/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

The texts gathered in this volume constitute an ample and important selection of the intelligence reports on nazi Germany produced over the course of the second World War and immediately after by Franz Neumann, Herbert Marcuse, and Otto Kirchheimer as analysts in the Central European Section of the Research and Analysis Branch (R&A) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). These documents, declassified between 1975 and 1976, are still held in the civil archives division, Legislative and diplomatic Branch of the Us national archives in college Park, Maryland, research Group 59; with rare exceptions, all are available on microfilm (r&a finished reports).

Is there a /pdfs/ link?

>>4864054

No, I just found this. Is there still a 2MB limit there?

>>4864054

I'll make a thread there, too.

It's up on /pdfs/. I forget how to link shit with >>> so go look for it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Leopold_Neumann

Franz Leopold Neumann (May 23, 1900 – September 2, 1954) was a German-Jewish left-wing political activist, Marxist theorist and labor lawyer, who became a political scientist in exile and is best known for his theoretical analyses of National Socialism. He studied in Germany and the United Kingdom, and spent the last phase of his career in the United States. Together with Ernst Fraenkel and Arnold Bergstraesser, Neumann is considered to be among the founders of modern political science in the Federal Republic of Germany. In the literature arising out of the Verona papers, Franz L. Neumann is named as the figure behind a code word for a singularly distrusted and very short-term "spy." The political design that may have led Neumann to the actions that earned him this classification are unknown, but until his death he enjoyed and repaid the full trust of American authorities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Marcuse#World_War_II

During World War II, Marcuse first worked for the U.S. Office of War Information (OWI) on anti-Nazi propaganda projects. In 1943, he transferred to the Research and Analysis Branch of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Directed by the Harvard historian William L. Langer, the Research and Analysis Branch was in fact the biggest American research institution in the first half of the twentieth century. At its zenith between 1943 and 1945, it included over twelve hundred employees, four hundred of whom were stationed abroad. In many respects, it was the site where post–World War II American social science was born, with protégés of some of the most esteemed American university professors, as well as a large contingent of European intellectual émigrés, in its ranks.

These men comprised the "theoretical brain trust" of the American war machine, which, according to its founder, William J. Donovan, would function as a "final clearinghouse" for the secret services—that is, as a structure that, although not engaged in determining war strategy or tactics, would be able to assemble, organize, analyze, and filter the immense flow of military information directed toward Washington, thanks to the unique capacity of the specialists on hand to interpret the relevant sources.[9]

In March 1943 Marcuse joined his fellow Frankfurt School scholar Franz Neumann in R8cA's Central European Section as senior analyst and rapidly established himself as "the leading analyst on Germany.[10]

After the dissolution of the OSS in 1945, Marcuse was employed by the US Department of State as head of the Central European section, retiring after the death of his first wife in 1951.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Kirchheimer

11 November 1905 in Heilbronn – 22 November 1965 in New York City) was a German jurist of Jewish ancestry and political scientist of the Frankfurt School whose work essentially covered the state and its constitution.[1]

Kircheimer worked as a research analyst at the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, starting in World War II and continuing to 1952.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Kirchheimer

Translate this. The English wiki on him sucks.

Bad goyim. Frankfurt school is just a conspiracy theory.

I hate the Jews so much.

>>4864657

it's also a historical precedent for the an american intelligence agency shilling for far-left ideology and propaganda.

>>4863759

What is huge?

>them being intelligence analysts (R&A) for the OSS

vs

>This book brings together their most important intelligence reports on Nazi Germany, most of them published here for the first time.

>all the reports the Frankfurt School kikes were writing for the OSS during WW2.

suggests the first one.

>>4864657

suggests the second

>>4863818

>>4863825

>>4863829

Makes for an interesting read. Do you have the pdf yet?

>>4864378

>Franz L. Neumann is named as the figure behind a code word for a singularly distrusted and very short-term "spy." The political design that may have led Neumann to the actions that earned him this classification are unknown, but until his death he enjoyed and repaid the full trust of American authorities.

Interesting…. any more info on that?

>>4864447

maybe tomorrow if i find the time for it.

>>4865028

Do you more info on the KGB financing the frankfurt school?

The text next to it sounds like it is sourced on the good old yuri.

>>4865409

Oh, and they weren't just given reign over West Germany as well. They were given access to American power, and influence over the American legal and political system with their ideas.

>>4865352

Soviet Union always financed groups and organizations that defended and promoted marxism, socialism and all sort of left leaning revolutionary ideals. For example it´s well know that pretty much every communist party had funds and conduct advices coming from the Soviet Union.

>>4865028

>>4865352

>Do you more info on the KGB financing the frankfurt school?

>The text next to it sounds like it is sourced on the good old yuri.

Here's a blog about that exact infograph:

http://www.moreright.net/frankfurt-school-caused-progressivism/

https://archive.is/14IWC

>As far as I can tell, it is completely accurate except for the point about the KGB funding the Frankfurt School, which I haven’t seen any direct evidence for.

I haven't seen any evidence of this either. If anyone has some, post it.

Marcuse wrote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Marxism:_A_Critical_Analysis

The Frankfurt School didn't really like "official" communism, either. The communists we had/have in the West were mostly Trotskyites, not Stalinists. Look at:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

The term "neoconservative" refers to those who made the ideological journey from the anti-Stalinist Left to the camp of American conservatism.

Some anon posted a while ago saying that the cold war was really Trotskyites vs. Stalinists. That makes a lot of sense. Western elites like the Rockefellers and such have always pushed leftist crap on us. They just didn't like Stalin, who the jews poisoned on Purim, 1953.

https://archive.is/mGGrZ

Stalin and the Purim Present

A new book reveals that Stalin met his fate poised to launch a post-Holocaust holocaust of his own.

>>4865984

>Do you more info on the KGB financing the frankfurt school?

Also, fun fact was that during the Cold War, some of the newer Chekist elements in the KGB thought that the US was doing the exact same to the USSR. It's actually the reason that after the Cold War was over that Putin and the FSB held their internal coup against the oligarchs and developed the concept of "spiritual security", to protect from subversion

http://cyber.sci-hub.bz/MTAuMTA4MC8wMjY4NDUyNy4yMDExLjYxOTgwMA==/10.1080%4002684527.2011.619800.pdf

tdlr, both sides got played hard

>>4864447

Otto Kirchheimer (* Nov. 11 1905 in Heilbronn, † Nov. 22 1965 in Washington D.C) was a socialist influenced state- and constitutional lawyer (german word is "rechtler") who had an effect in germany, france and the united states. He is considered on of the most important german state- and constitutional theorists.

LIFE

Kirchheimer, originating from a jewish family. visited the school in heilbronn, heidelberg and ettenheim from 1912 to 1924.

He subsequently studied jurisprudence and sociology in munic, cologne, berlin and bonn.

1928 he finished his study with a doctorate (Dr. jur., magna cum laude) at the university of bonn.

He was made a doctor by Carl Schmitt through his work on political science of socialism and bolshevism. Kirchheimer is considered the favourite student of Schmitt in bonn.

Even in his youth, kirchheimer professed to his socialist conviction. Later, he was a member of the social democratic party of germany.

From 1930 to 1933, Kirchheimer worked for the

social democratic paper "Die Gesellschaft" and lecturer for political science at the business school (handelshochschule). Moreover he worked as a lawyer in berlin from 1932 to 1933.

During the time of the weimarer republic, the young Kirchheimer made noise by his analyses about the relationship of social structure and the constitution. His essay "Weimar und was dann? Entstehung und Gegenwart der Weimarer Verfassung, Berlin 1930" (Weimar, and then what? Creation and present of the weimar constitution (wc)) was heavily discussed; in which Kirchheimer described the wc as a non future-compliant state-basis.

Ernst Fränkel, Franz Leopold Neumann and Kirchheimer were close to the konservative state-lawyer Carl Schmitt. 1932 Kirchheimer published the essay "Legalität und Legitimität" (legality and legitimacy) in the socialist newspaper "Die Gesellschaft" (Die Gesellschaft, Band 2, Heft 7, 1932). Carl Schmitt borrowed this title for a famous paper which came out in september 1932. He explicitly lauded Kirchheimer in this paper. Schmitt also repeatedly quotet Kirchheimer on various other instances. He wrote in an essay from 1929 about facism:"In highly developed industry states […] the inner political situation is thoroughly mastered by the phenomenon of "social balance-structure" between capital and work, employer and employee. This phenomenon, first noticed and named by Otto Bauer, was then dealt with by O. Kirchheimer in an interesting essay in the magazine for politics (Bd. 17, 1928, S.596) in questions of state- and constitutional theory." (Schmitt, Wesen und Werden des faschistischen Staates, in: Positionen und Begriffe, 1940, S.124-130, hier S.127). In "legality and legitimacy" Schmitt wrote: "This is why i think the wording of the essay by Otto Kirchheimer on legality and legitimacy (Die Gesellschaft, July 1932) for right, who says, that the legitimacy of the parlamentaric democracy "only exists in its legality" and today "evidently the legal barrier is equated with legitimatcy" (Schmitt, Legalität und Legitimität, S.14).

Kirchheimer returned the favor through positiv references on Schmitt. It says in an essay from 1932: "When a later time looks on the intellectual assets of this epoch, the book by Carl Schmitt on the legality and legitimacy will be a writing that presents itself, which distinguishes itself from the circle by it's going back to the basic foundation of state theory as well it's reservations in his deductions" (Verfassungsreaktion 1932, Die Gesellschaft, IX, 1932, S. 415ff.)

After the seizure of powers by the natsoc's, kirchheimer, the socialist jew, emigrated to paris. He was working here for four years as scientist in the french branch of the International Institut for social research (Korkheimer-Institute). He began with the revision of George Rusches "Punishment and Social Structure". The Rusche-Kirchheimer-Version of Punishment and Social Structure was released in 1939. Kirchheimer broke with his teacher Carl Schmitt, who rose up to the "key jurist of the third reich" (WTF? This sounds interesting!)

On the november the 11th 1937, kirchheimer emigrated with his wife Hilde Kirchheimer and his daughter (born 1930) to the united states. His marriage divorded there in 1941. In NY, Kirchheimer continued his work for the International Institute of Social Research as scientific assistant for law and social sciences, from 1937 to 1942. Parallel to that he was lecturer for the institute programm of columbia university

>>4865984

>http://www.moreright.net/frankfurt-school-caused-progressivism/

thanks for that. who made the infograph anyway? was it some anon?

I'll translate the rest about his work some other time. If you have any questions about the translation, go ahead.

bump

>>4874985

>who made the infograph anyway? was it some anon?

Yeah, I think so. Reverse image searching it just points to boards.

Whoever made it seems to have made the mistake of thinking that jews were tools of communism, when the reality is communism was a tool of jews.

Thanks for translating that Otto Kirchheimer section, I wasn't expecting anyone to actually hand translate it, I was just thinking people would run it through google translator.

>>4865352

>Do you more info on the KGB financing the frankfurt school?

It's impossible for the KGB to have financed the Frankfurt School as the KGB wasn't founded until 1954, long after the Frankfurt School scholars had been imported to Colombia. While the KGB did focus much of their resources on subversion, the Cheka and previous intelligence apparatuses did not (at least internationally). The Frankfurt School was financed by Otto Weil, who inherited his money from his grain merchant father.

Bumping

trying to get this fucking site to work

>>4864062

All file types should be limited to the 8MB limit.

>>4884633

I figured it out. I posted the book at /pdfs/

>>4864692

>it's also a historical precedent for the an american intelligence agency shilling for far-left ideology and propaganda.

I've honestly never understood this. It's obvious that it's happening, as anyone who is paying even vague attention can see, but I've never understood why.

If the intelligence agencies were pushing their own agendas, you'd think they would be conservative ones, seeing how conservative agendas tend to create political, social, and economic stability, and I'd imagine "stability" would be the primary goal of any intelligence agency.

They seem to be behaving in a way that goes directly counter to their own interests and goals, and I've never understood why that is.

>>4885811

The thing is that a lot of intelligence agencies are getting played just as much as anyone else

They compartmentalize so much that the amount of information one individual person within the organization receives isn't enough to conflict with their beliefs that they're doing the right thing, or at the very least if it does end up causing cognitive dissonance it isn't enough to be used by one person as a weapon against them

>>4885811

It's easily explained by education and organizational history. Educationally, most of the intelligence and high up military have degrees. The intelligence guys, especially foreign or technical intelligence like the CIA or the NSA, have been influenced by academia during their degrees and probably before during their schooling. Even if you didn't do anything explicitly humanities, you still would have been infected. This goes way, way back before muh cultural marxism of the 60s. You can read up on Dewey at the turn of the 1900s talking about making liberal radicals out of American students. Either the intelligence staff are liberal-lite or full blown liberal. Either way, they are pushing liberalism, which at its heart – especially in its social form – is thoroughly left wing no matter how much /leftypol/ and libertarians cry about how it isn't.

Historically, it wasn't too long ago that the CIA was a North-Eastern elite boys club for internationalist liberals and their (((friends))). It remains that way today. Lots of people can't see this of course, because they think liberalism and democracy is some middle ground, non-totalitarian political movement that perhaps is even conservative. Even though democracy and political terror go hand in hand: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8490.html

Much like communism and terror.

As to the military – who often also have their paws in these sorts of operations – ever been in an officer's mess? The majority of /pol/ haven't, so they wouldn't know, as most of them are geopolitical LARPers with no military experience (this isn't directed at you and others in this thread, as you and others seem genuinely curious, and not naive asshats). Those with military experience here, usually the 11b bootlickers or the prole fobbits, wouldn't know what the officer class is like – especially Brigade staff level and above – as they are too busy jacking themselves off to their militia fantasies and wondering which gun they'll use as they get blown away by feds to be worried about such things that alleged "armchair generals" are interested in. Suffice to say, above brigade level, the military officers are not your friends. They tend to be elitist, liberal, and disdainful of the NCOs.

>>4885939

That's why I'm banking on the bombs dropping. Let everyone get a little scared of the Nuclear Fire.

>>4866508

>The red mushroom clouds represent planned nuclear strikes on cities and targets in central Europe and the blue mushroom clouds represent the anticipated NATO response.

Why is red the political standard for the political left and blue the right in every country but the US?

>>4887283

Red as Republicans and Blue as Democrats is fairly new to the US

They used to be reversed

>>4884414

The Rockefellers also funded and helped bring Frankfurt Scholars over to the US for the "New School for Social Research"

Which is the same institute a lot of neocons crawled out of, and even some of the prominent libertarians had ties to.

>>4866643

https://web.archive.org/web/20150314065747/http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/spiritual-security-in-putins-russia

>>4884414

> Otto Weil

Heh, my bad. Wires get crossed sometimes. I also wrote Colombia like the country instead of Columbia the school.

>>4885811

>I've honestly never understood this. It's obvious that it's happening, as anyone who is paying even vague attention can see, but I've never understood why.

Consider the video here and the teleological perspective of the various strains of Marxism. Their function is to critique, deconstruct, and overthrow. Something which might interest CIA, no? Furthermore, institutional deconstruction leads to an atomized society, and an atomized society is far easier to push around and has much less of a chance of spawning resistance movements. In addition, as Marxism is explicitly anti-family (c.f. Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State), so family dynasties like the Rockefellers have a lesser chance of seeing any potential rivals emerge.

Notice how in the video there is an explicitly pro-EU component here. The ideology collects malcontents and organizes them while NGO's like the National Endowment for Democracy, the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Foundation (and all their little tributaries) can fund and direct them. This creates a powerful remote coup machine that can be pointed at regimes around the world.

I'd suggest reading up on Gene Sharp (and his DIA partner) and Color Revolutions for more.

>>4887283

Until the first Bush election, it was blue for Republicans, red for Democrats. Then they suddenly switched it, because too many people were using the old "better dead than red" and red = communist memes on the Democrats.

Sort of like how the Green Party is referred to as "watermelons"; green on the outside, red on the inside.

>>4889495

Wasn't that just because the soviets were Reds?

>>4889495

The better dead than red thing I mean.

>>4865760

They also created your friendly neighborhood Palestine Liberation Organization. Virtually all of the other *LO's also.

It's why it's funny when people bitch about Israel and how what they do to the mudslimes is wrong. Those fucks are just rapefugees too.

At best neither side is the good guy.

bump