[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, and current events

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


INTERNET PEOPLE

File: 1458260699624.jpg (42.73 KB, 344x245, 344:245, thechinesemustgo.jpg)

1115b2 No.5440001

Hey /pol/, why is no one talking about

CHINESE BIRTH TOURISM??

>COSTA MESA, Calif.—Thousands of wealthy foreign women, mostly Chinese, come to America each year for the express purpose of having babies on U.S. soil. The women arrive on tourist visas and typically go home with the baby after several months.

>But before the women leave with what critics have called “anchor babies,” they typically spend thousands of dollars in private hospitals, high-end shopping malls and luxury apartment complexes. That has made this practice, known as maternity or birth tourism, a lucrative business in certain areas of the U.S., including this one southeast of Los Angeles.

>The rise of Chinese birth tourism reflects the new wealth in China, and uncertainty among some of its citizens regarding the country’s long-term economic future. A child born in the U.S. automatically becomes an American citizen, and under federal law, when the child turns 21, he or she can sponsor foreign family members for a green card, and eventually citizenship.

>The Center for Immigration Studies, which supports a crackdown on the practice and favors more immigration restrictions overall, estimates that 40,000 women visit the U.S. annually on birth tourism, most from China.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/where-anchor-babies-can-be-a-lucrative-business-1446668720

More links:

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/09/25/birth-tourism-bay-area-operators-avoid-spotlight/

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/welcome-to-maternity-hotel-california-20150819

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/01/china-us-birth-tourism_n_7187180.html

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/08/25/birth-tourism-from-china-to-the-u-s-actually-is-a-problem/

If you are ever arguing with a liberal about Trumps policies, and they ever say that ending the 14th amendment is just about being racist against brown people, you can prove them firmly wrong, it's about being racist against yellow people too

I know Trump has brought up Anchor-Babies, but the guilty conscious of the browns has made it all about themselves, obviously. Can we bring the chinese into this conversation as well?

7173af No.5440135

I'll bump. Good thread.


410ec6 No.5440171

We need to get rid of these fucking anchor baby laws, it's the stupidest idea ever conceived. Who the hell came up with it?


116755 No.5440296

>>5440171

do you even need to ask?


944060 No.5440298

>>5440001

Been working in Singapore for the past 7 years; they handle birth tourism pretty well by not giving out citizenship to any child born here willy-nilly. I think the father has to be a Singaporean citizen before the child can even be considered one, and the foreign mother will be subject to strict immigration controls.

>>5440171

>Who the hell came up with it?

Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution shortly after the Civil War.


000000 No.5440435

>>5440298

And what's your opinion re: the Tittles Of Nobility Act (TONA), AKA the true 13th amendment, which, even if not considered an amendment, is the law of the land (though the jews and catholics, who have complete control over the supreme court, chose to criminally neglect the words of truth and fire)


6e4804 No.5440698

>>5440171

Guess (((who)))?


45d225 No.5440781

Liberals love this shit.

> Don't solve this glaring problem here because of one amall exception here.

So libshits, what is more lucrative: Wooing Chink women or rebuilding our economy to make China's look like a joke?

Thats what I thought you fucking commie bastards.

Forced leftist meme here: 'Birth tourism.'


ba0448 No.5440832

File: 1458265878508.jpg (59.29 KB, 325x495, 65:99, 9219464164_f65a3a723d.jpg)

>>5440171

Seriously. It makes no sense and would solve almost all of our illegal immigration issues.


38e9b5 No.5440863

I don't get this. How can people hate their own nation so much that they resort to these degenerate ways? How do they expect their kids to have any kind of honor or moral values? These kids will be soulless creatures all their lives.


18abf8 No.5440973

>The rise of Chinese birth tourism reflects the new wealth in China, and uncertainty among some of its citizens regarding the country’s long-term economic future. A child born in the U.S. automatically becomes an American citizen, and under federal law, when the child turns 21, he or she can sponsor foreign family members for a green card, and eventually citizenship

Then along comes Trump and illegals and anchor babies have to GTFO


5e1954 No.5441250

nationality merely by geographical birth is the stupidest shit ever


38e9b5 No.5441263

>>5441250

You should stop coming here then.

Traitor scum. End yourself immediately.


000000 No.5456969

>>5440171

Somebody living in an era when crossing the ocean took many weeks and cost a shitton of money.


6d9e2e No.5457028

As a libertarian, the market in anchor babies is a good thing.


d629f5 No.5457035

But 99.99% immigrants vote democrat!

So the real question is do you hate democracy?


05d9ac No.5457094

File: 1458394512485.png (191.63 KB, 267x264, 89:88, 1455772310676.png)

>>5440171

>Who the hell came up with it?

The 1865 congress under President Andred Johnson.


99a468 No.5457178

>>5457094

I don't understand this meme.


297eb1 No.5476105

>>5440863

>I don't get this. How can people hate their own nation so much that they resort to these degenerate ways? How do they expect their kids to have any kind of honor or moral values? These kids will be soulless creatures all their lives.

That's the Chinese right there in a nutshell.


ec4944 No.5501382

>>5441263

it is, niggers come to america, don't speak the language, don't know history, don't know shit about anything make a nigglet, and that monkey is a national

and somehow they have the same nationality as a guy, who speaks the language, is a die hard historian and knows his country

and somehow this is fair.


d156af No.5501435

File: 1458673926605.jpg (27.84 KB, 600x320, 15:8, deng.jpg)


2aa633 No.5501456

>>5440171

14th Amendment. It was put in place because whites in the US at the time were too lazy to repatriate niggers so they gave them access to citizenship.


8db5fb No.5501526

>>5440863

Its not degenerate when it means eventual hostile takeover by sheer demographic numbers

Its a conquest


12d968 No.5501756

>>5440171

Reconstruction Era America at a time when the only way to reach the country was by steamship or train.


56537d No.5501801

>>5457094

>law made in 1865

Oh thank god society hasn't changed since then


33acd2 No.5501888

File: 1458676048922.jpeg (84.73 KB, 640x413, 640:413, Chinese-Flag.jpeg)

>>5440001

What's wrong with the rich using their economic power in the free market to get what they deserve?

Are you a poor jealous fag?


86c5d8 No.5502725

I don't blame the Chinese for doing this as much as I blame the faggots who championed the legislation that made this possible.


12d968 No.5502837

>>5501801

Ironically, the Chinese Exclusion Act was written in 1882 to prevent Chinese from becoming American.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]