[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / cafechan / india / s8s / sw / vg / vichan / wmafsex ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
8chan Cup Knockout Stage - Friday, January 18 at 08:00 p.m. GMT
Winner of the 65rd Attention-Hungry Games
/cure/ - Your obscure board for medical-tan appreciation

December 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: 0f1ecb6aa77a742⋯.jpg (240.31 KB, 1200x1800, 2:3, ginny.jpg)

File: cd83e9e02308d49⋯.jpg (8.8 KB, 245x164, 245:164, sc.jpg)

ecff66  No.12657343

I am have looking around quite a bit and I can't find another example of an in absentee vote from a Supreme Court Justice except this one from Ginsburg herself just before her surgery. She blocked Trump's asylum thingymabob.

>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/ginsburg-voted-against-trump-asylum-policy-before-cancer-surgery

>https://web.archive.org/web/20181222034024/

She's not there again…

>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-past-comments-raise-questions-about-supreme-court-retirement

>https://web.archive.org/web/20190110170234/

Group effort. Has this ever happened before? Is it actually legal?

Fuck me if it's easy to find, but I haven't found much at all yet and I've been internetting about half an hour.

28bb1f  No.12657347

No, it is not legal.

t. formal law education


7bafbf  No.12657354

>>12657343

>>12657347

>Not legal

To bad that has never stopped kikes. God I hate what they've done to this fucking country.


ecff66  No.12657355

>>12657347

Sauces or further information at your leisure please. We should be hitting this hard ahead of them trying to pull obvious bullshit shenanigans.


4c5ac2  No.12657365

The spanish speaking majority does not care.


ecff66  No.12657442

She has been "spotted" by TMZ. In the video, if it's even her, she can't even lift her head.

>https://www.tmz.com/2019/01/09/ruth-bader-ginsburg-video-lung-cancer-frail-supreme-court-rbg/

Archive won't save the page and the video has to be played on their site anyways.


8c9540  No.12657475

File: 89a898de0a211b1⋯.jpg (137.44 KB, 1080x675, 8:5, Brenda-Snipes-e15417036035….jpg)

>>12657343

It has never been legal for dead people to vote, but that has never stopped (((democrats))) from doing it


82e192  No.12657480

She dead yet?


ecff66  No.12657483

>>12657475

Well, kek, I agree. But they will be attempting to say she is ALIVE and voting from her bed or home. They will pretend like this is business as usual and "nothing." So would be better for us if we could prove or show that it isn't legal to do so regardless of whether the heart is beating or not.


8c45d1  No.12657493

>>12657343

>let's ballot-harves Ginsborg in her hospital bed

Leftist thinking, ladies and gentlemen.


dc8291  No.12657507

File: 3aa341f55bd6901⋯.jpg (51.2 KB, 460x355, 92:71, niggers.jpg)

>>12657475

>thought that was Al Sharpton in your pic


ecff66  No.12662200

File: ce4b5c57aee64c3⋯.jpg (192.25 KB, 1258x740, 17:10, ginnyoral.jpg)

>https://web.archive.org/web/20190111174828/

>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will miss next week’s oral arguments, but her recovery from surgery remains “on track,” the Supreme Court said in a statement Friday.

>"Justice Ginsburg will continue to work from home next week and will participate in the consideration and decision of the cases on the basis of the briefs and the transcripts of oral arguments. Her recovery from surgery is on track. Post-surgery evaluation indicates no evidence of remaining disease, and no further treatment is required," Kathy Arberg, the Supreme Court public information officer, said in the statement.

Votes coming at some point…


36b1b4  No.12662277

>>12657343

whats stopping them form hiding her body and doing it for the next 50 years? completely illegal, complete farce.


b751f5  No.12662359

>>12657347

legal is, by definition, whatever the Court says is legal, and she's the Court.


d964c6  No.12662372

>>12662200

It literally doesn't matter. She voted from her hospital bed before the surgery. She doesn't have to be alive to vote. Are you stupid? Jews don't care about the laws of the goyim. Jews don't care about listening to court proceedings. They already know how they're going to vote before the case even exists.


d964c6  No.12662375

>>12662359

No, you're brain damaged.


fc2462  No.12662391

>>12662375

She can vote from home for the next 17 years if she wants, nobody will question it.


fa2252  No.12662404

>>12662391

>>12662391

the law is whatever the people with the most power say it is, period


408fe6  No.12662417

>>12662391

This is the sad truth here. One of her aids or the shady democrat scum will just keep putting in votes for her despite her being dead just so DRUFMPF doesn't get a third SC pick.

And of course if you question it you're an Alex Jones watching conspiracy theorist retard racist.


b751f5  No.12662441

>>12662375

Thanks for the free legal advice. Which state is your Bar license from?


fc2462  No.12662459

>>12662441

All lawyers come from the state of ISRAEL


d964c6  No.12662926

>>12662441

Not an argument. The court does not make law. You lied and are a kike.


ecff66  No.12683871

File: f9ed65ee2c4db52⋯.jpg (450.22 KB, 810x900, 9:10, proxy.jpg)

It's beginning. People need to be throwing a fit about now.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg/index.html

>On Tuesday, she issued a concurring opinion in a case concerning arbitration. The justices are to meet behind closed doors on Friday for a regularly scheduled conference – Ginsburg is likely to vote by proxy – and they will take the bench again for arguments on February 19.


feefd0  No.12683879

>>12683871

what a load of horseshit


3488ef  No.12683905

>>12683879

>>12683871

They're pulling a McCain. McCain showed how much contempt he had for his voters by not giving up his seat when he was stuck in the hospital for a year. His bitch wife that he divorced his disabled wife for even suggested that she should be entitled to his senator seat.


5604ff  No.12684328

>>12657343

There is pretty much nothing legal about what they are doing. But hey when has that ever stopped them?


0c67be  No.12684484

>>12662926

> Not an argument.

Neither is "you're brain damaged." Neither is "you're a kike." You get a legal argument when you deserve one.

OP didn't ask who made the law. Your statement is a strawman fallacy at best, though perhaps merely evidence of your innocent lack of reading comprehension.

The question was "is this legal" and courts exist for the very purpose of deciding what is and isn't legal.


584835  No.12687251

>>12684484

Too bad. Not an argument. You were proven wrong. The court does not make law.

>whatever the Court says is legal

You are lying. This is a lie. You were proven wrong.

>and she's the Court.

No. She's not. You know nothing at all.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / cafechan / india / s8s / sw / vg / vichan / wmafsex ]