

>has nothing whatsoever to add

>was completely proven wrong

<everyone I hate is the same person

Thanks for playing. Enjoy your reddit website. All those based niggers really help us out, don't they? And those good jews are really good because reddit says so. You love this, after all. /pol/ doesn't hate anything and is only LARPing as nazis because reddit says so. Ha ha, what a fun place fellow magapede!


d5fe92  No.12133522

>>12133518

>even more crying


dc1f55  No.12133543

>>12133398

>that disinformation anon

Regardless of what you think about Christianity, I don't think a book sold by the Bund can really be classified as "disinformation".


d5fe92  No.12133555

>>12133543

It was the 1930s. 90%+ of the country was Christian. They wanted to try to appeal to them, and link their religion to Nationalism.

>>12133549

That's nice dear.


f6aa91  No.12133568

>>12133555

Reported for spam.


d5fe92  No.12133578

>>12133568

>posting things you don't like is spamming

Reported for abusing the report feature.


89e5c6  No.12133587

>>12132109

very nice


40e8de  No.12133599

Is this the Anon who did Hitlers War and Goebbels Mastermind? If so, I applaud you for your work as Ive enjoyed them both. Work on your pronunciation though, there's still room for improvement there.


f6aa91  No.12133600

>>12133578

<oy vey my proven hoaxes are truth i say so

Reported for spam.


d5fe92  No.12133602

>>12133600

What the hell are you talking about?


44ec77  No.12133714

>>12133398

Thank you. Never noticed any other anons doing this. It would be nice if someone else joined in, but I understand not everyone wants to throw their voice out to the wolves.

>>12133599

Yes, that's me, and I am redoing Hitler's War at least (my Goebbels effort is good enough for now). I have the first 19 parts rerecorded, and I believe I'm quite a bit better than I was. Always room for improvement, though, I'm only producing this stuff as well as I can without it becoming a great burden. I don't bother with editing because that's very time consuming, but I have started pausing the recording for water breaks instead of interrupting the narration.

Glad you enjoyed them. There's more to come.


dcff5b  No.12133745

>>12133481

/pol/ got taken over by reddit spammers because of the mods dumbass, they would ban anyone who criticized trump, and now you're shilling for more moderation which will turn this place into reddit

disinfo/gaslighting

>>12132109

post a pdf


44ec77  No.12133761

File: 0c1c00224926d65⋯.pdf (1.17 MB, Hitler's Second Book_ Germ….pdf)

File: eef996439281e6d⋯.pdf (324.87 KB, Adolf Hitler - Zweites Buc….pdf)

>>12133745

Here's two versions. My recording is made from both.


cd0661  No.12133905

File: 25c91a8603b54e3⋯.jpg (132.02 KB, 900x900, 1:1, 1494538452874.jpg)

Err, I was hoping for an asmr table talk.


cd0661  No.12133933

Keep it up. I'm surprised the David Irving books hadn't already received a proper audiobook adaptation.


9033c8  No.12134045

It was called, 'The New World Order'. Yeah, really. Anyway, always a bump for Hitler.


2c9e03  No.12134072

>>12133481

the mods did not do there job so PV2 got cut, tbh more should be cut. they allow civnats and redditors to post whatever and don't ban spammers ever, especially when they are leftypol


dc1f55  No.12134106

>>12134045

>It was called, 'The New World Order'

Nope, Jonestein made that up.


b6783d  No.12134294

>>12132109

That's great, I'll upload them soon. I skipped around a couple of tracks and I think your reading voice has improved; its more neutral when reading in first person and smoother overall.

>>12133349

Cheers anon


44ec77  No.12134891

>>12134294

Good to hear, thank you.


000000  No.12137068

Fake "Second Book" was not written by Hitler

A book, its existence nobody did know of, before the 1950's.

German Wikipedia:

>bis zu seiner Entdeckung 1945 durch einen amerikanischen Offizier verblieb. Für die Echtheit des Buches bürgten Josef Berg, ein ehemaliger Angestellter des NSDAP-eigenen Eher-Verlags, sowie Telford Taylor, ehemaliger Brigadegeneral der US Army und Hauptankläger bei den Nürnberger Prozessen. Die Wiederentdeckung des zu Lebzeiten Hitlers unveröffentlichten (und ohne Titel verbliebenen) Buches erfolgte 1958 in den in die USA verbrachten NS-Archiven durch den Historiker Gerhard Weinberg. Da er in den USA keinen Verlag finden konnte, wandte sich Weinberg an seinen Mentor Hans Rothfels und dessen Mitarbeiter Martin Broszat am Institut für Zeitgeschichte in München, die das Buch 1961 veröffentlichten.

The book was alleged discovered in 1945 by an US officer.

Its “authenticy” is based on the word of Telford Taylor, former Brigadier General of the US Army and chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg show trials. As single witness they call Josef Berg, former employee of NSDAP owned Eher publisher.

The book was “rediscovered” in 1958 in US archives.

It was published in 1961 in Germany by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Munich, an orthodox holocaustian, state owned historical foundation.

Mind you, Hitler’s without doubt, only authentic book Mein Kampf, was then prohibited from publication and banned for the public, still is.

So, we should believe a state that fights Hitlers original thought to be published, to publish a book Hitler alleged wrote, but nobody did know about before the 1950’s?


000000  No.12137083

>>12133543

>>12133398

>that disinformation anon

>a book sold by the Bund can really be classified as "disinformation".

If by "Bund" you mean the federal government of occupied western Germany, it is sure it is not Hitler's authorship.


000000  No.12137122

>>12133481

You really are quite pathetic referring to yourself in the third person like that. Face it, you were axed because you're a belligerent, thread spamming faggot.


e9753b  No.12137143

>>12133481

>Not really, since I'm white

are you actually retarded and not notice that we would notice

or do you think you're so ((high verbel iq))) that

<these dumb goyim would never notice if act retarded and pretend im not


44ec77  No.12137160

>>12137068

Have you read the book? Can you tell me what advantage would be achieved by its forgery? How does it help the (((enemy))) narrative for this book to exist? Also worth noting is that David Irving considers this absolutely the word of Adolf Hitler. I don't know his reasoning, but why is he wrong?


000000  No.12137173

Introducing

Gerhard Weinberg, author of the second book that Hitler never wrote

Hitler's editor: Weinberg had discovered the dictator's second book, a manifesto about race and foreign policy that had been unpublished and was largely unknown. With help from Munich's Institute of Contemporary History, he made sure it didn't stay that way.

One day, in the summer of 1958, Weinberg was in his office, looking through a batch of files. He opened a thick folder that was labelled as a partial draft of “Mein Kampf.” “It was mislabelled, as I discovered in the opening lines,” Weinberg said. He recognized the twisted logic of the writer but not the writing itself.

“I was very excited,” Weinberg said. He showed a colleague, who felt the text was authentic. Around the same time, Weinberg received a message from Munich's Institute of Contemporary History, asking if he'd ever heard of a sequel to “Mein Kampf.” “I wrote them back and told them, yeah, I just found it!”

The Institute of Contemporary History published the “Zweites Buch” (“Second Book”) with Weinberg's commentary in 1961.

Here, the story of the “Second Book” closely parallels that of “Mein Kampf.” Nazi copyrights had been seized by the United States, in 1945, but they quickly reverted back to the government of Bavaria.

In an echo of postwar “denazification,” “Mein Kampf” was kept strictly out of print.

Florian Sepp, a historian at the Bavarian State Library, summed up the official stance, for the Washington Post: “This book is too dangerous for the general public.”

https://archive.fo/mru4B

https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/a-historian-who-fled-the-nazis-and-still-wants-us-to-read-hitler


44ec77  No.12137182

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>12137160

Cultured Thug has some relevant words.


000000  No.12137187

>>12137160

>>12137068

>Can you tell me what advantage would be achieved by its forgery How does it help the (((enemy))) narrative for this book to exist?

So why would a jew publish a hitherto unknown “book of Hitler” if it wouldn’t serve their purpose?

Just because you think it reinforce your image of “Hollywood-Hitler”, that doesn’t makes it desinformation.

> Also worth noting is that David Irving considers this absolutely the word of Adolf Hitler.

As if flip-floping Irving is the final arbiter of Hitlers thought

>I don't know his reasoning, but why is he wrong?

Because all that shit about Hitler’s “Lebensraum” his alleged expansionist, imperialistic shit does enforce the allies narrative of acting in self-defence?

Published, right in time for the Auschwitz trials in Germany. Second stage of reeducation, culminating into seeding of the leftist 68er movement by the “Frankfurt School” in the US “Free University” of Berlin. “No you filthy, aggressive Jermans did not act in self defense”, bow you head even if we had to let you live because we needed you as canon fodder against the Russians.


8d9614  No.12137195

>>12137068

<Did Hitler really write a Second Book?

>Irving David Irving replies:

>YES, the book is perfectly genuine; published also by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Munich, the historical institute; in my view it is far more reliable than Mein Kampf, having been written by Hitler in his own hand.


44ec77  No.12137212

>>12137187

>So why would a jew publish a hitherto unknown “book of Hitler” if it wouldn’t serve their purpose?

Why are you rephrasing my question and presenting it back to me?

>So why would a jew publish a hitherto unknown “book of Hitler” if it wouldn’t serve their purpose?

What?

>As if flip-floping Irving is the final arbiter of Hitlers thought

Never said any such thing, though he is probably closest to the title, at least concerning the war years. Also, what has he "flip-flopped" on as opposed to simply changing his mind as new information is found? Is "flip-flopping" what people do when you don't like their conclusions? Without a doubt, none of his "flip-flopping" has made his life any less scrutinized and obstructed by his (((enemies))), and his conclusions that people here don't like don't aid the jewish narrative in the slightest. Seems like an honest man to me.

>alleged expansionist, imperialistic shit

You're a baby if you don't think human ambition and desire is infinite. The only reason one group of people has not 100% conquered the globe is because other groups also desire to be on top.

Aside from that, Irving books (as well as "HSB") also show that Hitler was positive in outlook towards many peoples, as well as well as concerned about America's imperialistic future, which he was completely right about. You have to meet force with equal or greater force if you expect to win. Germany needed to expand if it was to compete with the American union.


e4b449  No.12137213

File: 8f878c4b9801744⋯.webm (8.42 MB, 600x480, 5:4, postwarpropaganda.webm)

>>12137173

>Around the same time, Weinberg received a message from Munich's Institute of Contemporary History, asking if he'd ever heard of a sequel to Mein Kampf.

>“I wrote them back and told them, yeah, I just found it!”

I don't know if it's authentic or not (and David "Maybe 6 million died, maybe they didn't" Irving isn't the arbiter of its authenticity) but this sounds like an awful cohencidence.


44ec77  No.12137215

>>12137212

>Just because you think it reinforce your image of “Hollywood-Hitler”, that doesn’t makes it desinformation.

I meant to say "What?" to this.


44ec77  No.12137219

>>12137213

You don't know the context of that. It's presented as if "around the same time" means Weinberg bumped his foot into the book just as they called. "Around the same time" could mean months. There could have been word of mouth traveling that spurred Munich's institute to contact Weinberg.


000000  No.12137220

>>12137195

>>12137068

>Irving David Irving replies:

>YES, the book is perfectly genuine; published also by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Munich, the historical institute; in my view it is far more reliable than Mein Kampf, having been written by Hitler in his own hand.

Please mark your sarcasm. Here are autists playing. Thank you for your consideration.


000000  No.12137282

>>12137219

>>12137213

>It's presented as if "around the same time" means Weinberg bumped his foot into the book just as they called. "Around the same time" could mean months. There could have been word of mouth traveling that spurred Munich's institute to contact Weinberg.

Oh please. Mr. (((Weinberg))) makes a sensational “discovery” nobody heard of before.

Of course do the lick-spittle of the institute ask for it, mentioning them is just to create the narrative that there was arcane knowledge about it before.

Thirteen years after the war is time enough to write half a dozen books for Hitler just by one author. There even would have been enough old new stock of paper and tape to create forensic convincing forgeries.

It is really no problem for a historian working at an archive of looted German documents to create and insert new content.

Ever heard of chain of custody?

If the documents would have stayed in German custody, it would have been very difficult to insert forgeries, because there are sequential numbered, bound in a way to make it difficult to add pages, there are indexes and copies and references, and many, many witnesses.

So you have crates with masses of papers out of order, missing parts. If something at odds? Yeah maybe it got lost in the war chaos? But here we found a copy of it. OK it is lacking the head and the style is not exactly like a German bureaucrat would put on paper, but it is irrefutable proof. What are you, some holocaust denier?

Aren’t you lucky that this nice jewish gentleman found some authentic thought of your beloved Fuhrer and published it with the help of the government of occupied Germany that on other occasions would try to erase any hint of original NS thought?


d4b3ea  No.12137298

>>12132109

Put it on mp3 you fukin faggot, that site is a shit.


44ec77  No.12137303

>>12137282

>a bunch of inconclusive rambling

You haven't even read the book. There's nothing in it worth it to (((them))) to forge, and a whole hell of a lot that's really valuable for a person looking to clarify their own National Socialist principles, call out the jews, understand the value of one's folk, and how to rationally pick one's allies. Weinberg, if he forged it, could have forged something truly damning but didn't. He did make some weak jewish arguments about the evils contained in the unfinished manuscript, but they're thin and concern a tiny portion of the books contents.

Fake or not (Obviously I lean heavily towards "not") it's a good read. But go ahead make your decision about it upon hearsay, and wikipedia articles.


19dbd1  No.12137450

>>12132234

I still have your older work of 'Hitler's War' and 'The Descruction of Dresden'. Looking forward for your rerecording!


e5ac2b  No.12137459

>>12137182

What are his points? Frankly he seemed a bit condescending "on a high horse" and not interesting to listen to for half an hour.


a21218  No.12137474

There was some bullshit book that was claimed to be Hitler's but was debunked years ago.

What's this shit? How do we know it's not Jewed? Hell, the Jews have even fucked up some editions of Mein Kampf!


0672df  No.12137485

>>12137474

David Irving says this book was actually written by Hitler as opposed to Mein Kampf that was mostly ghost written by members of his party.


a21218  No.12137502

>>12137485

Irving says stuff that may be true, but is short on cites.


714876  No.12137563

>>12133392

Just use torrents or IPFS, you don't want a purge to burn everything like many libraries in /pdfs/


000000  No.12137573

>>12137303

>>12137282

>a bunch of inconclusive rambling

You answered to none of my arguments.

>You haven't even read the book.

It is useless to argue about the content of a forgery.

>There's nothing in it worth it to (((them))) to forge, and a whole hell of a lot that's really valuable for a person looking to clarify their own National Socialist principles, call out the jews, understand the value of one's folk, and how to rationally pick one's allies.

It is called black propaganda.

If one want someone to swallow a poison, one uses candy to cover it up.

Learn about Sefton Delmer. He operated a whole radio station that pretended to be German. Part of black propaganda is to deliberate mix the truth with lies. He was proud about it and published a lot of it. His son did put it on the internet, but it is now nearly completely purged. Guess why?

The point of black propaganda is for you to unnoticed swallowing lies by padding it with half-truths and truths.

>In an echo of postwar “denazification,” “Mein Kampf” was kept strictly out of print.

>“This book is too dangerous for the general public.”

But “his second book” is quite confusingly not, it is even promoted by Hitlers enemies. How could that be?

>The Institute of Contemporary History published the “Zweites Buch” (“Second Book”) with Weinberg's commentary in 1961.


d5fe92  No.12137623

>>12137573

What in the book, specifically, do you think was lies?


4ab922  No.12137676

>>12137485

not ghostwritten, but partly dictated by Hitler, partly written by him as far as I'm aware.


000000  No.12137771

>>12137623

>>12137573

>What in the book, specifically, do you think was lies?

It is a complete fabrication.

If you want to argue, that some parts have roots in reality, then why don’t argue with fictional literature in general?


d5fe92  No.12137789

>>12137771

>obviously hasn't read the book

What in the books goes against what hitler said in MK or his speeches? If it was a fabrication, why would they have parts in there that show his admiration of the americans and brits? Why wouldn't they have bits about gas chambers in there?


d5fe92  No.12137791

>>12137789

*what in the book


000000  No.12138047

>>12137789

>>12137771

>obviously hasn't read the book

>What in the books goes against what hitler said in MK or his speeches?

OK, lets start with what even the cucks of Wikipedia noticed:

>In contrast to Mein Kampf, in Zweites Buch Hitler added a fourth stage to the Stufenplan. He insinuated that in the far future a struggle for world domination might take place between the United States and a European alliance comprising a new association of nations, consisting of individual states with high national value.[3] Zweites Buch also offers a different perspective on the U.S. than that outlined in Mein Kampf. In the latter, Hitler declared that Germany's most dangerous opponent on the international scene was the Soviet Union; in Zweites Buch, Hitler declared that for immediate purposes, the Soviet Union was still the most dangerous opponent, but that in the long-term, the most dangerous potential opponent was the United States.[4]

Lebensraum, a foggotry post-war communist meme. Where it is tried to give a perfect translatable German word, living room, some sinister connotation and declare the total fictional intention of Germany, Hitler “to conquer the world”.

In the book Hitler did write, Mein Kampf, the term “Lebensraum” is mentioned exactly four times. Once in a discussion of Germany’s pre-first-world-war options and situation in the world (p.148).

A second time, in a discussion what is the purpose and task of the state (p.164)

A third time, about nomads, what makes them different from farming societies and the jew not being a nomad but a parasite. (p.333, 334)

A fourth time, stating that Germany needs to assert itself in Europe secure its border there, not in colonial adventures. (p.741)

In Weinberg’s Second Book, the term Lebensraum is used inflationary 22 times, reinforcing the allies narrative that Hitler was out “to conquer the world”.

>In Mein Kampf, Hitler mentioned the United States only occasionally and even with contempt. They were, to him, a "racially degenerate" society that will continue to see its demise. In his second book, however, Hitler describes the United States as a dynamic and "racially successful" society that has eugenics, racial segregation practices, and an exemplary immigration policy at the expense of "inferior" immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. Why this change occurred in Hitler's attitude between 1924 and 1928 is unknown.

Yeah, strange maybe it has not the same author?

But even that is not correct, because Hitler mentions the USA in comparison to South-American states that have become degenerate by race-mixing with natives and slaves. He mentions America with Europe as source for Japanese dynamism. Hitler argues that civ-nat cuckery is worse in Weimar than in the USA.

Weinberg argues in his Second Book, that the USA is super strong competitor, so inevitable that has to lead to conflict with Germany.

How that goes along with Hitler’s idea in Mein Kampf that Germany should concentrate on its position in Europe, that is probably the secret of jews like Weinberg.

Weinberg argues further in his Second Book, that the Germans as a people are not of the same average quality as the English (serious?) and depend on particularly gifted individuals and think Germany in need of strong eugenics (compared to the English? That sounds totally authentic Hitler, not).

I could continue with the bullshit this jew tries to sell us as caviar, but juck.


4ab922  No.12138189

File: ad5faf3539e43ea⋯.pdf (1.37 MB, Hitler's Second Book by Ad….pdf)

>>12138047

This is from the "Introduction: The Story of the Manuscript" part (from page 8 onward)

"Removal of the classification was promptly authorized and in August 1958, the document was submitted informally to the

Historical Division, Department of State. By 1959 it had been microfilmed and released into the public domain.

German jewish historian Gerhard Weinberg then quite falsely claimed that he had discovered the manuscript

(“Revealed: the amazing story behind Hitler’s second book”, The Telegraph, London, Sept. 25, 2003).

In reality, Weinberg had only been told about the manuscript’s existence by Bauer, who should really be credited with finding the book.

After obtaining a copy of the manuscript from Bauer, Weinberg then produced a highly-edited (actually a censored)

version of the book in German, titled Hitlers Zweites Buck, ein Dokument aus dem Jahr 1928 (“Hitler’s Second Book, a

Document from the Year 1928”), published by the Institut für Zeitgeschichte (“Institute of Contemporary History”) in Munich.

The Institut für Zeitgeschichte was, and still is, a historical research center set up by the post-war West German

government in 1947, at the insistence of the Allied occupying powers, to present anti-Hitler propaganda in Germany.

'''Subsequent to the edited version appearing in German, an unknown “pirate” edition of Weinberg’s version appeared in

English.''' This first translation was pitifully poor, and in some sections, completely incomprehensible. This was probably

aggravated by the fact that the original manuscript was also unedited. '''Finally, another English edition appeared, of better

quality, but that remained only a translation of the “edited” Weinberg version.''' The work you now hold in your hands is the very first

complete and accurate translation done in which the basic ideas are put down in readable and everyday English. All of the ideas,

thoughts and concepts have been faithfully captured, analyzed and set down in the manner in which they would ultimately have appeared, had it ever been officially printed.

Apart from the foreword, the original manuscript contains no chapter titles—possibly they were to be added later. This

edition has kept to that restriction, but essential summaries of chapter contents have been added to the table of contents to help guide the reader."

Arthur Kemp

June 2014


ed253a  No.12138239

File: 9d3962c3b0c7fe1⋯.jpg (46.37 KB, 578x472, 289:236, 1528796740026.jpg)

>>12132109

thanks a lot for your service anon


4ab922  No.12138299

>>12138047

>Hitler mentions the USA in comparison to South-American states that have become degenerate by race-mixing with natives and slaves. He mentions America with Europe as source for Japanese dynamism. Hitler argues that civ-nat cuckery is worse in Weimar than in the USA.

I could find no mention of USA in comparison to South-American states, no less about race-mixing between them. Or even about Weimar.


d5fe92  No.12138307

>>12138047

>Lebensraum

Well, he did want to bolster the german communities in eastern Europe and the Baltics. I also wouldn't doubt if he wanted to reinstate the Germanic upper classes in eastern Europe that were decimated by the communists.

>USA is super strong competitor

It kind of was. If the US didn't enter the war and/or the USSR lost, I can easily see a cold war type scenario occurring between the US and the Germanic reich.

>How that goes along with Hitler’s idea in Mein Kampf that Germany should concentrate on its position in Europe.

Yes, they were focused on its position in Europe, but the Second Book is focused on foreign policy. The industrial power of the united states would be a major competitor.

>Germans as a people are not of the same average quality as the English (serious?)

He may have thought this on account of Germany not being able to have a empire like the brits.

>Germany is in need of strong eugenics

They were, as were most white countries.

TLDR- I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.


d5fe92  No.12138319

>>12138299

Couldn't find the part about Weimar, but here is the comparison between N. America and S. America.

>History shows us countless examples which prove this law. It shows with alarming clarity that every time Aryan blood has mingled with inferior races, the result has been the end of the greater civilization whose members were the flag-bearers of superiority. The North American population consists overwhelmingly of Germanic elements which have mingled very little with inferior colored peoples and this shows a very different sort of civilization and culture from Central and South America. In Central and South America, the mostly Latin settlers mingled, sometimes on a large scale, with the people who were native to the area. This one example by itself clearly and distinctly shows us the effect of racial mixture. The racially pure and almost unmixed Germanic peoples on the American Continent have risen to become the master of their land. He will remain the master as long as he does not yield to blood pollution by mixing with lesser races.


000000  No.12138321

>>12138189

>>12138047

>German jewish historian Gerhard Weinberg then quite falsely claimed that he had discovered the manuscript

Quite irrelevant, being a total fabrication


604713  No.12138345

File: cd1a58fae56f393⋯.jpg (3.14 KB, 40x40, 1:1, glogo.jpg)

Archive.org link

https://archive.org/details/HitlersSecondBook

>>>/pdfs/8073


000000  No.12138428

>>12138299

>>12138047

>I could find no mention of USA in comparison to South-American states, no less about race-mixing between them.

p.313 About race

>Or even about Weimar.

p.490 Citizen, Nationals, Foreigner

>>12138307

>>12138047

>Lebensraum

>Well, he did want to bolster the german communities in eastern Europe and the Baltics.

I named exactly what Hitler really wrote, not some bullshit that was writen after the war.

>USA is super strong competitor

>It kind of was.

Totally irrelevant because Hitler didn’t write about it.

This is not about fiction what someone might have imagined, or what the real author thought would flatter the Anglo.

>How that goes along with Hitler’s idea in Mein Kampf that Germany should concentrate on its position in Europe.

>Yes, they were focused on its position in Europe, but the Second Book is focused on foreign policy.

This was in Hitlers book about foreign policy.

>Germans as a people are not of the same average quality as the English (serious?)

>He may have thought this on account of Germany not being able to have a empire like the brits.

I’m not going to dis the Brits here, but Hitler was very much aware of the racial make up of Britain and the stratification of their society.

This is just stupid jewish black propaganda! Read what Hitler wrote about the contribution the Germans made to the success of America.

Of course, the jews can not help them self, they must put underhand denigration everywhere, even if it is a contradiction to the personae they play.


eeac54  No.12138994

File: 01ab5439bdca2ad⋯.jpg (1.56 MB, 1116x1579, 1116:1579, wife nork dotpl.jpg)

>>12132109

Does anybody have an audiobook of Mein Kampf in the STALAG Edition if it exists?


0eb6bb  No.12139193

File: 8ed7debdb1b85c9⋯.png (1.25 MB, 1920x1035, 128:69, screenshot-archive.org-201….png)

File: f370a40b815c2c2⋯.png (228.68 KB, 1711x804, 1711:804, screenshot-en.wikipedia.or….png)

WHY THE 2ND BOOK IS NOT FAKE

Chapter 9.

Towards the end of it he attacks Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Pan European Movement, which went on after the war to become the EU.

If the book was written by jews or cianigs, they would have left that part out.

No one even started talking about Kalergi until a few years ago.

They aren't going to write a disinfo book pointing back to themselves. It would just be full of 'insane ravings of a genocidal madman', nothing included that would counter the official historical narrative, etc.


8d9614  No.12139635

>>12139193

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/07/a-national-socialist-view-of-european-unity/


44ec77  No.12139817

>>12137573

>“This book is too dangerous for the general public.”

>But “his second book” is quite confusingly not

There's no comparison between the unfinished second book on foreign policy, and the complete story of Hitler's awakening up to a point in Mein Kampf. One is an inspiring story of a man's development from normie to NatSoc, and the other reads like a bunch of Mein Kampf political rants taken out of context. Not to mention Mein Kampf was already a famous work with proven effectiveness as propaganda. Pretty easy to see why one book would be considered dangerous and not the other.

Your points are thin, and inconclusive just like I said. You're putting a suspicious amount of effort into trying to discredit a book you've not read.

>OK, lets start with what even the cucks of Wikipedia noticed:

There you go letting (((wikipedia))) do your thinking for you. This is laughable. Read the book or shut up.

>>12138345

Thank you

>>12138994

Doesn't exist as far as I can tell, and that's not a job I will be undertaking. The Ford Translation is fine, and the audiobook is beautifully read.


19db98  No.12139869

>>12132109

WOW

This man right here is the kind of selfless devotion that empowers a whole nation. Think what happens when you get 1/10th of all men doing something like this just once a year for people that aren't their immediately family!

You are magnificent anon!


000000  No.12140150

>>12139193

>WHY THE 2ND BOOK IS NOT FAKE

>he attacks Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Pan European Movement, which went on after the war to become the EU.

>If the book was written by jews or cianigs, they would have left that part out.

>No one even started talking about Kalergi until a few years ago.

That is wrong, Kalergi and the Pan-European movement were founded before the war, had important and influential supporter then.

Hitler did fight Kalergi and Otto von Habsburg. The later was already head of the Pan-European movement. Habsburg probably hoped to regain his lost position as emperor, for now as a president of Europe. Maybe hoped for a restoration, new formation of a European monarchy.

>They aren't going to write a disinfo book pointing back to themselves. It would just be full of 'insane ravings of a genocidal madman', nothing included that would counter the official historical narrative, etc.

It is full of antisemitism.

Black propaganda is mostly authentic, just with little but significant alteration.

You really can’t argue for black propaganda fakes, with the content, that is lifted 99 percent of real sources, it is just not Hitlers original thoughts.

Would you eat candy that is 99 percent delicious sugar, but 1 percent arsenic?

>>12139817

>>12137573

>“This book is too dangerous for the general public.”

>One is an inspiring story of a man's development from normie to NatSoc, and the other reads like a bunch of Mein Kampf political rants taken out of context. Not to mention Mein Kampf was already a famous work with proven effectiveness as propaganda. Pretty easy to see why one book would be considered dangerous and not the other.

This is an incoherent argumentation. If both books are authored by Hitler, both should be “too dangerous for the general public”.

In practices, one is not, the poisoned one.

>You're putting a suspicious amount of effort into trying to discredit a book you've not read.

You are pushing a book that was “found” and promoted by a jew. A book that was published by the regime that suppresses Hitler’s without a doubt authentic book.


28edc3  No.12140243

File: 387d37980085925⋯.jpeg (169.63 KB, 998x1416, 499:708, 28b36d81b71cff507475868d6….jpeg)

>>12132109

Thank you for this anon


4b9167  No.12140339

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zweites_Buch

The book was translated by a jew,"victim of the holocaust" watch out your sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Weinberg


44ec77  No.12140682

>>12140150

>It's full of antisemitism

No more than Mein Kampf, which really wasn't that much. Again, you haven't read the book, you don't know anything.

>>12139869

>>12140243

You're welcome

>>12140339

>"victim of the holocaust"

Nice fake quote. David Irving considers Weinberg a reliable historian. If you know what reliable means in this context you know that doesn't mean he necessarily agrees with Weinberg's personal conclusions, but rather the methods used to acquire information.


000000  No.12141395

>>12140682

>>12140150

>It's full of antisemitism

>No more than Mein Kampf,

That is the point. One, the authentic one is banned, the other, the forgery is published.

>Nice fake quote. David Irving considers Weinberg a reliable historian. If you know what reliable means in this context you know that doesn't mean he necessarily agrees with Weinberg's personal conclusions,

>Weinberg was born in Hanover, Germany, and resided there the first ten years of his life. As Jews living in Nazi Germany, he and his family

>They emigrated in 1938, first to the United Kingdom and then in 1941 to New York State. Weinberg became a U.S. citizen, served in the U.S. Army

> From 1951 to 1954 Weinberg was a Research Analyst for the War Documentation Project at Columbia University and was Director of the American Historical Association Project for Microfilming Captured German Documents in 1956–1957. After joining the project to microfilm captured records at Alexandria, Virginia, in the 1950s, Weinberg published the Guide to Captured German Documents (1952).[3] In 1958, Weinberg made the discovery of Hitler's so-called Zweites Buch (Second Book), an unpublished sequel to Mein Kampf, among captured German files. His find led to his publication in 1961 of Hitlers zweites Buch: Ein Dokument aus dem Jahr 1928, later published in English as Hitler's Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf (2003).

>In the globalist versus continentalist debate, concerning whether Hitler had ambitions to conquer the entire world or merely the continent of Europe, Weinberg takes a globalist view, arguing Hitler had plans for world conquest. On the question of whether Hitler intended to murder Europe's Jews before coming to power, Weinberg takes an intentionalist position, arguing that Hitler had formulated ideas for the Holocaust by the time he wrote Mein Kampf.

He would never forge documents to “prove” his thesis.

>the alleged diaries of Adolf Hitler, the U.S. weekly magazine Newsweek asked Weinberg to examine them hurriedly in a bank vault in Zürich, Switzerland. Together with Hugh Trevor-Roper and Eberhard Jäckel, Weinberg was one of the three experts on Hitler asked to examine the alleged diaries. Squeezing the visit into just a few hours so as not to miss any of his teaching assignments at Chapel Hill, Weinberg reported in Newsweek that "on balance I am inclined to consider the material authentic."[22]

On the front cover of the books were pasted on initials, in “Old English fracture font” the letters were F H. Fritz Hitler maybe?

>The initials FH (top row) which Kujau mistakenly used on the diary covers, instead of AH (bottom row). Both sets of initials are in Engravers Old English font.


ee53ff  No.12141489

>>12140682

>David Irving considers Weinberg a reliable historian.

If so, where does he say that and why does he consider that I wonder. Not like Irving is a final judge despite his great work.

Weinberg seems to be a fraud of a historian and has nothing to do with the original "The Second Book" or this edition

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/ad5faf3539e43ea7869ee71adbb8b7bc2b9d798fa3208e58ada0cb38916ea532.pdf

>>12140339

This was translated, introduced and annotated by Arthur Kemp. See >>12138189


cd0661  No.12141570

Itt:

>mutts find out Hitler predicted the mutt meme(probably made him chuckle heartily)

>everything is a shill

Pathetic.


44ec77  No.12141864

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>12141489

>Where does he say that?

Embed related. It's in the last 20 minutes somewhere. He goes into why Table Talks are valid as well (which refer to a second Hitler manuscript).

>why does he consider that?

Like I said, if he says a historian is reliable, it's because he's probably satisfied his need to know how information was acquired and verified the rationale for logical conclusions drawn from the information. Not a concrete answer, but that's his career modus operandi. You can also just email him, he usually answers.

>Arthur Kemp

Yeah, that's the version I recorded.


d5fe92  No.12142387


8e295b  No.12148159

>>12141864

At 56min 05sec. I wonder why he says Weinberg is reliable, maybe he doesn't know that Weinberg's edition was not completely accurate. Anyway, not a big issue, people will find the "Arthur Kemp edition" and moreso now that your audiobook work exists.

I wonder if Irving has ever gotten to reading Mein Kampf after that talk. Although he has been focused strictly on the 1940s onward period so that explains why he hasn't I suppose. But he never undermines Mein Kampf of course.


44ec77  No.12149557

>>12148159

>I wonder if Irving has ever gotten to reading Mein Kampf after that talk.

I don't know, it's strange that he claims not to have read it. He does refer to the contents of it in "Hitler's War", the newest edition of which is from 2001, well before this talk. I guess he only went as far as to verify the contents of chapter 14 which espouse Hitler's designs on Russia, and which existed publicly while trying to strike a deal with the Soviet Union.


4b9167  No.12149607

>>12141489

>>12140682

The later version is made by a kike who was victim of the holocaust.

Nothing is fake, is in the article there, you believe what you want.


44ec77  No.12149650

>>12149607

"Victim of the holocaust" is not a phrase in either article, hence "fake quote". If you want people to take you seriously, don't make shit up to fit your narrative.


d2d679  No.12153666

>>12149607

Yeah, the censored false version is from Weinberg the jew.


6804c4  No.12157836

File: 295e049368a9e1e⋯.jpg (126.91 KB, 1200x686, 600:343, 1512712969380.jpg)


3151db  No.12158958

>>12132109

MEIN KAMPF 2 CONFIRMED BY NASA


0c4d46  No.12158964

>>12148159

>I wonder if Irving has ever gotten to reading Mein Kampf after that talk

He has, he said he didn't just so that the kikes suing him had less fire on him. I have had contact by e-mail with Irving on and off, he also know now about the Weinberg kikery.


d6d5d3  No.12158995

File: a5da47e14eb5da5⋯.jpg (79.71 KB, 431x595, 431:595, 21.jpg)

Nice OP. Really nice. I hope you make this a thing and keep doing great books like this. Some Evola would be great. Or March of the Titans.


17ee62  No.12159039

>>12137213

>Weinberg received a message from Munich's Institute of Contemporary History, asking if he'd ever heard of a sequel to “Mein Kampf.” “I wrote them back and told them, yeah, I just found it!”

(((pure coincidence)))


6804c4  No.12159597

bum ping


44ec77  No.12159640

Whoa, the view counter went way up on the archive for my recording. Must be gettin around.


000000  No.12159836

>>12153666

>>12149607

>Yeah, the censored false version is from Weinberg the jew.

There is only the Weinberg version. You only know of this book because Weinberg presented it to you.

You seem to convuse the first non-authorized english translation with the second one.

Anyway both are based on some German language paper Weinberg claims to have found. Weinberg is native German speaking BTW. Problem is, the story of its authorship, has to many holes in it.

>>12159640

>the view counter went way up on the archive for my recording. Must be gettin around.

Jewish fiction has a big audience.


675571  No.12159844

>>12158964

Good to hear


cd0661  No.12159872

>>12141864

Pat Buchanan said reading Hitler's Table Talk gave him a whole new understanding of Hitler and highlighted what a genius he really was(or words to that effect).

To lazy to find the interview again, he was going through his bookcase on PBS, and the reporter asked about it.

Pat is shit at hiding his power level.


cd0661  No.12159907

>>12159872

Sorry, not pbs, it was cspan

https://youtu.be/z0Nt14AImq0

1:26:30


ac4c42  No.12160072

File: e22665bc0d019b0⋯.jpeg (18.6 KB, 480x480, 1:1, e22665bc0d019b0f30fd9ac3b….jpeg)

>>12132109

Fantastic, anon!

Now I have something to listen to when I go fishing. Keep up the good work!


605b7e  No.12161545

>>12132120

>I have his third book

The cook book? Yes, it's brilliant.


cee60b  No.12161783

>>12140682

>David "actually, on further review, the holocaust did happen" Irving


27a2af  No.12167142

>>12159640

For sure; requesting you to make a thread whenever there's a new ready!


4896c4  No.12168050

>>12161545

assuming you aren't totally shitting me, I need that recipe for Fuhrer Cake

right now


987329  No.12168169

>>12167142

I always do.


27a2af  No.12168307

File: 878f9954edcba11⋯.mp4 (1.46 MB, 720x1280, 9:16, Birthday cake.mp4)

>>12168050

Have a slice anon.


6804c4  No.12171144

bump


1ffd5b  No.12185796

File: d0304449c3aca47⋯.jpg (36.67 KB, 400x567, 400:567, Perun.jpg)

Bump

“As to methods there may be a million and then some, but principles are few.

The man who grasps principles can successfully select his own methods.

The man who tries methods, ignoring principles, is sure to have trouble.”

- Harrington Emerson




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / animu / di / leftpol / mde / nep / tacos / vg ]