/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

So what's a decent alternative?

Use Startpage for anonymity, you will still be filtered, but they can't tell it's you.

You may try just making your own web spider too, it's not so hard.

Sage because most of you are too low energy to do that.

>>4875992

>So what's a decent alternative?

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ixquick-privacy-search-engine/?src=search

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/startpage-https-privacy-search/?src=search

>but I don't use Firefox/FF Fork

You should.

>>4876042

chromium is better in literally every possible way

>b-b-but muh voice recognition binary chunk that got added with a patch years ago then quickly removed when autistic linuxcucks threw a shitfit over it

>>4875992

Well, if you ask me, I'd think it would be better to create a whole new platform and have people adopt that as the new search engine and Video platform or so…

Now the rough problem here, is that for some reason I haven't seen anyone on this planet make something similar to google back when google was made in the earlier days. Ducduckgo doesn't cut it. The reality of all this is that Jewtube and Jewoogle including Facefuck (facebook) are now filtered much like how the media is controlled today.

>>4875969

>Eli Pariser

is a Marxist Jew cuck and not to be trusted.

>using google

>having faceberg

it's not my fault you are a normalfag who only now is waking up

>>4876042

Startpage uses Google results.

>>4875992

DuckDuckGo.

Bing.

There isn't really any viable alternative to Facebook or Jewtube.

>>4876155

cuckcuckgo was compromised from the beginning,, startpage/ixquick are the only alternatives

>>4876169

>compromised from the beginning

DDG has onion support.

If you're upset about DDG being run by a Jew you should know that Startpage/IX are also run by a Jew.

>>4876096

Another problem is that there are people who make their living manipulating results. How do you stop them without "filtering" results?

>>4876189

Then what is not run by a jew?

>>4876208

You would need something the equivalent of google analytics to report actual statistics on pages, so you could filter our for example… when somone only spends half s second on a site… which woukd mean that even though they clicked your search result it wasnt actually what they wanted and it shouldn't increase the ranking in search results.

Normies really have no fucking idea about how many of these types of complex problems jewgle has to deal with to figure out what results are authentic and useful.

>>4875969

Youtube is basically a music player to me now.

I don't even need to favorite stuff anymore, the same music videos are just recommended to me again and again ad infinitum

>>4876239

But also, search engines are like a democracy. Most people are fucking stupid and jewgle has no incentive to present results that are true… only results that are "relevant" which just means results which normies subjectively like.

A fashy search engine would be heavily filtered also, to prevent people from accessing information that is inaccurate, false, deceptive, etc…

>>4876155

>Bing.

lel

>>4876569

You should read "Magicians of the Gods"

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1444779672?*Version*=1&*entries*=0

Or get it free as an audiobook by signing up for Amazon Audible

>>4876215

Your hope.

>>4876275

There needs to be a search engine that automatically links you to archive.is links of articles instead of the actual pages. With an option to filter that shit out of your search completely when you aren't interested. Perhaps a way to blacklist websites that you personally don't like, like what I hear Google used to have.

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

IXQUICK

THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE

>>4876042

>>4876061

Cyberfox > Pale Moon > Waterfox > Chromium

>>4876155

>duckduckgo

Please

https://8ch.net/tech/ddg.html

>>4876008

>Use Startpage for anonymity

Startpage is a proxy for using Google anonymously but it's still Google's results. IxQuick is a meta search engine that uses Bing, Yahoo, Yandex and others but not Google. That's the one I use the most often. (Startpage and IxQuick are the same company)

What is the difference between StartPage and Ixquick?

https://support.startpage.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Article/View/103/0/what-is-the-difference-between-startpage-and-ixquick

The difference between our two search engines is that StartPage returns Google results, while Ixquick returns results from other search engines, but not Google. Both are equally private.

Google is the best when you look for recent results, you'll get the freshest results with them (assuming they're not censoring your search for some reason). But if what you're looking for isn't from the last 48-72 hours then you can use IxQuick and you don't really need Google. Sometimes I compare the search results from Startpage and IxQuick and IxQuick gives me more relevant pages than Startpage/Google.

>>4876835

>There needs to be a search engine that automatically links you to Archive.is links of articles instead of the actual pages.

Searx does that but with Archive.org, there's a 'cached' button under every result with a link to Archive.org, but the search results aren't as good as with IxQuick

https://searx.me/

Archive.is is a manual archive tool, Archive.org is supposed to be an automatic archive tool that saves 90+% of internet pages

Is this why my Google searches are becoming less and less relevant to what I'm looking for? (((It's a form of advertising, the results order, and not only for products…i.e., what are acceptable and unacceptable thoughts)))

Google will somehow go the way of Twitter (in its early death throes) as people tire of not getting what they want when they do a search: the most relevant results.

>>4881186

>IXQUICK

Yeah?

>>4875969

Google Trends Deletes Tweet: 'Will Jeb Bush Drop Out?

http://archive.is/udDS7

Google Trends regularly tweets out trending questions about candidates and data prior to and during presidential debates. Before the debate, Google Trends tweeted the top trends for all candidates on the GOP debate stafe, but deleted the one about Jeb Bush. Here is the deleted tweet: The top question: "Will Jeb Bush drop out?"

>>4875969

>>4875992

https://privacytools.io/

https://prism-break.org/

https://browserleaks.com/

https://wiki.installgentoo.com/

San Francisco rainbow haired social justice faggots at Twitter are trying to stifle Trump supporters:

Twitter’s Attempt to Silence Generation Trump

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/02/08/twitters-attempt-to-silence-generation-trump/

From Yiannopoulos’s unexplained unverification to the permanent suspension of popular Trump activist @RWSurferGirl and temporary account lock of conservative Twitter personality Linda Suhler, it seems that Twitter isn’t just attacking conservatives. Whether deliberately or not, they’re going after the social network’s most influential Trump supporters.

Twitter’s suspension, ban, and locking notifications do not inform users which rule they have supposedly broken, instead simply stating that the user has somehow impinged on the terms of service. Finding out the reason an account has been punished is generally impossible.

In reality, it’s not so difficult to understand. You probably just had the wrong politics, according to Twitter’s increasingly barmy social justice-inspired rules.

On a social network that frequently allows death threats against political figures like Trump, hashtags like #KillAllWhiteMen and, let’s not forget, ISIS recruiters to go unpunished, it is easy to see why conservatives on the platform are starting to find it bizarre that innocent supporters of the GOP frontrunner are being hunted down by Jack Dorsey’s authoritarian leftist droogs.

@RWSurferGirl had over 665,000 followers when her account was suspended, and her tweets have been featured in the New York Post, the Washington Post, on Yahoo! News, and even Jimmy Kimmel Live, where President Obama read a tweet that she had sent wishing for the president to be left at a golf course on the other side of the world.