[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bestemma / chaos / fa / jenny / lewd / lovelive / marx / roze ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 68rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - Home of Headswap and Detachable Girl Threads

January 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: 57d2918f2fa8d1c⋯.jpg (529.38 KB, 2040x3160, 51:79, 34fXtIe.jpg)

465e4c  No.12626533

James Watson Won’t Stop Talking About Race

>The Nobel-winning biologist has drawn global criticism with unfounded pronouncements on genetics, race and intelligence. He still thinks he’s right, a new documentary finds.

>It has been more than a decade since James D. Watson, a founder of modern genetics, landed in a kind of professional exile by suggesting that black people are intrinsically less intelligent than whites.

>In 2007, Dr. Watson, who shared a 1962 Nobel Prize for describing the double-helix structure of DNA, told a British journalist that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says, not really.”

>Moreover, he added, although he wished everyone were equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”

>Dr. Watson’s comments reverberated around the world, and he was forced to retire from his job as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, although he retains an office there.

>He apologized publicly and “unreservedly,’’ and in later interviews he sometimes suggested that he had been playing the provocateur — his trademark role — or had not understood that his comments would be made public.

>Ever since, Dr. Watson, 90, has been largely absent from the public eye. His speaking invitations evaporated. In 2014, he became the first living Nobelist to sell his medal, citing a depleted income from having been designated a “nonperson.’’

>But his remarks have lingered. They have been invoked to support white supremacist views, and scientists routinely excoriate Dr. Watsonwhen his name surfaces on social media.

>Eric Lander, the director of the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and Harvard, elicited an outcry last spring with a toast he made to Dr. Watson’s involvement in the early days of the Human Genome Project. Dr. Lander quickly apologized.

<“I reject his views as despicable,” Dr. Lander wrote to Broad scientists. “They have no place in science, which must welcome everyone. I was wrong to toast, and I’m sorry.’’

>And yet, offered the chance recently to recast a tarnished legacy, Dr. Watson has chosen to reaffirm it, this time on camera. In a new documentary, “American Masters: Decoding Watson,’’ to be broadcast on P.B.S. on Wednesday night, he is asked whether his views about the relationship between race and intelligence have changed.

<“No,’’ Dr. Watson said. “Not at all. I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature. But I haven’t seen any knowledge. And there’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on I.Q. tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic.’’

<Dr. Watson adds that he takes no pleasure in “the difference between blacks and whites’’ and wishes it didn’t exist. “It’s awful, just like it’s awful for schizophrenics,’’ he says. (His son Rufus was diagnosed in his teens with schizophrenia.) Dr. Watson continues: “If the difference exists, we have to ask ourselves, how can we try and make it better?”

465e4c  No.12626536

>Dr. Watson’s remarks may well ignite another firestorm of criticism. At the very least, they will pose a challenge for historians when they take the measure of the man: How should such fundamentally unsound views be weighed against his extraordinary scientific contributions?

>In response to questions from The Times, Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, said that most experts on intelligence “consider any black-white differences in I.Q. testing to arise primarily from environmental, not genetic, differences.”

>Dr. Collins said he was unaware of any credible research on which Dr. Watson’s “profoundly unfortunate’’ statement would be based.

>“It is disappointing that someone who made such groundbreaking contributions to science,’’ Dr. Collins added, “is perpetuating such scientifically unsupported and hurtful beliefs.’’

>Dr. Watson is unable to respond, according to family members. He made his latest remarks last June, during the last of six interviews with Mark Mannucci, the film’s producer and director.

>But in October Dr. Watson was hospitalized following a car accident, and he has not been able to leave medical care.

>Some scientists said that Dr. Watson’s recent remarks are noteworthy less because they are his than because they signify misconceptions that may be on the rise, even among scientists, as ingrained racial biases collide with powerful advances in genetics that are enabling researchers to better explore the genetic underpinnings of behavior and cognition.

>“It’s not an old story of an old guy with old views,’’ said Andrea Morris, the director of career development at Rockefeller University, who served as a scientific consultant for the film. Dr. Morris said that, as an African-American scientist, “I would like to think that he has the minority view on who can do science and what a scientist should look like. But to me, it feels very current.’’

David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard, has argued that new techniques for studying DNA show that some human populations were geographically separated for long enough that they plausibly could have evolved average genetic differences in cognition and behavior.

>But in his recent book, “Who We Are and How We Got Here,’’ he explicitly repudiates Dr. Watson’s presumption that such differences would “correspond to longstanding popular stereotypes’’ as “essentially guaranteed to be wrong.’’

>Even Robert Plomin, a prominent behavioral geneticist who argues that nature decisively trumps nurture when it comes to individuals, rejects speculation about average racial differences.

<“There are powerful methods for studying the genetic and environmental origins of individual differences, but not for studying the causes of average differences between groups,” Dr. Plomin writes in an afterword to be published this spring in the paperback edition of his book, “Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are.”

>Whether Dr. Watson was aware of any of this science is unclear. In the film, he appears to have grown increasingly isolated. He mentions missing Francis Crick, his collaborator in the race to decipher the structure of DNA.


465e4c  No.12626537

<“We liked each other,’’ Dr. Watson says of Dr. Crick. “I couldn’t get enough of him.’’

>As history now knows, the duo was able to solve the puzzle in 1953, with their hallmark models of cardboard and metal only with the help of another scientist, Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray photograph of the DNA molecule was shown to Dr. Watson without her permission.

>The tools of molecular biology unlocked by their discovery have since been used to trace humanity’s prehistory, devise lifesaving therapies, and develop Crispr, a gene-editing technology that was used recently, and unethically, to alter the DNA of twin human embryos.

>And Dr. Watson became perhaps the most influential biologist of the second half of the 20th century. His textbook, “Molecular Biology of the Gene,’’ helped define the new field. First in a laboratory at Harvard and then at Cold Spring Harbor, he trained a new generation of molecular biologists and used his star power to champion such projects as the first sequencing of the human genome.

>“You knew when you heard him that you were at the start of a revolution in understanding,’’ Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studied with Dr. Watson in the 1960s, says in “Decoding Watson.’’

<“You felt as if you were part of this tiny group of people who had seen the light.’’

>Mr. Mannucci, the director and producer, was drawn to his subject by a certain similarity to “the King Lear story’,’ he said — “that this man was at the height of his powers and, through his own character flaws, was brought down.” The film highlights Dr. Watson’s penchant for provocation, exemplified by his candid 1968 memoir, “The Double Helix,” of the race to decipher DNA’s structure.

In later years, even before his 2007 comments, Dr. Watson began making offensive statements about groups of people, suggesting, among other things, that exposure to sunlight in equatorial regions increases sexual urges and that fat people are less ambitious than others.

>“He was a semiprofessional loose cannon,’’ said Nathaniel Comfort, a science historian at Johns Hopkins University. “We become prisoners of our own personas.” In the film, Dr. Comfort also suggests that Dr. Watson’s views on race are the result of the genetic filter he applies to the world: “There’s a risk to thinking about genes all the time.”

>But Mary-Claire King, a leading geneticist at the University of Washington who knows Dr. Watson well and is not in the film, suggested that the racially homogeneous culture of science also played a role in shaping Dr. Watson’s misconceptions.

>“If he knew African-Americans as colleagues at all levels, his present view would be impossible to sustain,’’ Dr. King said.

>If that is the case, it may not bode well for combating prejudice in biomedical research, where African-Americans represent just 1.5 percent of grant applications to the N.I.H. Biases in hiring by medical school science departments are well documented.

>“It’s easy to say, ‘I’m not Watson,’’’ said Kenneth Gibbs, a researcher at the N.I.H. who studies racial disparities in science. “But one should really be asking himself or herself, ‘What am I doing to ensure our campus environments are supporting scientists from backgrounds that are not there?’’’


465e4c  No.12626538

>“Decoding Watson’’ marks the first time Dr. Watson and his wife, Liz, have spoken publicly at length about finding out that Rufus, their older son, has schizophrenia. Rufus and his brother, Duncan, also appear in the film, but Mr. Mannucci said that other people close to Dr. Watson declined to participate.

>In interviews with The Times, some said they believed that Dr. Watson was ill served by speaking publicly at this point in his life.

>Still, Mr. Mannucci said that he had asked Dr. Watson about race and intelligence several times over the course of making the film in order to ascertain his real views. “I didn’t want to feel that it was a product of age or having caught him in a moment, trying to get a rise out of someone,’’ he said.

>In the film, Dr. Watson sometimes seems to be grasping for explanations for his own views on race and intelligence. He mentions that he is a “product of the Roosevelt era,’’ and that he has always believed genes are important.

>“To the extent that I’ve hurt people,’’ he said, “of course I regret it.”

http://archive.vn/Syj6I

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/01/science/watson-dna-genetics-race.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimesscience


7c6e00  No.12626579

>How should such fundamentally unsound views be weighed against his extraordinary scientific contributions?

>fundamentally unsound views

Yeah I'm sure a "journalist" knows more about biology/genetics than a geneticist. Makes perfect sense. Oh wait, no.

The older I get, the more disgusted I am with these "people" who lie to themselves and everyone else.


1aa099  No.12626633

>>12626579

this. Like many people, like Dr. Watson, I dont hate niggers. In fact I feel sorry for them. But they have no business in the white mans lands, and it was a grave mistake to allow them access. They are mentally retarded, and prone to violence, through no real fault of their own. They should all be removed to Africa, and we should all leave Africa alone, no colonies, no mines etc etc. If we want to help niggers thats ok. Those who wish to do so can go to Africa and help niggers, I really dont care. I just dont want them in white mans land anymore. They are never going to become "modern humans',,, it quite simply will never happen. All the current trends are doing is dumbing down the best of the humans, mongrelizing that which was beautiful and brilliant, I cannot fathom how any sane individual would think this course wise.


9b4e24  No.12626649

>spergposting

And filtered.


de84fb  No.12626650

This could make for top notch propaganda. It would really stress the cognitive dissonance of youth in academe to realize that the man that proved that DNA is a double helix is a race realist and that there's a lot of people talking out of their asses teaching them nonsense.


cd9ccf  No.12626652

Why not shut down that racist old white male by publishing a scientific study that disproves his point of view?


316cf8  No.12626659

>>12626652

Because it's not possible


ee5101  No.12626660

>Science is cucked and a Jewish lie

>Unless it seems to support the world view of a highschool dropout such as myself then it's totally okay

-(((/pol/)))


465e4c  No.12626668

>>12626652

They would if they could, but they've been worried about us using genetics for at least two years now.

http://archive.vn/0dA8M


51c040  No.12626670

I bet he's doing this because at least one granddaughter burned coal


b03866  No.12626680

>>12626660

Great posting, you sure convinced us.


51c040  No.12626693

File: d081f62cc4d698c⋯.png (148.96 KB, 595x721, 85:103, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

File: 6bf62a70b6fb85b⋯.png (29.01 KB, 584x117, 584:117, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

File: 8f6e42ee2cb61a0⋯.png (24.44 KB, 403x121, 403:121, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

File: 0eebf3bba575e7f⋯.png (25.15 KB, 396x119, 396:119, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

File: a903ade932d25c1⋯.png (31.61 KB, 588x140, 21:5, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

Oh boy…

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1080127782930313216


000000  No.12626723

>>12626633

>If we want to help niggers thats ok.

No we shouldn't be helping niggers. At all. Ever. Leave them to fight among themselves on their own continent, and shoot to kill if they attempt to migrate.


51c040  No.12626736

Someone post that % of people with Gorilla gene infographic. I can't find it


da7670  No.12626737

>>12626693

>emotional intelligence

lol


51c040  No.12626747

File: c0199cc4c15c7fb⋯.png (63.08 KB, 611x304, 611:304, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

File: d12dc0e04846da3⋯.mp4 (447.81 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, literally.mp4)


de84fb  No.12626750

>>12626693

Rosalind Franklin took a picture. That's it. Watson and Crick spent years of experimentation, theorizing, and Franklin had nothing to do with it. She took a picture, and was credited for it in their work. What's fucking hilarious about when they put forth these amazing stronk female pop science heroes is that when they are demolished by an honest assessment of their contributions (or lack thereof) it makes women as a whole seem really pathetic. The fact that they have to lie about female contribution to science makes them seem way stupider than if they had just stayed mum and said nothing about it at all.


51c040  No.12626756

>>12626750

I'd like to have a citation handy for redpilling purposes


51c040  No.12626758

File: a393db6688f5612⋯.png (46.67 KB, 580x133, 580:133, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

>IQ is not "intelligence"

WTF is it then?


de84fb  No.12626765

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>12626756

Here's an entertaining introduction to the facts about just how incompetent women are and how they have to lie about it to feel better. He's a manosphere type but the beginning is about Franklin.


51c040  No.12626769

>>12626765

I'm talking about Rosalind Franklin specifically


7353c2  No.12626774

>>12626758

its a proxy for something that is defined as IQ … its like KFC

KFC is not chicken, "what is it then" … its KFC


de84fb  No.12626775

>>12626769

Dude, just say thank you and watch the fucking link. Watch the whole thing, it's breddy gud.


d4075c  No.12626778

>>12626533

>“It’s awful, just like it’s awful for schizophrenics,’’

What did he mean by this? Schizophrenia is a jewish disease.


fc4eb8  No.12626780

>>12626533

>just don't talk about it

>just pretend there are no differences

Thats some dystopia level of reality denial.


ee5101  No.12626786

>>12626778

His son has it. Guess he's a Jew too and IQ is confirmed yet again to be a Jewish lie.

>>12626680

p.cute you think anyone's here to educate the two digit IQ brainlets here and not just to ridicule you


51c040  No.12626787

File: 145fa5d7f096883⋯.png (46.79 KB, 580x141, 580:141, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

>Not that I have any claims to refute him


d4075c  No.12626792

>>12626787

>while discredited

source


477736  No.12626795

>>12626778

>Schizophrenia is a jewish disease.

It's more common among Jews, but saying that it's a Jewish disease is overdoing it.


add478  No.12626799

How much money would it take to solve the bell curve problem?


3f7b7a  No.12626802

>>12626795

Neurosis and delusions of persecution are the root of the jewish psyche. If we lived in an ideal world Schizophrenia would be called "Jew's Disease" or "Jew Brainedness"

>>12626799

How much does VX cost per ton?


d4075c  No.12626806

>>12626795

>but saying that it's a Jewish disease is overdoing it.

Why are (((you))) here?

Was it to be filtered?

If it doesn't come from jews, where does it come from? You think completely different animal species just develop schizophrenia independently of each other and it happens to end up on the same genes?


51c040  No.12626815

File: 834ab67b0dd57c3⋯.png (62.56 KB, 601x407, 601:407, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

Man, a lot of people are wigging out


de84fb  No.12626818

>>12626799

<problem

Why a problem? Diversity is a good thing. pls no bully

>>12626802

>delusions of persecution

Funny thing, that's an apt description of lots on this board. See:

>>12626806

>nigger tier understanding of science

>well poisoning


d4075c  No.12626820

>>12626807

Which book is that?


51c040  No.12626823

File: 37f3d50b57f83d2⋯.png (490.23 KB, 617x818, 617:818, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

hahaha, was this guy an IRL troll?


51c040  No.12626829

File: 6f52c36ef2365a3⋯.png (76.62 KB, 595x358, 595:358, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

WE


d4075c  No.12626835

File: f70e4058dde12aa⋯.png (9.13 KB, 279x223, 279:223, fff.PNG)

>>12626823

I think xher is breddy cool.


465e4c  No.12626836

File: 3ad1a333845be6e⋯.gif (2.87 MB, 375x250, 3:2, 1418754063695.gif)

>>12626823

>he doesn't like pretty girls


51c040  No.12626837

File: 472601958264632⋯.png (280.48 KB, 603x634, 603:634, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)

I'm starting to develop a man-crush


736c4f  No.12626839

>>12626536

>Robert Plomin

>David Reich

Funny they are using two pop-science nobodies to refute a nobel winner. It is be like referencing neil degrasse tyson to refute heisenberg.


d4075c  No.12626843

>>12626837

>jews being intelligent

That's wrong though. Unless sub 100 IQ is intelligent.

>Chinese being intelligent

That's wrong though. China selectively picks their best as the average. I will admit the Chinks make for great biological abacuses.


3f7b7a  No.12626844

>>12626818

You know it's true and you're just yiddishly splitting hairs. Mental illness is so prevalent in jews that is both fair and desirable smear them with such a claim. How can you refute your own cancer ridden, shitty genes?


51c040  No.12626845

File: 497dba676354b22⋯.png (166.92 KB, 585x501, 195:167, Screen Shot 2019-01-01 at ….png)


29f084  No.12626850

>oy vey goyim, look how he promotes Jewish intelligence and his son is a schizo! Clearly a Jewish puppet!

And the two digit IQ /pol/tard slept happily that night knowing that science is all a scam and his decision to drop out of highschool was the right one


316cf8  No.12626856

>>12626765

Don't care, how many of you are actually still pure royal women?


316cf8  No.12626862

How can you claim that title and hold that status and support Marxism? It baffles my mind how you can hold these two ideas in congruence within your minds.

Pick a side. You're either a European, or you're going Jewish.


736c4f  No.12626870

>>12626750

>Rosalind Franklin took a picture.

This article also claims that someone showed the picture to Watson "without her permission," which is retarded. The picture was shared all over the place. That's how science works. It isn't like she was keeping it hidden.


51c040  No.12626874

File: f02ff5ce22137e5⋯.png (400.89 KB, 513x1942, 513:1942, james.png)


de52b7  No.12626878

File: fca96bf0ee67d3a⋯.jpeg (825.22 KB, 1536x1968, 32:41, 28965F5F-3B6B-4E34-B44D-4….jpeg)

>Dr. Collins said he was unaware of any credible research on which Dr. Watson’s “profoundly unfortunate’’ statement would be based.

This ad pops up in the article.


ee5101  No.12626892

>>12626878

>ad

I knew (((/pol/acks))) were retarded but wow


d621de  No.12626901

File: 10b05840b4bd197⋯.jpg (176.71 KB, 710x888, 355:444, 10b05840b4bd197bfdad8cd3b7….jpg)

>>12626850

>True or False: Your ancestors were bugs, rats, apes, and niggers

<hurr durr true

>True or False: The technology stolen from kangs by whites makes the globe warm everywhere and will kill us all

<hurr durr true

>True or False: gender is whatevs so it's okay if you suck cocks with your butthole in a children's library

<hurr durr super-true

>Here's your Certificate of Good Goy Science

So smart


add478  No.12626914

I really don't like when conservatives start virtue signalling us. Yet I'm glad that he hasn't bent over. Perhaps he senses that nobody will care what the libs have to say about his content in the very near future.


07b675  No.12626925

>>12626901

>>True or False: EVOLUTION DOESN'T REAL.

><hurr durr true

>in a thread praising the discoverer of DNA


ee5101  No.12626931

>>12626925

You clearly fell for the Jewish trick of science anon, see the light and worship our pagan deities!


316cf8  No.12626942

I see the women posters are out.


477736  No.12626943

>>12626806

You have no idea how genes work, do you?


55e2aa  No.12626953

>>12626723

Agree. Any involvement will mean we will need organizations set up to administer that help.

Its easier to commit 100% than 99%. No involvement in shitholes. We don't wipe our feet well enough and then we get shit in our own house.


477736  No.12626962

>>12626945

Godspeed, Anon. This is a type of work we need right now.


d6bb9d  No.12626969

File: c84e426964621c1⋯.jpg (19.88 KB, 450x372, 75:62, batthink.jpg)

>>12626874

>I think having all these women around makes it more fun for the men but they're probably less effective


b95ddb  No.12626975

>>12626633

Nationalism is about love for your own people. It's not about hate. It never has been. We just want to be left alone. We don't want to babysit the entire world as everything inevitably goes terribly pear-shaped. When the left accuses us of hate, it's just another clear case of projection. All we want is to be pro-white and put ourselves first. They want to put us last and replace us. They're anti-white. They're the ones who hate. And they've created a network of convoluted language and reasoning using their wizardry to obfuscate that fact. Clown world never ceases to be clown world.


55e2aa  No.12626976

>>12626945

do you have a website for the project?


b95ddb  No.12626982

>>12626945

If you want any help with anything I'm an IQ researcher associated with Richard Lynn. I also have experience with technical editing.

brizgoys@protonmail.com


55e2aa  No.12627006

>>12626874

>anyone who would hire an ecologist is out of his mind

what does he mean by this? Does he mean people with ecological interests or simply people who are ecologists as their occupation?

Hitler was very ecologically/environmentally minded. One of my favorite bits about him.


316cf8  No.12627097

>>12626823

Fuck, I have another hero.

My contention against darker girls is that I don't want to deal with their families. They will get pissed at me. I already have enough obligations. Don't want to piss off the rest of that tribe.


316cf8  No.12627103

>>12626969

It's the opposite for me. With women around I work more efficiently. When men are around I simply stop caring.


b95ddb  No.12627117

>>12627109

>No shit? I might take you up on that; I believe I cite some of his work. With a book this long (and a memory this bad), it's hard to say. Here's my current ToC. Even this late in I've moved a few bits around recently. In before, "Holy fuck, anon; it's too long and covers too much!" because I know that. It's not exhaustive, just informative. It sticks to its three purposes: 1. The exposure of the jewish race, psychology, religion, and beliefs. 2. Explaining how the world used to be, how it is now, and why today is either wrong, bad, or a lie. 3. How the jews, collectively, are primarily responsible for this, explicitly because of their judaism.

Yeah. I'm working on a 1000 study meta analysis of negro IQ right now. My library of studies is massive. I'm more than happy to assist if this is a serious operation you're engaged in.


b95ddb  No.12627130

>>12627124

Message sent. Will update you in the next few days.


ff70b1  No.12627137

>unfounded

Fucking journalists. Scum of the earth.


94b2dd  No.12627232

File: 14a085e4a94027a⋯.jpg (10.51 KB, 345x328, 345:328, 14a085e4a94027a401dd693bf3….jpg)

>>12626537

>Dr. Watson began making offensive statements about groups of people, suggesting, among other things, that exposure to sunlight in equatorial regions increases sexual urges and that fat people are less ambitious than others.

You ever feel like you're in a horrible nightmare world, where there is some sort of subconscious hivemind conspiracy that the entire society agrees with wherein making factually true statements is not permitted? And that such statements should be treated with ridicule and derision?

Just read some of the comments in that article about this brilliant man. They all speak about him as if he's dead. Despite all his accomplishments, he has become a non-entity simply for making observable assertions based on data, and the hivemind agreed that he should be deleted. It's the creepiest shit. Left is right and everyone agrees except you.

<Simple, observable facts that even average people can recognise are "fundamentally unsound views" and "not scientifically supported"

What a fucking horror realm we inhabit.


ff70b1  No.12627234

>>12627232

We should tell them that oxygen is racist.


692800  No.12627272

>>12626945

>I still need to find a publisher

>trying to get it on as many e-book stores as I can all at once

It will be banned from any normal book store.

Just release it under creative commons license and prohibit any editing.

People will spread it by themselves.


692800  No.12627283

>>12627272

>prohibit any editing.

I suggest this because you could sue anyone who spreads distorted versions of the book to either let you look unreliable by adding stuff like flat earth speculations or to sabotage your presentation by removing sources.

Even if you don't want to sue people (and expose your real name), you could use the license to get fake stuff removed.

You could also prohibit any commercial usage of the book. This wouldn't prevent you from working together with likeminded people who have your permission to earn money with your product and you could even tolerate random people who host your stuff and earn ad money.


8325e2  No.12627294

>>12626533

Reading this article, coupled with my own experiences, makes me so fucking angry that I can hardly contain myself.

I have been fortunate enough to be gifted with a high level of intellect, and as a result, I was able to attend the University of Pennsylvania for my undergraduate degree and Harvard for my graduate degree. During my experiences there, I have interacted at length with some of the most intelligent people around - Nobel prize laureates, prodigies and people with near-superhuman work ethic. Sometimes these people have shone so brightly that even my own accomplishments seemed dim in comparison. Despite all this, the vast majority of these individuals were so blind to the truth, so blind to facts that should be obvious to even an average person, let alone a bonafide genius, that it made me depressed to consider the state of civilized humanity.

I attributed their blindness to a combination of social conditioning and a fear of severe professional repercussions for engaging in wrongthink. I anecdotally confirmed my hypothesis after speaking to a friend of mine who is a professor of philosophy. This professor, at a personal level, is as knowledgeable of the truth as anyone on this board, but like all of us, he has to conduct himself with tact in the workplace. For several semesters, he conducted an experiment where he would teach his students Julius Evola, but they were mostly unaware of Evola's school of philosophy, rather, they were being given passages to read that made no specific mention of it. The students happily accepted the material and the vast majority of them agreed with Evola's thoughts. The sample set of students exposed to Evola must have been over 150, yet he had not received a single complaint from a student or a faculty member.

This confirmed my hypothesis that the conditioning that these students receive only works for specific words or statements, meaning that if you can deliver ideas to them that are subversive to the leftist educational system we find ourselves in without mentioning certain words that they will inevitably have a knee-jerk reaction to, you can plant the seeds of dissent virtually undetected. I have not yet figured out how to market something like this more effectively since we aren't going to have a swarm of /pol/lacks picking up philosophy professorships any time soon, but it provides some measure of hope. I think that to some extent, dressing up our ideas in academic jargon and marketing that via Youtube has worked well, and will continue to work well as long as we maintain the proper aesthetics that the brainwashed masses associate with authority figures such as professors. Case in point: The meteoric rise of Jordan Peterson, despite the fact that he is almost certainly a leftist in disguise.

We need more Jared Taylors.


b95ddb  No.12627313

>>12627294

>Reading this article, coupled with my own experiences, makes me so fucking angry that I can hardly contain myself.

>I have been fortunate enough to be gifted with a high level of intellect, and as a result, I was able to attend the University of Pennsylvania for my undergraduate degree and Harvard for my graduate degree. During my experiences there, I have interacted at length with some of the most intelligent people around - Nobel prize laureates, prodigies and people with near-superhuman work ethic. Sometimes these people have shone so brightly that even my own accomplishments seemed dim in comparison. Despite all this, the vast majority of these individuals were so blind to the truth, so blind to facts that should be obvious to even an average person, let alone a bonafide genius, that it made me depressed to consider the state of civilized humanity.

>I attributed their blindness to a combination of social conditioning and a fear of severe professional repercussions for engaging in wrongthink. I anecdotally confirmed my hypothesis after speaking to a friend of mine who is a professor of philosophy. This professor, at a personal level, is as knowledgeable of the truth as anyone on this board, but like all of us, he has to conduct himself with tact in the workplace. For several semesters, he conducted an experiment where he would teach his students Julius Evola, but they were mostly unaware of Evola's school of philosophy, rather, they were being given passages to read that made no specific mention of it. The students happily accepted the material and the vast majority of them agreed with Evola's thoughts. The sample set of students exposed to Evola must have been over 150, yet he had not received a single complaint from a student or a faculty member.

>This confirmed my hypothesis that the conditioning that these students receive only works for specific words or statements, meaning that if you can deliver ideas to them that are subversive to the leftist educational system we find ourselves in without mentioning certain words that they will inevitably have a knee-jerk reaction to, you can plant the seeds of dissent virtually undetected. I have not yet figured out how to market something like this more effectively since we aren't going to have a swarm of /pol/lacks picking up philosophy professorships any time soon, but it provides some measure of hope. I think that to some extent, dressing up our ideas in academic jargon and marketing that via Youtube has worked well, and will continue to work well as long as we maintain the proper aesthetics that the brainwashed masses associate with authority figures such as professors. Case in point: The meteoric rise of Jordan Peterson, despite the fact that he is almost certainly a leftist in disguise.

>We need more Jared Taylors.

Training since infancy that only the establishment is right and therefore anything in disagreement is wrong. That's why you can give them something like Evola quotes and they won't mind it at all unless they learn that he's a Nazi. I myself do IQ research, specifically meta studies on underperforming minorities. I've already hired a few leftists just to see what would happen and the general reaction is something along the lines of, "well, this would be pretty racist but it is science I guess, hur hur hur".

Look up the work of John Taylor Gatto. All school is from K up is a training institute for making extremely obedient people who addicted to routine and mediocrity.

This is a good start, too:

https://www.datapacrat.com/Opinion/Reciprocality/r1/index.html

Normalniggers are dopamine addicted predatory psychopaths by design.


0c26fa  No.12627329

>>12627294

>a fear of severe professional repercussions

That is the crux of it. Mankind is oppressed by jewish organized crime and they won't accept that this is true, because it would shatter their perception of reality. The entire human history is based on lies and humans who are too afraid to admit it.


e44183  No.12627361

>>12627294

all that and you're still dumb

peterson is the pinnacle of modern philosophy

he is an actual intellectual unlike you


b95ddb  No.12627367

>>12627361

>all that and you're still dumb

>peterson is the pinnacle of modern philosophy

>he is an actual intellectual unlike you

You're actually retarded. He's a 117 IQ charlatan. Vox Day has already thoroughly exposed him as being a fraud.


4a7a29  No.12627376

>>12626787

>diversifying science

What science even mean to these people?


4a7a29  No.12627384

File: 2d7824ff2d753c4⋯.jpg (72.19 KB, 645x729, 215:243, Brainlet - Sarlacc pit.jpg)


8325e2  No.12627386

>>12627313

So it is clear from both of our cases (and a few other anecdotal experiences I can mention) that the vast majority of thinking individuals with IQs above the mean find these realities about race to be self-evident regardless of political ideology, but those that are most strongly conditioned will gravitate towards leftist ideology. I believe that people with higher IQs tend to value fairness and compassion much more, so it only makes sense that when you couple their inherit desire to be a "good person" with a lifetime of brainwashing, this sort of intellectual cognitive dissonance is more commonly found in whites. The fact that whites believe in PC bullshit more than other races is perhaps more of an indicator of their intellect than the lack thereof.

I am familiar with Gatto, but it still strikes me as profoundly upsetting that legitimately intelligent people are unable to see through this hoax that seems so obvious to us. Intellect and education are, or at least should be, entirely separate.

>>12627329

Shattering their carefully constructed reality would probably induce insanity in these people. The question remains: how do we sneak past these mental barriers and deliver the info? I think we need to get to these kids when they're young before the brainwashing fully takes hold.

>>12627361

hahahahahahaahahahaahahaahahahahaahahahaha

lurk more


49423b  No.12627395

>>12626533

157 IQ here.

This is EXACTLY why I dropped out of high-school and pursues the NEET life.

No self respecting and honest intellectual can survive in today’s climate, doubly so if he’s white and Republican. I’ve seen Jews get lifted to the heavens (Noam Chomsky) for doing a tenth of what gentiles do and receive no praise for. I have written many books that will never be published because of this. Fuck this world.


0c26fa  No.12627396

>>12627376

Either pay check or revenue stream, depending on which side they stand. Science itself is used as a racket to fleece citizens with selling them ideas, while the real scientists are enslaved under non-disclosure agreements, subverted under funding, and their achievements solely confiscated by military intervention. What the regular citizens are actually getting out of science are piecemeal rackets, made out of decade old inventions, carefully trickled down to them.


316cf8  No.12627397

REACH


0c26fa  No.12627407

>>12627386

>how do we sneak past these mental barriers and deliver the info

We don't. Their linchpin has to fall, the Holocaust, after that it's them against mankind in on bloody finale. This was predestined for thousands of years. If you're too afraid to accept this harsh truth, then the only thing you can do is challenge all narratives openly and push the truth without apologizing for anything. Break reality, crash the Matrix!


0c26fa  No.12627410

>>12627395

Life was always intended to be a struggle for us. Use your knowledge to deconstruct the lies in this world. Challenge them to make more and more mistakes, while enticing your brethren to become independent thinkers and doers.


64fd8c  No.12627414

>>12626945

If you would like any help with the style and presentation aspect, I would be happy to help deliver your research in a way that will resonate with readers. Let me know.


b95ddb  No.12627420

>>12627386

>I am familiar with Gatto, but it still strikes me as profoundly upsetting that legitimately intelligent people are unable to see through this hoax that seems so obvious to us. Intellect and education are, or at least should be, entirely separate.

Your're missing a key piece to the puzzle: dopamine self-addiction: https://www.datapacrat.com/Opinion/Reciprocality/add.html

Read the whole thing.


b95ddb  No.12627421

>>12627420

>People trapped in dopamine self-addiction don't have the experience of true thought. They imagine that thought is evaluated by quantity, not quality. For them, there is not any skill of finding simple ways to see complex things. Furthermore, they believe that quantity of thought is proportional to energy expended. They belive that great thinkers like Einstein and Feynman didn't see more deeply, instead their brain-pans became red-hot as they dissipated energy performing huge numbers of simple arithmetic examples! Their brains were "like computers". They "grind through it", "figure it out", "work through it". If an insight ever occurs to people trapped in dopamine self-addiction, it is a rare chance event - "the penny drops". To these people, thinking is just like shovelling manure. It is unpleasant, not a joy. Like all other behaviours that must be extracted from junkies, coercion must be used. Teachers are concerned with enforcing "compliance" to a bare minimum and end up preventing the aware children from excelling - on the grounds that all "non-compliance" is inherently bad. SATs in schools just make things worse, as ISO9001 has made things worse in industry.


49423b  No.12627423

>>12627410

I’ve already influenced beliefs on here more than you can imagine.

I have influenced enough people to personally change the lives of millions and change the world dramatically. I have made over a thousand 300 reply threads on here alone.

And after all that time I realized what I want most is recognition. It is not right that the (((professors))) get to receive praise constantly for their half-truth forever searching bile. The truth is easy to find and blindingly obvious but only if you are willing to accept it.

I’ve spent many nights compiling information about who controls each and every facet of our culture and why they do it. I have studied anthropology and history to the point of madness.

I have dedicated my life to the pursuit of truth and knowledge but what I’ve done will never see the light of day, nor will it benefit me in my lifetime. All because I could not bend the knee and trade my integrity for a flimsy doctorate.

The final redpill as you call it is being able to work yourself into the system and work against it. Something that I failed at out of dogmatic morality. The only way to stop the system is to become the system. A Joseph Stalin of you will.


0c26fa  No.12627424

>>12627414

Don't. He first needs to finish and release the core product undisturbed. Once this is out in the public, we all can chip in with presentation, marketing, spreading, etc. Any interruption beforehand endangers him and the project.


b95ddb  No.12627428

>>12627423

>I have made over a thousand 300 reply threads on here alone.

That works out at roughly 1 thread every two days for the last five years. And all got over 300 replies? Bullshit or you're the most autistic person to ever visit this board.


49423b  No.12627433

>>12627428

I go through periods where I post nothing and others where I post clusters in hours.

My current thread is this one: https://8ch.net/pol/res/12623059.html

I also cross post on 4chan /pol/ but they are a bit duller, hate reading too much wordz, and have an overabundance of faggots, bots, and kikes.


0c26fa  No.12627436

>>12627423

>what I want most is recognition

And you deserve all of it and have eternal gratitude from all of us… as little as that counts. But if it's the limelight you seek, then you have to put your life on the line to do so, with little chance of success. That's depressing as fuck, but the reality. What I would advice you to do is build up substitutes who spread your knowledge. Think in terms of masquerading the info behind comedy routines, or songs, or cartoon shorts, sketches. Always start with deconstructing something obvious that pisses the masses off and once you have them on your side, you gonna bring up the next related redpill.


49423b  No.12627439

>>12627436

Funny you mention those things. I’ve written a great host on those too.


0c26fa  No.12627441

File: 5a7eae4da1e699c⋯.png (121.7 KB, 1000x2000, 1:2, lgbtp-blocks-comic.png)

>>12627436

Like this…


51c040  No.12627442

>>12627376

anti-white


b95ddb  No.12627444

>>12627376

>What science even mean to these people?

If you read between the lines it seems he's scared about affirmative action being taken down.


f1f79d  No.12627449

>>12627420

>>12627386

>>12627423

>>12627436

As per usual, nice to find diamonds in the literal pile of shit that is chan discussion. This kind of conversation would lend itself perfectly to /32/ (psychopolitics). It was more active during the initial exodus but I see no reason why that can't change.


b95ddb  No.12627452

>>12627449

https://www.datapacrat.com/Opinion/Reciprocality/ Here's the catalogue.


655ebd  No.12627456

>>12626533

This article angers and frightens me. Science suggests niggers are dumb, but that's wrongthink so we must just condemn the guy for saying that instead of disproving his "faulty" science.

>But in October Dr. Watson was hospitalized following a car accident, and he has not been able to leave medical care.

I'm curious if it was an accident or (((accident))).

>A Nobel Prize-winning scientist who co-discovered the DNA double helix was injured in a serious crash in Syosset.

>News 12 has learned that Dr. James Watson veered off Bungtown Road and careened down a 20-foot hill into a ditch.

>Tactical units pulled the 90-year-old out of his vehicle. Dr. Watson was airlifted to the hospital with a head injury.

>News 12 reached out to Cold Spring Harbor Lab, where Dr. Watson works and lives with his family, but officials were not commenting at this time.

>Dr. Watson's son says he hopes his father returns to work next week, to continue his research in finding a cure for cancer.

Sure, he's 90 so it's not out of the question he fucked up due to bad reaction time or sight. If it was an (((accident))) it might not be due to his wrongthink, but his research to find a cure for cancer.

http://longisland.news12.com/story/39367255/sources-dna-pioneer-drove-down-20-foot-ditch-at-cold-spring-harbor-laboratory

http://archive.vn/XZcwm#selection-615.0-651.123


655ebd  No.12627472

>>12626829

I'm getting tired of these arguments that nigger countries are shit, because something bad happened to them in the past. It's not like there haven't been wars, civil wars, drought, flood and plague in any other countries. Yet some countries manage to get their shit together. But since Alexander did something thousands of years ago, niggers gotta nig.


b7bf83  No.12627476

File: 1680928595a25ed⋯.jpg (180.17 KB, 1200x1177, 1200:1177, 1200px-Chirlane_McCray.JPG)

>>12627097

>okay with bestiality

>just doesn't want to upset the herd

Fuck off


9a10f0  No.12627479

>>12627472

I'm getting tired of placating losers. When you lose you aren't owed anything. That's the point to winning, so you don't have to bend to the losers demands.

Nobody ever demands a casino to retun their losses.


64fd8c  No.12627480

>>12627424

Totally agree. I meant once he felt he had gathered all of the info he wanted.


fbeb44  No.12627739

>>12626693

>Lindelani Mnguni

>PhD

Lol this guy is doing groundbreaking research on Melanin, trying to prove the existence of Yakub, and reengineer Da Pyramids for spaceflight


da0107  No.12627794

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Watson isn't the only scientific genius to observe the facts and come to the conclusion that negros have inferior IQs statistically as a group to whites. Are there blacks that are more intelligent than certain whites? Definitely.

But as a group they're not as intelligent.


da0107  No.12627798

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


da0107  No.12627807

File: a5e39fa75587912⋯.jpg (145.81 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg)

With the Trotskyites and their minions invading every corner of the intellectual world, even tying down giants like Watson with their unclean rhetorical tyranny, like Gulliver being tied down by the Lilliputians, how long will it be before we descend into the ruinous pit of Lysenkosim?


2137a3  No.12627856

>>12626874

What a hero.


fc4eb8  No.12627869

>>12627376

It means affirmative action scientists.


2137a3  No.12627879

>>12626533

<“I reject his views as despicable,” Dr. Lander wrote to Broad scientists. “They have no place in science, which must welcome everyone…"

>the absolute state of modern science


9445ab  No.12627889

There should be a simple question that must be answered by any person seeking a scientific or academic grant:

"Do you swear that you will always seek out and only ever publish the truth and never an expedient untruth, no matter the outcome"


88f29f  No.12627890

>>12627476

You stupid monkey. Whatever they have done to me was against my will.


377f5d  No.12627891

>>12627879

That's not science, that's a dogma. And anyone who says that is a coward and an intellectual midget. It's sad.


e17cfe  No.12627897

>>12626787

>discredited

Can I have the studies, published papers with sources that discredit it?

Until then, it's a proven and well known fact that dr Nathan A. Smith is a crack smoking gangbanging nigger who got his doctrate by writing about muh dik and fried chickuns.

>>12627807

We're already there.

But this time it's called Diversity.

everything that doesn't align with (((diversity)))

here's your answer >>12627807

>>12627879

It's called scientism, a primitive religion, where high priests wear labcoats and clipboards, telling you that if you don't mutilate your kid's genitals you will face divine secular wrath, also, buy overpriced lightbulbs or natural disasters will strike you down.


261343  No.12627900

>>12626579

They didn't even once point out in the article why his views are unsound. They just imply that it is and then implies that apparently nurture is more important than nature - which Watson rightfully points out has no evidence.


1e5908  No.12627914

>>12626660

>you are wrong because I smeared you

Smear is everything a jew does. You are a living cloaca against truth.


1cb5c1  No.12627924

This how you make the antifragile. They hace no recourse to doubling down trump is the utmost serving model. Didnt russian oligarch offer him some fuck you money also?


51c462  No.12627942

>>12627900

The very first step in the jewish debate playbook: assume your audience is stupid or ignorant, then make a baseless claim and assert its validity.


5efa1b  No.12627947

>>12626750

>female contribution

(((female))) contribution, to be precise.


4631e7  No.12627968

>>12626945

>I still need to find a publisher

That'll kill it dead in the water, just release it creative commons, needless to say avoid exposing your identity or IP or email to anyone before it's ready.


35e10a  No.12627969

God bless you james watsom bump


88f29f  No.12627974

Not the emporer you tards, I don't play that stupid game.


a038cb  No.12628017

File: 3b39bfa8928ca0d⋯.jpg (2.74 MB, 2816x2112, 4:3, Two_Torah_scrolls.jpg)


1f5e12  No.12628055

>>12627879

That's probably a better example of double-think than even Orwell could have written.


ff6ded  No.12628061

>>12626668

>ban genetic testing goyim because it might be used against us

These people want your children dead from preventable and treatable genetic diseases. Treat them accordingly.


ff6ded  No.12628066

>>12626693

How high did white boy David Hogg have to test to get into Harvard again?


ff6ded  No.12628069

>>12626758

>it's not intelligence when it doesn't fit our narrative, than it's irrelevant

These people are fucking Lysenkoists.


ff6ded  No.12628071


ff6ded  No.12628075

>>12626945

This should be good. At this point in time you can essentially walk into Elsilever with your (((peer reviewed))) paper and have it vanity published in the brand new Journal of Hebraic Faggotry.


88f29f  No.12628077

>>12628066

He's a Jew.


ff6ded  No.12628078

>>12627097

>My contention against darker girls is that I don't want to deal with their families.

Same here. Want to know how I found out kikes, despite their image, are racist as fuck at home?


ff6ded  No.12628082

File: 0814187029962d3⋯.png (34.62 KB, 259x180, 259:180, cult gatekeepers.png)

>>12627232

>You ever feel like you're in a horrible nightmare world, where there is some sort of subconscious hivemind conspiracy that the entire society agrees with wherein making factually true statements is not permitted?

Every single day, anon.


ff6ded  No.12628087

>>12627329

>Mankind is oppressed by jewish organized crime and they won't accept that this is true, because it would shatter their perception of reality.

And it's really just a case of the elephant and the rope.

https://theunboundedspirit.com/short-story-the-elephant-and-the-rope/

>As my friend was passing the elephants, he suddenly stopped, confused by the fact that these huge creatures were being held by only a small rope tied to their front leg. No chains, no cages. It was obvious that the elephants could, at anytime, break away from the ropes they were tied to but for some reason, they did not. My friend saw a trainer nearby and asked why these beautiful, magnificent animals just stood there and made no attempt to get away.

>“Well,” he said, “when they are very young and much smaller we use the same size of rope to tie them and, at that age, it’s enough to hold them. As they grow up, they are conditioned to believe they cannot break away. They believe the rope can still hold them, so they never try to break free.” My friend was amazed. These animals could at any time break free from their bonds but because they believed they couldn’t, they were stuck right where they were.


ff6ded  No.12628099

>>12627423

>The only way to stop the system is to become the new system.

FTFY.


88f29f  No.12628102

>>12628078

Want to know what it's like to be stalked by Jewish girls? Trade place with me.


703b50  No.12628188

>>12628102

>>12628078

Sounds like you two have some stories


9a10f0  No.12628258

>>12627914

I fancy myself a bit of a linguistic ninja and I had to look up cloaca. Very impressive, Anon!


2433de  No.12628293

>>12626533

checked. i don't need an award winning scientist to tell me niggers are gonna nig. still cool though.


2433de  No.12628298


8325e2  No.12628303

>>12627420

>>12627421

This piece is fascinating. I've actually considered and internalized much of what the author is saying for quite some time now, but I have never taking the time to place it into words.

Funny enough, I am also an engineer, although not of the software variety. When I was younger, I was bullied by teachers for "not paying attention". One teacher would often say that I was "off in lala land", because her small mind could not comprehend how someone could possibly grasp the entirety of her 75-minute lesson in about 3 minutes, and spend the rest of the lesson practicing their drawing skills (I got quite good at this). I was able to ignore the complaints of the teachers because I effortlessly aced their exams and whatever other standardized tests the school could throw at me, so they did not attempt to pursue any corrective action. I did not have the utmost highest grades - many Asian students who spent countless hours memorizing the material to perfection "seemed" to do better…at least until graduate school.

In graduate school, where a mapper mindset is far more preferable to that of a packer, these Asian colleagues could not perform as efficiently. Gone were the times where you could memorize facts, equations and paragraphs and succeed - now you were forced to apply what you had learned in a creative way. These were Harvard Asians mind you, presumably the top of their class, but their lifetime of rote memorization education and conformity hamstrung them when it came to designing your own project or developing your own ideas without parroting someone else's; they seemed helpless. I run my own company now and I employ packers to do the routine day-to-day work that I can't possibly bear to do (which is why I can shitpost on 8pol during the afternoon).

Back in undergrad, I had the pleasure of working with an individual who had numerous diagnosed mental "issues". He was called autistic, bipolar, mentally disturbed, depressed and every other catch-all moniker that psychiatrists employ to justify the validity of their profession. He was also incredibly brilliant - his mind could perform calculations and find solutions to ideas at a savant level, much faster and more elegantly that I thought was humanly possible. One example: he fell asleep during a differential equations final (he had narcolepsy as well), woke up during the last 20 minutes of the exam and managed to get the only perfect score in the class. We had patented some software in our free time. Despite the fact that I am not a programmer, he was able to help me build incredibly efficient algorithms for what I needed. Mind you, this was during a time when he was being medicated, which I imagine hindered his amazing mind.

The various PhDs that criticize Dr. Watson seem to be impostors despite their lofty academic credentials because they are unable or unwilling to see his genius, in accordance with the framework set up by Carter in the link you provided; or they are simply scared to voice their true opinion. This is unfortunate, considering how fucking rare actual deep thinkers who have not been beaten down by the system are. While I must note that Carter does layer theories upon theories and that numerous studies should be performed to confirm at least the base of his hypothesis on dopamine addiction, considering the sorry state of academic inquiry today, even his flawed analysis carries a lot more weight than does 95% of the non-replicable peer-reviewed (whatever that means) so-called studies of the psychiatry and psychology fields.


0c26fa  No.12628328

>>12628087

Great analogy. Thank you for posting it.


000000  No.12628398

>>12626807

Is your book avaliable?


0ea0b9  No.12628409

>>12627423

I'd like you to extend a bit of that big Aryan brain toward an idea.

Why would Hitler send some 60,000 Jews to settle Palestine knowing the potential repercussions it may offer?

Couple this with the emergence of light haired blue eyed jews we've seen in the last few decades and I'm wondering if you might find yourself asking the same question I've been asking myself on the subject?

Were they really Jews?


c7dcf4  No.12628427

File: 2838d20f7abb21e⋯.jpg (61.75 KB, 850x400, 17:8, struggle.jpg)

>>12626533 (Check'd)

Does he take bitcoin for support?


ee8d17  No.12628439

Stop reposting the entire fucking article just to inflate post count, nigger.


f3b2cd  No.12628453

>>12626633

> But they have no business in the white mans lands, and it was a grave mistake to allow (((them))) access.

Fixed that for you. Who owned the slaves? Who brought the slaves? Who sold the slaves?


c6717b  No.12628528

>>12628453

Do you have a source on Jews owning the slave ships? I've seen this claim tossed around for a long time, but never any solid proof.


38a47a  No.12628543

>>12627109

Godspeed anon, may you succeed in your endeavor and may truth prevail.


9b896e  No.12628553

>>12626874

a true oldfag before his time


79c976  No.12628596

>>12627294

> I have interacted at length with some of the most intelligent people around

That's what you don't understand: no you didn't.

You did NOT interact with the most intelligent people. You interacted with the most intelligent people who the Jews were willing to accept into their prestige conferring institution. Smart-ish people who could influence society for their purposes. David Hoggs.

Which does make me suspicious of your having been admitted to these institutions. Why did they let you in? What did you promise to do against your people?

I will live to see the day that these Jewish institutions will be desecrated from their prominence.

May your Harvard degree be a scar on your reputation.


50fe7a  No.12628615

>>12626533

>>In 2007, Dr. Watson, who shared a 1962 Nobel Prize for describing the double-helix structure of DNA, told a British journalist that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says, not really.”

Weird, you would assume that a geneticist knows the meaning of the word "inherently", but apparently not.


ff6ded  No.12628626

>>12626660

>>Science is cucked and a Jewish lie

This part is correct. Remember, kikes have help, see >>12628082


a57c1b  No.12628647

>>12627329

>Mankind is oppressed by jewish organized crime

>Mankind is oppressed by jewish organized crime

Mankind is oppressed by jewish organized crime

This is really all one needs to know.


a57c1b  No.12628659

>>12628102

>Want to know what it's like to be stalked by Jewish girls?

Oh, you met her too? She was kosher enough to make aaliyah but always told me she was Catholic.


57404c  No.12628696

>>12626536

>Even Robert Plomin, a prominent behavioral geneticist who argues that nature decisively trumps nurture when it comes to individuals, rejects speculation about average racial differences.

He's just being a pussy.

>“There are powerful methods for studying the genetic and environmental origins of individual differences, but not for studying the causes of average differences between groups,” Dr. Plomin writes in an afterword to be published this spring in the paperback edition of his book, “Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are.”

Another cop-out. He's basically saying 'methods to measure group differences must not be established lest they counter the prevailing moral narrative underpinning the globalist project'.


5172c0  No.12628697

James Watson was teaching a class on race and IQ

"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Hitler and accept that he was the most highly-evolved being the world has ever known, even greater than Donald Trump!"

At this moment, a balding, bearded, bespectacled assigned male who had made 1500 tweets and understood the necessity of social justice and fully supported all decision made by jews stood up and linked the professor to a video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn1VGytzXus

"If African-Americans of Color, as you say, have lower IQ… then how do you explain this?"

Watson was visibly shaken, and dropped his Donald Trump action figure and signed copy of Mein Kampf. He stormed out of the room crying those nazi crocodile tears.


51c040  No.12628710

>>12628697

You laugh, but he spends his free time committing Linux kernel patches


8325e2  No.12628713

>>12628596

Lol, they're intelligent by basis of their accomplishments, high IQ scores and various awards they have received. They are intelligent in a conventional sense (having a high cognitive ability). While your suspicion of the merit of these institutions is justified and in many ways confirmed, they still produce a lot of legitimate research. I have already mentioned that I was shocked that people with such high cognitive ability would be so foolish as to believe the lies that they are taught, in congruence with the equally highly regarded researchers that denounce Dr. Watson, despite the fact that he is a giant compared to them.

Your post is a prime example of the borderline psychosis exhibited by some posters on this board. These institutions may be corrupt to the core and play no small hand in subverting society, but they still employ thousands of brilliant minds to secure research grants to fund them. Penn and Harvard would not have such massive endowments without these grants. They still function as a business. These people were not David Hoggs, they have legitimate achievements in the sciences and most of them are too autistic to get in front of a camera anyway. Hogg is an aberration, even by Harvard standards and there was not such an insane focus on social justice when I attended there.

Why did they let me in? Because my SAT and GRE scores were in the 98th percentile and I write good essays.I also produced some pretty good research as an undergrad. Nothing less and nothing more. My parents weren't even particularly wealthy, they would be considered firmly middle class.


51c040  No.12628729

When is it going to drop?

https://www.pbs.org/video/decoding-watson-ua6jjx/


79c976  No.12628770

>>12628713

>Because my SAT and GRE scores were in the 98th percentile

Not to put too fine a point on it, but I exceeded your scores and was denied by the entire ivy league. I remember talking to my college guidance counselor about it, and was literally told I was considered a "boring, white, Christian boy" by Princeton, so I wasn't considered a cultural addition to the school.

So you can take your pseudo-jewish Freudian

>psychosis

Allegation and shove it up your ass. Again, I will say that your admission to these institutions raises more suspicions than it does confer prestige upon you. Usually a white guy getting into Penn needs to be especially compelling. Hope you're able to take advantage of the free credibility in the greater economy though.

Meanwhile these "credentials" dont mean shit here. You shouldn't hold them up as if a Jewish selection process differentiates you from the rest of your people.


e7f3b7  No.12628811

>>12626533

Checked.

Good. It's nice to see that a few scientists actually stand for the truth first.

Reminds me of that study released recently that analyzed the prevalence of genetic code elements linked to intelligence across racial groups. There were 300, iirc, or so genetic factors that were known to affect intelligence and most showed large differences in prevalence between Whites and blacks. They concluded that just those known factors would account for at least a 10 IQ point average difference between the groups studied.

Probably memory holed.

>>12626850

Most of the people who "deny science" here are shills. It's called well poisoning.

>"Dropped out of high school!!!!!"

Projection?

Genetics is the foundation of everything living, including humans and human behavior. Race is genetic. The genetic differences between racial groups give rise to large differences in ability, appearance, and behavior, including intelligence. Indeed, the largest genetic differences between racial groups is in the genetic coding that regulates brain development.

Culture is very important, but it is limited and acts as a veneer applied on top of individually fixed genetics.

>>12626901

Evolution is real. It is brutally obvious.

Where do you think dog breeds come from?

Evolution in which humans were/are the selection pressure. Most modern dog breeds DID NOT EXIST 300 years ago. Evolution. Likewise for other domestic animal and plant breeds and cultivars.

Poorly conducted science =/= quality science.

Lies and misdirection peddled by those who claim to be scientists, but are fools or bad-intentioned =/= quality science.

The proper application of the scientific method and its related techniques is the best way to seek understanding of the observable world.

Key word being "proper."

>>12626925

Truth first, always.

>>12626931

Germanic Paganism in no way conflicts with science.

The gods, spirits, and souls of our people exist outside of the observable world. They may interact directly with the observable world sometimes, but are usually hidden.

Science is observation, measurement, and modeling of the observable world.

Complimentary, not conflicting.

>>12626945

Awesome.

>>12626975

This.

Their projection is endless. They (the multicult diversity globalist types) are the ones supporting genocide. Nationalists are the ones opposing the genocide of their own people, and, by supporting strong borders and separation, opposing genocide in general.

Globalism = genocide

"Diversity" = genocide

Multicult = genocide

Volkism = opposing genocide

>>12627097

Racemixing is genocide.

>>12627232

Welcome to clown world.

>>12627361

He supports White genocide and opposes any organization among Whites to defend themselves from invasion, theft, rape, and MURDER.

He admits that his goal is to "oppose White tribalism."

Not good at all.

>>12627376

Hurting White people, promoting marxism, and opposing "problematic politically incorrect ideas."

Thought control.

Things like that, it seems.

>>12627386

This. However, under healthy morality, good people would oppose White genocide. It is morally imperative for White people to do so.

"Good people oppose cultural and genetic genocide"

"Diversity and multicult are genocide"

"Nationalism is opposing genocide"

"Good people are cultural and genetic Nationalists"

Separation is the only way to oppose genocide long term.

>>12627444

Checked.

Praise KEK.

And it should be. The current system is retarded and internally inconsistent.

Either racial discrimination is illegal, and thus "affirmative action" in all its forms must therefore be illegal, or racial discrimination is not illegal, and thus chartered racial communities, for example, that ban non-compatible races must be legal.

Instead the current system is "whatever hurts White people."

>>12627449

Volk first, politics and psychology second.

>>12627889

Look up oathbreaking rituals.

Strong culture of honor + genetic predisposition to honorableness + punishment for oathbreakers. Otherwise lies and liars everywhere.

>>12628069

Pretty much, it seems.

>>12628409

One Reich, one Volk.

The final solution was deportation.

>>12628626

Again, liars in science warping studies and corrupting conclusions does not equal science itself being a lie.


b004ae  No.12628834

File: 8a5faaa0ccde40f⋯.jpg (176.91 KB, 615x441, 205:147, IQ France 2.jpg)

>>12626633

>All the current trends are doing is dumbing down the best of the humans

Already happening


b004ae  No.12628865

File: f461694fdc99033⋯.png (314.79 KB, 1762x906, 881:453, Schizo Genes.png)

>>12626795

>It's more common among Jews, but saying that it's a Jewish disease is overdoing it.

right JEWBOY


b004ae  No.12628937

File: 63790c45115d548⋯.png (301.22 KB, 1186x2048, 593:1024, Peterson MolyJEW Dumb Je….png)

>>12627361

>Peterson is the pinnacle of modern philosophy

The pinnacle of white "cuckism"

a complete jew puppet


267a95  No.12628939

>>12626533

>>12626536

>>12626537

>>12626538

I don't consider myself a racist person, but the tone of this NYT article, and the "scientists" within it, are abominable.

I was raised with the idea that you should treat everybody equally. Do not pay attention to somebody's race, because that is racist and irrelevant. Pay attention to their character, their actions, their beliefs.

This sentiment was famously summarised by Martin Luther King Jr.:

>I have a dream this afternoon that my four little children, that my four little children will not come up in the same young days that I came up within, but they will be judged on the basis of the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.

When it comes to the question of whether genetics cause average IQ differences between races, I don't know the answer. But it is certainly possible that genetics do indeed cause such average differences, given that we know that genetics cause average differences in the rates that different racial groups contract different diseases (e.g. Africans have higher rates of Sickle Cell Disease, Northern Europeans have higher rates of Cystic Fibrosis, and "Asian Flush" - turning red after drinking alcohol - is essentially unique to East Asians).

Perhaps Watson was insensitive when he said "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true [that all races are intellectually equal]". I think people are justified in feeling angry about that comment.

But they are NOT right to dismiss Watson's suggestions as proven false. Because they are not proven false. It is entirely possible that there are genetic causes for average differences in intelligence between different racial groups. Unfortunately it seems it is impossible for science to honestly answer this factual question, because it is thought of as too taboo. I think it is very unfortunate that our quest for objective knowledge is stymied by moral panic, to be honest. Our moral proclivities are AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE QUESTION from questions about factual reality. If there are average differences, it doesn't mean we need to treat people differently based upon their group membership. I mean, we already know that there are many black people who are smarter than many white people. Obviously. The groups have a large amount of overlap. And it's true that average differences between these groups could be in large part (perhaps mostly) due to cultural / environmental factors.

It seems that a lot of these leftist "scientists" are not mature enough to distinguish questions of fact from questions of morality. They are like the staunch religious zealots of ages past, where people believed it was essential that people must believe in the literalism of heaven and hell, or else society would collapse - regardless of whether heaven and hell have any factual basis to them.

I don't want to discriminate against people. It is important that we treat everybody as an individual. Race should be irrelevant. Like I said, there are of course many ethnically African people who are smarter than many ethnically European people. Everybody should be judged on their individual qualities. Race is irrelevant.

But it is possible there is a small, and perhaps insignificant, genetically-caused difference between racial groups when it comes to certain qualities, or certain proclivities. We must admit that it is possible for these differences to exist - just like we acknowledge that males are, on average, physically stronger than females. We don't let this stop women from participating in sports - they can play whatever sport they like. So if there are very small differences between races then why does that necessarily lead to stopping some races from doing certain things? This is not necessary at all and I wouldn't want it to happen. Why are some people incapable of distinguishing questions of fact from questions of morality? Fact is fact, whether humans have yet discovered it or not. But moral questions are completely open for humans to decide for themselves.


b004ae  No.12628954

File: b55caa5213eb0d2⋯.jpg (73.18 KB, 1024x656, 64:41, Gas the Jews2.jpg)

>>12628939

>Race should be irrelevant

JEW DETECTED.

Engage the gas


000000  No.12628992

He's right and the genes for intelligence were outed recently https://pastebin.com/KLSS62Y1

too despite all the attempts of the leftist creationists to suppress this knowledge

To think it all started at only 7%

https://www.ed.ac.uk/news/2018/hundreds-of-genes-linked-to-intelligence-in-global

Then this

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-discovered-almost-1-000-new-genes-associated-with-intelligence

And finally this

https://pastebin.com/KLSS62Y1

Mainstream science already accepts intelligence is mostly genetic too. It's all ogre. Watson was right again.


d4075c  No.12629005

File: 6cf619a2e7748d4⋯.png (20.06 KB, 861x355, 861:355, rofl.PNG)

>>12628992

>He's right and the genes for intelligence were outed recently https://pastebin.com/KLSS62Y1


d4075c  No.12629013

File: 8616b5c97871080⋯.png (27.14 KB, 951x433, 951:433, rofl2.PNG)

>>12628992

>And finally this

>https://pastebin.com/KLSS62Y1


000000  No.12629028

Anyone remember this?

>It was a triumphant moment for the young scientist. He was up for tenure and his research was being featured in back-to-back articles in the country's most prestigious science journal. Yet today, Dr. Lahn says he is moving away from the research. "It's getting too controversial," he says.

>What Dr. Lahn told his audience was that genetic changes over the past several thousand years might be linked to brain size and intelligence. He flashed maps that showed the changes had taken hold and spread widely in Europe, Asia and the Americas, but weren't common in sub-Saharan Africa.

>Yet Dr. Lahn, who left China after participating in prodemocracy protests, says intellectual "police" in the U.S. make such questions difficult to pursue.

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115040765329081636-T5DQ4jvnwqOdVvsP_XSVG_lvgik_20060628.html?mod=blogs

I'm only reminded of Professor Ted said in his manifesto

>Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

Every single twin study in existence itself has already made clear most of what we are is genetic. Environment and socioeconomic factors were debunked ages ago too.


000000  No.12629035

>>12629005

>>12629013

Well that figures. Hold on

https://archive.fo/IUDcy


ff3c90  No.12629043

>>12626533

>(((unfounded)))

The author just couldn't help himself, could he?


8325e2  No.12629059

>>12628770

Well that's just bad luck on your part then. Perhaps you didn't take enough AP classes in high school, perhaps your high school was low-ranked and not considered as competitive in, perhaps they didn't like your essay or your extra-curricular activities, perhaps you just had a nigger admissions officer who didn't want wypipo admitted or they had already met their wypipo quota by the time they looked at your application.

It seems unusual that some of the lower-ranked Ivies rejected you if your testing scores were that high (considering the average score for ADMITTED students is 96th percentile for Penn). These schools are chock full of "boring white people" so simply being boring isn't enough to get you rejected from all of them.

To assume that every single person admitted to these institutions was admitted there for some Jewish reason (there are tens of thousands of students), or that everything they do is at the behest of some all-seeing Jewish administration, or that every single researcher there only received their position as a result of serving the sinister agenda of the school's administration is certifiably insane. I am able to differentiate those that have merit from those like Noam Chomsky, who are frauds.

The credibility of these institutions hasn't helped me secure a job because I own my business- started it upon graduation. Rather, I am only mentioning them to offer insight to the situation of Dr. Watson from the perspective of someone who has experience with "elite" academics. Watson's colleagues have high IQs, but even despite that, they are mentally damaged as a direct result of their conditioning.


135702  No.12629092

>>12626945

please share it when done.

I am planning to write one, condensing scientific stuff (with the most possible neutral point of view) and would like honest reading material.


ba001b  No.12629098

>>12627376

Diversifying science means pretending invalid unrepeatable experiments and their conclusions should be taken into account, if said experiments are conducted by a browny.

True and false, zero and one are NOT diverse enough. Now the world has to change because of the racism of right and wrong as described by wypeepo


703b50  No.12629114

File: 3ac69a17f4bb455⋯.jpg (446.76 KB, 1469x1600, 1469:1600, slaves traders.jpg)

>>12628528

Here's something I've saved a while back. I'll sage for irrelevance to the thread


135702  No.12629119

>>12626901

>>True or False: Your ancestors were bugs, rats, apes, and niggers

I wouldn't call them "ancestors" but very distant related animals.

Why would we have the same genetic code as any other animal on this earth?

To call them ancestors is to mislead.

And here comes a small human evolution intro:

Defining species is always tricky. There are two major rival theories about humans:

OOA

Multiregional species

The first one says we were humans, and then migrated out of Africa

The second one, that some groups of hominids migrated out of Africa, and then speciated into modern races.

It is just another case of scientific ((( consensus ))) to determine if we were or not a "species" or a bunch of "races", among other possibilities.

As you can see, both of the most popular (among evolutionists) theories point to our ancestors being african hominids. Current estimates are of 800K to 4M years. And the discussion is centered on whether we were one species or many species, but almost all agree that one small population of "something hominid" diverged from Africa at one point.


000000  No.12629130

>>12626945

Try contacting Professor Kevin MacDonald to help you find a publisher https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/

>>12627232

Have you ever read the preface to Animal Farm or 1984? Orwell's real fear wasn't some authoritarian dictatorship, no. It was people themselves and how they non-think and police each other for correctness. That truth can be classified as wrong-think and non-think.

>>12627294

If you or any other real scientist wants to feel true rage and learn what is really wrong with science today, READ THIS: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/


135702  No.12629136

>>12627103

>When men are around I simply stop caring.

you are a feminist faggot


000000  No.12629152

>>12626945

>>12629092

I strongly advise if your goal is to get a message out to the masses and not fellow intellectuals, you should go the route writing along the lines of Common Sense. Something easy yet true for the masses to digest. Times are already changing seeing how Europeans are quickly turning against the migrants politically and violently and the Americans number one concern now from the polls are regarding immigration rather than anything involving the economic state. It is time.


703b50  No.12629162

>>12627376

That the term "per capita" doesn't exist anymore


000000  No.12629186

>>12629119

Speaking of evolution

>At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked (18. 'Anthropological Review,' April 1867, p. 236.), will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

(The Descent of Man, 2nd ed., New York: A.L. Burt Co., 1874, p. 178)

http://charles-darwin.classic-literature.co.uk/the-descent-of-man/ebook-page-105.asp

I'm amazed they have not memory holed other great scientists such as Charles Darwin and Einstein for both being confirmed racists more than Watson was.

More amazing is the observation virtually all the greats can be called racists. Intelligence begins with simple observation and understanding and even the great Arab intellectuals of the Islamic Golden Age leftists praise observed the blacks are the lowest in intellect among mankind.


16371e  No.12629192

>>12626750

Franklin actively hindered the search for DAN's structure and she was a pain in the ass for the entire British team.


000000  No.12629199

>>12629162

We live in a globalised world now :^) per capita no longer is needed when thinking globally and that means whites are minorities and niggers nig in collective number at levels unseen among the rest of mankind. No matter truth-bending mental gymnastics, no matter what game they play, these leftist creationists will lose. But how pitiful the decline of Christianity only gave faith to the even more insane and damaging to science faith of Egalitarianism.


000000  No.12629204

>>12629192

Really now? Would science have an explanation for this? Let us see

>A fascinating paper about sex differences in the human brain was published last week in the scientific journal Cerebral Cortex. It’s the largest single-sample study of structural and functional sex differences in the human brain ever undertaken, involving over 5,000 participants (2,466 male and 2,750 female). The study has been attracting attention for more than a year (see this preview in Science, for instance), but only now has it been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

http://quillette.com/2018/05/24/cant-woman-like-man/


d84f91  No.12629274

>>12628954

petition to have soyjack banging on the window as gas is deployed


b004ae  No.12629299

Petition approved.


402bc1  No.12629320

File: c6163f88817a942⋯.jpg (72.52 KB, 640x887, 640:887, Poo-litzer.JPG)


08e644  No.12629392

>>12626787

He's a nigger, what does he know?


d347a1  No.12629433

File: 417b65da6f65bfe⋯.jpeg (Spoiler Image, 777.58 KB, 3840x2160, 16:9, PIVX-ME.jpeg)

>>12628427

>bitcoin

Not superior PIVX


000000  No.12629461

>>12626693

>emotional intelligence

Kek there's actually a test for this and niggers score the lowest because they're a pack of violent subhuman psychopaths.

Is it any wonder shitskin races hate dogs and dogs in turn despise them?

Man's best friend knows who has a heart and soul.


cff495  No.12629497

>>12626536

>He explicitly repudiates Dr. Watson's presumption… as essentially guaranteed to be wrong

That certainly is scientific to just ignore Watson's data and just say it must be wrong. Shit like this makes me furious.


000000  No.12629747

When does Chinkoid York Times run the hit piece against Einstein? They hired that anti-white little gook and Einstein was anti-gook. Science is raycis lmao Science is objectively right all the appeals to emotion on earth can't hide the truth forever.

>>12626533

Reich is funny because he's basically literally Hitler as it is and makes contradicting statements. Here's some excerpts of the leading geneticist at Harvard Dr. David Reich's interview with the NYT recently

>The orthodoxy that we should be anxious about any research into genetic differences among populations.

>It is simply no longer possible to ignore the average genetic differences among races

>Groundbreaking advances in DNA sequencing technology […] measure with exquisite accuracy an individual's genetic ancestry.

>The line has already been crossed. Scientists identified 74 genetic variations that are over-represented in genes known to be important in neurological development. Another study found genetic variations in more than 20 genes that were predictive of performance on intelligence tests.

>Differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today's racial constructs are real.

<People who deny substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position […] that will not survive the onslaught of science.

>All traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations. […] The genetic influences on behaviour and cognition will differ across populations.

>You will sometimes hear that any biological differences among populations are likely to be small. This is not true. The ancestors of East Asians, Europeans, West Africans, and Australians were, until recently, almost completely isolated from one another for 40.000 years or longer, which is more than sufficient time for the forces of evolution to work.

>It is […] dangerous for geneticists and anthropologists to simply repeat the old consensus about human population differences. Voices are filling the void that our silence is creating.

>Genetic studies will show that many traits are influenced by genetic variations, and that these traits will differ on average across human populations. It will be impossible– indeed, anti-scientific, foolish and absurd – to deny those differences.

>It is likely that are few stereotypes will be validated by findings from genetics.

>Pretending that scientific research has shown there can be no meaningful average genetic differences among human populations […] is contradicted by scientific facts.

>There are clear genetic contributors to many traits, including behaviour.

>Present-day human populations, […] often but not always […] correlated to today's race categories, have in a number of instances been largely isolated from one another for tens of thousands of years. These long separations have provided adequate opportunity for the frequencies of genetic variations to change.

>Genetic variations are likely to affect behaviour and cognition just as they affect other traits.

>Given that all genetically determined traits differ somewhat among populations, we should expect that there will be differences in the average effects, including in traits like behaviour.

>To insist that no meaning average differences among human populations are possible is harmful. It is perceived as misleading, even patronizing, by the general public. And it encourages people not to trust the honesty of scholars.

>-Dr. David Reich Ph.D, Leading Geneticist at Harvard University

I'm strongly guessing why (((they're))) pulling this shit now is because the cat is out of the bag and nothing can stop it now but it won't stop them from trying. It is only a matter of time very quickly approaching. The age of truth, the light of the morning star. He is coming.


3f5520  No.12629858

>>12628865

>40% more

>For every ten non-jew schizos there are fourteen jew schizos

>IT'S ONLY A JEW DISEASE

is lack of reading comprehension a kike trait too?


725467  No.12629870

>>12626870

Franklin was an employee in Maurice Wilkin's lab. It was his call to show the image to Watson and Crick. She may well have been unhappy about it, but as senior PI in his own lab, that was his choice to make and not hers.


725467  No.12629909

BBC did a pretty good movie about the relationships called "Life Story" - it's on Vimeo. Relevant scene with Wilkins and the data is at 1hr22

https://vimeo.com/179934156


55542d  No.12629921

>>12626652

They won't even approve studies like this, because they are terrified that they will prove him right. Because of that fact, they will never be done. And they will continue to wring their hands at how such a study would be unethical.


000000  No.12630050

>“If he knew African-Americans as colleagues at all levels, his present view would be impossible to sustain,’’ Dr. King said.

>L-l-look I have a smart black friend so it's impossible for blacks to be less intelligent than whites.


9243ac  No.12630275

>>12626806

>completely different species

Ashkenazim are genetically closer to Germans than Northern Chinese are to Southern Chinese.


9243ac  No.12630295

>>12626843

Western scientists included Americans have concluded that Asians have significantly larger brains than Whites despite being smaller (greater EQ), which predicts an even greater IQ disparity than the one actually revealed on IQ tests.


add478  No.12630300

>>12629921

Why not just do it without their permission?


51c040  No.12630303

>>12629461

It's up

ds/new7  youtube-dl -f best "https://www.pbs.org/video/decoding-watson-ua6jjx/"

[pbs] Downloading JSON metadata

[pbs] decoding-watson-ua6jjx: Downloading webpage

[pbs] decoding-watson-ua6jjx: Downloading widget/partnerplayer page

[pbs] decoding-watson-ua6jjx: Downloading portalplayer page

[pbs] decoding-watson-ua6jjx: Downloading 0 video url info

[pbs] decoding-watson-ua6jjx: Downloading m3u8 information


effe06  No.12630321

>>12628066

David Hogg is unironically a CIA nigger.


21431c  No.12630639

File: 81eeb58d9ed085f⋯.jpg (74.91 KB, 711x531, 79:59, 947067409 - Copy.jpg)

>>12626901

>technology stolen from kangs


000000  No.12630765

>>12629921

Multiple IQ studies were started and done by anti-racists and all it did was confirm the "racists". Same with diversity studies, Putnam was anti-racist trying to scientifically prove the benefits of diversity only to get fucked by reality. It's continually hilarious, the results repeat themselves and they just try to pretend it doesn't exist but it's too late. Genetics is advancing so much the Chinese are already on path to creating superhumans. The end is near.


000000  No.12630856

https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2015-piffer.pdf


31d327  No.12630864

>>12627889

You can't filter out shitlibs with vows and promises, because words and truth mean nothing to them. They won't just lie to your face and feel good about it, half the time they don't even comprehend what's a lie and what isn't. "Truth" to them is just another word for "consistent with liberal dogma"


000000  No.12630879

>>12630864

That's the best part, they're the new fundamentalists. The decline of the church has brought the crazies of the delusional Egalitarian faith to front and they did well enough already to alienate the moderates and fence sitters. This article itself admits their fears as science advances, without them, the truth cannot be suppressed for long.


46d58b  No.12631268

>>12626807

What is your book called, and when do you think it will be ready?


b004ae  No.12632326

>>12630303

The video seems to be blocked outside the US.. could someone upload it to mega or some other file sharing place?

Thanks


000000  No.12632573

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

I strongly recommend everyone watch another PBS documentary called "Lord of the Ants", it focuses on one of the greatest and most respected scientists in the world E.O. Wilson and goes into a bit about how political correctness destroys science.

>>12632326

Just use a US proxy. Tons out there.


1be3a1  No.12632624

>>Moreover, he added, although he wished everyone were equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”

You will never be a based Noble Prizing wining shitlord. Or will you? Not unless you give up anime and vidya xD


000000  No.12632734

>>12629747

Harvard sure is good at producing a lot of brilliant wrong-thinkers.


000000  No.12632943

Anti-Slide

You can't hide

From Dr. Bones wild ride


4c00c7  No.12632967

what stupid racist honky fuck press s


6d6079  No.12633035

>>12632967

Cool meme talk fellow anonymous!


28bd9c  No.12633422

File: e33f8c137558218⋯.png (52.84 KB, 1321x410, 1321:410, e33f8c137558218e91a7cf0442….png)

>>12628939

Reminder that you are here forever. /pol/ is a hurtbox.

Couldn't find the hurtbox image this'll do but if another anon has a better filestore with ocr search implemented I'd be obliged if you could post the hurtbox cap for the benefit of this well-intentioned but woefully new and idealistic poster


28bd9c  No.12633486

File: 53a3520f738e702⋯.jpg (77.95 KB, 473x339, 473:339, KRzKdpo.jpg)


465e4c  No.12633518

File: 39612e78e13e097⋯.png (169.32 KB, 999x442, 999:442, d167ef889031a37e9ba8adcd2a….png)

>>12633422

Is this the hurtbox pic you were thinking of?


80774f  No.12633520

File: 23cf88f7cf75cca⋯.gif (2.92 MB, 500x606, 250:303, 1530066829856.gif)

>>12627807

>>12627897

Not there quite yet.

The moment that science sausage-making like RetractionWatch falls to SJW bullshit is the moment I will despair, but not before.


28bd9c  No.12633566

File: ac0a9ba4ef83152⋯.jpg (46.58 KB, 484x530, 242:265, c8ee07cbe210ae8119e4616ae5….jpg)

>>12628939

Take heed of this warning:

>>12633518

Yes. Thank you anon and may Kek smile upon you. Have this for your trouble


465e4c  No.12633577

File: b8b17fcc46701ff⋯.png (1.27 MB, 1200x877, 1200:877, 43c0117c3be3214b05eef2fdf6….png)


a7228f  No.12633709

File: cfef391c31d1e8e⋯.jpg (101.04 KB, 557x506, 557:506, HitlerTruth.jpg)


000000  No.12637072

>SHUT IT DOWN OY VEY

Nobody can stop it.


a9c476  No.12637301

>>12626533

<“I reject his views as despicable,” Dr. Lander wrote to Broad scientists. “They have no place in science, which must welcome everyone. I was wrong to toast, and I’m sorry.’’

>DNA has no place in science.


08c8f0  No.12637354


799200  No.12638020

>>12626693

>emotional intelligence

An oxymoron


365d18  No.12652593

>>12628939

Look, I just left you a warning because it was the best way to take what you said in good faith, but I have to break down your post.

>I don't consider myself a racist person, but the tone of this NYT article, and the "scientists" within it, are abominable.

If you even ask people to listen to the kind of things Watson had to say about race, you will be labeled a racist. Forget about what you think racist means. It's just a bogeyman word for wrongthink, and you're already doing that if you're thinking.

>I was raised with the idea that you should treat everybody equally. Do not pay attention to somebody's race, because that is racist and irrelevant. Pay attention to their character, their actions, their beliefs.

That's great. Nevermind the relevant probabilistic biological information about those people you can glean based on race. Nevermind the fact that societal organization has to be based on group averages if you're trying to optimize the globe. Just keep judging individuals individually and don't try to organize into like-minded groups to protect your group interests.

>This sentiment was famously summarised by Martin Luther King Jr.: When it comes to the question of whether genetics cause average IQ differences between races, I don't know the answer.

Oh, come off it. Say what you know is true. https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php

>But it is certainly possible that genetics do indeed cause such average differences, given that we know that genetics cause average differences in the rates that different racial groups contract different diseases (e.g. Africans have higher rates of Sickle Cell Disease, Northern Europeans have higher rates of Cystic Fibrosis, and "Asian Flush" - turning red after drinking alcohol - is essentially unique to East Asians).

Evolution didn't spare the brain. This is fucking obvious. If you had enough exposure to bio to know about even the most commonly known genetic diseases, you know that evolution affects the entire organism INCLUDING the brain.

>Perhaps Watson was insensitive when he said "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true [that all races are intellectually equal]". I think people are justified in feeling angry about that comment.

You ever work in a place with greater than 50% black coworkers?

>But they are NOT right to dismiss Watson's suggestions as proven false. Because they are not proven false. It is entirely possible that there are genetic causes for average differences in intelligence between different racial groups.

Understatement of 2019 but go on.

>Unfortunately it seems it is impossible for science to honestly answer this factual question, because it is thought of as too taboo.

"impossible" =/= taboo. The research has been done. You are just afraid to say the truth.

>I think it is very unfortunate that our quest for objective knowledge is stymied by moral panic, to be honest. Our moral proclivities are AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE QUESTION from questions about factual reality.

Wait, shouldn't the facts and consequences of "moral" behavior impact our assessment of the moral value of the behavior? What are you trying to acheive?

>If there are average differences, it doesn't mean we need to treat people differently based upon their group membership. I mean, we already know that there are many black people who are smarter than many white people. Obviously. The groups have a large amount of overlap.

Well, if you're going to be an ultraindividualist, you're consistent at least.

>And it's true that average differences between these groups could be in large part (perhaps mostly) due to cultural / environmental factors.

Wait what happened to the consistency? SURELY you wouldn't suggest trying to make different sets of rules for different groups of people based purely on their cultural differences (of course not judging by skin color or ethnicity so as not to be a "racist")? You wouldn't do that, would you?


365d18  No.12652595

>>12628939

>It seems that a lot of these leftist "scientists" are not mature enough to distinguish questions of fact from questions of morality. They are like the staunch religious zealots of ages past, where people believed it was essential that people must believe in the literalism of heaven and hell, or else society would collapse - regardless of whether heaven and hell have any factual basis to them.

Morality and fact are inseparable. Zealotry isn't the proximate issue here, it's distal - fanatical leftist globalist Zionist Jewish zealots are the distal cause of the proximate issue, scientists fear to speak the truth.

>I don't want to discriminate against people. It is important that we treat everybody as an individual.

It's certainly important to the enemies of me and my people that we never see ourselves as anything more than atomic individuals in an impenetrable cultural morass which can't be changed by individuals. But it's gauche for me and mine to create groups for ethnic solidarity because that's for everyone else. But don't think about the fact that me and mine are the global minority, just let everyone else into the countries me and mine built so they can demographically replace me and mine. That's what my enemies think is important. You're not aligning yourself with my enemies are you?

>Race should be irrelevant. Like I said, there are of course many ethnically African people who are smarter than many ethnically European people. Everybody should be judged on their individual qualities. Race is irrelevant.

You're the one making a distinction between moral and factual questions, and then you go and conflate an 'ought' and an 'is'. I sure hope there's no ulterior motive here.

>But it is possible there is a small, and perhaps insignificant, genetically-caused difference between racial groups when it comes to certain qualities, or certain proclivities. We must admit that it is possible for these differences to exist - just like we acknowledge that males are, on average, physically stronger than females. We don't let this stop women from participating in sports - they can play whatever sport they like. So if there are very small differences between races then why does that necessarily lead to stopping some races from doing certain things?

I honestly don't know what you mean about stopping certain races from doing certain things.

>This is not necessary at all and I wouldn't want it to happen. Why are some people incapable of distinguishing questions of fact from questions of morality?

You just fucked that up in a sandwich of complaining about people fucking it up.

>Fact is fact, whether humans have yet discovered it or not. But moral questions are completely open for humans to decide for themselves.

Would it be morally OK for me and mine to create a breakaway civilization that doesn't invite the people I think are culturally and genetically dead weight? Because every single time my ancestors have tried, for (((some reason))) the dead weight parasitizes its way into their lands, subverts their cultural and financial institutions, and then tries to ethnically cleanse us with miscegenation and immigration. Is that morally OK with you?


28a892  No.12652643

File: 8d9abcba80b28ea⋯.jpg (153.64 KB, 625x910, 125:182, 1544874097276.jpg)


28bd9c  No.12652773

>>12652643

Well if you're going to meme with words on the image, that's not a bad approach


f909dd  No.12653700

>>12626693

Who let these jungle folk on the white man's internet?


769e5b  No.12653787

File: e16bcf80ba5b547⋯.png (343.12 KB, 410x517, 410:517, konrad heiden.png)

File: 43cdb2a9f750b20⋯.png (726.77 KB, 800x800, 1:1, reddit_discarded.png)

>>12626652

>>12627234

>>12627313

>>12628078

>>12628939

>>12629098

>>12629186

>>12630765

>>12632967

>im not -ist but..

>as a white guy/girl

>unironically using leftist/cuck dialect on /pol/

You faggots and newfags should deprogram yourselves from using trotskyist non-words like the 6 gorillion -isms, as well as ridding yourselves of that 'cuck dialect' I'm starting to notice whenever anyone speaks of anything mildly 'sensitive'.


769e5b  No.12653981

File: b168cde19055abe⋯.jpg (40.16 KB, 779x584, 779:584, reina.jpg)

File: f9dbb1bf87aa770⋯.jpg (490.68 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, unrelenting chaos.jpg)

>>12626533

>Shut it down

I just thought of something; What if, the 'shut it down' meme is actually an inverted way of empowering the kike's ability to shut things down (((they))) do not approve of, and that whenever the meme is applied (((they))) can actually do exactly just that, which is also why this timeline gradually became shittier with every passing month. It may seem like a foolish idea and a way to make fun of their modus operandi, but if looked at another angle it could actually be a potentially a really very bad case of not memeing responsibly


25a0ff  No.12654441

>>12628528

The definitive research on this topic was done by the Nation of Islam, and published in their book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.


e5c734  No.12654505

>>12626536

>But in October Dr. Watson was hospitalized following a car accident, and he has not been able to leave medical care.

I feel sorry for him. Imagine being in your 90's, injured from a car accident, needing to be in a hospital or care facility for months if not the rest of your life, and knowing that all those nigger nurses and doctors are subhumans who are more interested in twerking than making sure your meds are correct. Hell on earth.


41ce55  No.12654547

>>12654441

The nogs are just as gay as the Jews.


41ce55  No.12654552

>>12653787

>talks about them deprograming, immediately calls them newfags to convince them that they are now gay, because they use the internet instead of chasing roasties.


c0822e  No.12654797

>>12654505

Everyone's final days are some version of that unless you get lucky enough to die in your sleep at home.


0b5dc2  No.12655219

>>12626579

Dr. Watson isn't just 'a' geneticist, he is 'the' geneticist. He probably knows more about the topic that almost anyone alive.


e61616  No.12655572

File: 86d4591abdb8bcb⋯.jpg (122.74 KB, 1024x640, 8:5, national_IQ_map_world_char….jpg)

File: 75658b258725f02⋯.jpeg (109.74 KB, 887x501, 887:501, average iq by state.jpeg)

>>12628834

Awful lot of (((cohencidences))) with data


000000  No.12671861

>Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

It was over years ago and it's worse now with all the modern discoveries and advances in science. In modern polls, virtually all biologists and geneticists admit they know the truth.


c1672e  No.12676442

>>12626633

>I dont hate niggers. In fact I feel sorry for them

You really need to understand that your excess in empathy is being weaponized against your race. You need to hate them or we will not survive.


c1672e  No.12676520

>>12671861

Isn't it funny what pussies they always are? Compare their complete cowardice to Galileo suffering persecution for defying doctrine.


43dd87  No.12676707

>>12626660

Science IS cucked. That is why Watson is being judged based on opinions and not facts.

Of course, disingenuous morons cannot use facts because the truth is not on their side…


000000  No.12681823

What is it about this thread which brings out such fear in shills ?


1f52db  No.12681912

>>12626975

>All these faggots promoting Luke-warm equalitarianism with all a different face

Listen here, you fucking nigger lover, there is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to exterminate the lesser races and colonize their territories. We have no obligation to let them continue to occupy the wealth of land the squandor. Enough of this sickening “we just all want to be separate but equal” garbage. You’re not only lying to yourself and everyone else, but worst of all, you’re still operating under the moral framework of your enemy.


976959  No.12682117

>>12626536

DAVID REICH

This fucking timeline


000000  No.12682194

https://damnatioadreactiones.wordpress.com/2019/01/14/the-case-for-james-dewey-watson/


6c268b  No.12682264

>>12626536

>David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard, has argued that new techniques for studying DNA show that some human populations were geographically separated for long enough that they plausibly could have evolved average genetic differences in cognition and behavior.

Kike Shilling 101: Praise that which you intend to destroy. Start by giving the opponent's main point away for free. This disarms him, so there will be no resistance when you go back on it in step 2. In this case, give away the duh-duh level obvious point that niggers and man evolved apart. Then. . .

>But in his recent book, “Who We Are and How We Got Here,’’ he explicitly repudiates Dr. Watson’s presumption that such differences would “correspond to longstanding popular stereotypes’’ as “essentially guaranteed to be wrong.’’

Take it away again, give no reasons at all why you're right, and shill your fucking book.

Masterful.


04590c  No.12682472

File: d898a176d31ddcd⋯.jpg (847.07 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, jew says.jpg)

>>12626660

>Science is cucked and a Jewish lie

/thread


04590c  No.12682504

File: 47f050557271a97⋯.jpg (120.62 KB, 800x984, 100:123, Wernher_von_Braun.jpg)

And this is what we've come to, that great men are shut out of the world of science because "muh feelings that we should all be created equal", guess what kiddos that's not how the world works. The real truth is much uglier. Being that jews want to confound you into believing that we're all equal so as to dilute and destroy the white race. Wht would they embark upon such an endeavor? Because whitey is the only entity that could oppose their total domination of the western world.although this is a really shitty plan because when whitey is no longer around to protect them the sand niggers and chinks are going to eat them alive but I digress


7db2b8  No.12682547

Ching Mao, how can you support such reactionary ideas of the capitalists? The People's Cultural Revolution will stone you to death for speaking positively of doctor Watson. The smart thing to do is sign this confession and say you never meant it. Then you're only looking at 10 years reeducation. Niggers are equal under communism!


9671fc  No.12682567

>>12682504

The whites are not being eradicated. They’re being contained and domesticated for their role.


54faca  No.12682575

File: 19995005e433ea4⋯.jpg (116.7 KB, 780x438, 130:73, blm1.jpg)

>>12626533

How could any modern person imagine blacks being less intelligent or more prone to violence in this age?


d5498d  No.12682591

File: fc0a3a8e96439f1⋯.jpg (840.49 KB, 2032x3528, 254:441, 1507616781360.jpg)

>>12628939

>Race should be irrelevant.

>Race is irrelevant.

Nice race-mixing propaganda, Shlomo.


d5498d  No.12682608

File: 053b8bd1effebd7⋯.png (619.98 KB, 815x871, 815:871, 1500352512225.png)

File: 876cf56d2a210b8⋯.jpg (68.8 KB, 535x449, 535:449, 1501690042357.jpg)

File: 5ce44b8d2caba5c⋯.jpg (130.99 KB, 601x800, 601:800, 1499050742299.jpg)

File: 4c47d8b04390d9b⋯.jpg (532.17 KB, 855x817, 45:43, 1512838259649.jpg)


d5498d  No.12682630

>>12628528

Extra informative article:

https://goysguidetoworldhistory.blogspot.com/2018/07/merchants-of-babylon-jews-and-slave.html

There is another good article:

https://wrongthink.net/read-blog/70_jewish-control-of-the-transatlantic-slave-trade-to-north-america.html?lang=dutch

But Wrongthink.net site doesn't respond, he get me Error 521.

So try to find some redpill pictures from this article by following this link:

https://www.google.ru/search?q=https://wrongthink.net/read-blog/70_jewish-control-of-the-transatlantic-slave-trade-to-north-america-part-i.html&newwindow=1&client=opera&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj1ueuikvLfAhW_AxAIHUkZBDUQsAR6BAgCEAE#imgrc=_


d5498d  No.12682680

>>12628992

Added Archice.fo links, in case of (((shut it down))):

"Hundreds of genes linked to intelligence in global study"

https://archive.fo/h9Ueq

'"A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence"

https://archive.fo/uBXSH

"Scientists Just Found Almost 1,000 New Genes Associated With Intelligence"

https://archive.fo/4rpdX


170379  No.12682692

File: ecd67845923d4b3⋯.png (295.36 KB, 1136x568, 2:1, v65665.png)

>>12629858

>is lack of reading comprehension a kike trait too?

It must be the 56%.


000000  No.12704052

A lot more geneticists and biologists have been speaking out lately and watching all the suppression and damage control is highly entertaining. It's obvious what's happening here, they're scared and they're scared because they know they can't contain the truth forever and remember science doesn't care about anyone's feelings. Science is just reality, truth. This was always going to happen.


000000  No.12724605

>>12629747

>David Reich

>Reich

KEK


000000  No.12724714

Based boomers.


000000  No.12725230

Oh do I hate the damned kikes………

To say that there is no genetic component to intelligence at all is to say that the intelligence of a human and a tree are equivalent. This is an obvious absurdity.

We must point this out everywhere we go. The normies will either come to our side or perish in fires of their own making.

THE UMMAN MANDA RIDES FORTH


000000  No.12732990

>>12627386

Mainstream science already accepts intelligence is mostly inheritable so I think they do know.


000000  No.12738079

Gift for frens

https://ghostbin.com/paste/75udp


0190f2  No.12738086

>>12626533

>I, some new york times writer, know more about genetics than the guy who practically, I know not entirely but he was a massive part of it discovered DNA

>I know this because the current zeitgeist says I'm right


ec10b9  No.12738389

>>12628298

N SHIET


eea00f  No.12738533

File: 7f144946551d1fb⋯.png (137.36 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 7f144946551d1fbf6cbc608486….png)

>>12628303

>patenting software

Software patents are the devil. To quote John Carmack,

>The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying.


7215e9  No.12738548

>>12626836

>she wasn't White


f73d2b  No.12738609

Anyone who says that a statement about incredibly complex phenomena such as human intelligence has been absolutely discredited betrays their wholly lacking understanding of the scientific method. While no controlled experimental results have been produced yet, mainly due to the fundamental challenges of performing such studies on humans, all our observational experiments, some of them very rigourous, indicate that there is indeed a significant difference in average IQ, and that it's largely due to genetic differences.

Anyway, since I haven't seen much litterature being posted in this thread, I'll share one of my favorite articles that expertly details the arguments from both sides of the discussion on race and IQ, while presenting very compelling evidence for the nature+nurture model:

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf


cec05c  No.12741758

File: e778a6ae81d3556⋯.png (33.75 KB, 300x100, 3:1, 218.png)

File: 79b0841d123d046⋯.jpg (1.25 MB, 2048x1153, 2048:1153, 10203461.jpg)

File: 8eb736c7f9d3f5f⋯.jpg (1.14 MB, 1000x1000, 1:1, Gold.jpg)

File: 7dbb7f01a4ef310⋯.gif (23.59 KB, 400x289, 400:289, use caution.gif)

File: 5fb50d050c13a78⋯.jpg (102 KB, 613x720, 613:720, 1452127728996.jpg)

>>12626533

this goy-murder murdered my caretaker, how did you get so close to his face while he was planning a bomb attack with that radio? lel


000000  No.12746257

Lysenkoism still persists, even after the fall of the USSR, but even Harvard's best geneticist David Reich knows quote

People who deny substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position […] that will not survive the onslaught of science.


000000  No.12756657

>>12738609

I'm not sure what you mean by controlled studies but twin studies are at this point, numerous and shocking in their consistent results. Human beings just aren't "free" as they would like to believe, everyone is just a slave to their genes.


000000  No.12780136

SHUT

IT

DOWN




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bestemma / chaos / fa / jenny / lewd / lovelive / marx / roze ]