/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Wew, did you archive this at least for some actual proof? I don't doubt you, but proof is still required.

inb4404

>>4388406

Mate what don't you remember exactly this time last year how there used to be weekly pedo threads? This is the first one I've seen in months. Like maybe 5 months.

>>4388447

> this makes it totally ok.

>>4388406

This made my dick hard

>>4388447

There are blatant pedo spambots on pretty much every board. Have you not seen it?

>>4388406

Stop being so overdramatic. Just filter the thread.

>>4388406

We will be good as long as anons like OP are around kicking ass and fighting the good fight.

>>4388465

fucking degenerate you sicken me

>>4388465

They're cucks who would rather settle for degenerate western women after they hit the wall.

>>4388465

>>4388505

>weeaboo

>low quality bait

>>4388465

>being a faggot who has sex with dolls

>>4388455

>>4388471

I'm just saying the hysteria is dramatic and it'll get sorted soon

>>4388505

> weeaboo

>> /trash/

>>4388515

>>4388531

What did dolls ever do to you?

>>4388447

They didn't come with blatant 3d CP right in the OP. This is clearly different. There's no reason that thread should still be up.

Fuck off to masterchan

>>4388563

>masterchan

>one loli board

meanwhile 8chan has like 10, who are the real pedos here?

>>4388651

feels good man.

>>4388651

That's all and good but why do dolls trigger you so? I really want to know

>>4388658

why do arguments scare you so much weeaboo?

btw how much do you get paid per hour? is it per post or per hour?

>>4388701

please listen to pic related anon, you are literally the scum of the earth and you belong there.

>>4388431

This will not stand.

https://web.archive.org/web/20151227210913/http://8ch.net/pol/res/4387353.html

>>4388406

/polpol/ is still up, if thing run out of control, we can just jump board.

>>4388658

You sir, are a degenerate.

>>4388674

>>4388712

That's the thing no one has even tried to argue with me, they just keep posting weeb

>>4388747

so they just point out what they see? sounds less retarded than writing the dumbest argument in the world over and over again tbh fam.

>>4388747

There's no argument to be made, you're a nasty degenerate, and that's all there is to it. Don't seek validation for your perversion from us.

>>4388782

>>4388760 was right.. there's no arguing with these retards…

>>4388406

Some of you niggas seriously got no chill

>>4388789

>you're a nasty degenerate

Is being nasty degenerate against the board or global rules?

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

remove pedo

How did they edit the image and remove the Black blocks?

>>4388822

they didn't it was added later on because otherwise we'd be just as bad as them.

>>4388834

No I mean check the original picture of that thread, the black blocks are removed

>>4388782

>completely misrepresenting the argument

You just proved the point

>>4388841

They were never there to begin with because it is a photo of a doll and so has no reason to be censored.

>>4388465

So you have a fetish of realistic naked children life size dolls? Fuck off

>>4388841

yeah it was like that to begin with, but when me and the other OP made these two threads, we editted in the black bars

>>4388868

>>4388860

OH wow okay that was messing with my head

OP is a fagot, using tiny ass screen shots of a picture of a doll to make it look more like CP.

With out regard to a stance on any of the surrounding issues, trying to win by misleading like that is against everything I stand for and is littaraly SJW type of shit.

Its like that Canadian reporter who took screenshots of threads with girls in baiting suits and put black bars across the baiting suits to make it seem like they where nude children.

OP you have no moral ground to stand on, please die.

>>4388885

here he is goys!

do you get paid per hour or per post? one of my friends was thinking of joining tbh.

>>4388406

FILTER BY ID ANYONE WHO DEFENDS PEDOPHILIA

DO NOT ENGAGE WITH THE DEGENERATES

>>4388910

ignoring it doesn't make it go away. Pol can easily be shut down on the premise that it hosts CP content faggot, we need to fucking burn these people before they burn us

How do pedos always become mods. Every fucking time. Pedos and SJW's. They go hand in hand, its why SJW's so easily spam their enemies with CP.

>>4388732

An exception should be made an ALL these faggots should be executed by Moonman and their board permanently removed.

>>4388901

This. It was a total SET UP. The realistic looking doll, the mod standing by to flush the reports. Obvious or obvious obvous?

this is some 4chon tier autism on the part of the mods

>>4388939

Why do you keep changing your ID?

>>4388920

CP has a rather clear definition.

I have seen no evidence of CP being posted and not being removed in a timely manner.

Provide evidence of the staff protecting ACTUAL CP or you are a fagot literally asking for things to be censored because you don't like it.

This.

Where should we migrate next? The fucking mods are allowing CP here.

>>4388852

IMPORTANT

zerosugar is a global mod

those global reports were demoted because the pic doesn't violate US law and that's the only thing the global mods are in charge of. They aren't in charge of quality control on /pol/ you fucking retards

holy fuck I guess it's really true that only morons are left this place.

>>4388978

There has always been a line drawn on /pol/ and that line was pedophilia. I don't care if its a drawing, a clay sculpture or a fuck doll.

That isn't even the point. Its a thread about defending pedophilia, not just the fucking picture, you fucking cunt.

That shit does not belong here. We as a collective hate pedophiles. We brook no quarter or debate on the issue of pedophilia, it is a non-issue, it was resolved long ago, with a rope and or a guillotine.

Get your subhuman practices outta here, you've got to go back.

>>4389045

I hear they have really overbearing moderation on this site called 4chan.org. You should check it out sometime!

>>4389054

>pedo gets angry people have morals

kill yourself

>>4389063

>We as a collective

>/pol/ is one person and I speak for the hive

WEW

>>4389063

I recall being in a pedo pol thread that was mainly ribaldry and banter.

So speak for yourself.

> look guise, pic related is a doll

> nobody thinks it is

> what one person thinks outweights what the rest of the people think

welcome to /pol/..

>It's obviously a doll

And it got reported as CP by over 18 users. Thank god for those sharp eyed mods right, guys?

>>4389063

>No true Scotsman.

I have been on /pol/ for years, you don't speak for me and you cant speak for all of us.

It is politically incorrect to post logical arguments in favor of having a young wife and forming a strong pair bond.

There is nothing sacred, noting off topic, especially when the topic is controversial or goes against the grain.

When pedo shit or pony shit comes up you chimp out like brainless Muslims upset that someone could have drawn a cartoon of Muhammad. If you have no argument other than muh feels present it, otherwise you are just shitposting.

This is a free speech site, no laws have been violated, you are simply incapable of reacting in a rational manor because you are an animal no better than a Muslim or nigger chimping over one of there triggers.

>>4388406

People who can't tell the difference between a doll and a real child should be locked away in an asylum with the rest of the retards.

Damn, that doll must've really triggered you, this is like the third thread you make about how it will single-handedly destroy 8chan and western civilization

>>4389159

>muh lolbergtardianism

>>4389160

I don't even get this argument.

Let's assume that you aren't a fucking retarded asswipial bacteria and somehow that is a doll.

how is that better?

literally. how is that better? does that make your cock hard you disgusting little shithead? if i made a giant doll of christ riding a dick, would that offend you asswipe?

where is your argument??

>>4389181

>how is that better?

It isn't illegal, moron. It's very fucking simple.

>>4389063

Who died and made you king of /pol/, you cocksucker?

>>4389225

kill yourself.

The huge majority of /pol/ hates pedophilia and wants you pedos dead.

Kill yourself, he has every right to speak for /pol/ on this issue.

>>4389138

It's almost like some people report against things they don't like. Either way, they're reporting to the wrong mods as it's not CP. If i's against global rules, then you report as global, if it's against board rules, then you report for the board. The mod in this case is only doing his job.

>>4389178

Your logical augment is astounding.

>>4389224

You sure showed me! Do you even understand the justice system you mongoloid? It's all based on ==assumption==

But let's play your game.

A giant doll of adolf hitler is not illegal, and yet a court would rape your fucking anus until you'd cry.

please, reply to this, I am very eager to see what retarded arguments you have, I bet you will continue to spout that a doll is legal, watch this.

>>4389261

>Do you even understand the justice system you mongoloid? It's all based on ==assumption==

Do you even understand

red text

>>4389271

Oh look, he's using ad hominem now that he's ran out of actual arguments! Boy this is fun.

>>4389159

>Replying to me defending pedophilia

>This is a free speech site

/pol/ was never a free speech board, only pedos and other degenerates have claimed this.

This is why shitposting threads are deleted, this is why pedo threads are deleted.

>Muh free speech

Free speech is about protecting the right to freely express yourself without being reprimanded unjustifiably by the LAW of the land.

It's not about taking an ideological dump in the commons of a particular culture of people. AKA forums, businesses, schools, etc, private institutions.

Expect to be thrown out of a place when you piss on their floor.

I'm going to assume /pol/ mods are simply not online.

I understand why global moderators are not deleting the thread, they aren't /pol/ mods

>>4389237

>he has every right to speak for /pol/ on this issue

No he doesn't, this isn't whatever shitty forum you crawled out off, as an anonymous user you can only speak for yourself.

>>4389279

>he's using ad hominem

How is asking a question a ad hom? You're right this is fun, but literally do you understand redtext it looks like you were having a bit of trouble newfriend?

>>4388651

>Will never have a gf or kids.

thank you Jesus.

>>4389310

this is /pol/ you fucking retard. gas yourself already.

>>4389261

>assumption

And those assumptions don't trump facts. It's like that one guy that was arrested for having CP because he had videos of Little Lupe when she was 19. She showed up to court to defend that guy and he was released.

But as I said before, this isn't a global issue but a board issue, and the board mods probably aren't online.

>>4389181

A picture of a doll is not illegal. There was no text in the OP that contained illegal content such as a link to CP or threats. Neither the picture or the continence of the OP violated the rule so why is this OP chimping out about the global mods doing there jobs properly? The thread should not be deleted by global mods over something that does not violate the global rule.

This thread however should be deleted and posted on a meta board. If the OP keeps posting it he should be banned for spam.

>>4388406

I am against pedo

but this seems like an SJW tier response to bait

>>4389312

> newfriend

But your attempts to drive the conversation in another direction because you ran out of arguments isn't successful pal.

Shove that doll up your ass if it's so legal and doesn't offend you.

>>4389261

Dude, the people who you are responding to are not worth your time.

They played their sick joke, posted a picture of a (very) realistic looking child sex doll, got in their twisted pro-pedo info in the replies. The mod knew about it beforehand.

Now in these threads we here from the same chumps talking about freedom of speech. As if freedom of speech has anything whatsoever to do with it.

Next you will be gaslighted:

>It's obviously a doll

>What is it about a doll that triggers you so much

>Are you just against freedom of speech? Go back to wherever

And all the while, the shitty CP post stays at the top of the catalog. Operation is a success.

>>4389329

Source?

>>4389339

>drive the conversation in another direction because you ran out of arguments

Hey anon I was just trying to help a newfriend out. Please remember in your future postings redtext must go on a separate line then normal text or it won't work, enjoy your stay.

>>4389319

What does that have to do with anything, you want this place to be a huge echo chamber with everyone patting everyone else's backs over their brilliant plans to exterminate niggers and jews and nothing else?

>>4389280

>This is why shitposting threads are deleted, this is why pedo threads are deleted.

It is not against board rules at all. Pedos where given the rights by the board owner to have one rolling thread at a time. There was a time when that thread was up constantly for months on end. It never should have stopped. Keeps the worst kinds of new fags such as yourself out.

>>4389350

[Boku]I came with the force of one thousand suns

>>4389388

>A photo of a doll isn't.

b-b-but my muh morals!!!

I'm done /pol/. It was nice visiting you agaiin for Christmas, but this is too fucking stupid. The thread should have been gone the moment it was reported. There is no doubt that 8ch has been pozzed. Whatever, in a little time these people will hang. L8r m80s.

>>4389399

bye

>>4389388

> muh doll

This is a co-ordinated shill OP.

Post fake CP (to avoid legal liability), then immediately start screaming that the mods are infiltrated, they are trying to destroy 8chan by allowing pedophilia, that we need to replace them with mods pre-approved by the screaming shills. That it's all over and everyone needs to leave and stop discussing actual issues.

>>4389399

See you tomorrow

>>4388897

>Is a doll child pornography under United States law? its a yes or no question.

The answer is: Yes, if it looks realistic enough to be confused with real child porn. And the image is.

>>4389399

Your absence will not be missed. Have fun in your safe spaces.

Not a tear was shed.

Biased I admit.

>>4389413

Then, by your logic, the mods should remove the thread.

It was not immediately shouted that mods were compromised. We waited until AFTER they dismissed 18 reports of the thread to come to that conclusion. The thread is trash and no reason for it to exist, and yet mods leave it there even knowing that it makes us distrust them.

So, who's running the shill op?

>>4389432

MUH DOLLS

>>4389425

>wants proof for an post without proof itself

0/10

>>4389438

>without proof itself

Its called the bill of rights commie

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

>>4389435

even regardless of anything else, The OP was a troll, and should have been removed.

Your move fagot.

>>4389446

MUH DOLLS

>>4389449

And if it were deleted you'd point out how it was fake and how the mods are abusing their power.

You people are too predictable.

>>4389452

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

mods dismissed 18 global reports for cp

>>4389449

op is a troll CP is totally fine pls remove and kill

>>4389417

This is not actually true. First the original threads picture would not have been confused as an actual child by anyone who closely inspected it. This OP could have been argued to having created CP by cropping it so small that it makes it hard to tell. But even that is not the case. The supreme court ruled that a cropped image is not cp if the original source was not CP. That means if you go to a nudist colony and take photos of nude kids (not cp) and crop out everything but there genitals the cropped images are still not CP. This was an actual case before the supreme court and the defended won setting case law.

>>4389329

>father/daughter incest

Literally the only type of incest that is shit in all ways imaginable including 2D.

Fucking kill yourself. And don't bother posting on any 2D board we don't want you there either.

>>4389446

>>4389435

>>4389449

>>4389458

>being this triggered about a doll

>>4389446

mods dismissed 18 global FALSE reports for cp

Thank god the mods are not as retarded as you.

>>4389486

>>4389482

> MUH DOLLS!

>>4389486

==how did they know it was a doll?=

==how did they know it was a doll?=

==how did they know it was a doll?=

It doesn't matter if it is a doll.

It can still become a twitter screencap "look at the right wing pedos" by the usual fags. It's obviously not an OP used to elicit actual debate, there is another pedo discussion thread that didn't get that saged, guess why? Because there's not a pedo doll in the OP nor blatantly trollish greentext. >>4385710

So fuck the pedos and get the fuck out, /pol/ is not /b/.

>>4389493

how did they know it was a doll?

how did they know it was a doll?

how did they know it was a doll?

FTFY

>>4389493

They looked at it and were not mentally deficient.

You going to tell me you think this is a real child?

http://8ch.net/pol/res/4387353.html

>>4389493

because it looks like one

>>4389505

Why don't you know how to link properly?

https://archive.is/Q1iRz#selection-561.0-583.36

therealmoonman also dismissed a report for the thread hours before zerosugar did.

>>4389413

You're probably right. A /pol/ mod wasn't the one dismissing reports. This got pretty obvious, pretty fast.

I was in the other thread, I tried to global report but kept getting 404's. I ended up just Saging the hell out of it and somehow it lasted to almost 700 replies. Shady shit to say the least.

>>4389467

This

Also this has exactly ZERO to do with if it's CP or not and everything to do with the fact it's blatant shitposting.

For fucks sake if you don't some measure of standards you might as well become halfchan.

>>4389506

Father/daughter is absolutely disgusting and someone should bring you behind a shed and shoot you

Older sister/Brother = twins (male/female) > older sister/sister > twins (sister/sister) > mother/son > brother/younger sister > brother/brother (both traps) > brother/brother (one a trap) > shit > brother/brother (no traps) > father/anything

Fucking kill yourself.

>>4389519

>>4389413

>>4389435

This is not going to work, you stupid shill.

>>4389517

Nevermind, my bad, that highlight is one digit off. 4 != 7

>>4389525

FYI sage has been mostly broken across 8chan for months.

WE ARE BEING RAIDED

How convenient is it that this comes up right after the most recent thread dissenting against /v/?

It wouldn't let me report that shit!!

>>4389505

>>4389507

>>4389535

MUH DOLLS

>>4389563

At least I'm not a filthy shitposter that has no understanding of board etiquette.

Wanna take this to /a/ so I can properly school you son?

>>4389552

Thanks for the heads up. If sage is broken and the mods are fucking off what can we do?

>>4389564

Quality discourse and excellent argument you provide there.

卐卐卐卐卐卐卐卐

Plebbit pedophile raid detected

1488

卐卐卐卐卐卐卐

Plebbit pedophile raid detected

>>4389554

Its obvious that it's the same people to tried to get us to raid /v/ over SJW bait threads.

I would bet you

TEN BUX

on that being the case.

>>4389580

muh ad hominem

muh dolls

>> /v/

>>4389576

>what can we do?

Wait for InfinityNext????????????

>>4389585

Who*

>>4389600

That's 46 reports in total.

>>4389608

yeah, mods surely aren't total asswipes.

surely.

>>4389600

STOP GLOBALLY REPORTING THE FUCKING THREAD

YOU LOCAL REPORT IT

IT'S NOT CP

IT'S STILL SHIT

FUCKING GET IT TOGETHER /pol/ THOSE 28 REPORTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOCAL.

>>4389614

> implying local reports for everything from CP to trolling and shitposting haven't been submitted and ignored.

>>4389614

It's almost as if both local and global got ignored or something

>>4389564

>doll

>>4389500

>>4389181

>>4389063

>>4389159

>It is politically incorrect to post logical arguments in favor of having a young wife and forming a strong pair bond.

Read the OP of that thread again and tell me it isn't a troll post but actually making a sound argument.

Also, do tell me if we really need two threads about that.

>>4389159

leave fucko and take your libshit with you.

We're being raided again by pedo sympathizers using "Free Speech" to post sexualized children in an attempt to ruin a forum they fear.

It's actually sad that people get mad and take their bait. It's also sad that mods defend this behavior based on this "Free Speech" but I defend shit I don't agree with at my job too.

>>4389614

>Implying it isn't also reported it locally.

Thread should be deleted because its nothing but a slide thread but the fact that you fucks got so butthurt over it that you made several other threads about it is fucking hilarious. You just amplified the damage severalfold because you are that autistic.

>>4389628

They did?

Proof?

So far this zerosugar is the only one that's getting caps posted about him.

There isn't a /pol/ mod named zerosugar.

>>4389667

check the logs

Wait, but don't Global Volunteers also delete 3D CG Animations that look like child porn?

What's the difference?

>>4389666

But Satan, how will they ever learn to control their butthurt?

>>4389733

MUH DOLL!

> a doll with a vagina and nipples is ok

>>4389740

Well then!

NOW you have a problem /pol/

Have fun I guess. I suggest burning the entire board to the ground and starting over.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>>4388406

>pol can discuss most anything rationally

>pedo comes up

>people completely ignore hebephilia and lump it together with pedo, already falling for kike tactics

>people completely ignore successful marriages that came about this way but yearn for a return to traditional marriage that doesn't include the actual traditions of dowry or parents guarding the daughter

>everyone going MUH SAGE AND REPORT DOWNVOTE EVERYTHING HERE HURR DURR WE ARE NOT PLEBBIT TIER!!!!!!!!!

>almost no sources for either side having to do with actual marriage and pedophilia but with concepts like "childhood wasn't defined by that time!"

This thread is sad, not because of the OP making a shit tier argument, but because not only did you give it SO MANY FUCKING REPLIES, you completely lost all notion of logical thought.

Every fucking retard ITT needs to go gas themselves, the level of SJWism is absolutely pathetic. Great job mods, for at least being able to recognize crying /POL/JW's for what they are.

inb4 muh pedo defense, i haven't even picked a side just stating the absolute observation about the PEOPLE ITT and their foam at the mouth response. See the following exchange:

>>4387462

refutes claim that pedo marriage is muslim exclusive, citing that it even happened in our own countries' past

>>4387628

focuses on the example over the concept and goes full SJW "everything is rape even though that's not at all what you're saying.

Not even something like "well this study says kids are fucked up as a result" or "the science says kids should wait until 15 for optimal child rearing (least risk to mother and child is around this age)"

KILL YOURSELVES ANTI-INTELLIGENCE FAGGOTS!

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>>4389757

Source?

>>4389757

Hahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Fucking mods. One goddamn job and they blow it.

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

MUH DOLL

>>4389751

Yes, because fucking a real child with nipples and a vaginal physically and mentally scars the child, but fucking a doll doesn't scar the doll.

>>4389768

https://8ch.net/faq.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

>>4389761 (cont.)

>>4389354

>i say you use SJW tactics over logic IN THIS ONE ISSUE

>you reply with a strawman and apply it to EVERY ISSUE

Wew lad, so glad you didn't prove me 100% right just now.

>>4389390

thanks for the link, will read and hopefully participate.

>>4389397

>implying sjws dont support pedos

Except i clearly mentioned that my post referred ONLY TO THE PEOPLE POSTING ITT. Nice SJW tactic, cherrypick the words and make a faulty conclusion. Keep on proving me right fag.

>implying we havent seen it before

IMPLYING WE HAVENT SEEN THE BILLION NIGGER, ANTI FEMINIST, ANTI GUN THREADS, TRUMP THREADS, RON PAUL THREADS, ZIM ZAM THREADS. IMPLYING ACTUAL DISCUSSION TOOK PLACE THIS TIME. OH AND >TRYING TO MOVE DISCUSSION AWAY FROM THIS THREAD TO PREVIOUS EXAMPLES. NOPE.

>implying there's any justifiable reason to be attracted to someone incapable of thought out consent or even age to reproduce

>BEING SO FUCKING RETARDED YOU DIDN'T CATCH THE "CANT SEPARATE HEBE FROM PEDO" IN THE VERY TOP OF MY POST

0/10.

>>4389408

>its bad because it tries to rationalize the other

No, that's your own jump to a conclusion. It's literally the argument that "if we legalize marijuana because its safer than alcohol, then soon we'll see legal cocaine and heroin, which are not safe at all due to low amount needed to OD."

Again, NO SJW TACTICS OR GTFO.

>>4389411

>they want free reign to fuck kids

I didn't argue that they did or didn't.

>nobody mentioned hebe

which is why i can make the logical assumption that it's been lumped together with pedo, especially given today's climate and destruction of words.

>posts defending pedo shit were clearly kids

And some people here say the holocaust never happened while others do, does this mean we can never discuss the topic at hand because its triggering? TRUTH DOES NOT FEAR INVESTIGATION FAG, THAT APPLIES TO THIS TOPIC TOO. IF YOU ARE SURE OF YOUR SIDE, THEN ARGUE IT, BUT DONT CENSOR ANOTHER FOR ACTUALLY TRYING TO DISCUSS A POINT.

How can you fail to see this basic fucking point?

>nice try with false consensus and strawman

Provide examples of how i'm strawmanning. Is there not dozens of posts consisting of nothing but redtext SAGE SAGE SAGE and shitty MUH KILL YOURSELF PEDO FUCK. That's not an argument, its shit adhoms. I'm simply demanding we have a RATIONAL discussion, I didn't even say we had anything close to consensus, if anything its impossible to achieve that with nothing but shit flinging on both sides.

>OP was clear bait

So where are you reporting every bait post, and shitpost EVER on /pol/? Yeah I didn't think you did that either you hypocrite.

>it's on the same level as is X white

Except we can actually discuss the topic at hand as opposed to applying "whiteness" to an inanimate object/activity.

>remove!

remove yourself from the gene pool until you grow up a bit, at least you actually tried though unlike the others i responded to.

>>4389768

its the US legal definition of CP, so a clothed teen taking a suggestive pic can actually be called CP. Google it.

>>4389774

Thanks, when I posted the thread updated itself and I saw your post.

>>4389772

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ANTI-DOLL FAGS BTFO

https://8ch.net/dost.html

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children

>and so called "real dolls"

>and so called "real dolls"

>and so called "real dolls"

>and so called "real dolls"

>dolls

>dolls

>dolls

>dolls

>dolls

>that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

https://8ch.net/dost.html

For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

POST IT

>>4389764

Zerosugar BTFO

Report that mod to authorities. Spam the Cripple, he's got a wild pedo on the loose!

Remind me again what CP/Doll posting has to do with /pol/?

>>4389784

NO! MUH DOLLS!

>>4389623

>>4389628

It's almost like the mods are doing their jobs and not deleting threads that do not violate the rules or something.

>>4389796

see >>4389784

fucking asswipe.

>>4389784

>3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>3D renderings

>renderings

thank you for proving you have the reading comprehension skills of a nigger

>>4389814

> MUH DOLLS ARE NOT RENDERINGS!

>>4389814

>3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls"

>>4389814

GET FUCKED KIKE

>>4389733

this is disgusting but should be 100% legal. it shouldn't be getting spammed on this board. to be fair, if statists stopped getting triggered it wouldn't be spammed.

>>4389757

>>4389785

>>4389770

>indistinguishable

Do you seriously not understand the meaning of that word?

>>4389777

>which is why i can make the logical assumption that it's been lumped together with pedo, especially given today's climate and destruction of words.

No you can't. No you can't. You just make that assumption because if facilitates your strawman.

> I'm simply demanding we have a RATIONAL discussion

No. Fuck off to /n/, or /polpol/ or /leftypol/ or whatever other hellhole you want.

You don't get to come in here and make demands of the /pol/ack userbase. We discuss what we want, and your thread was held as shit and sage bombed. It was reported over a hundred fucking times.

Just piss off. You're a shitposter and nobody wants your shit.

REMINDER THAT IT'S JUST A DOLL WITH A VAGINA AND NIPPLES, TOTALLY OK.

>>4388901

I don't see how that is a contradiction. those are two tangential topics, and honestly, you people are acting like a bunch of hysterical women. It's fucking pathetic.

>>4389783

>indistinguishable

REMINDER THAT IT'S JUST A DOLL WITH A VAGINA AND NIPPLES, TOTALLY OK.

>>4389751

>BAN PILLOWS PEOPLE CAN FUCK THOSE TOO!

the hysteria is beyond insane, especially when you consider how many kids could be spared a rape had a pedo fuck been given an alternative.

>>4389823

>>4389828

These, it clearly goes against the law and therefore shouldn't get posted here at all. But it is asinine to suggest that it should be illegal since its a fucking inanimate object.

>>4389830

First off, the doll is pretty indistinguishable.

Secondly, it's not the /pol/ users nor the mods, both local and global's, job to look carefully at the picture to discern that. Hotwheels has stated that the mods need not look at it. They can even delete shit that's spoilered if they have reason to believe it is CP.

The job is on the poster to know if his shit passes the guidelines. Don't like it? Don't post real kids. There's a perfectly good /loli/ board ready for your usage. It's even ran by a global! You got IRC cabal protection!

>>4389811

>indistinguishable

in·dis·tin·guish·a·ble

ˌindəˈstinɡwəSHəb(ə)l/

adjective

not able to be identified as different or distinct.

The rule is that if you cant tell that its a doll then it doesn't matter. Are you arguing that you are unable to tell that >>4389733 is a picture of a doll?

>>4389877

Yes. I cannot. There is no argument I simply cannot. Get fucked kike.

>You may not personally agree with this law, but 8chan, being a clearnet website hosted in the USA, is required to follow it. Please respect that.

>>4389837

you sound sarcastic. it's a piece of plastic that has plastic formed in the shape of a vulva and nipples. if i drew red dots on a fucking barbie doll's chest should the FBI storm my house?

the problem with banning dolls because they hurt your feels is at what point do they become illegal? I get a blank ragdoll and draw vag/nipples. is it legal? i write "14 years old" on it. legal? I get a high quality doll that looks like an adult female. legal? i get one that looks two years younger. legal? I get one that looks 28 but write "14 years old" on it. legal? I get one that looks 14 but write "28 years old" on it. legal?

it's such a fucked up scenario. it has to be legal you can't rely on the courts to make impossible arbitrary decisions on this.

>>4389261

>A giant doll of adolf hitler is not illegal, and yet a court would rape your fucking anus until you'd cry.

Uhh, no they wouldn't. It isn't illegal to have a doll of Hitler either, retard. And certainly not to post a picture of a doll of Hitler.

You are acting like a hysterical woman.

>>4389882

Well then you are not qualified to be a moderator in my opinion.

>>4389856

NO IT'S NOT YOU FUCKING PAEDOPHILE

https://8ch.net/dost.html

For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>>4389893

muh doll. can't you see it's muh doll?

>>4389837

>>4389856

Like I said earlier, it's okay because no children are harmed in the fucking of a doll.

>>4389782

>>4389856

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

https://8ch.net/dost.html

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

>>4389911

so it literally is ok.

incredible

>>4389340

>shitty CP post

it is about freedom of speech. I'm a normie who likes adult females but it's literally a fucking doll.

>CP

>CHILD PORN

>no child involved in the creation of the image

>a hunk of plastic molded by an adult male or a team of adult males

>a child

do you really value children that little? the porn part of CP is also dubious. it's really not C or P.

>>4389920

> muh doll argument again

ITT quality discourse and debate

>>4388406

>Thinking dolls = CP

Just hang yourself already.

>>4389938

> a doll with a vagina and tits is actually ok

> he actually believes this

> not a shill

>>4389938

(1)

MUH DOLL

>>4389956

>it's not ok because I say so

>>4389931

i really hope you're trolling. here's a tip. if your reply can be used to counter any conceivable argument then it's not a valuable reply. it's shit post.

>>4389938

Not realizing that shitposting OPs should be removed, regardless of doll or CP.

>>4389835

>No you can't. No you can't. You just make that assumption because if facilitates your strawman.

1. You've yet to explain where my strawman is at.

2. I may be erroneous in my assumption, but it still is logical to assume X+Y=Z. Quite a difference. The most ironic thing is, you've spent so much time in hysterics that you've yet to explain why it's wrong for me to lump hebe with pedo in a time where pedo is used almost globally to mean any girl under the age of 18. Go ahead, I'm waiting for a real response. Put your conceived notions about me aside and solely argue with my OPINIONS.

>No. Fuck off to /n/, or /polpol/ or /leftypol/ or whatever other hellhole you want.

In that case go fuck off to /b/ or 4cuck if censorship and lack of rationality is what you desire.

>You don't get to come in here and make demands of the /pol/ack userbase.

Been going to 4pol since 2012, what you're doing now is divide and conquer. Shill tactic after shill tactic after shill tactic. I can go on all day and you're still wrong because of your inability to separate one topic from the other.

>We discuss what we want, and your thread was held as shit and sage bombed.

>your thread

HAHAHAHAHA YOU DIDN'T EVEN REALIZE MY ID TOLD U I ONLY HAD LIKE 4 POSTS LAST THREAD! I copy pasted my post here because it was my first one. KEEP ON SHILLING GOLDBERG, SOON YOUR NOSE WILL EXTRACT THE ATMOSPHERE

>It was reported over a hundred fucking times.

And it should have been, OP pic is illegal. Besides that, there's no other reason to report the thread any more than there would be to ban a thread saying the holocaust didn't happen. Why? BECAUSE POL DOESNT PANDER TO YOUR FEELINGS IT PANDERS TO TRUTH ABOVE ALL. So far, your kike tactics screams the very opposite it what you want. If you want a hugbox, gtfo to reddit.

>Just piss off. You're a shitposter and nobody wants your shit.

>calls me shitposter

>still hasn't explained where my strawman is

>still hasn't proven me wrong

0/10

>>4389918

Yes it is. You can throw around your buzzwords as much as you want. It doesn't matter how many times a doll gets fucked; It's a victimless act.

>>4389956

>actually believing an imaginary object should not be allowed because of muh feels

>not a shill

>>4389959

>(3)

>>4389985

We have a board for complaining about things like this.

It's called >>>/polmeta/

>>4390016

>We have a board for complaining about things like this.

Containment boards are no good for raising the awareness that OP wants to discuss. Which is the subversion of 8chan by mods.

>>4389938

>thinking dolls = CP

according to the US definition of CP, it is. This is what I'm talking about in my fucking posts, we need some logic in this shit because pedo hysteria is making everyone go full on SJW tier.

>MUH DOLLS ARENT CP

THEY ARE, THE LAW SAYS SO

The point we can actually agree on is that "it's a fucking doll, it should't be illegal but because it actually is we shouldn't have this posted here."

It's stupefying how far such a simple conclusion lies from this discussion.

>>4389733

>it was real in my mind

>>4390027

>It's stupefying how far such a simple conclusion lies from this discussion.

It's not that stupifying if you consider that pedo posters might be shills…

>>4390027

>>4390043

This. Both of these posts are accurate.

>>4390016

>>4390029

MUH DOLL 2: ELECTRIC BOOGALOO

>>4390027

>THEY ARE, THE LAW SAYS SO

what law

>>4388852

Remove zerosugar immediately.

>>4390064

this.

>>4390027

Show us exactly what the law states, for the record.

>>4390027

No, they aren't you retard.

If you live in the US you can go to trottla right now and order one of these dolls and not a single person will give two fucks.

That one the reasons that HW changed the rule related to posting those dolls here, which means what is currently stated in the dost page is outdated.

https://8ch.net/obscenity.html

>Since October 23, 2013, 8chan has deleted and banned the following board names permanently:

>/doll/

https://8ch.net/dost.html

>For the purposes of the 8chan website, given the legal grayness surrounding 3D computer generated child pornograhy and so called "real dolls" and how similar they are to real children, 3D renderings that violate the above Dost test and that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children are also not allowed.

Hotwheelz has made his position on loli dolls perfectly clear. They are not allowed on his website.

If Hotwheelz says it's CP, then it's CP if it's on 8chan.

>>4389996

Your strawman is that /pol/ isn't willing to have the pedo discussion.

We are. We've had it. Multiple times. It's just bait at this point.

>ablooblooo I've been here all summer

Nobody cares faggot. Piss off.

>>4390099

MUH DOLLS BTFO

>>4388406

Called it.

/pol/ users are too much of a pussy to stand up to themselves.

>>4390099

>that are so realistic as to be indistinguishable from real children

it's pretty obviously a doll m8.

>>4389912

>We err on the side of caution

Conspicuously absent from this instance.

>>4390027

>>MUH DOLLS ARENT CP

>THEY ARE, THE LAW SAYS SO

This is false. It is CP only if it is made from the image of an identifiable child or it is indistinguishable from a real child.

If you think I am wrong then post the applicable laws. And be aware that the courts have invalidated some of the bush and Clinton era laws that where over broad. If you link them I will link you proof of there invalidation.

>>4390125

Doesn't matter, loli dolls are banned. Did you even read the fucking rules?

>>4390099

> so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

so realistic as to be indistinguishable

>>4390043

>It's not that stupifying if you consider that pedo posters might be shills…

It's not that stupefying if you consider that illogical anti pedo spammers might be shills…

>>4390125

So obvious that 18 ppl reported it as a child out of 60 users, representing almost a third.

>>4390116

>pedo discussion.

>posting CP realdoll against 8chan rules

>troll greentext

>with another pedo discussion thread going >>4385710

>it's just discussion guys stop being triggered

You can't be this retarded, you have to be a shill.

>>4390052

Search for "dost", it links to the legal and is posted ITT.

>>4388852

hmmm… I'm conflicted here. The mod allowed discussion to go on despite a MASSIVE hysteria about the subject but at the same time OP pic is illegal and was left alone… If they had just removed the OP pic it would have been a fine thread (minus the hysteria of course). I'd have to go with remove for allowing CP but even then it's not that black and white of a choice.

>>4389425

>no its not i want proof

>ctrl + f

>dost

Found it you lazy kike.

>>4390133

It's a REALISTIC' Doll you DUMB''

MOTHER

FUCKER

>>4390145

Nigger are you brainfucked? over 120 people reported that thread for child porn you disgusting fungi.

where do you even buy these things?

>>4390125

>>4390133

It fucking is indistinguishable. That's why there were 18 global reports. Anyone who disagrees is either lying or a super ultra mega autist.

>>4390160

120 redditors?

can't wait for the winter vacation to end

>>4390052

>>4390086

>>4390088

Fucking Pedophiles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

>Prohibits computer-generated child pornography when "(B) such visual depiction is a computer image or computer-generated image that is, or appears virtually indistinguishable from that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"; (as amended by 1466A for Section 2256(8)(B) of title 18, United States Code).

>Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the Miller test of being obscene, OR are engaged in sex acts that are deemed to meet the same obscene condition. The law does not explicitly state that images of fictional beings who appear to be under 18 engaged in sexual acts that are not deemed to be obscene are rendered illegal in and of their own condition (illustration of sex of fictional minors).

THE CP DEFENDERS ARE OBVIOUS SHILLS

>>4390176

What a pathetic argument.

>>4390167

Exactly this my fellow aryan. 8chan must be shut down for the good of the children. Heil Hitler 14/88.

>>4390160

You misunderstood me, nigger. I'm saying it it IS realistic enough for 1/3rd to report. Some people won't report anything at all, and some don't know how.

>>4390176

>Any one who reported this thread is a redditor!

Nice enlargement Chaim

>>4390181

It wasn't an argument.

>>4390183

Or we can just ban pedo spammer faggots like you.

>>4390152

Nigger I am on your side.

>>4390155

>It's a REALISTIC' Doll

ok you got two words in

>so realistic

now try to climb the mountain that is the rest of the phrase

>as to be indistinguishable

Any reasonable person can….

wait why am i still replying

>>4390191

MUH DOLLS CHAIM

>>4390196

The only spammers here are you and your bright red letters.

>>4390153

The mods could have just deleted the photo which would have ended the hysteria, but the haven't.

>>4390176

For real. If you're that sensitive stay on reddit or kikebook god damn

>>4390113

Bump and reply to highlight this. This shit started only after Mark and Coleslaw were doxed.

KEEP FIRING!

>>4390176

> encouraging global rules to be broken.

fucking cuck.

>>4390179

FUCKING THIS. BUMP.

>>4390179

>CP defenders are shills

Totally. They're still hiding behind the free speech / debate argument like a bunch of Al Goldstein porno Jews. They want to have the law changed much like the same.

>getting mad over pieces of plastic

Its disgusting but its not CP you massive faggot.

Kill yourself.

>>4390179

> wanting clarification on the law makes you a shill

good one.

>>4390116

>Your strawman is that /pol/ isn't willing to have the pedo discussion.

So, just to be clear, you're saying that an endless barrage of shitposts, lack of sources and walls of redtext screaming SAGE indefinitely until bump limit reached (and the guy doing this actually admitted his intention was to kill the thread by doing this) constitutes a RATIONAL DISCUSSION ON PEDOPHILIA?

KIKE FUCKING DETECTED.

>We are. We've had it. Multiple times. It's just bait at this point.

BUT I COULD SAY THE SAME ABOUT ANYTHING ON THE CATALOG RIGHT NOW:

>whites in SA thread

>pol literature

>how many polacks are women

>how to find non degenerate women for a family

>ramzpaul thread

>trump thread

GEE IM SO FUCKING GLAD WE NEVER TALK ABOUT THINGS AFTER A CONSENSUS AMIRITE?

>abloobloo ive been here all summer

>no one cares faggot

wow the shill is so real, you attack me by going divide and conquer and when I state I'm part of the group you still try to divide and conquer by going newfag vs oldfag. Nevermind the only reason i brought that shit up in the first place was your ad hom attack going after my status as a /pol/tard

GTFO kike, we see through your shit.

>>4390219

they cp to be low priced while avoiding jailtime.

>>4390238

kikes are notorious pedophiles retard.

>>4390238

>KIKE FUCKING DETECTED.

>pulling out the kike card

I'm done arguing with you.

You cannot be this dumb. You're obviously being disingenuous.

>>4389733

I wonder what she's thinking.

>>4390179

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

>The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California. It has three parts:

>Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,

>Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law

>Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

CP DEFENDERS ARE SHILL AND ARE NOW TYING TO MEMORY HOLE/ CHANGE THE NARRATIVE TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THEY WANTED A SERIOUS DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER (WHICH THEY DON'T)

>>4390235

>lplz spoonfeed meeeeeeee

>>4390179

>meet the Miller test of being obscene, OR are engaged in sex acts that are deemed to meet the same obscene condition

Please read what you just wrote and then see the image in the OP again.

>>4390116

We can have pedo discussion. It's the pedos who don't want it to be a discussion. About five posts in the pedos inevitably decide that they've won the argument and celebrate by spamming loli animoos, photos of little girls in bathing suits, and ebin u mad maymays. They've been this way since the first fucking exodus, and that's why we hate them.

>>4390286

And you did spoonfeed me, thanks retard. Now I won't waste my precious energy using jewpedia and can spend it wanking to dolls.

>>4390130

>this is false

nope, see >>4390179

>>4390191

>good thing mods know what naked women look like

The argument is "is it indistinguishable or not", if one person says it isn't then legally it's fucking not. If you handed that OP pic around the street and someone reported it as CP, YOU WOULD GO TO JAIL FOR CP UNDER THE LAW AS DESCRIBED HERE: >>4390179

You can keep loli posting, i don't care, that is clearly not real, OP pic however can fool some.

>>4390271

>claims superiority

>does not respond in any logical way to argument presented

>COMPLAINING ABOUT MEMES AND BOARD CULTURE ON THE FUCKING BOARD THAT SPAWNED THEM

Nethanyahu pls go.

KRIPPLEKIKE FIX YOUR FUCKING SITE

>>4390289

>Maybe if I try tone policing I can get them to change their minds.

Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law.

>>4390271

>cant rebut anything

>just call him a kike

That'l show em

>>4390286

The Miller test is absolute bs and the doll breaks the law regardless.

And anyone, why are we discussing law? Even assume the doll was legal, so? Still against 8chan rules. End of story.

On a related note, I love hearing about how they treat pedos as soon as they invariably land in prison. I used to watch those crummy prison shows full of niggers just for those rare moments. Anyone remember/know of any good ones?

>>4390313

Because its a pedo topic and pol cant be rational or civil when its being discussed.

>>4390304

>if one person says it isn't

No its actually if the average person says its indistinguishable not if one person says its indistinguishable.

OPERATE THREAD IS UP!!

>>>/operate/45645

>>>/operate/45645

>>>/operate/45645

>>>/operate/45645

>>>/operate/45645

>>4390295

As an /a/non, the usage of loli in this obvious shitposting campaign saddens me.

Why are /pol/ mods such utter shite they can't clean up their board?

>>4390304

What memes?

You're going for the "lol you're a kike" approach, which is both incorrect, and devalues the accusation of shill or JIDF to the point it basically becomes another word for "faggot", just an insult to throw at people that disagree with you.

The post is clear bait, was worded as bait, broke the global Dost rules, and was sagebombed and reported a hundred fucking times.

What fucking worth was there in that thread? What interest was there beyond shitposters? You're mad /pol/ didn't want to have the discussion so what? We're forced to discuss the goddamn legality of pedo shit when the board doesn't want to?

>>4390309

OP IMAGE IS NOT OFFENSIVE NOR SEXUAL MORON

>>4390359

>IMAGE DISPLAYS SIMULATION VAGINA AND NIPPLES

>"IT'S NOT SEXUAL U GAIZ!"

GAS YOURSELF

>>4390304

>"is it indistinguishable or not"

Are you a judge?

>>4390369

>NUDITY = SEXUAL

How is high school treating you?

>>>/oven/

>>4390341

Nobody cares about operate anymore mate. You're wasting your time.

>>4390333

That is hardly the case. /pol/ doesn't WANT to have the discussion.

Why must it be forced to?

>>4390286

>CP defenders are shills wanting to change narrative and trying to get a logical discussion

Oh come on now, Ive been fair this entire thread and all I've asked is civil discourse.

The biggest problem is:

>I DONT LIKE THE LAW ITS STUPID WAAAAH

Which is true, it is stupid but complaining about it doesn't mean shit. Loliposters are pure cancer because they're being too kike about the legal definition when the word REALITY or REALISTIC doesn't come close to applying to anime.

The real destruction of this topic is really everyone fixating on the dolls, its illegal and complaining about the law won't make a difference, however actually bringing sources to discuss pedophilia/hebephilia can and should be done.

>>4390340

In court, it only takes one judge. In my example, just one person is the average person.

>what memes?

>kike and shill aren't memes on /pol/

filtered.

>>4390369

>VAGINA AND NIPPLES

Just like most beaches outside of the US

>>4389063

Don't let these pedo-apologists get to you anon. The vast majority of us here know these pieces of human garbage will have their special tree in the DOTR.

>>4390309

>specifically defined by applicable state law.

Most states do not have laws against obscene images. Loli and dolls could perhaps be considered obscene and be illegal for those reasons (not for being CP) in some states but they are not illegal in the US as a whole. Prosecutors are very skiddish about trying people under antiquated anti obscene images laws because they have a high probability of finding the laws unconstitutional and removing there power to abuse them to pressure plea deals out of people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

>>4390385

What do you not get about it being a fucking SEX DOLL?

>>4390399

>Like most beaches outside the US

Bitch…you wot?

>>4390390

>pol doesn't want to

>pol is one person

the shilling is insane

>n-n-no i-i meant that ummm… uhhh, i dont want to discuss it

Then why are you still here?

0/10

>>4390407

Believe it or not most of the world out side of the US and middle east isn't triggered by nudity.

>>4390391

>Kike and shill accusations are memes

>LOLOLOL GUYS JIDF ISN'T REAL! SHILLS AREN'T ALWAYS ATTACKING /pol/ GUYS

And I'm the kike here?

I am also NOT convinced this is a doll. I know a good deal about them from the Peter Coffin saga.

>>4390430

>Hurr durr just look at the rest of the world goyim

They don't have guns or freedom to say what they want about Jews without going to prison. Why can't we be just like them?

>>4390404

>SEX DOLL

Wrong. It's an aesthetic doll.

You cannot have sex with these kind of dolls since they don't have any penetrable orifices.

>>4390445

>America has freedom

I'm American so I know your lying

>>4390446

>>4390404

Obvious shill

Gas this whole thread

>>4390454

> doll has a vagina, literally

> no penetrable orifices

the fuck kike?

>>4390457

Since when do you go to prison in the US for talking about Jews? Did you read the whole sentence before replying?

>>4390467

>Since when do you go to prison in the US for talking about Jews?

https://reason.com/blog/2015/06/05/montana-hate-speech-case

butthurt eurofags terrorised by their feminist nanny state

==[14:54] <gaffer> they're photorealistic

[14:54] <Claud> End of story

[14:54] <gaffer> it should have been deleted by globals

[14:54] <ados> i think Jesus did that to punish them for not letting me break my lease for free when i had cancer and couldnt work

[14:54] <ados> Jesus is on my side

[14:54] <Claud> We don't need to bring the globals into this

[14:54] <gaffer> globals are dismissing CP reports

[14:55] == kealey [~vario@Rizon-04BB1FE.d.pppool.de] has joined #8chan

[14:55] <Claud> This was a failure by the /pol/ mods first and foremost

[14:55] <gaffer> What are the globals' jobs?

[14:55] <+cedra> gaffer dost says nothing about "photorealistic" images

[14:55] <gaffer> >it's okay for globals to allow CP because other mods are offline

[14:55] <+cedra> I don't know whether or not your mods are pedophiles, but that doll does not violate any rules

[14:55] == metsis [~metsis@Rizon-47850DD.dhcp.inet.fi] has joined #8chan

[14:55] <Claud> gaffer I could give less of a shit about the CP crap. It's a doll, good for the pedos, look at all the shits I give

[14:55] <Claud> It's still shitposting

[14:55] <Claud> Remove all shitposters. Give no quarter

[14:55] <+Carr0t> uber cuck phil donahue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPaiB5Umilo

[14:55] <gaffer> it violates https://8ch.net/dost.html

[14:55] <Claud> You are either firm with the cancer or it spreads and takes over

[14:56] <gaffer> Globals should have removed it

[14:56] <Claud> Wanna become halfchan?

[14:56] <gaffer> Why are you disagreeing with me while pretending to agree with me?

[14:56] <gaffer> It should be removed, by whatever mods are online, and globals failed to remove

[14:56] <gaffer> it's in their jurisdiction because it violates dost and is therefore CP

[14:57] <+cedra> someone tell gaffer that he's not the one that chooses who deletes images and who doesn't, also he misunderstands the entire point of dost

[14:58] <+cedra> if a doll turns you on, that's your own fucking problem but dost has nothing to do with that

[14:58] <+cedra> whoever that mod is, he's not doing anything wrong

[14:58] <lal> gaffer, you are obviously the one posting simulated cp

[14:58] <lal> and its really sad

[14:59] <+cedra> It's only bothering him because it turns him on and he's a closet pedophile

[14:59] <+cedra> truth boys

[14:59] <gaffer> Assuming, for the sake of your evasion techniques, that I was posting it, we are apparently in agreement that it should be removed right now

[14:59] <gaffer> so why isn't it?

[14:59] <lal> oh i didn't look at it

[14:59] <lal> i'm not a mod

[15:00] <lal> if you pay me hotpockets i will look at your post

[15:00] <+cedra> It's a picture of a clothed doll laying on a bed

[15:00] <+Carr0t> send me your email

[15:00] <+Carr0t> ill email you a pizzaroll==

>>4390454

Not only >>4390460

but i have seen this thing around before. This isn't my first rodeo.

It's literally a sex doll. To deny the obvious is fucking stupid. But thanks for the laughs chaim.

Now get off our fucking board you pedo-apologist scum.

>>4390467

Arguably, it's worse than Jail.

You're fired from your job, your work record is tainted, you your home and your family is harassed by dozens of regional Anti-Semitic groups, depending where you live you may be kicked out, etc.

By publicly naming the Jew you're opening yourself to be violently ejected from society. This also goes for Blacks, Muslims, Women, Minorities, etc.

You're public record is branded as a racist, you can't get a job or a car or a house or a bank loan, literally nobody wants to associate with you.

Jail is better.

>>4390454

>You cannot have sex with these kind of dolls since they don't have any penetrable orifices.

You would know this how? >>4390528 claims the opposite.

>>4390459

>(1)ing and calling others shills without contributing to the discussion.

>Having an argument and bring in facts an information makes me a shill.

>>4390481

he'srighyouknow.jpeg

>>4390460

http://trottla.net/etop.html

>Please note, our products are not sexual toy dolls.

Just because it has an outside labia it doesn't mean the vagina itself it's penetrable, obviously.

>>4390519

>==[14:54]

>pizzaroll==

Did this fucking retard actually tried to redtext that entire wall of text?

MOD CHAT

[14:54] <gaffer> they're photorealistic

[14:54] <Claud> End of story

[14:54] <gaffer> it should have been deleted by globals

[14:54] <ados> i think Jesus did that to punish them for not letting me break my lease for free when i had cancer and couldnt work

[14:54] <ados> Jesus is on my side

[14:54] <Claud> We don't need to bring the globals into this

[14:54] <gaffer> globals are dismissing CP reports

[14:55] == kealey [~vario@Rizon-04BB1FE.d.pppool.de] has joined #8chan

[14:55] <Claud> This was a failure by the /pol/ mods first and foremost

[14:55] <gaffer> What are the globals' jobs?

[14:55] <+cedra> gaffer dost says nothing about "photorealistic" images

[14:55] <gaffer> >it's okay for globals to allow CP because other mods are offline

[14:55] <+cedra> I don't know whether or not your mods are pedophiles, but that doll does not violate any rules

[14:55] == metsis [~metsis@Rizon-47850DD.dhcp.inet.fi] has joined #8chan

[14:55] <Claud> gaffer I could give less of a shit about the CP crap. It's a doll, good for the pedos, look at all the shits I give

[14:55] <Claud> It's still shitposting

[14:55] <Claud> Remove all shitposters. Give no quarter

[14:55] <+Carr0t> uber cuck phil donahue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPaiB5Umilo

[14:55] <gaffer> it violates https://8ch.net/dost.html

[14:55] <Claud> You are either firm with the cancer or it spreads and takes over

[14:56] <gaffer> Globals should have removed it

[14:56] <Claud> Wanna become halfchan?

[14:56] <gaffer> Why are you disagreeing with me while pretending to agree with me?

[14:56] <gaffer> It should be removed, by whatever mods are online, and globals failed to remove

[14:56] <gaffer> it's in their jurisdiction because it violates dost and is therefore CP

[14:57] <+cedra> someone tell gaffer that he's not the one that chooses who deletes images and who doesn't, also he misunderstands the entire point of dost

[14:58] <+cedra> if a doll turns you on, that's your own fucking problem but dost has nothing to do with that

[14:58] <+cedra> whoever that mod is, he's not doing anything wrong

[14:58] <lal> gaffer, you are obviously the one posting simulated cp

[14:58] <lal> and its really sad

[14:59] <+cedra> It's only bothering him because it turns him on and he's a closet pedophile

[14:59] <+cedra> truth boys

[14:59] <gaffer> Assuming, for the sake of your evasion techniques, that I was posting it, we are apparently in agreement that it should be removed right now

[14:59] <gaffer> so why isn't it?

[14:59] <lal> oh i didn't look at it

[14:59] <lal> i'm not a mod

[15:00] <lal> if you pay me hotpockets i will look at your post

[15:00] <+cedra> It's a picture of a clothed doll laying on a bed

[15:00] <+Carr0t> send me your email

[15:00] <+Carr0t> ill email you a pizzaroll

>>4390543

>>4390519

I saw you post this in /operate/ as well, you little shit.

You're just butthurt, fuck off.

>>4390543

>8chan global channel

>modchat

Nigger…you what?