/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Probably for a similar reason they prefer police to have guns over citizenry

If power becomes externalized then one feels less responsibility and fear

"Civilization" in these terms is more like a cattle farm

If hipster faggot nu-males are anything to go by, I'd say they only say that under particular circumstances.

Consider the difference between a hipster faggot nu-male's attitude toward "strength" and "virility" and their attitude to black males, Baltimore riots, and muh pitchfork reviewed hip hop music. Hell, Hollywood is basically made up of revenge porn against whites that pencil-necked hipster geeks with black framed glasses jerk themselves off over.

Because they think of themselves as civilized, but are weak.

>>4933008

Because they equate strength to shows of strength and dominance — that is violence. And large amounts of violence is indicative of barbarism or, more often, savagery (be aware of the differences).

It's also probably a tool designed to help destroy civilization. Shame or guilt the strong and vital as being barbarous and uncivilized, thus promoting passivity and weakness and helping further destroy Westernity.

A leftist's feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive himself as being a strong and valuable individual. He can only feel strong as a member of a mass movement. Having no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation, he immerses himself in the sordidness of his problems in hope of inspiring the pity, guilt, and anger of others around him to take from those more fortunate.

When you call out his inability and powerlessness he shrieks your audacity yet humiliates himself when then asked, what is he going to do about it? Because a leftist's power only lies in arousing feelings of guilt and shame in others. His only option is to acknowledge he is a loser and play being a victim.

By working together as a group and calling strength barbaric and weakness civilized they hope to cause the strong to surrender their power to them for a good cause under the name of equality.

>>4933008

Because the only emotion they understand is fear

Because they were all raised by single mom's and they were all cucked long before they even learned how to jerk off

They also equate physically strong and violent women as role models. Females that take on male traits are heroes, and vice versa.

>>4933008

Because being passive makes you a victim and therefore a winner in the Victimhood Economy.

Because they are all fucking pseudo-faggots

Because if you live in a crowded city, i.e. in a civilized setting, being strong and aggressive creates problems whereas passivity makes it easier for you to fit in.

>>4934479

>less presidential advertisements

For a very pleasant time there were none

They do make nods to it. They replace virility (root word vir – man in latin) with words like "dynamic" and "diverse." There is the sense that the old words are too masculine. I think the more important concern is what they mean in reality, i.e. what they call diverse against what one called virile.

Virility against agitation, direction against mindless "development." A plan. A mold with energy in it against energy expended at random. High rises and foreign money = dynamism, agitation, exploitation, apathy of everyone but the greedy or well-constituted. Superficial changeability, fickleness, what was call inconstancy, a vice, now a virtue. I get tattoos, dye my hair, shop in thrift shops, and I become a dynamic "individual." A country gets foreigners imported of the lowest calibre. Either assimilated or ghettoized. The former has culture reduced to superficial expression of food and language, and is emptied of content. The latter are xenophobic and mean and selfish (as to their group). The country is thus "diverse." The country has form without content. Foods of all kinds, colours of all kinds, materials of all kinds, buildings of all kinds and ages. Yet one has a pond, not a river. I.e. one has a motionless body of water.

The different between virility and dynamism is between motion and stagnancy, and between directed energy and going on past momentum.

You used to get in the past streams of highly directed energy crossing. You got Greeks fleeing into Italy and you got the Renaissance. That is diversity in a real and productive sense. A box of m n m's is not diverse except in colour, and having thrown in it a few beatles does not make it any more appetizing.

The symbol of virility is the sun.

>>4933008

>Why do leftists/normalfags equate strength and virility to barbarism and passivity to being civilized?

I have noticed this in others and previously in myself some years ago, that's when I became worried and completely flipped everything around. I can only thank God for introspection.

This is the core of leftist thought and spread.

I think the essence put in words is - rejection of authority.

-First, a leftist rejects absolute God. He is then an atheist, not religious, or has his personal Jesus reduced to hippie. God can't be better than him.

-Then he rejects authority figures - there can be no king, our parents are stupid dinousaurs - if we have a preseident it's only because he's goofy and likable.

-Then they reject superiority of character - "That guy is strong but he must be stupid, so he's lower than me. That guy is successfull, but he's evil so he's lower than me. I could easily be just as successful!"

-Then they reject authority of nature - "I am not what I am, I am what I decide to be. Conscious mind triumphs over all!" Then they project this onto others, so that characteristics don't mean anything.

Rejection of authority is the best way to put it.

>>4935723

>The symbol of virility is the sun.

PRAISE THE SUN

>>4933952

>By working together as a group

We work together as a group, too, or should. We need to be a fam, a clan, a tribe, a nation working together to crush our enemies 'neath our mighty wills.