[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, and current events

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


YOU COULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS

File: 1455011062774.jpg (81.76 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, GodEmperor.jpg)

8f2bce No.4900863

We all know that Donald Trump has had some degeneracy in his past. I've been waiting for his past alleged infidelities to be dragged out and used as a tool to pick apart his credibility, but the media has steered clear. Some have hinted about it, but there have been no major attacks on his past sexual proclivities.

Why not? Well, I think it's because the liberal media pushes so hard for instant marriage to whoever and whatever you want and they'd love to have same-day divorce, if they could. It's hard to bash Trump for something that happened 30 years ago when you want trannies to be mainstream and faggots in every home. It's hard to talk shit on Trump's lack of overt religiousness when you actually hate all religion except Islam and Judaism. When you're pushing for partial-birth abortion, it's hard to call out his interivew in Playboy magazine.

Also, the media darling, Cuntlary Clittin' and Bill have so much shit to dig up that Donald's sexual proclivities make him look like a priest. Once you open Pandora's Box for attacks on personal lives, it can't be put back in the box. That 50lb stack of shit just will not fit in that 20lb sack once it's out. The media, while it backs Hillary, has to be careful about what they say about Trump. Attacking his personal life three decades ago just gives the green light to call Bill out for his past and encourages the digging of Hillary's past. They simply can not jeopardize their choice in that way.

For all the media does to push a "progressive" agenda, attacking Donald's past sex life (which is incredibly tame by the standards of today's social elite) unravels the agenda they're feeding us. How can you support gay marriage and say that marital infidelity in the 80s is a horrible thing?

I've been waiting for them to attack Trump's personal past, but they just can't. In the past, this would have definitely been an issue for Trump; but today, they must keep their criticisms to themselves, lest they look like they care about Christian values. Can't be caught dead trying to uphold morality today, if you're the media. There's so much immorality that the media is forced to encourage to achieve their end result that all such personal mistakes have to be swept under the rug by all nominees.

This is one benefit of a liberal bias in media that Trump can exploit. If he's smart, he needs to start personally attacking Hillary as soon as she becomes the nominee. When he drops Clinton bombshells and they're forced to talk about personal issues, his look like peanuts by comparison.

Thank you, liberal media, for making Donald Trump bulletproof for his personal mistakes.

f9d802 No.4901222

File: 1455013812187.jpg (63.94 KB, 500x376, 125:94, 1274970486844.jpg)

It's funny, how they'll go all out against Republican politicians who get caught doing gay shit, but not much else gets traction anymore. It seems as though the only thing that offends the (((media))) enough to make them ruin someone's career is hypocrisy. Many politicians have had huge infidelity scandals that were ignored as soon as they spent a week groveling. David Vitter was even exposed as a diaper-shitting fetishist. But unless the man in question is on record as an enemy of the same practices in which he engages, they don't have a clear path for attack on moral grounds.


8f2bce No.4901278

File: 1455014275534.jpg (10.44 KB, 200x200, 1:1, checkem.jpg)

>>4901222

nice get


a05dba No.4901302

What happened to the recordings Bill Clinton threatened to use against Donald?


8f2bce No.4901378

>>4901302

What recordings?

All Donald has to do is mention the name "Jeffrey Epstein" and it will shut Bill's pie hole.


a05dba No.4901387

>>4901378

I don't know. I recall seeing it mentioned a few weeks ago. I guess meetings between him, Hillary and the Donald.


8f2bce No.4901409

>>4901387

If they had something substantial on Trump that isn't just as damaging to the Clintons, they would've made it public by now.

Either it doesn't exist or it does exist and it's nothing substantial.

I don't see a scenario in which Clinton can go after Trump without sinking themselves in the process. Hillary can't be throwing stones while living in that glass house.


dcd6cf No.4901424

>Why not?

Because they're waiting until the last minute. People can be forgetful. Why waste your ammo half a year before the actual election date?


df298c No.4901480

I'm not so sure OP.

Look at what happened to Anthony Weiner. He had a sexting scandal hit him twice. The media pulled no punches.

I think it ultimately boils down to "who cares, it was 30 years ago" and the fact that the media ran the story to death back then anyway. Bringing it up again would be completely pointless.


8f2bce No.4901557

>>4901480

If they do, they'd have to talk about Bill's infidelities. If Donald's infidelities are a valid concern, then the Clintons shouldn't be allowed to even run.

Everything that can be used against Trump can also be used against Hillary even more. Every legitimate concern about Trump, besides the racist allegations, can also be said about Hillary.

His wealth can't be mentioned because the Clintons are filthy rich from real estate scams. His divorce can't be mentioned because Bill was fucking Monica with a cigar in the oval office. His lack of experience can't be mentioned because Hillary has very little experience and fucked up during her time as Sec.

It's my opinion that they don't mention these things because they're just as damaging to Hillary. I could be wrong, but just 15 years ago, the media was chomping at the bit about W's cocaine use in the 70s and his former alcoholism in the 80s. Either the media has no moral ground to stand on anymore or their darling has more dirt than Donald. I think it's a bit of both.


f56baf No.4901564

File: 1455016889916.jpg (21.66 KB, 600x337, 600:337, 1454694577461.jpg)


19a134 No.4902141

File: 1455022353129.jpg (105.1 KB, 400x345, 80:69, thatword19789999.jpg)

>>4900863

>degeneracy

Bill Clinton = serial rapist, Donald Trump = Bruce Wayne. That's the difference.


7fc835 No.4906885

Part of the compromise with monogamy that whites made thousand of years ago is that we sort of look the other way when extremely successful Alpha males have mistresses


eb8c15 No.4906974

The other day I was was watching Fox news icr the program but they had some liberal cunt on there going on about how much the liberals love trump and that if they weren't voting for Hillary or Sanders, Icr which they said, that they would be voting for Trump.

So basically they are trying to convince the conservatives that trump is actually a liberal.


a9f814 No.4907049

What if a COMPLETELY NOT RIGHT-WING reporter went and attacked him over this solely to open the Pandora box? The entire MSM would burn itself alive


a7c872 No.4907864

>>4900863

That's exactly what they wanted.

If they really were against him, they would to the same to him like they did to ron paul


d3c023 No.4917643

>>4900863

Wow, OP, it's almost as if Donald Trump is a Jewish puppet or something. That would be impossible though, right?

http://pastebin.com/cRZDHRc6


7fe50f No.4917690

>>4900863

I think you're overestimating the moral consistency of the average shitlib. Remember, these are the same people that get furious by that strange-looking wog Roosh's "pro-rape" comments to the point they put on a tryhard act about getting whiteknights to beat his ass or sending female boxers to disrupt his event, but didn't bat an eye at Rotherham and criticised the Right for "exploiting" the Cologne gropefest by rapefugees.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]