[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / baphomet / casey / choroy / dempart / freeb / tob / vichan ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 83rd Attention-Hungry Games
/strek/ - Remove Hasperat

May 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: be2881b075d1af1⋯.jpg (26.32 KB, 474x284, 237:142, punchthehatoff.jpg)

7f2e0e  No.13490529

>“It would mean a degeneration and a degradation of human fiber which would turn back the hands of time a thousand years,” Sedgwick said in 1914. “Hence it will probably never come, for mankind will not lightly abandon at the call of a few fanatics the hard-earned achievements of the ages.”

>According to the leading theory, mental exertion could jeopardize reproductive health. And if the science of the day asserted that women could become infertile if they did too much thinking, no man would want to send his daughter, sister, or wife to college or the office—and certainly not to the ballot box.

>“Women simply had inferior brains, which made them unsuited to the rigors of voting”

>If women couldn’t defend the nation through physical force, they shouldn’t be allowed to determine its policies with the ballot.

Has it led to a degeneration and degradation of human fibre that is turning back the hands of time

a thousand years?

Have women become infertile, mostly through being college and the office?

Do women have inferior brains?

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/07/womens-suffrage-nineteenth-amendment-pseudoscience/593710/

http://archive.is/WwTQj

7f2e0e  No.13490637

>>13490529

No one cares that a guy 100 years ago foresaw accurately what we are living in.


cb1c55  No.13490643

>>13490637

I care, faggot. Stop with your bullshit.

This ain't your house, nigger.


e395cc  No.13490661

>Women simply had inferior brains

I agree with everything else, but this bit? That kills the guy's opinion.

I don't disagree with it. I mean, I can acknowledge the statistical outliers, the "anomalies", because I've had the good fortune of working with women in math/physics related fields and found a good deal of them to be on par with their male counterparts.

That said, they ARE statistical outliers. I've also had the misfortune of working with female programmers, and while they do finish projects, they take far longer than men did, and they were not autonomous at all. Constantly asking things that would be obvious to anyone else, seeking reassurance that no, they're not gonna fail, and if they do, it's THAT guy's fault because he told them to do X.

The problem with the argument Mr. Sedgwick made is that if you tried to spread nowadays, noone will hear it. The kike propaganda has settled the idea that "men and women are equal on all things".

Not that the public at large buys it, but there's a generalized fear of going against that narrative and having your life ruined by half a dozen harpies screeching "Muhsoggyknees" at you.

Good food for thought anon, but then again, the only people who will applaud it, are people who already think that way. Or people who can agree anonymously.


19ae96  No.13491141

Giving women the right to vote was probably the biggest mistake ever made in the history of the western world.


fc0f11  No.13491178

C.S. Lewis once wrote that his two concerns for the future were Communism and the feminization of society.


6b50b9  No.13491199

>>13490661

>doesn't hang out with the average woman.

Anon women have the emotional maturity of children. They make wonderful mothers and caregivers, outside of this the average woman is lost and cannot function on the same level as single men.


6f989e  No.13491203

>>13490529

interesting thread OP, here have a bump!


9a9f15  No.13491216

>>13490643

To be fair a lot of people saw this coming it's just there wasn't a way to accurately record it on a massive scale, and what was recorded was destroyed or deliberately hid. The onslaught of media was a double edged sword. Television and even the internet are responsible for dragging us down quicker (accelerationism) but at the same time provided the only chance to stop a centuries long decline if they ceased to exist.

A lot of these people weren't prophets or even some genius, but rather individuals who looked at the macro and compared the micro to the macro of the day to the macro of the past and where that will likely be in the future since society moves painfully slow in macro terms. Those people just understood things ahead of the inevitable outcome. As much as we on the micro scale feel helpless to do anything, imagine trying to stop it before it truly started and going nowhere.

People like Yockey had an amazing general awareness that is comforting in retrospect. His view on how the West was fully feminized in the 1700's is pretty interesting as it is funny.


16bde0  No.13491228

>>13490529

>Has it led to a degeneration and degradation of human fibre that is turning back the hands of time a thousand years?

>Have women become infertile, mostly through being college and the office?

>Do women have inferior brains?

duh


7af04e  No.13491241

>>13491216

>feminized in the 1700s

What? Where'd he write this? I'd say 1800s is more realistic, but not 1700s.


000000  No.13491273

λοπαδο­τεμαχο­σελαχο­γαλεο­κρανιο­λειψανο­δριμυπο­τριμματο­σιλφιο­καραβομελιτο­κατα­κεχυμενο­κιχλεπικοσσυφοφαττο­περιστεραλεκτρυονοπτο­κεφαλλιο­κιγκλοπελειο­λαγῳοσιραιο­βαφητραγανο­πτερύγων (lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphioparaomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon)


8ceb57  No.13491295

File: 47836b27bdb6fee⋯.jpg (155.93 KB, 867x1000, 867:1000, women in power.jpg)

>>13490529

1914? How about 391BC


9a9f15  No.13491306

>>13491241

He says 18th century which if you're retarded like I am sometimes you think 1800's. I was surprised myself when I first read it but it's largely in his earlier chapters (first 250 or so) when he's talking about democracy and the feminization of men.

His basic point was the founders were cucks and feminized because of this gay "muh human rights" and "all men are equal" retardation in the constitution. He claims it was the true beginning of it all where men began to lose their masculinity to essentially maintain order and peace by whimpering such clearly false dogma.


000000  No.13491314

>>13491295

I always knew our ancestors were wise but this is beyond words, thousands of years ago they even predicted the feminine nature and regressive backwardness of leftism and communism.


e65fb8  No.13491323

>>13490661

My observation on the subject after many years of working/living with women is that they have differently wired brains or that a mans and a womans brain function mostly the same but there are areas of specialization that both possess. Females, i've noticed are very good organizers, with most things. They have a way of mentally compartmentalizing seemingly everything from chores to objects(closets/kitchens/offices etc) to their feelings. Women seem to work in a liner fashion. Men on the other hand seem more focused and suited for 'big' picture things. Mens brains don't work in a linear fashion. They are always seeking ways, any ways into or out of a problem and not just the every day problems but the life ones. Basically womens brains are zoomed in and mens brains are zoomed out.


8ceb57  No.13491325

>>13491314

Human nature hasn't changed in a couple thousand years. That's not even a drop in the bucket on the evolution timeline. Human nature/instincts are hardwired into the DNA.


bcc505  No.13491331

>>13490529

>>13491141

>>13491178

>>13491199

>>13491203

>>13491216

>>13491295

>>13491306

Take your islam somewhere else, WHITE women are conservative and voted Trump, they know damn well 3rd world pos like you are lining up to rape them and we need to keep their votes. WHITE women voted all through the 30s 40s and 50s golden era, and everything was fine.

Minorities vote overwhelming democrat and no one talks of taking away their voting rights. White women vote for YOU and you retards want to strip away their right to vote.


6f989e  No.13491353

File: 7453dc3acf42e66⋯.jpg (118.41 KB, 488x652, 122:163, 1509344333441.jpg)

File: 8d0e59cc4c42431⋯.png (173.3 KB, 500x792, 125:198, 1531354275960.png)

File: 3ac6d46037b2231⋯.jpg (177.94 KB, 740x810, 74:81, 1509343845198.jpg)

File: 85e51ab54d61374⋯.jpg (69.58 KB, 680x440, 17:11, golden-tate.jpg)

>>13491331

> WHITE women voted all through the 30s 40s and 50s golden era, and everything was fine.

citation needed

>>13491331

> they know damn well 3rd world pos like you are lining up to rape them

oh bless your heart


6cef07  No.13491354

File: d4da782b743d464⋯.jpeg (187.49 KB, 1000x664, 125:83, 9D748C5E-F1CD-4AD0-B091-E….jpeg)

>>13491331

Women should have no civic responsibilities at all and they should not be anywhere but tending to the needs of their family whether married or unmarried. Unrestrained by male dominance they are inherently self destructive to both themselves and their family/society/ingroup. Nobody is saying they be imprisoned in a burka or not enjoy a healthy social life with their community but the truth is the more unrestrained women are the more impulsive, destructive and forthwith their bastards spring out with the same spirit. Your loyalty is to your race, nation, community husband and children anything other than that is a betrayal


bcc505  No.13491359

>>13491141

>>13491178

>>13491199

>>13491203

>>13491216

>>13491295

>>13491306

Minorities & immigrants - *votes democrat*

/pol - *silence*

White Women - *Votes conservative*

/pol - *autistic screeching* REVOKE WOMEN'S RIGHT TO VOTE


5e5c08  No.13491362

>>13491331

>unironically uses the word "democrat" on /pol/

the fuck


8ceb57  No.13491363

>>13491331

No women should be able to vote. No exceptions.


6f989e  No.13491366

>>13491354

>Women should have no civic responsibilities at all and they should not be anywhere but tending to the needs of their family whether married or unmarried. Unrestrained by male dominance they are inherently self destructive to both themselves and their family/society/ingroup. Nobody is saying they be imprisoned in a burka or not enjoy a healthy social life with their community but the truth is the more unrestrained women are the more impulsive, destructive and forthwith their bastards spring out with the same spirit. Your loyalty is to your race, nation, community husband and children anything other than that is a betrayal

all of my relatives who are christian evangelicals are so goddamn cucked by their wives it isn't even funny, they even control the purse strings you have some hard core marxist brainwashing going on in the churches as they were infiltrated by communists long ago


5e5c08  No.13491368

>>13491366

a cucked christian

now i've seen everything


bcc505  No.13491373

>>13491353

WHITE women voted all through the 30s 40s and 50s golden era, and everything was fine.

> citation needed

Are you serious dumbass?

Women had the right to vote nationally in 1920.

White female black male is the least common couple, but a false (((media and advertising))) campaign makes you think they are the most common.

https://christophercantwell.com/2018/06/24/whos-behind-the-race-mixing-agenda-in-advertising/


6f989e  No.13491374

File: 607c71d9c7489ce⋯.png (376.77 KB, 600x450, 4:3, sinead-mccarthy-mudshark-b….png)

>>13491359

Hi Sinead! Take yer schizo meds ya crazy cunt before you flip out and drown your mongrel kid in the bath tub.


6f989e  No.13491377

>>13491373

>citation needed

>posts Christopher Cantwell

W

E

W

Now I know you've gone lost it Sinny :^)


bcc505  No.13491379

>>13491363

Right right, let blacks and immigrants from the 3rd world line up and vote. But not conservative white women. That makes just a fuck ton of sense.


bcc505  No.13491391

>>13491382

>>13491387

Don't know who sinade is, but you're suicidal or an islamist.


8ceb57  No.13491394

>>13491379

Sure they can vote, in their own countries. In my world non-whites would be purged.


bcc505  No.13491461

>>13491394

Problem with patriarchy is, a patriarchy will always organize itself to molest children.

Eg. islam is a patriarchy, the catholic church is a patriarchy, flds is a patriarchy.

They all rape kids. The first order of business in any patriarchy is to immediately grant itself the right to rape children.

Already, there are rumblings in the redpill community how they are going to legalize rape on private property and do away with age of consent laws.

Because when you get down to the bottom of it, that's what they really want, to rape kids.

You never have to look far on /pol to find pedophilic posts and images.


8ceb57  No.13491475

>>13491461

Patriarchy built this world, it is the foundation of the civilization that allows leftist faggots such as yourself (more likely a wahmen, a fat one at that) to even survive long enough to fuck everything up. Leftists are the ones pushing the pedophilia shit, because that's what their jew overlords want them to do. They've already destroyed the family, and with it they've already seeded the end of this civilization.


c9baf2  No.13491480

>>13491475

Leftists pushed child abuse in all its forms. If they promoted pedophilia, things would be far less grave.


bcc505  No.13491490

>>13491475

We got along just fine in the Golden trad era of the 20s 30s and 40s with white women voting, it wasn't until jewish immigration after WWII that problems set in.

The first order of business in any patriarchy is to immediately grant itself the right to rape children, and since the redpill community how they are going to legalize rape on private property and do away with age of consent laws, it is unlikely the children would be safe without the White mothers of those children voting to protect them.


bcc505  No.13491545

>>13491480

We got along just fine in the Golden trad era of the 20s 30s and 40s with white women voting, it wasn't until jewish immigration after WWII that problems set in.

Since the redpill community is already licking their chops about how they are going to legalize rape on private property and do away with age of consent laws, it is unlikely the children would be safe without the White mothers of those children voting to protect them.


bcc505  No.13491587

>>13491480

>>13491490

Well, if we are to form a new society in which women cannot vote, but they and their children can be legally raped with impunity, I don't see how we will get them to live among us unless it is by gunpoint,

And if we are pointing guns at women whilst raping them and their children, how, pray tell, are we an improvement on islam?


ec0846  No.13492029

>>13491273

>hill fragments of the gall-granular cavity of the gravel-crushed gravel of the gravel crushed gravel of the gravel cavity of the superstructure of the gravel of the gravel

?

youse shitposting


19ae96  No.13492287

>>13491354

Well said!

The concept of women being involved in politics is utterly ridiculous and destructive.


000000  No.13492315

Women know less about politics than men worldwide

Regardless of gender equality, women are less likely to know about current affairs than men. The survey findings were consistent from Colombia to the UK

>Women know less about politics regardless of gender equality, according to a survey by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

>The report focused on ten nations, both developed and developing, where men and women were asked questions about domestic and international news. Despite the diversity of the ten sample countries – Australia, Canada, Colombia, Greece, Italy, Japan, Korea, Norway, the UK, and the US – women answered fewer questions correctly than men in every country.

>10,000 participants took part in the study, which tested their knowledge of broadcast, print and web journalism. They were asked a combination of questions based on hard and soft news reports including recent international events. The hard news questions pertained to topics such as national unemployment, while soft news related to sports personalities and celebrity scandals. The level of gender equality in the nations surveyed was based on the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap index ratings.

>Professor James Curran, Director of the Goldsmiths Leverhulme Media Research Centre at the University of London, was surprised to find that gaps in political knowledge are wider in countries that have done the most to promote gender equality. These gender gaps in Norway, the UK and the US are as large, or larger than gaps in South Korea and Japan.

>Women's scores in the UK, the US, and Canada were more than 30% lower on average than men, whereas in Greece, Italy and Korea, women's average score was only 20% lower. The UK is positioned at 18/135 in the WEF gender equality rankings, while Korea is placed at 108.

>Academic studies have previously found that women have higher levels of risk aversion and so are afraid of being wrong. When faced with multiple-choice questions, women are more likely to give a 'don't know' response than men. Others argue that the questions used to gauge political knowledge tend not to be gender-neutral and that women's political knowledge is more concerned with a personal experience of local politics and government programmes relating to daily life.

>ESRC researchers found that the frequency with which people watch the news on television plays a role in gender gaps. Apart from Colombia and the US, the more people watch TV news, the better informed they tend to be. However, watching, reading and listening to the news tend to be more male activities, particularly in Canada, Norway, UK and US.

>Age is also a factor in women's interest in political affairs. The study found that women acquire political knowledge much later in their lives than men, regardless of a country's gender equality status. This could be because women have less time to keep up with current affairs in their 30s and 40s as they spend most of their leisure time looking after family and doing housework. Meanwhile, men in advanced democracies steadily acquire political knowledge as they grow older.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jul/11/women-know-less-politics-than-men-worldwide

https://archive.is/MqN9c

Even lefty rags admit it. They can't be trusted with stately affairs.


ca94d7  No.13492485

>>13491216

>To be fair

^ Faggot.


42e5f6  No.13492503

>whoreposting atlantic spam

Pottery.


8ceb57  No.13492650

>>13491490

>The first order of business in any patriarchy is to immediately grant itself the right to rape children

You're definitely a wahman, devoid of logic and an overabundance of emotion and logical fallacies. The biggest irony of all is that all women are CHILDREN mentally, age isn't even a factor. The only difference is how much shit they think they can get away with.

To paraphrase the feminist bullshit, A REAL WOMAN knows she's doing civilization damage by being allowed to vote.


7e9bca  No.13492656

File: f712f90c4090652⋯.jpg (109.94 KB, 640x640, 1:1, 7f00f98c8425a888406287cd17….jpg)

>implying the vast majority of males should vote in the first place


000000  No.13494610

We can only blame ourselves now. We listened to boomers instead of the ancients.


59c094  No.13494618

>>Hence it will probably never come, for mankind will not lightly abandon at the call of a few fanatics the hard-earned achievements of the ages.

Remember when we were so young?


9346db  No.13494625

>>13490661

>Constantly asking things

Wow, anon, so women and men function differently in social environments and women are more social. No one but 'purple anon' could have predicted this one. :P


9346db  No.13494629

>>13491323

Good observation.


9346db  No.13494633

>>13491353

Still thinking 'voting' matters and that the kikes haven't done whatever they wanted to our nation since they overthrew it in 1913.


9346db  No.13494637

>>13491359

Glad I am not the only one to notice the 'muslim/semitic' contingent on /pol/. It will be a good day for the planet when all the semites are completely destroyed.


9346db  No.13494644

>>13491461

HOLY SHIT THIS IS 100% TRUE

I have even despaired that men should live at all thinking it would be better to have a complete do over because they are SUCH FUCKING DISGUSTING PEDOS ALL THE TIME…It is literally like they can't stop being parasites. At this point in my time on /pol/ I am 50% hoping that Kim's sister (the real head of NK) unleashes the male murder virus so that we can start over without pedos, I would feel bad but it is FUCKING ALL MEN…LIKE ALL OF THEM WANT TO FUCK CHILDREN.


b1d56a  No.13494646

Spengler predicted as much at the same time.


cb1c55  No.13494650

File: 748f7da2572c010⋯.jpg (11.69 KB, 207x255, 69:85, 4bdd0d568eb2de80e0b33708a0….jpg)

>>13491461

>>13494644

Could you glow harder?

Of course you can, spicspam. You glow like the sun all over this fucking board.

Chatbot, with a beancunt riding shotgun to steer it straight when it veers off topic, or gets outed.

Non, fucking stop


9346db  No.13494652

>>13494650

angry semitic pedo…LMAO


e8c810  No.13494660

File: 14cba4bc176cd75⋯.jpg (64.83 KB, 453x604, 3:4, 8nK6r9CovhY.jpg)

>>13490529

>women got infertile due to change in gender roles

nope cuck, women in Israel got 3.1 fertility rate and serve draft 2.5 years (Russian men serve 2), feminism is also very radical in Israel

also CRETINS who pull nonfacts out of their ass should not EVEN DARE talk about Orthodox or Ultraorthodox Jews because there gender roles are reversed basically. Man prays and reads scripture while women do all the work. Even their women go to draft while men do religious studies. Still ultraorthodox women give birth to, on average 7 kids, while atheist Israeli do 2.2

muh gender roles is the most idiotic falsity there is, always coming from celtic phenotype (R1b) that I feel disgust towards


cb1c55  No.13494672

File: e8b1c864ba68b56⋯.jpeg (60.51 KB, 480x768, 5:8, boo.jpeg)

>>13494652

We all see your glow, spicspam. You're beyond fucking pathetic. You must get paid per post.


8fc023  No.13494691

File: 9509feb4f27b4cf⋯.jpg (760.54 KB, 1334x1113, 1334:1113, 1500846827810.jpg)

>>13490661

Did it?

Seems fairly accurate to me, the parts which matter the most are like comparing a AMD FX processor to a Core i9.


000000  No.13494736

Countless religions and mythologies say every evil is born and descended from women. I swear these myths are descended from prehistoric myths of historical reality when a bands of cavemen and tribes first gave women power and witnessed total collapse after they are given reign over men. Man has known for hundreds of thousands of years.


b1d56a  No.13495143

File: b79a98511ba00cc⋯.jpg (222.57 KB, 567x349, 567:349, boehner-swirl.jpg)


d5a6a6  No.13495152

File: 03b4ab4cbc36d1e⋯.jpg (32.33 KB, 420x585, 28:39, Patrizio_Torlonia.jpg)

>The Lex Oppia was a law established in ancient Rome in 215 BC, at the height of the Second Punic War during the days of national catastrophe after the Battle of Cannae, and repealed in 195 BC.

>…the Lex Oppia was the first of a series of sumptuary laws, and it restricted not only a woman's wealth, but also her display of wealth. Specifically, it forbade any woman to possess more than half an ounce of gold, to wear a multi-colored garment (particularly those trimmed in purple), or to ride in an animal-drawn vehicle in the city or any town or within a mile thereof, except in the case of public religious festivals.

>The basis for concern about luxury and extravagance was mixed. It was a universal assumption that indulgence in luxury could undermine traditional military virtues. Also, a devotion to luxury was considered to be a stimulus to greed, and thus a major contributor to the increase in corruption. Finally, there was a widespread tendency to correlate lavish and self-indulgent expenditures with uneconomical use of personal or family fortunes.

>Following the Second Punic War, with Rome victorious over Carthage, wealth from the conquered areas began to flow into the hands of the Roman ruling class, transforming their lives from one of traditional agrarian simplicity to ostentatious display and unbounded extravagance.

>During this period, there was an inevitable change of mores, which in practice meant largely the conduct of individuals in the upper strata of Roman society; and with the financial woes eliminated, there was no longer a reason for women to restrict their expenditures. With Rome rich in Carthaginian wealth, attempts to check self-indulgent expenditure with sumptuary legislation proved vain.

>The supporters of the Lex Oppia were led by two tribunes of the plebs, Marcus Junius Brutus and Publius Junius Brutus, and consul Marcus Porcius Cato, also known as Cato the Elder, who had been elected in 195 BC. Cato argued that the law removed the shame of poverty because it made all women dress in an equal fashion. Cato insisted that if women could engage in a clothes-contest, they would either feel shame in the presence of other women, or on the contrary, they would delight in a rather base victory as a result of extending themselves beyond their means. He also declared that a woman's desire to spend money was a disease that could not be cured, but only restrained; the removal of Lex Oppia, Cato said, would render society helpless in limiting the expenditures of women. Cato pronounced that Roman women already corrupted by luxury were like wild animals who have once tasted blood in the sense that they can no longer be trusted to restrain themselves from rushing into an orgy of extravagance.

>As nobles spoke for or against the repeal of the Lex Oppia, the matrons of Rome crowded the Capitol. They could not be kept indoors by either the authority of the magistrates or the orders of their husbands or their own sense of propriety. They blocked all the streets of the city and the approaches to the Forum, and implored the men as they descended to the Forum to allow the women to resume their former adornments. After the speeches against and in favor of the Lex Oppia, the women poured into the streets the next day in greater numbers and besieged the doors of the two Brutuses. The dissenting tribunes eventually gave in to the persistent demanding of the Roman matrons, and the Lex Oppia was repealed in 195 BC.

TL;DR: it's all so tiresome


9346db  No.13495329

File: f063f121333840e⋯.jpg (72.23 KB, 404x454, 202:227, mother punished for protec….jpg)

>>13494736

That is because men just can't bear to look in the mirror and see themselves. They have never been capable of examining themselves. Couple this with the vocal faggot globohomo contingent that really is the most vile and degenerate people on the face of the Earth and you can see that it is easy to blame women for all your behavior. Even easier when the semitic religions, which will not allow women to have a voice or any defense for protecting family and children are dominant as well.


9346db  No.13495333

The whole point of the semtitc religions and the patriarchy is that they have access to raping children and doing 'whatever they like'.


729f2b  No.13495531

>>13491366

Same. White christian men are the biggest cucks and beta males


b74f5f  No.13495538

>>13491359

>pol loves shitskins and doesnt respek wamen

You stupid bitch show tits or GTFO


000000  No.13495547

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>be daughter of Roman Emperor

>lust after foreign mongoloid barbarians

>write love letters to said barbarians

>invite them to invade Rome

>gets erased from history from this point onward

Who am I?


a74f10  No.13495559

>>13491331

white women did mostly vote for trump, yes

but if white women, black women, hispanic women, native women, and other women all didn't vote for trump, then he would've won the election by a wider margin


a74f10  No.13495563

>>13495559

>all didn't vote for trump

didn't vote at all, I meant


cb1c55  No.13495568

File: 4486c5be3d09ba8⋯.jpeg (57.82 KB, 612x426, 102:71, grrr.jpeg)

>>13495558

>>13495554

>>13495555


000000  No.13495598

>>13495559

Correction, OLDER women voted for Trump. The young women who you are most likely arguing against and apart of your generation are the ones poisoning it and the world.


0cbdd1  No.13495638

>>13491354

Jews understood that intimately, because their women are the absolute most abhorrent example of the feminine going out of control. That's why the first thing they did on their crusade was introduce women's lib.


12af67  No.13495648

>>13490637

First post worst post.


9346db  No.13495656

>>13491354

>Nobody is saying they be imprisoned in a burka or not enjoy a healthy social life with their community

Yeah you are pretty much saying exactly this. Germanic people living in a free society are not concerned with monitoring their womens every move. This is sandnigger thinking.


0cbdd1  No.13495660

>>13495656

You're a jew.


9346db  No.13495690

>>13495660

Nope. But I know the difference between a free people and a captive people. I am not buying your authoritarian bullshit. You don't need to control every fucking thing people do, you globohomo faggot.


0cbdd1  No.13495692

>>13495690

No one said that, you double-spacing boomer retard. Stop pressing Enter twice after each sentence, and stop assuming everyone who understands the Woman Question wants them in burkas. You're thinking like a jew.


0cbdd1  No.13495696

>>13495692

Space, rather. Thinking of reddit spacing.


9346db  No.13495701

>>13495692

WRONG ANSWER. Free people don't need anyone to tell them how to dress or what to think. FUCK OFF KIKE.


000000  No.13495912

>>13490529

Women ARE inferior beings. They are nothing more than tools for reproduction. Women are not people.

The good news is that, aside from enslaving women again, men are now developing artificial tools for reproduction, so women aren't necessary anymore.

A world without degeneracy is a world where all women are genocided, and replaced by artificial wombs that will produce only men, while said men can create artificial sexbots for their sexual needs. In short, the very soon near future. A reality that no woman, jew or leftist will be able to prevent.


412845  No.13495968

File: 780f93b3d9e253e⋯.png (773.93 KB, 800x842, 400:421, POINTING - GOD.png)

>>13491353

>> WHITE women voted all through the 30s 40s and 50s golden era, and everything was fine.

Too bad about the 20's, and from the 60's onward>>13492029

>youse shitposting

probable a bot got past the captcha>>13492656

>>implying the vast majority of males should vote in the first place


9346db  No.13496103

>>13495912

GLOBOHOMO TORKIKE


ca006f  No.13496168

>>13491545

>We got along just fine in the golden era of the 20s, 30s, and 40s

>what were flappers?

>what was the great depression?

You're historically illiterate.


2dffb3  No.13496400

>>13491331

>white women vote republican

ironically, if only men voted reps would win in landslides so you literally defeated ur own argument if muh zog approved winner actually means something to you


9346db  No.13496424

>>13496400

Not with a parasitic voting block that is more than 50% of the nation. LMAO You don't think you 'voted' for these demographic changes? Do you?

Don't be faggot and remember to VOTE WITH A BULLET.


2dffb3  No.13496580

>>13496424

Lurk more nigger: In summary, this how many electoral votes Clinton and Trump might get if the following groups were the only ones allowed to vote:

People of Colour*: Clinton 538, Trump: 0

Women: Clinton 461, Trump: 71

College Educated Whites: Clinton 216, Trump: 322

White Women: Clinton 211, Trump: 327

White People: Clinton 169, Trump: 369

Men: Clinton 158, Trump: 350

Non-College educated Whites: Clinton 64, Trump: 474

White Men: Clinton 45, Trump: 493

https://brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/

Reps would win and by a fucking landslide.


2dffb3  No.13496643

>>13491359

>if you support one thing it means you dont support the other

women should not have the right to vote and in white nations nonwhites should also not have the right to vote.

>>13492656

Literally only married white men with children should get the right to vote in a white country.

>>13495968

>and from the 60's onwards

LMAO you're being too kind: "We propose that giving women the right to vote changed the size of government. We examine several indicators of the size and scope of government, from state government expenditures and revenues to voting index scores for federal House and Senate members from 1870 to 1940.

Twenty-nine states gave women the right to vote before the Nine-teenth Amendment to the Constitution was approved in 1920, withseven of the remaining 19 approving the amendment and 12 having women’s suffrage imposed on them. Women obtained the right to vote in four states even prior to the turn of the century, in eight states between 1910 and 1914, and in 17 states in 1917–19. By 1940,the end of our sample, women had been voting in 12 states for at least 26 years and in four states for at least 44 years.

We utilize data for all 48 contiguous states from 1870 to 1940 (…) [Figure 2] shows that state governments grew dramatically when women were given the right to vote. State government expenditures declined for four of the five years before women began voting, and expenditures reach their lowest point immediately before women were given the right to vote. Within four years after women’s suffrage, expenditures had risen above their previous peak, and within 11 years, real per capita expenditures had more than doubled from $101 to $208. Total spending and taxes are rising, but the components that we so far have been able to measure do not change much. The point estimates imply that social service expenditures are increasing at least at one-third the rate of the increase in total expenditures in response to the growing influence of female voters.

The two consistent results were thefollowing: allowing female suffrage resulted in a more liberal tilt incongressional voting for both houses, and the extent of that shift was mirrored by the increase in turnout due to female suffrage.The effects are quite large. For voting by House members, a one-standard-deviation change in female suffrage fraction of the population over 21 that is female is able to explain 14.5 percent ofa one-standard-deviation change in how a state’s House of Represen-tatives delegation votes, and a one-standard-deviation change in theadditional turnout due to female suffrage explains about 19 per-cent.16For the Senate these figures are 21 and 30 percent, respectively"

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf


000000  No.13502036

>>13490529

Do women?


0a108d  No.13503123

>>13495912

>tfw anon is a 14 year old


6c5302  No.13507776

I just want to kill jews.


6c5302  No.13507778

I just want to kill jews. I'll say it again. I just want to kill jews.


f0337c  No.13508303

>>13495638

After securing the creation of money and sending goyim men to massacre each other in a macabre game of monoply/risk. Then they came with the womens lib.


f47ad6  No.13508322

>>13496643

IOW when women get placed in a position of managing funds, regardless of whether it's their own private funds or public funds, they're wastrels and irresponsible idiots.


f47ad6  No.13508326

>>13495912

Women are hard wired to teach babies to speak and often read (at least the higher functioning white ones). When you see women gazing at their babies and making idiotic nonsense sounds they're teaching speech to babies. No way you're going to get guys doing that. We're fuckers and don't give a shit about little babies. They repel us and fill us with fear. Rearing babies is women's work. Accept no substitutes.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / baphomet / casey / choroy / dempart / freeb / tob / vichan ]