/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie_Energy

http://www.worldoil.com/news/2015/10/09/genie-energy-confirms-significant-find-in-golan-heights

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiNmIivqObKAhUBOz4KHQqlAC4QFggtMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fisrael-grants-golan-heights-oil-license-2013-2&usg=AFQjCNERQF-K1EwzZhlgvU4ZLemSoVWSHA&bvm=bv.113370389,d.cWw

http://theantimedia.org/what-rothschild-murdoch-cheney-and-israel-love-most-about-syria/

>>4877526

>>4877526

Rothschild Defense force please leave.

Inbreds.

>>4877842

i see his twitter, he's so fucking retarded he can barely spell

but he's never really had to

fuck

tfw not rothschild family

>>4878161

Fuck off kike.

Reminder that these threads always attract shills like flies.

>>4879019

Have fun.

I still don't get whats wrong with the Rothschilds

I know they basically own everything, but I don't understand how that negatively affects me

Can /pol/ please redpill me?

>>4879469

>>4879469

>>4879252

>>4879399

Can you into research or reading? You didn't even listen to the intro of that documentary or read the thread

We're talking about the Rothschilds NOT the Muppets…you muppets

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYu6qhd88_M

>>4880630

>>4880630

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

Spooky time! #2SPooky4ME!

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/a-tale-of-two-rothschilds-7831372.html

http://whitenations.com/showthread.php?t=407

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2003/nov/2/20031102-111400-3720r/

https://archive.is/0QhHS

Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker

By - The Washington Times - Sunday, November 2, 2003

LONDON (Agence France-Presse) — Control of Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares in the Russian oil giant Yukos have passed to renowned banker Jacob Rothschild, under a deal they concluded prior to Mr. Khodorkovsky’s arrest, the Sunday Times reported.

Voting rights to the shares passed to Mr. Rothschild, 67, under a “previously unknown arrangement” designed to take effect in the event that Mr. Khodorkovsky could no longer “act as a beneficiary” of the shares, it said.

Mr. Khodorkovsky, 40, whom Russian authorities arrested at gunpoint and jailed pending further investigation last week, was said by the Sunday Times to have made the arrangement with Mr. Rothschild when he realized he was facing arrest.

Mr. Rothschild now controls the voting rights on a stake in Yukos worth almost $13.5 billion, the newspaper said in a dispatch from Moscow.

Mr. Khodorkovsky owns 4 percent of Yukos directly and 22 percent through a trust of which he is the sole beneficiary, according to Russian analysts.

From the figures reported in the Sunday Times, it appeared Mr. Rothschild had received control of all Mr. Khodorkovsky’s shares.

The two have known each other for years “through their mutual love of the arts” and their positions as directors of the Open Russia Foundation, Yukos’ philanthropic branch, it said.

Russian authorities Thursday froze billions of dollars of shares held by Mr. Khodorkovsky and his top lieutenants in Yukos — throwing control of the country’s largest oil company into limbo and causing frenzied selling on financial markets.

Russian prosecutors said owners of the shares are still entitled to dividends and retain voting rights, but can no longer sell their stakes.

They said the freeze was necessary as collateral for the $1 billion that Mr. Khodorkovsky and his associates are accused of misappropriating during the 1990s.

Mr. Rothschild is the British head of Europe’s wealthy and influential Rothschild family, and runs his own investment empire.

Remember this story when the "Jewtin" shill kid pops up again

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_Copper

Resolution Copper (RCM) is a joint venture owned by Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton formed to develop and operate an underground copper mine near Superior, Arizona, U.S. The project targets a deep-seated porphyry copper deposit located under the now inactive Magma Mine. Rio Tinto has reported an inferred resource of 1.624 billion tonnes containing 1.47 percent copper and 0.037 percent molybdenum at depths exceeding 1,300 metres (0.81 mi).[1] The proposed mine is one of the largest copper resources in North America.[2] Following the passage of the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act, many Native American and conservation groups fear the copper mine will destroy sacred and environmentally sensitive land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Tinto_Group#Formation

At the end of the 1880s, control of the firm was passed to the Rothschild family, who greatly increased the scale of its mining operations.

(I don't have any proof the Oregon thing is tied to the Rothschilds, but the Government sure wants the ranchers and indians off these chunks of land so they can set up mining.)

>durr them cracka militia got what they dezurved

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

https://archive.is/8cBXp

https://archive.is/B03M5

>>4885136

Nice i forgot about this. Kasparov ( Jewish chess player) was a Rothschild Shill too. Bobby Fisher hated his guts!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes#South_Africa

In October 1871, 18-year-old Rhodes and his brother Herbert left the colony for the diamond fields of Kimberley.

Financed by N M Rothschild & Sons, Rhodes succeeded over the next 17 years in buying up all the smaller diamond mining operations in the Kimberley area.

In 1873, he returned to Britain, to study at Oxford, but stayed there for only one term after which he went back to South Africa. His monopoly of the world's diamond supply was sealed in 1890 through a strategic partnership with the London-based Diamond Syndicate. They agreed to control world supply to maintain high prices.

At his death he was considered one of the wealthiest men in the world. In his first will, written in 1877 before he had accumulated his wealth, Rhodes wanted to create a secret society that would bring the whole world under British rule.[6] The exact wording from this will is:

To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.

https://archive.org/details/lastwilltestamen00rhodiala

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Rothschild,_1st_Baron_Rothschild

Natty also funded Cecil Rhodes in the development of the British South Africa Company and the De Beers diamond conglomerate. He later administered Rhodes's estate after his death in 1902 and helped to set up the Rhodes Scholarship scheme at the University of Oxford.

Read Carol Quigley's Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment:

http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf

http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/The_Anglo-American_Establishment.pdf

Quigley was a kosher college professor, so he never makes the point that Rhodes was just a shabbos goy for the Rothschilds, but he lays out the map of the conspiracy.

>>4885319

Isn't Fischer a Jewish name tho? Makes sense, since self-hating Jews tend to be the biggest bad goyim.

>>4885373

This SS booklet is the best short summary about Masonry I've come across. They actually shut down lodges and went through their shit, so it's not just some Masonposter with

>my Grandpa was a mason, he wuz a good man

or

>masons eat babies

http://der-stuermer.org/freemasonryen.htm

https://archive.org/details/Schwarz-Dieter-Die-Freimaurerei

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi#Pan-European_political_activist

According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 his friend Baron Louis de Rothschild introduced him to Max Warburg who offered to finance his movement for the next 3 years by giving him 60,000 gold marks.

Warburg remained sincerely interested in the movement for the remainder of his life and served as an intermediate for Coudenhove-Kalergi with influential Americans such as banker Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch. In April 1924, Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the journal Paneuropa (1924–1938) of which he was editor and principal author. The next year he started publishing his main work, the Kampf um Paneuropa (The fight for Paneuropa, 1925–1928, three volumes). In 1926, the first Congress of the Pan-European Union was held in Vienna and the 2,000 delegates elected Coudenhove-Kalergi as president of the Central Council, a position he held until his death in 1972.

His original vision was for a world divided into only five states: a United States of Europe that would link continental countries with French and Italian possessions in Africa; a Pan-American Union encompassing North and South Americas; the British Commonwealth circling the globe; the USSR spanning Eurasia; and a Pan-Asian Union whereby Japan and China would control most of the Pacific. To him, the only hope for a Europe devastated by war was to federate along lines that the Hungarian-born Romanian Aurel Popovici and others had proposed for the dissolved multinational Empire of Austria-Hungary. According to Coudenhove-Kalergi, Pan-Europe would encompass and extend a more flexible and more competitive Austria-Hungary, with English serving as world language, spoken by everyone in addition to their native tongue. He believed that individualism and socialism would learn to cooperate instead of compete, and urged that capitalism and communism cross-fertilize each other just as the Protestant Reformation had spurred the Catholic Church to regenerate itself.

http://www.jta.org/1940/08/05/archive/baron-eugene-de-rothschild-arrives-by-clipper-nurse-tells-of-nazi-brutality-in-paris

http://pdfs.jta.org/1940/1940-08-05_101.pdf

https://archive.is/QkL9m

>>4877881

>>4877842

>>4877801

Worry about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathaniel_Philip_Rothschild

He's the one that's going to be running the show.

>>4886517

>>4886528

>>4886539

>>4886548

>>4886553

>>4886560

>>4886567

>>4886587

>>4886606

>>4886646

>>4886653

Just remember they also funded the Cecil Rhodes and the Diamond trade in South Africa. Jesus Christ they're have a hand in everything don't they.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N_M_Rothschild_%26_Sons

https://en.wikipedia.org

>>4898711

>>4887888

Yep. http://web.archive.org/web/20160210083000/http://8ch.net/pol/res/4877477.html

>>4964389

Thanks for the heads up :^)

>>4979837

Losing one shekel?

Must be painful for a jew.

>>4981179

You have no idea.. ;^)

>>4886571

Can we combine all those pictures? Someone made a lot of them. Can we make one gigantic family three of all jews?

>>>/pdfs/ owner here.

I know I haven't been that active lately. But that is because I have been dedicated to look for real important rarities to collect.

I found one. The Rothschilds: A Family Portrait - Frederic Morton 1962.

This is one of the most revealing biographies on the Rothschild family, and because it is so revealing and contains so much information. "They" don't give book much publicity, to keep it out of public public consciousness.

This book will blow any disinfo shill that says Hitler was a Rothschild funded agent right out of the Sol system.

In fact, the book contains an entire chapter entitled Hitler versus Rothschild. An entire chapter about Hitler and the Nazis trying to stop the Rothschilds.

Hitler was far from the first great European leader that tried to stop the Rothschild takeover of Europe (and the World in general). Napoleon also tried to stop the Rothschild bankers. And there is chapter dedicated to that part of history as well, Rothschild versus Napoleon. So you can read about that lesser known war against the Rothschild empire by another great European leader.

The author is of course sympathetic to the Rothschild cause. But the book is a true rarity.

The book.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160215101443/https://u.pomf.is/lqyloq.pdf

https://web.archive.org/web/20160215101443/https://u.pomf.is/lqyloq.pdf

https://web.archive.org/web/20160215101443/https://u.pomf.is/lqyloq.pdf

>>4994352

BASED

>>4994336

If you make less than 100,000 than you know all too well the suffering of the American people and that times are tough. You also know, whether you are poor or rich, that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Many mistake that this is the system, that there are a group of people who are really rich that make lots of money and horde it all. This is true, but the fact remains, raising the wage won’t help people, because companies will raise the price of goods and services like they have done in Australia where the minimum wage is fifteen dollars (AUS). Let us look deeper and find the root of the problem.

Who owns the money? Think about it, money isn’t simply burned like the scene with the Joker, no one just burns money and while people spend it, we know those who earn more, earn enough that is to save prosper well. But to get more money one either has to hustle or have an education, but to have an education one must take loans or debt and to hustle one must risk incarceration and the million black men in prison shows that hustling isn’t as prosperous as it seems. While there may be those few who rise above, the fact remains, most men who break the law get dealt with swiftly and consequently harshly.

The system is not built for rehabilitation, it’s built to break you down and keep you in your place. So why not take debt and get an education, an idea that seems far less risky. Well, the economy isn’t so good, but why is that? Why isn’t the economy so good, why aren’t people spending? Trust in one word sums it all up. Trust in the economy is at an all time low. But what caused that? That word, or rather two words is consumer confidence which despite papers and statistics is an all time low. But what caused that? Well the panic and financial collapse of 2008. What followed seven years later in August of 2015 was the collapse of the Chinese industrial and manufacturing sector.

We went from an inflationary economy (back by Central Banking), to a stagflation economy (where nothing improves but the next iPhone or Samsung phone and only marginally) to an officially deflationary economy in August of 2015 with the shaking of the stock market from the ripple effect of China. If this all seems too complicated, it is and it’s done intentionally. The idea of “liquid” assets or financial regulation is complicated and hazy, but that’s intentional, so that you, the average person do not understand it. Let’s cut through it all and get to the core of it. What happened in 2008?

Well, what happened was a shifting of resources. A shifting of money. Money in 401ks, retirement accounts, money that was set aside for savings dropped in value on the stock market because people started to sell. And that selling caused people that managed your money, namely mutual funds to sell those stocks and positions in the market for a cheap price, causing a reduction in retirements and savings. So picture this, you’ve worked hard your whole life, 40 years, you’ve set aside a bit aside. You’ve portioned carefully only to find in two months, your money go down to half of what it was worth.

What does this do? Well it causes people to panic and to not trust the economy and to save up. But to save up one must have money and to have money one must have a job but to have a job requires an advanced education in a shifting economy, which requires debt or loans to re-train yourself which requires time and effort. Why would you give time and effort to re-train yourself for the global economy when you just lost half your hard earned money and are beyond the working age.

Old people earn money over their lifetimes, but when there is nothing to retire on, they continue to work blocking younger people who got expensive educations from working from earning money. This is the basics of the stagflation economy. Things are “slower”, people have less money but the stress of having less money and less job opportunities and less work around causes people to drink more, do drugs more and spend money in an illicit way, any way to get high and forget the problems of today. So already we can see that the system that we are talking about, the global economy is a fragile system indeed, backed by people’s educations, debts, emotions and their spending patterns.

>>4994443

So let’s continue. Who benefits from a stressed out worker that does drugs and works overtime for the same salary. Who benefits from people earning less and working harder to maintain their job because other people are out of work. Why are people out of work? Because people are spending less because they don’t trust the economy? What is the economy? A series of connections, frameworks or connections if you will.

You’re hungry so you spend money at Taco Bell or McDonalds to eat. That in one way is a part of the economy. You need clothes, so you shop at Kohl’s or Wal-Mart, that in one way is an economy. The economy is simply the exchanging of money for goods or products and services. Stuff that is made that you cannot make because you lack the resources (lumber, oil, minerals, steel, manufacturing labor, etc, etc). So basically, you cannot build a car, so you must buy one. You cannot stitch shoes or get the plastic from the ground, unlike a sandwich, so you must buy one. So you work to get money to spend money for the exchange of goods.

This is the economy in a nutshell, an agreement, an exchange and it is a constant series of exchanges. But when people spend less, they shop less, companies earn less, so they hire less so people have less jobs to compete for but the population or total amount of people around remains the same so people compete all the same for the same amount of jobs. Who does this benefit, who has to something to gain, who is happy about people not working about people suffering about people smoking cigarettes constantly, about people drinking constantly about people bickering constantly over bills, over money?

Who benefits over young black men killing each other for drug hustling corners, who benefits from young white men working lower paid jobs for which they are overqualified for? Who benefits from lots and lots of Eastern Asians and Indians who are willing to work harder for an education, work for less and question authority and offer innovation far less? Who benefits basically, from people staying in their place and bowing before to the almighty dollar. Think about it, who’s happy when people suffer, when people work harder for less and bicker and argue about it?

You would think it’s the bosses, that own the companies but once more, wouldn’t those same bosses who own your Mom and Pop shops, who own stores want the economy flourishing, working well so they could sell more stuff? Sell more wine, food, shoes, jeans, phones, headphones and such and such? Why wouldn’t a store owner or a mechanic or a programmer want the economy flourishing? Why wouldn’t a doctor want patients to come in, instead of worrying about people not coming in because they can’t afford medical bills? Who has to gain? If the economy is bad, neither the worker nor the employer gain.

Yes, while the employer has to pay more in an inflationary economy and has to deal with turn-over, that is employees leaving for a better job, he doesn’t get as many sales, he doesn’t make as much money and he still has to worry about his business making ends’ meet. So it is not the employer, it is not the businessman and if anything we should thank the businessman because as shitty as a basic job is, that is barely above or at minimum wage, he still (the employer) provides that opportunity. Otherwise, one must live on welfare or sell drugs or scrap money from others, whether they be parents or someone else to get by.

>>4994501

So the million dollar question is, who benefits from workers staying in their place, form business not earning more and from people arguing with each other over petty issues instead of focusing on the issues at hand? Who benefits from chaos? From worker strife? From millions of men in prison? From the system being totally inept and corrupt and from stealing money from the middle class? If we examine it under a spy-glass we can begin to ask the right questions, find out who got hurt and who benefited and who gained and who lost in the crisis of 2008 and why things have changed so much, for the worse since then.

The crisis originated in September, when a bank known has Lehman Brothers could not pay it’s debt back. It was a bank that had been running since before the civil war, a time so long ago that people had earned trust in it. It was one of several big banks, deemed “too big too fail” or banks that would be around and continue to be around. To borrow money, one must pay it back but to earn the right to borrow money one has to say, “hey, give me this money but I’ll pay you back and extra” or known as interest. Interest, is what owns the financial world and it what runs the financial world and banks because no one gives away money for free because there is always a risk you might not get it back.

So interest comes into play. So the interest or “haircuts” on the Lehman Brother’s account got too high and they couldn’t pay back their debts so they defaulted. It just so happened several other financial firms essentially had money tied up with Lehman Brother’s, namely AIG or a mortgage bank. What is a mortgage? Well it’s a house. To buy a house you either have to put all cash down or get a loan. Are you starting to see the bigger picture? The world doesn’t run on exchanges, it doesn’t run on you buying food or goods or services, it runs on a series of loans of exchanges.

At the highest levels, everyone borrows money and the higher you get on the mountain top of power and financial success or money, the smaller that mountain top gets. Those at the top all know each other at some level. So we’re beginning to form a clear picture here, and while it seems confusing bear with me. Banks run the world because they loan out money, and they get interest and since interest is invisible as long as you continue to receive money from someone you know who is trust worthy or has a high enough credit score you can continue to make money as a banker.

This is why poorer people spend money as soon as they get it, they have no credit or no score and no reliability or “report card” aka a financial score or credit score so that banks or other firms can loan them money. Because they have no fall back money, they don’t know that there will be a better tomorrow. So in there stress and short-sightedness, they spend more freely, on alcohol, meth, cocaine, ecstasy and so on as a release for the pressing jobs they work at for less to earn less. So on the surface we come to our original discussion, those who earn the most, the richest continue to make money because they have “fall back” loans or people they can trust on and they can loan out money to the middle class and know they will get it back because if someone from the middle class doesn’t pay their money back, they get a bad credit score and can’t borrow money in times of need.

Are you getting the bigger picture yet? It’s okay, let’s break it down further. When there are crisis or people drink and argue or fret over money, crisis tend to happen from increased stress levels, focus drops, the idea of self-actualization of happiness decreases because people work harder. So the poor go out and spend money, on new flat screens or new shoes because they never know when they get it. And the middle class or the former middle class, continues to pay back debt they borrowed to buy newer things because they’re scared of their “adult report card” or their credit score going down. So, the people at the top, the people that loan money, will only loan money to secure people or people who can pay it back.

And the fear of not being able to pay money back and never getting money again in a form of a loan (for an education or car or house) keeps middle class people working instead of following-up on an education to avoid being poor. Because to be poor means to never have money to spend and only getting it marginally and what would be the point of saving it up regardless if you are, as a poor person, only going to work a terrible job for so long? As a poor person, you cannot count on savings because in times of need, such as a friend or wife or child needing money, you have to spend it? In times of stress, you need to relax as a human being so you spend it a the bar or your dealer or with comfort foods and so on and so on.

>>4994601

This wouldn't happen in a free market economy

>mfw /pol/ wants an even bigger government with a planned economy based on Keynesian economics.

>>4994601

Let us continue on with this world view or framework in how we deconstruct the world. You know the world is shitty because you earn less or have money problems and you know because your friends or family are suffering. You know you’re desperate for a job or know as a college or university student there might not be a brighter day, you might not get that job. You know as a middle class person or an older person, security, stability and having solid relationships and a solid job over time build prosperity but you’re not feeling it. Even as a rich person, while the effects of this never-ending “recession” are beginning to wear on you. So let’s define the classes, the people that earn money and that don’t.

If you don’t have a job, you are in the “slave” class or welfare class where you depend on the government. Whether you get money because of medical issues, real or not or whether you are an African-American earning money from wel-fare or a prisoner in prison, you rely on more or less the American Government for your bread, for your meals and for your prosperity and therefore you are a slave because while you may get food, shelter and be provided for, the money you earn is insubstantial for real prosperity, for a mortgage or a new suit or an education. Furthermore you are unlikely to have good credit or any standing with various banks or much of a network, therefore you are deemed in one way or another to work the rest of your life or toil about aimlessly, as a slave would in centuries earlier with no definite chance of moving up in financial standing in the world.

You are to die at an earlier age due to drugs or stress related issues or as a girl get pregnant. This is a terrible class to live in and a class that struggles and lacks the understanding for why they are prodded at constantly and it is a class unfortunately that police and bureaucracy tend to clamp down on, because if they would not, the violence in their hearts would boil over and create riots of much more frightening murders of the poor class or middle class who do pay taxes and support the system that is, police, army and bureaucracy.

So what does the “slave class” or being poor have to do with the global economy, with debt, with banks loaning money? Who owns us? Who owns the dollar? Who owns the police? Who owns the courts and federal system? Ask different people and you will find different answers. Some will say various parts of the system is not for sale or believe in our Democracy or our Democratic-Republic while others still believe it is the Anglo-Saxon people who first immigrated here from England and to this day from the 1600s still have roots in power. Known as “WASPS” or the “White-man” and yet still others claim that boomers or those born in the 50s and 60s hold power.

Let’s assume something first, those in power want to stay in power. They want to fuck the prettiest women, drive the nicest cars, wear the nicest shoes, drink the finest wines, sail the nicest yachts, build the tallest sky-scrappers, they want to stay in power and enjoy power. But who is in power? We can think of names and while we confuse money for power we confuse also, who owns the money, owns the power. But what is money? For the “slave class”, it is the check from the government or the meal from the government. For the poor, a step above the slave class, it is the ability to have a job, any job, whether minimum wage or not and being able to provide for their kids due to their bad decisions.

For the middle class, it is a credit rating or reputation with firms to hold their mortgage or house down and their new car. For the rich? Well, the business owners, the scientists, the doctors and lawyers it is the ability to have clients, customers people that will shop, people from the poor and middle class who have money. So what are we missing? If we know the rich or those that have entitled degrees or businesses don’t benefit from a slow economy or less exchanges of money for their goods or service, then what class is above that, that does benefit? Well, let’s call them the “elite class”, the class that in Marxist rhetoric would be the bourgeoisie or those that don’t have to worry about money, because remember, they can loan it out and a loan, is as good as money working for itself.

>>4994807

Money multiples, it stacks upon itself, the more money you have the more money you make. This is a rule of power. What is power? Power is the way, the flow the tai chi if you will of the financial, military and successful world. It is the fundamental laws of human exchanges or negations or relationships which define money and how it works. Why do rich people or rather I shall say, “elite” people as we imagine them drive nice cars, go to balls and wear nice dresses and suits? Because it dignifies power or the ability to create opportunities or exchanges with others because one has influence with others up higher on the mountain top, whether they be judges, senators or businessmen.

Looking nice is just part of the rules to power, a set of rules I must admit are contradictory. For example, say a random bum of the street asked for money, you might give it to him depending on how you are feeling and your background. But if he asked for a business loan you would not give it to him. Say a man pulled out of a new Lexus, or Ferrari or whatever vehicle you imagine a rich man to pull out of and walked up to you and asked for a hundred dollars and that he would pay it back with another hundred in a week. Likely you would still not give it to him, but perhaps you would and would be interested. The fact that you show interest in him because of his materialistic possessions shows that you respect the laws of power, to achieve something must mean someone is doing something right.

But if you knew this man, and he was the richest man of your circle of friends or family or people that you’ve known, you would consider giving this man money, perhaps you would. That is power, the acknowledgement of a connection or the fact that you know this man. See the difference between power and money? Money is simply an exchange, and power is the ability, the dynamic flow of people and connections which dictates money, investments, loans, relationships, wives, husbands and such, it dictates how we act and perceive others and how we respect others. Hence why drug dealers dress nicely, because with their new found wealth, they want women to respect them, to entitle them to let them know they can share in their wealth without the hard work involved to raise their kids.

Does anyone have the image with all the powerful families surnames? I remember it being posted once in a thread on /cringe/ but i didn't save it.

>>4994832

So once more, the rich, while they have money do not have power because they are part of the system, they are unable to loan money. They do not benefit from chaos because their prosperity slows and while they don’t feel it, their money does not grow and they must work just as hard, just in much nicer conditions then the poor. Therefore the elite, who have money, who have power because they have the ability to loan money which creates money because money that is lent is working for itself are separate from the rich. That is why, when we ask for socialism or for the idea for the rich to pay their share, it does not work, because those who make more than 100,00 aren’t the problem, neither are the rap stars, the balls stars, the accomplished scientists who earn millions.

They pay their taxes. Even the business owners who make millions and only pay 15% on investment tax aren’t the problem because at one end or another they make their money but it slows during a recession or stagflation or as now, a deflationary economy where growth actually slows. So calls from liberalism or socialism or the call for income equality, isn’t exactly equality, because we’re already equal in some sense, we all spend time making money, we all follow the laws of power, we all follow our place in the system. Rather what income equality is, is the ability for the middle class to get access for more support from the government, in terms increasing the number of slave class who depend on the government, in turn increasing the strain on the rich class who do support the system through tax and the majority of the money they pay.

It would seem, socialism or communism or any other collectivization would not work because it would increase the amount of the “slave class” who depend on government, decrease the number of middle class, strain the rich. Once more, we find only one class that benefits from this form of chaos or “wealth” distribution, the “elite class.” Remember, money isn’t just burned, no one just wastes money and while some of it might get lost or watered out or bills might crinkle and rip and might become useless, much more is printed out in colossal volumes to make up for this. In fact, when more money is printed out, it hurts the middle class and poor class though a term known as “inflation.”

But before we dig deeper and begin to explain these complicated terms, let’s focus on the simple. Let’s focus on what we know and what we can deduce, let’s get even simpler in fact, and break things down to such a level that you have full understanding of the world around you and you climb above it. Let’s form our own circle of power, our own class, our understanding because what runs the world is power, which runs money, which segregates people in class, but power is derived from knowledge so it is through this knowledge you can form your own class, your own awakening. You can join the few who know what is going on in the world and spread this knowledge and form a new class, regardless of slave, poor, middle or rich, you can become “awakened”, part of the aware of those who know exactly who rules us and break those shackles, open up the eyes that are hidden and rise above.

>>4995015

What is money? An exchange waiting to happen or in the process of happening. What is power? The network you have to decide how your money and other’s money is handled. What is a network? People you know. Who has the most power? Those who know others who know the network that decide how money is made and created. But before we even dig into this, yet we must know why must we have money. What does money really decide? Money decides prosperity or success and what defines that? The ability to raise your children. But why children? Because money and power define the ability to have access to women’s reproductive abilities or her ability to have a child and to raise that child successfully from birth to adulthood.

Let’s reiterate that. Money is the control of exchanges, exchanges that in the mass amount of volumes and for the larger portion decides the reproductive ability of women to create children. That is why prison or insanity is so unpleasant for many factors but that women are not around, a man insane will live with other men in an asylum, a man a criminal will live with other men in a prison. There is no reproductive ability, no way to offset the aging through the passing of genes. Even the most liberal hippie who smokes marijuana, who has no care, in same way or another fights for his own existence. The very air we breathe, oxygen in the minority and nitrogen in the majority, is in fact some way toxic and erodes the skin and cells.

The very atmosphere we breathe, the very world we live in, ages us. What is cancer? Cancer is the unrestricted reproduction of cells, toxic cells that feed off the system creating imbalances which causes early death. What is AIDS? A virus that erodes our immune system from fighting off the diseases, viruses and bacteria around that kills us. Old age is the passing of the organs and the body as a system. Our cells, continually multiply off each other and copy off each other, just as a son copies off his father in genetic code and behavior if he had one, so do our very skin cells (technically the ones underneath our skin since our skin is in fact dead) reproduce and replicate. A human is merely half a cell, an egg and another half a cell, a sperm merged together to create a unique string of DNA which multiples itself into a full human being. Our cells and our very DNA is a unique combination.

The determining factor for reproduction and to pass on our genes and to continue on in this world is through our DNA which can live on long after us. So really this world is in constant conflict of various DNAs or strand of unique codes, stands which determine nations, cultures and religions in fact. DNA is so sacred to our existence and for our reason of conflict and it why women lie in the center of all this. A man is limited, once he has enough money, status and decent enough looks, by only his factor of time and physical energy to reproduce as much as possible. While a woman, must be limited to nine months for a full pregnancy and due to her oxytocin levels and chemicals that create a bond, to almost the entire child’s lifetime to raise it. That is love, the ability to nurture and create something.

Hence, a man can reproduce and have sex with hundreds or thousands of women but nowadays is limited by legality and jealously of other men, but nonetheless, he is capable of reproducing a lot. But to have this, he must have status or power or money to subconsciously factor into a woman’s mind for his ability to offer his resources or connections for his ability to raise a child should he in fact impregnate her through sex. Hence the term, “getting lucky” for a man nowadays does not in fact to have to have a child with a woman every time he has sex, and most sex in fact does not lead to kids but our very basic hard-wiring, our brains, that very primitive side does still equate sex with reproduction. The very competitive forms for sexual reproduction, now pronounced through money still take place today.

>>4981465

>A number of critics have been incredibly suspicious of the motives of Marx and suggest that the purpose of his work was to sabotage the nascent socialist movement; he reframed all of the socialists who came before him as exponents of "utopian socialism" and his ideas as so-called "scientific socialism",

>It should be noted that before Marx ever wrote a word the socialist movement already existed in Germany, France, Britain and elsewhere, each with their own national expressions and ideas of how to improve the situation of the working-class following the Industrial Revolution.

>Funnily enough, the name "Rothschild" is completely absent from Das Kapital.

>>4995115

On some level, the competition for money is in fact competition for women, and the other part for the middle class and rich class and even the elite class, for the competition to raise their children successfully. It goes much deeper than that, the competition or desire to have one’s own, to pass on one’s own unique DNA and heritage is what creates families, a bond which cannot be shattered easily. It is why elites horde money, to create unique DNAs and why Kings and their bloodlines mattered so much, because the unique DNA strand determined who should rule and inherit the kingdom and armies of a deceased King. The following or loyalty to these DNA strands or shall we say, dynasties or families has created nations, flags, ideologies and the combining of forces of war.

This is why Marxism or communism is so unnatural, because it seeks to destroy the very hard-wired evolution through millions of years to protect our own DNA and our own existence to reproduce for the sake of other “foreign” DNA. This is the basis of nationalism, to protect others’ DNA lines who closely match yours against foreigners who share DNA far further away from the tree of evolution of yours. So therefore, the elites wish to preserve their existence and their lines of family heritage, but to do that they must create chaos, to point the finger away from them. They must create entertainment, to keep the commoners and the peasants entertained. They must keep the poor alive with Football and advertisements.

They must keep the middle class entitled with movies and TV. They must keep the rich bogged down in political and business feuds and with petty things such as travel and boasting about one’s own status to deflect from the fact that their heritage and sacred lines are preserved. It is why unifying together for anything other than a King or a DNA line is absurd. To follow an ideology or a flag or a nation or a leader, rather then the disguised fact it is the promotion of one owns DNA and knowledge is hideous. However, let us return to the question of those who own us.

Let us assume again, that they can print money, an in abundance and in fact the only nation that is allowed to print money freely is the United States. However, the United States Central Bank, needs to take on loans, or Bonds as they are called to print money. Money can’t just be printed or too much might be printed which causes inflation, which means with too much money around, someone might get it who doesn’t deserve it. If five people have twenty dollars in their pocket including you and you’re bidding on an ice cream cone, you can assume the price will be several dollars but who knows really. But if another ten people come in with twenty dollars, that increased competition will cause the price to go up to twenty, or in fact higher as people pool money together to share the ice cream.

See how power trumps money? Power is the connection people make to take that ice cream cone to pool money together while inflation is the fact more money came in through other people. Now the idea of spending so much and working so hard for an ice cream cone is absurd, but what would you think of a Victoria Secret model or a Lamborghini. What do you think model cat-walks are about, what do you think modeling shows are for? For the rich to “bid” on women or enjoy them being shown off. What do you think clubs are for? For the middle class and rich to enjoy women dancing in tight jeans or short skirts to “bid” with drinks with “money” and on who brings who home, hence the music we listen to nowadays.

What do you think house parties are for? For the poor or young, to “bid” on women with drugs and the ability to have a car or their own place to bring a woman back. Then we form friendships, wingmen, other sub-set systems and cultures around it, around getting “laid” and bringing girls back because we are taught to and it distracts us from the real question, why are all so damn poor? We’ve explained that it started back in 2008, but what happened was a redistribution or money being taken from the rich, middle class and poor to the elite’s hands. When a stock price drops, it’s cheaper and if someone buys that off someone because they know the price will go back up (because they have enough power and connections to know it will), they can in turn buy that cheaply and sell it later for far higher money.

>>4995213

Yet still we lack the answer. We know the elite have connections with each other, because if they did not, they would start conflict with each other. We know they share a unique DNA, a unique strand with each other in one way or another because if they did not, they would not be unified. It is not money alone that unifies people, but a strand of family, of dynastic families, of heritage of people having a common bond. Even amongst two young birds in a nest, one will pus the other out to access resources. So competition amongst the top must be either cut-throat and extremely dangerous as it was in times of the princes of for example Italy of the Renaissance period or extremely calm, because everyone knows each other. An example would be the 19th century for various parts, as various monarchs of Europe knew each other. With the exception of the Napoleonic wars (a young upstart with no royal bloodline who sat upon various countries his own family members to rule) which was a bloody series of conflicts of the Monarchs against Napoleon.

So do white men rule the world? Do rich white men rule the world. Well, the answer would be no because rich white men do share a common DNA strand, they do not share a common enough bond, they would eventually cut each others throats or a more figurative answer would be drive each other out of the business of lending money. Are Swedish men, English men, Russian men, Greek men, Italian men close enough genetically to warrant them working together and setting their families together in the game of power to own congressmen, the media and various other circles of power. We know for a fact, those who own us, own the dollar, own the ability to print money and lend it own, to the government in the forms of bonds and to use as it trickles down in mortgages, own the media as well. Because if they did not own the media, then the media, and those who own it, would shine the light on those who do own us to make us rise up so that the men who own the media, would get more money and power and be able to raise their kids better.

Are you starting to see the pattern? Those who robbed us in 2008, were not the bankers on Wall Street, they weren’t some shadowy firms, not investment bankers and not mathematicians and analysts, those men lost their jobs too. They were men higher up the ladder, who could loan money, who don’t cause conflicts and who don’t run each other out of business because that would cause conflict, cause change and cause other family lines to pull into each other for support for those family lines that started the conflict. Remember, the elites know other elites so to harm and elite would be to get other elites against you. And we know with all the distractions today, that it is intentional, just look at the ads of today. We know that today, with our culture of not caring and nihilism that is intentional, that causes conflict which causes us to work harder and stress out more and save less and prosper less.

We know that our culture of Instagram and Facebook and boasting to one another of how successful we are to garner attention, support, power and other women or men in our lives is intentional. Because it refuses to unite us by our common bonds of DNA, those we share DNA with and thus prevents nationalism or the right to defend one owns borders from foreign DNA invaders. We would assume those who immigrate to another country, legally, threatened by deportation would act correctly while those who are smuggled in illegally, with nothing to lose would go after women first to propagate their DNA in the foreign country to create a common bond for their own success against the natives. We can assume the elites would encourage immigration, politics who encourage immigration of particularly successful countries to impregnate the native women to change the population.

>>4995298

You can look at the firms today, the businesses and corporations of today and find that they have been much the same for awhile and while they create new and exciting research and developments, they remain much the same. The big brands, BMW, Coca Cola, General Motors, Wal-Mart, these firms have been around for a while. If there was increased competition between them, although they don’t share the same market, but what I mean is, if competition firms like Apple and Microsoft did not have those who share a common bond ruling them, we would see continual competition to completely override the other. Instead what we see is passive competition, competition of nature to rule over the other, to earn more, not to destroy as was in the olden days.

Furthermore, the elites would encourage socialism, communism, collectivist ideologies which tell others to set aside ties to family, community, religion, traditional bonds based on you and your neighbors sharing enough of a common DNA strand to defend each other in times of need. After all, by not relying on your neighbor in times of crisis as liberalism would have it, you have to rely on banks, on loans or as poor person who cannot afford their bills and will soon be kicked out or will have their money go to someone else, drugs and alcohol and easy women. Rather, as an elite, you never would want the people to unite, that would pose a threat to the security of you being able to raise your children comfortably for the next thousand years, long after you are gone, ensuring your success on this planet and it’s hostile environment.

While we evolved form tribes of dozens or hundreds of humans, we no longer share such a large connection, rather these connections are more or less digital now, and less feeling, less emotional, less humanistic and to restore that, we would have to follow-up a DNA line which would allow that connection to become human, that connection for DNA, that connection for nationalism, basically a King that would rise up against the elites, that would rise up against indiscriminate money printing and tectonic shifting of the market for personal gains. But there is one last piece we are missing in fingering the elites, in piecing together the puzzle, in figuring out who owns us, in finding out who keeps our virtual shackles on us through debt, constant shenanigans in the media and entertainment, growing government for handouts and who makes us feel like less through our virtual and disconnected lifestyles.

>>4995801

>high leadership

Oh shut fuck up. Kikes are ruthless conniving bastards and blood thirty psychopaths. They are not "leaders" they are parasitic tyrants.

>>4995849

Seriously can you be anymore obvious?

>>4996160

Whoops here ya go.

>>4878933

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Mayer_Rothschild

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Lionel_de_Rothschild

http://en.rightpedia.info/wiki/Rothschild_family

http://en.rightpedia.info/wiki/Adolf_Hitler_against_Rothschilds

http://en.rightpedia.info/wiki/Nathan_Mayer_Rothschild

http://en.rightpedia.info/wiki/Lionel_de_Rothschild

also keep an eye on Alexandre de Rothschild

>>5007119

I never knew he was named Don Juan. Based.

>>5007325

Interesting.

>>5007325

Baron David was indicted in France back in July. I don't know if anything came out of it.

http://www.mintpressnews.com/famous-rothschild-banking-dynasty-facing-fraud-charges-in-france/207233/

>>4885543

he reminds me of this guy lol

i thought that i was pretty redpilled until i read this

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php

>>4981443

>>5152172

Better?

>>4878096

>>4885023

>kate rothschild

>>5165983

>>5165998

Fuck out of my thread Larping Pagan faggots.

>>5166474

>we can't do shit about this, why even discuss it

Go to bed, shill.

>>5166474

Nicki Hilton is married to James Rothschild i remembered. I thought that was pretty interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Hilton_Rothschild

Zac Goldsmith and Alice Rothschild look like Germans

can someone explain this?

maybe there was not only incest, but also lot's of cheating going on. (German lovers)

or maybe these two are no Rothschilds/Goldsmiths and are only actors

>>5193879

Apparently Nathan Rothschild and Ivanka Trump used to date.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-446056/The-richest-Rothschild-all.html

And here's the fixed version the op picture in case anyone was interested.

Rothschild Blvd, Israel

>>5265247

Nice, they also have a hotel there.

>>4879234

I'm not even to the 1900s and this is depressing me.

>>5267472

>>5267472

List of Rothschild properties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_properties_in_the_Home_counties

>>4884988

Might as well dump some spooky pics.

Rothschild 1972 ball

>>5282499

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/pictures-rothschild-family/

>>5282530

>>5282530

>Dali.

Well that explains everything.

>>5292464

I honestly never heard of Dali before (although I recognize some of his work), kek.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Dali

>>5282614

Sorry for the >>5282621

>>4877477

glorious Godly 77s blessed twice

I curse your shekels rothschild!

>>4877593

>>5437201

Every goddamn time.

Religion upholds tradition and moral structure. Christianity is easily the best and most prevalent candidate for this right now, but it doesn't really matter which religion.

Good luck converting people to whatever Pagan shit you believe in, you hopeless faggot.

>>5437240

Interesting.

>>5166025

>>5437201

>>5437224

Baron Rothschild indicted in France over fraud case

http://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2015/06/18/exclusive-baron-rothschild-indicted-in-france-over-fraud-case/

This might be old but i figured i add to the thread.