/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

>>4932471

Where's that Breitbart cuck who was supposed to come out with an "explosive" article about Cruz?

Motherfuckers. I knew as soon as he said, "Its stuck in editorial" that they were tossing that story in the memory hole.

Anyway, Cruz crashing and burning is the key. Publicizing his cheating in Iowa would probably help.

>>4932471

>>4932471

The thing is that SC is the true dixie, as long as we can meme it such that it aligns with the Southern sensibilities, Trump should be fine.

>>4932471

Trump learned from Iowa. He now has a good "ground game" as it's called, and I'm sure he knows what he's facing in South Carolina

>>4932502

>>4932471

Oh also, Cruz backed the gang of 8 immigration plan, just like Rubio, and now his official position is that he was only SAYING he supported it so that he could sabotage it.

An accurate word describe his own description of this strategy, which I think would convey things well to evangelicals, is "Treachery".

It really illustrates his nature as a snake, regardless of WHEN he was actually being sincere (if ever).

Treacherous ratman?

TREACHEROUS RATMAN

Trump is polling much higher in SC than NH.

Just make sure that everyone knows Cruz is a nigger loving jew slave.

>>4932591

>namefagging

filtered

>>4932624

he's right, namefags are cancer

>>4932471

>Media's starting to say that South Carolina will be a huge Trump hurdle

This is nonsense. Why would it be a hurdle?

Bake a pancake with trump and jesus on it

Trump just needs to be himself and be honest…..which he is doing.

>>4932709

We hope

Not saying Trump isn't the current best choice, but the only intentions you ever fully know are your own

>>4932471

>‘This Will Be The End Of Trump’s Campaign,’ Says Increasingly Nervous Man For Seventh Time This Year

When has the media been right about Trump ever?

Give me one time, I can wait

>>4932765

Back in the 80's they said he might run for president one day.

Imo just court evangelicals the least acceptable amount. They drink grape juice at church, they have woman pastors. They are cucked beyond all hope. Trump support will come from non retards and moderates.

>>4932765

They said he was a joke candidate.

And here we are, all laughing.

>>4932793

Evangelimemes aren't even human, they are ZOGbots.

>>4932817

>Cartman supports trump

>Kenny accidentally takes some of Ben Carsons sleeping pills and dies a quiet death.

>Kyle tries to comfort a bawling Jeb Bush who confesses that all he ever wanted to do was open a pet store that sold turtles in Dade County.

>Stan exposes that Trump is really saddam hussein or some shit.

>"I learned something today…"

>Mr Garrison is deported for being a fag.

>>4932817

They would use a really shitty caricature of him that would annoy me

>>4932525

True dixie but the bible belt. And some of the most irrational ones as well. I've heard they have a big drug problem, like most states these days. Pin it on illegals, if there are enough white incarcerated pin it on economics.

It'll be a hard win but I don't see Rubio or Jeb playing well there and Cruz isn't a long term threat. As long as Trump does better then Rubio that's all that really matters.

>>4932741

>seventh

If I was counting it'd be about anudda shoash by now.

>>4932850

basically this.

Good for the South Park guys that they can think outside the box about a poop joke, but they really fail at doing so when it comes to politics.

False compromise fallacy abounds, and Trump flies in the face of that.

>>4932502

We dont care about that. It sounds like whining. Make memes about him being an effeminate pussy. A jingle and images would do the trick. Faggy sound bites.

>>4932848

>Trump turns out to be (((literally))) hitler

>what a surprise

>>4932893

>>4932848

please let this be the episode

>>4932867

Their issue is that they can't take a political stance because of their contrarian nature, so they just shit on everything. And since everyone else already shits on Trump it would be pretty lame.

>>4932884

Oh, and we have roadblocks we put up to catch illegals driving without a license. Build wall would be just as good. Push cruz and rubio being gang of 8

>>4932850

>>4932867

That's kind of the point though, isn't it? South Park makes fun of people to make a point in the end

At the very least, they say things that are anti-sjw, so maybe they'll be on Trump's side at the end of the episode

>>4932471

First new SC polls come out tomorrow.

https://twitter.com/Opinion_Savvy/status/697586682087018496

Polling #SouthCarolina tonight - prelim results show @realDonaldTrump with yuge lead' - full results tomorrow night #SCPrimary

See also https://twitter.com/Opinion_Savvy/status/697624256662917120

>>4932884

>Make memes about him being an effeminate pussy. A jingle and images would do the trick. Faggy sound bites.

No, fuck that kinda shit. Trump's strength for this entire campaign has been that he's done EVERYTHING (especially attacking) differently from other candidates.

If he falls into the pattern of, "Running a commercial where you string unfortunate sound-bytes into something painfully unfunny and obviously out-of-context", then he reduces himself to looking just like the other candidates. (and people have been sick of that political trope for years anyway)

He's gotta combine substance with viciousness.

>>4932893

No, because Hitler himself rises up from hell for a 3 minute monologue in a shitty condescending faux-german accent to tell Trump to take it down a notch.

Cartman has a dream sequence about putting on Trumps Hair and commanding the world. The audio is cut directly from Trumps stump speeches.

At the end they all sit around with randy and get high at a bernie rally, because south park fucking sucks and has sucked since season 10.

Almost forgot…

Most of the polls are conducted by the MSM. Real Clear Politics shows no new polls since January for SC - meaning: the delay means the polls really don't fit the MSM's narrative. Trump's poised to rek SC

Newt Gingrich said earlier today: Trump most likely will be the nominee.

>>4932692

Underrated post

How does one go about actually doing this?

>>4932944

Honestly at this point I really am hoping they broker the convention.

If Trump gets 49% and they broker the convention the establishment will burn.

>>4932587

There is a potential future problem though because Rubio and to a lesser degree Carson are on a fast decline, and Cruz could pick up a lot of their religious votes.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/02/south-carolina-gop-republican-primary-polls-polling-trump-cruz-bush-rubio/

Trump should still get this, but any stumble will be magnified, plus the Evangelical leaders who hate Trump will be going for blood.

>>4932587

>>4932587

There is a potential future problem though because Rubio and to a lesser degree Carson are on a fast decline, and Cruz could pick up a lot of their religious votes.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/02/south-carolina-gop-republican-primary-polls-polling-trump-cruz-bush-rubio/

Trump should still get this, but any stumble will be magnified, plus the Evangelical leaders who hate Trump will be going for blood.

>>4932967

They burn either way. Might as well win. I also don't think Trump's stupid enough to let them broker it. Believe it or not, I'm pretty well convinced he'll find a way to disrupt those plans too.

>>4932926

Whatever you say yank

>>4932982

>Trump should still get this, but any stumble will be magnified, plus the Evangelical leaders who hate Trump will be going for blood.

Trump won with evangelicals in Iowa. Quit repeating this Cruz propaganda.

>>4932967

It IS sort of a zero sum game, when you look at the historical prescient.

The last time something like this happened, it was Reagan in 1976, but Reagan was cucked out of the nomination that year by the process and the people who didn't want him.

That whole event was why there was a so-called "Reagan Revolution" in 1980.

For the record thought, the nomination process has been tightened up since then, and delegates are much more closely bound to vote for the candidate indicated by the electorate rather than using their discretion.

And tippest of top keks, those rule changes that are now fucking the GOP establishment were made to cuck Ron Paul.

>>4933011

No he did not. Stop lying.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/primaries/iowa-entrance-poll/

>>4933045

Yes, he did. He unexpectedly won all the densely evangelical areas that were predicted would go Cruz. Ann Coulter pointed it out multiple times following the Iowa caucuses. Bill O'Reilly conceded it just last night in an interview with Trump.

Also, you seem salty as fuck. Did I blow your kippah back, Moshe?

>>4932471

The media's full of shit. Trump will have hurdles (like TX) but this isn't one of them.

>>4933027

Here is a good article on brokered conventions.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/11/politics/brokered-convention-republican-party-donald-trump/

What I didn't see is what the obvious big question is: has anyone walked away with the nomination from a brokered convention who didn't have the most delegates? If you only got 38% of the delegates, but more than anyone else, you still won in a sense. Picking someone who has 33% of the delegates would seem really shitty.

>>4933065

>>4933045

With the caveat that I don't know anything about how Iowa evangelicals voted, I'd just like to point out that the caucus entrance polls showed Trump being many points higher than the final result,

so obviously, barring shenanigans, some people changed their minds within the caucus itself

>>4933095

Those shenanigans were brought to you by microsoft, giving your vote for Trump a 33% chance of really being for Lubeio.

>>4933065

I already provided a link showing evidence otherwise. I know lying is second nature for Christians, but all you have to do is read there that Cruz won on Evangelicals 34 to 22, and Trump won on non-Evangelicals 29 to 18.

>Also, you seem salty as fuck. Did I blow your kippah back, Moshe?

One thing that is funny about Christians on /pol/ is that you all sound like you are from 2012.

I'm not worried about any states for Trump, other than California and Washington, and probably Colorado.

IE, libcuck commie pinko states.

>>4933082

>Picking someone who has 33% of the delegates would seem really shitty.

Let's it was, say, Trump, Cruz, and Rubio, Trump at 40%, the spics at 30 each.

Assuming they could get get either spic to fold (promise of position within the administration, hell, a fucking BRIBE), they could get the two to stand together and say, "We're so much alike, and all our voters have in common that they were clearly voting against THAT GUY!"

And then the Trump people would abandon the election and they'd get shlonged, but hey, there ARE ways to spin it.

Of course, they'd be double-fucked because that treachery would get the Don to break his promise and run third party.

>>4933095

That is true, and South Carolina is a primary, so a different set of circumstances. Ted Cruz simply had a much better ground game in Iowa.

What is a little scary re Iowa is that Rubio and Carson also did well with Evangelicals, so Cruz was splitting the religious vote with them.

The good thing about South Carolina is that they see niggers firsthand, so they live in less of a bubble than idiots from Iowa.

>>4933095

>>4933107

This. The entrance polls differed from the final results. Maybe people did change their minds. Or, maybe the evangelicals that Cruz stole from Dr. Carson with his campaign's fraudulent propaganda had something to do with it.

>>4933126

And I'm presenting evidence that the entrance polls from Iowa were entirely unreliable & at odds with the final results. You also ignore the fact that Trump & others have said exactly what I am saying, and no one has bothered to contradict that Trump did enormously well with Evangelicals in Iowa. Don't forget that Trump received endorsements from Jerry Falwell, Jr. & Franklin Graham, two Evangelical heavyweights. Finally, you neglect to factor in Cruz's deceitful and underhanded tactics, which no doubt hurt both Carson & Trump.

>>4932862

Drugs are bad here, coke/crack for the nogs, pills meth and heroin for the white kids. Wigger culture really hurt us starting in the late 90's and through the 2000's. White kids thinking it's cool to drink syzurp and take xanax like Little Wayne. Nogs run wild in the hoods and spill over into white areas bringing hood crime with them. Richest city in the state had two nogs from a neighboring city go on a high speed chase through it and ended up home invading some white guy. https://archive.is/Keowv

Point is, people in the South are sick of this shit and we support Trump because we know he's wise to problems created by non-whites.

tfw you live in the South not during it's glory days but now in this mockery of what it once was

>>4933187

forgot to mention, the cop in that story is named

>Detective Sgt. Michael Mangina

>>4933174

Yeah, I could see something like this happening if Rubio bounces back. If Jeb remains in the mix, and possibly even improves over time, then it gets more plausible.

It would be massively controversial.

>>4933184

You did not present any evidence, just assertions. Entrance polls actually question the beliefs of those who voted one way or another, which matching districts to beliefs do not do.

You are full of shit, as is the norm for Christians on /pol/.

Here is a recent article on the problems evangelicals and their leaders have with Trump: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/meet-the-evangelicals-who-hate-donald-trump-20160203?page=2

>>4933250

>rolling stone

>same magazine that said "Trump's not funny anymore, guys"

Ya blew it.

>>4933269

You don't have an argument. Bye.

>>4933274

>>4933269

>>4933250

fug you both

>>4933274

You cited the Washington Post & Rolling Stone, two virulently anti-Trump outlets since day one. You clearly only have an interest in winning the argument - not the truth. And to top it off, you flounce like a liberal on Twitter.

Ladies & gentleman, Chan Outreach in action.

>>4933279

You still watch South Park. You aren't from /pol/ either

>>4933283

Speaking of truth, do you have any proof of the Chan Outreach thing being real?

Not saying you're making it up, but I've seen it mentioned a few times, but never with evidence along side it

>>4933294

Bring me evidence of the holohoax and I'll bring you evidence of Chan Outreach.

goy

>>4933283

This is another Christian tactic, that of challenging sources. Anyone can play this game, as hardly any sources are above reproach.

Of course, you are welcome to have your stupid conspiracy as to why Rolling Stone & Washington Post would lie about Evangelicals not liking Trump. Because, of course, they like Evangelicals so much.

>>4933310

It's like you didn't even read my post

>>4933295

Wow, that was a great argument. You have really done your research. I'm so impressed.

Now take your standup comedian with his nigger wife and go fuck yourself.

>>4933274

Sounds like a ledditard

>>4933321

Oh, so you DO know how to challenge a source based on reputation. Because when you thought that anything written by rolling stone, I thought you didn't understand that a "news source" with no credibility and a history of liberal agenda might not be worth using to try and change someones mind.

Top Cuck.

>>4933316

Listen, Chan Outreach was created by Daniel Gabriel and is a subdivision of Applied Memetics LLC, look it up.

Rubio's unexpected success in Iowa was possibly due to a last minute push by Evangelicals. Check this out.

>Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., widened his lead in WORLD’s latest evangelical insiders survey, breaking 70 percent in combined support for the first time.

>The findings are part of a monthly survey of 103 evangelical leaders and influencers, 82 of whom participated in January. The results are not scientific or representative of all evangelicals but offer a glimpse into how a group of influential evangelicals are leaning in the 2016 presidential race.

http://www.worldmag.com/2016/01/rubio_widens_lead_in_latest_world_survey

>>4933339

No I think I'll wait for the person I replied to originally to respond. Thanks for playing

>>4933274

What argument? They're lugenpresse.

Their reporting is true insofar as, "Yes, Evangelicals who hate Trump are a thing that exist." allegedly

>>4933349

Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing

>>4933349

Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that you are not a shill. You are a fucking shill.

>>Guy called Dan Gabriel tied to Ted Cruz is an ex-CIA guy. Specializes in SIGINT and online shilling.

Runs a company called Applied Memetics.

They also recruit security specialists that look like hackers(archive.is/DbOfY)

Applied Memetics IP address also runs on same server as Hungarian NGO business type of company that just happens to have Soros affiliates and other shady characters on the board of members.

There is also a "national security" provider tied to US gov that uses same telephone number as Applied memetics.

Applied Memetics has ties to various other areas outside Virginia (where lots of US gov intel guys work).

The IP address for Applied Memetics is on the same site as americanhungarian.org, Which has people who used to work for Soros.

He's apparently been training journalists in countries like Cuba, Ukraine and Georgia

His company has also been hired by the U.S. Army(archive.is/TX7BG)(drive.google.com/file/d/0B6Mo1c2bIFLWQ1VMa3RnREJ3aG8/view?pref=2&pli=1)

ALBUM FROM ORIGINAL THREAD ON THE OTHER PLACE:

http://imgur.com/a/UqYNE

>>4933369

k

>>4933312

>your stupid conspiracy

This is another shill tactic. I also like how you're practicing your religious D&C script on me when I've given no indication or tell to you that it might work.

>>4933321

>debate me

>>4933328

>the holocaust happened

Filtered. You're just the foil in this game.

>>4933348

>the Rubio surge was real

Don't forget the 6 million, goy.

>>4933349

I don't have to prove shit to you. If you'd been here before December, you'd know about Chan Outreach, and how it hilariously failed to shill /pol/ into swinging for Sanders. If anyone's got the screenshots, post em.

>>4933376

Let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that you shouldn't kill yourself. You know exactly why you should kill yourself.

>>4933380

>I don't have to prove shit to you

You're right, I was asking you to nicely.

>If you'd been here before December

I don't lurk /pol/ every day. Once a week at most

>>4933392

k

>>4933380

>shills displaying reading comprehension

>a picture that questions the holocaust and BTFOing a "blueprint" for a "Death camp" with actual testimony from a kike at nuremburg's book is saying the holocaust happened

Proof you're a kike shill here to sew discontent.

>>4933399

Do you get paid per post or per hour kike?

>>4933380

Do we really need to? Its been mentioned daily for months now in like 25% of threads

>>4933404

k

>>4933380

>the holocaust happened

His picture implies the opposite. Just saying.

>>4933380

>>the holocaust happened

Reminder this retarded fucking kike actually thinks this picture

>>4933328

implies the holocaust happens.

Filter his ID. Ignore all responses.

>>4933405

>Do we really need to? Its been mentioned daily for months now in like 25% of threads

Nope. That's my point.

>>4933413

I think he was posting that pic to lend himself some kinda 1488 cred.

>>4933406

Do you have a contract that requires you to reply to every post?

>>4933418

>I think he was posting that pic to lend himself some kinda 1488 cred.

oh really schlomo

>>4933380

>>the holocaust happened

because you say something completely different.

Can't wait to show you the price your tribe has wrought.

>>4933422

k

>>4933413

Yeah, but he's a Christian, and they're dumb as fuck.

>>4933432

Reminder religious d&c is done by a script like this one.

>>4933418

These two IDs filtered and the last half of the thread is readable. odd.

>>4933432

I was under the impression a good portion of /pol/ were Christians

>>4933427

Is it sheer stupidity, or is it that they can't help but lie? All you need to do is scroll up a few posts to see that he was clearly confused about the meaning of your image, but he has to act like he understood it.

Anyway, good image. Saved.

>>4933447

I think they all came with the 2nd exodus.

>>4933450

>>4933462

Stay salty, d&cbot.

>>4933447

Godlessness leads to degenercy

>>4933447

There's a big minority for sure, but a lot of stormcucks and militant atheists bash them at every opportunity they get.

>>4933431

So it's confirmed that you're required to reply to every post.

Remember that your entire existence is worthless and you should fucking kill yourself today you sack of shit shill.

>k

>>4933472

You do realize by replying to him saying he's trying to divide and conquer, you cause people to become paranoid whether that could be true, thus furthering his agenda by decaying trust within our group, right?

>>4933479

>stormcucks

Killyourself kike

>>4933481

k

>>4933487

jew

>>4933491

k

>>4933431

You get no upgoats here, shlomo

>>4933492

jew

>>4933484

You are new as fuck. Lurk moar, shill

>>4933498

k

>>4933501

kek this is pretty fun, why am I so easily amused

>>4933484

Actually, retard, i'm explaining that there's a literal script which triggers on certain mentions of key topics in threads. One of these is religious, it sets up a "christian" or a "pagan" to bait and reply to eachother and encourage "organic" repsonses and erode trust

I'm pointing this out to you because you're too stupid to understand what it is when blatantly faced with it, yet you call it paranoia

I used to think nixon was paranoid too when he said those goddamn jews are always listening to me

I don't think he is anymore.

>>4933484

Good insight, but that went way over his head.

D&C is simply one of the things they spit out reactively. They don't give it much thought.

>>4933504

Because you have the shill assblasted

>>4933518

Tell me friend, who or what am I shilling for?

You have all the facts it seems :^)

>>4933512

So I'm a script then, huh? I guess I can't pass the Turing Test for someone as smart as you, who doesn't even know to use periods at the end of a sentence.

>>4933512

>i'm explaining that there's a literal script which triggers on certain mentions of key topics in threads. One of these is religious, it sets up a "christian" or a "pagan" to bait and reply to eachother and encourage "organic" repsonses and erode trust

And what proof do you have of such a wild claim

>>4933510

>>4933522

>>4933532

For someone pretending to be a shill, you sure do check off all the boxes of a dedicated shill. I'm curious, how does derailing a thread benefit you?

>>4933522

Youre sliding. Spamming, trying to off topic with SP, religion, memetics, and concern trolling trump. You sound like a reddit kike

>>4933545

I wasn't pretending to be a shill, some faggot got all assblasted that I asked a question and called me a shill.

All I did was fuel his hatred by replying with one letter

>>4933548

I have literally only spammed "k", and made one post about South Park.

The rest you clumped other's posts with mine because you lack an argument

>>4933532

Don't hold your breath waiting for a response. I mean, it's not like there is any real reason for anyone on /pol/ to despise Christianity: >>4920717

>>4933557

Yeah, honestly, some of this discussion is academic when it comes to South Carolina. Your state is something like 28% nigger. That is a big wakeup call right there.

Iowa is almost completely white, so they can still believe in their silly fantasies.

>>4933532

>And what proof do you have of such a wild claim

You still denying it.

>>4933593

Nigger please

I'm not denying anything because you haven't given me anything of substance to deny. Give me some proof of what you say to look over with my own eyes, then I can make a decision on whether I believe you or not. I'm not gonna take what you say as truth just because you say it is

>>4933560

Its because of our ID system here. Holy shit you really are new here

>>4933557

Im in Fort Mill. I dont see any signs for Trump. Mostly carson, rubio, and cruz. Most I talk to wont admit in public they like Trump, but do behind closed doors.

>>4933557

>This place will be a walk in the park for Trump.

Finally back on topic. I'm optimistic, but I expect it to get very nasty. Cruz & Bush will be gunning for Trump. Pro-Rubio Super PACs connected to Romney dark money are already pushing negative ads and shilling on social media. And then there was the plant at the rally in Pendleton yesterday. /pol/ wasn't the only group who noticed him.

The real salt is gonna come when the poll numbers are released in a few hours. I think the media's been withholding polls for SC because Trump's got a huge lead, and there's no clear 2nd place.

>>4933550

Way to evade my question. How do you benefit from derailing this thread?

>>4933600

I know what IDs are fuckhead

You made up those topics I posted because you're mad

>>4933603

Did I evade it? I thought it was obvious with the "fuel his hatred bit"

It was fun. Have you forgotten what that is?

>>4933610

Fun? I thought you were a serious guy who demanded evidence and arguments.

>>4933600

>>4933605

Both of you shut the fuck up. Derailing is derailing. No shit from either of you for 'he started it' or 'I'm not derailing'. It takes two to dance.

>>4933610

A good example is with this guy >>4933600

. I'm gonna ruin it for the sake of this example

He still thinks I'm shilling for whatever the fuck, so I keep replying with inane bullshit and insults to fuel his anger because it's funny

Excuse my triple post

>>4933619

I'm not derailing he started it

>(1)

>>4933615

The only person I want proof from is >>4933512

The rest is funposting

>>4933603

>and there's no clear 2nd place.

That I'd be a little surprised by. It seems natural that Cruz would be a strong 2nd, even if Trump is way ahead, but maybe things haven't caught up there.

>>4933619

Ive been responding to the OP as someone actually in the fucking state.

I think doubling down on build wall rhetoric will be the best bet. State coming up Im concerned about is Nevada, but it isnt a winner take all state (SC is winner take all btw).

But I am TELLING you, the Trump ads here are lacking, but the rallies are great. Wish hed come up by the nc border again sometime before the primary

I always found the (1) meme amusing because usually, the more posts someone has in a thread, the less value any of them have. Case in point Mr. (29).

Anyone know what the odds are of Fiorina and Christie supporters going to Trump? It would be a nice boost.

>>4933658

Hes right you know

>(30)

>>4933599

>>4933626

Nice proof btw

>>4933652

I agree, he needs to nail SC hard with the wall.

>>4933634

>That I'd be a little surprised by. It seems natural that Cruz would be a strong 2nd, even if Trump is way ahead, but maybe things haven't caught up there.

I posted these before thread got derailed.

https://twitter.com/Opinion_Savvy/status/697586682087018496

https://twitter.com/Opinion_Savvy/status/697624256662917120

Should've been more clear. There's no clear establishment lane candidate and the race for 2nd is too close for comfort - that's my point.

>>4933658

Fiorina probably go to some other cuckservative.

Christie will mostly funnel into Trump because they have similar alpha personalities and Christie smashed Rubio in the same way Trump has been doing to Yeb! for the whole campaign.

>>4933658

The case has been that supporters of those that drop out will spread out, but usually most go to the current leader. Krispy Kreme is similar to Trump as is. The old hag, I dont think so. Never met anyone that wanted to vote for her though.

>>4933630

Whatever you say, slider who talks like a plebbiter

>>4933697

k :^)

>>4933658

Fiorina will endorse Rubio or Jeb, depending on who the establishment decides to get behind. Remember, Mitt Romney urged her to enter the race long before Trump even announced. She's deep state insider.

Some disagree w/ me about Christie, but I think he flipped on the GOPe and will either endorse Trump or help him from the shadows.

>>4933697

Are you kidding? Don't feed the trolls.

>>4932966

paint it in negative with some sticky oil, burn the rest enough to give contrast.

>>4933707

Murdoc called his debate a suicide bombing, so probably. He hit Rubio in a way that trump couldnt and he knew it

>>4933707

>>4933697

>>4933685

That's not bad, a nice 5% boost to Trump will help, especially in SC where it's winner-take-all. The boost he will get there gives me a boner.

I had never even heard of Fiorina before November or whenever she slithered out of the woodwork. I didn't know she was a cuck but given her track record of failure I'm not surprised.

>>4933739

hi, still waiting

i know you filtered me but still read this

>>4933721

reminder that christie died to make america great again

>>4933742

>>>/suicide/

>>4933751

I'm not the one spouting shit without proof

>>4933756

>call out d&c bot

>the d&cbotresponse script activates

>>4933760

And on you go

>>4933760

>current year

>still feeding trolls

>>4933652

Trump's aim is a sort of organic, grassroots feel. He's a populist, so it's not surprising that he's running almost no ads.

Honestly, I wonder if ads might actually hurt his campaign.

>>4933739

So do all the 20% takes that Super Tuesday has (Because Trump is the only person Guaranteed to get over 20% even in states he's shakey on like Texas)

>>4933768

He's the troll, Anon.

He's the one who refuses to post proof of what he says and expects people to take him at face value

>>4933658

Fiorina's voters will probably spread but a decent number of them might go to Trump since he's also seen as a business-oriented political outsider.

>>4933770

Hes getting millions of dollars of free exposure. Its like his campaign has been funded by 100 million dollars of Streisand Effect

>>4933781

Then stop replying, faggot. What the fuck did I say about 'he started it'?

>>4933789

It's truly a thing of beauty.

>>4933790

Why? It's fun to see him squirm

>>4933721

This. And the fact he called Trump on Tuesday night is telling.

>>4933735

>I had never even heard of Fiorina

My dad knew of her from her days at HP. He kinda believed the outsider thing for about a day. It always smelled fishy to me, once she mentioned knowing Bibi.

>>4933790

hestartedit

>>4933806

still waiting

>>4933806

>>4933809

Both of you shut the fuck up.

Daily reminder that the people arguing with shills are shills themselves. Back to the topic, highlight Ted's sliminess.

>>4933812

This doesn't concern you Anon

>>4933813

A good idea.

Ratman is maybe a good meme to start.

I have no meme magic but something that makes him look particularly untrustworthy would be good. Particularly if it's paired with information about his indiscretions.

Not together though. Maybe the indiscretions could be a well-sourced and professional-looking infographic.

>>4933652

I'm worried more about Texas, this is a state where if Trump got NH results he'd get all the votes (Due to a 20% rule) but Cruz is going quite well there

>>4933809

>activate play stupid script.css

jut go back to whatever shithole you came here from kike

>>4933822

Yeah. It's Ratman's backyard.

We have to destroy Cruz's image completely and irrevocably for Trump to take Texas.

>>4933775

Alabama, Georgia, TN, TX, VT, ID, and Louisiana are 20%ers for Super Tuesday. Worth a total of 383 votes.

>>4933836

Sorry LS and iD are not on super tuesday, but shortly after

>>4933831

I have a feeling Cruz's chickens may come home to roost in TX

>>4933831

That's actually quite surprising to hear. Texas is one of the worst hit states when I comes to spics, and I figured the Wall would be very popular there more than anywhere else because the Wall directly effects them.

>>4933867

The big thing would be the whole gang of 8 thing with no mention of the phrase gang of 8. That is getting tired with people, being less impactful

>>4933900

Cruz supports tough immigration laws now. He flip flops more than Kerry did

>>4933900

>>4933904

Don't forget Trump's spokewoman is Katrina Pierson, a Tea Party girl from Dallas. He's already had ample practice attacking Cruz, so rest assured, Trump will have an arsenal come 1 March.

>>4933447

yes we are

>>4933658

both

>(1)

and

>(Six gorillion)

are huge red flags

>>4933447

Yes, I've grown to respect them and many of their beliefs since coming here (Used to be reddit teir Militant Atheist)

That said a few of their beliefs are a tad cucked

>>4934085

(1) shouldn't be a red flag. I always use it to mark drive by shills because I don't have to bother responding to them.

>>4932783

lmao

Okay, one time.

>>4934004

>Suddenly, media says it'll be hard for him to win.

Their memes are so limp, though.

It's like our Golem is a huge, violent warrior and theirs is a little clay saltshaker with legs that tries to take a step and falls over.

>>4934126

>>4932794

He is a Joke Canidate just not in the typical sense

>>4934148

Well that was almost Prophetic

>>4933372

>Applied Memetics IP address also runs on same server as Hungarian NGO business type of company that just happens to have Soros affiliates and other shady characters on the board of members.

I missed this bit. Holy fucking shit. All roads seem to lead to that piece of shit and his horrid globalist empire.

Trump + Confederate flag = Tapping into that conservative rage he harnesses so well.

Make it happen.

>>4934203

David Brock funds a Super PAC that is funded by Soros - remember, it's all shell companies. From Wikipedia:

American Bridge PAC employees over 50 “trackers” to follow and record Republican candidates across the country. These trackers are equipped with high-tech recording gear and are assigned Republican targets to follow and record. According to the New York Times, the organization “aims to record every handshake, every utterance by Republican candidates…looking for gotcha moments that could derail political ambitions or provide fodder for television advertisements by liberal groups.”

>>4932471

Nah fam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QRA8qSoSt8