/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

I think I should also point out that the history of bad behavior she talks about is entirely fictional. Outside of last class, I have been perfect. She has even said so on multiple occasions and my participation grade for the last semester was perfect.

In fact, we had a meeting on monday to discuss an unrelated topic, and she made no mention of any participation problems I have. And again, roughly 3-4 weeks ago while I was asking her and the TA a question, she told my participation is always excellent.

I can definitely call her out on this, and I think she'll try to bullshit something, I'm much more eloquent than her and I don't think she can bullshit her way out of it.

punch her in the dik

I know you said it's a required class, but are there alternative professors you can take it with?

Can you just afford to drop it now, and resume next semester with someone else?

Make a point that Marxist theory is to the economy as Creationism is to biology.

>>5446999

Are you an imbecile, op?

You're going to an indoctrination establishment willingly every single day. If you don't like it, quit.

Impolite sage.

>>5447135

This.

Fuck her. It's not worth the trouble.

>>5447178

Fuck you, jewish goblin.

Sounds like you've been marked for "Re-education Camp!"

It doesn't get any more 1984 than this.

Final last words: "He loved Karl Marx."

>>5446999(checked)

What's your major OP?

>>5447144

Dubs confirm.

Also, is she hot? Fuck your professor and set her dumb ass straight, OP.

Terrible structure and grammar.

You either wrote this yourself or your teacher is a poorly educated feminist.

she needs the big D

>>5446999

This is why women should never be in positions of power. Call out her lies and comply with her asinine demands and be prepared to get graded harshly by her from now on.

>>5447226

I'm not sure why "poorly educated feminist" wasn't your fist guess.

>>5446999

Wow, sounds like she got second thoughts after what seemed like a congenial apology and decided to run to the big daddy uni authorities to sort things out for her. Pathetic, really, that she can't address you individually and with a respectful teacher-student relationship.

What do you expect from a Communist?

>>5446999

>An escalating pattern of litigious and confrontational behavior and attitude in class, which includes speech as well and dismissive or extremely agitated facial expressions and non-verbal gestures while others are speaking

>dismissive or extremely agitated facial expressions and non-verbal gestures while others are speaking

This makes me think you were sperging out in class and spilling your spaghetti everywhere. Have you not learned how to pretend to be interested/not irritated yet? Just "looking" upset is enough for you to trigger people nowadays. You have to pretend to smile and nod before politely calling out their retarded bullshit. It's called "tone policing" and it's all a libshit needs to deflect any and all facts and evidence you give them, because you "sounded mean", or you made a "creepy face".

Don't roll your eyes, don't chuckle when they say stupid shit, and don't make stress-sighs. Look at them with sincerity like they're a real person (even though they aren't) and smile and nod until they finish spewing their indoctrination.

>>5446999

>>5447083

Document everything, if this ever goes to the dean or something be prepared to lawyer up. College is supposed to be an open market of ideas between mature adults, not an indoctrination center.

Good job standing up for yourself, OP, you were not a fag today.

>>5447223

I think most of these feminist-commie cunts have just never had a real non-cucked man fuck them until they're sore.

It's my feeling that the more commie feminist they become, the more they want a hard dick. I bet the next day after being with a real man, they start wearing long dresses and acting like women.

If she's ugly, put an American flag over her head and fuck her for old glory. She'll sing a different tune almost immediately. Put that little whore in her place and I bet she becomes someone else altogether. Make a woman out of her, OP.

>>5447279

She's probably legitimately terrified that OP saw through all the bullshit. A male, non-pushover, visibly anti-Communist student would make any feminist immediately fear of some kind of imminent shooting.

>>5447295

>not an indoctrination center

>implying it hasn't been anything but for a long time now

I've witnessed some friends from HS go full SJW after only two years of College.

It's a fucking death trap I swear it.

I'm leaving this pos hellhole.

>>5447297

There is this one girl in my poetry class (it's for a writing minor, I know) who has a pin on her backpack that says "Ask for my pronouns" or something. During one workshop, she basically didn't like my poem, where I compared a body of water to a voluptuous woman. The other girls in the group didn't care; one even thought it was beautiful. I asked her, "Does it matter?" very plainly and her face went red and she sperged out. The other two girls had this look on their faces, like they were thinking "What the fuck?"

Anyway, whenever we make eye contact in class she gives a little smile to me. It's probably because - despite our differences - my former workshop liked to critique each others work. Either way, I think she misses reading my poetry and wants me to fuck her stupid and make her body contract in ecstasy. A lot of her poems dealt with loss of innocence and sex. Projection much?

>>5447311

That's why I've began wearing my MAGA hat at college.

People try to give me shit, but when I shrug it off or mock them, they just stop cold in their tracks. Unable to grasp how someone could disagree with them or how they couldn't sway someone with bullying tactics.

Show up to class anyway. Force yourself into participation.

You payed to be there. They have to do significantly more or you have to do significantly worse to be barred from class.

>>5447349

>tfw ordered my hat on the 28th of Feb

>tfw still haven't even gotten a shipping notification

What the fuck gives.

It sounds like you shamed her and got her to apologize to you…. but then she probably told someone else about it, got buttflustered and they cooked up the 2nd pic to try and reassert her authority.

keep cool op and stand your ground. you did nothing wrong.

>>5447376

>>5447384

Not even China could keep up with the demand he has.

>>5447384

Yeah. I mean I knew that they were busy, but this is getting pretty fuckin ridiculous.

>>5447376

hmm I think I ordered mine around the first of Feb

got my shipping notification about 12 business days later

Then my hat arrived 3 days after that

>>5447401

Chicago happened recently… So many hats were likely ordered due to that.

>>5447401

also it can depend on what hat you ordered I would suspect

Red and White is probably flying off the production line fast. But I went with Black and White

>>5447396

When Trump gets into power, just as Hitler revived the economy by putting millions to work on the Autobahn, so will Trump by making YUGE numbers of hats.

You should drop out of the joke degree you're taking and take a degree with a math class.

If you're in arts, your degree is overrepresented in the marketplace. What's more, as you've experienced, you're not getting an education - you're getting an indoctrination.

>>5447135

Fucking drop the class OP.

Take the W and move on. Hopefully its not too late for you to drop without an F.

>>5447132

aha quality post anon just quality :L

>>5447471

>:L

>>>/reddit/

>>5447345

Honestly, I think femi-cunts become femi-cunts because they lack male leadership (see: non-faggot men).

Women have no fathers these days, certainly not ones who put their foot down and make them grow up.

When they first see a non-faggot male, they are confused and angry, yet I think it provokes hormones and sexual attraction very quickly. In the end, after getting the dick from a man who puts her in her place, they become satiated, aware of their place in society not as a warrior dyke, but as a feminine female who wants life and family. Hell, maybe the right dick would even make them find Jesus.

Never back down from an attractive "feminist." You'll have her crawling on the floor in lacy panties begging for the D in no time at all.

>>5446999

If she wants to play that game, simply have one of your classmates accompany you to see the Dean and tell them to say the following:

"I don't really know Anon personally, but he has always been a quiet student. He does participate in debates when asked, though not in a confrontational manner whatsoever. On the day of the so-called incident in question, our tutor, ___, seemed to be in a very irate mood the moment class started. She was acting in a manner that under other circumstances I might have described as "bullying". When anon very timidly offered a healthy and rather placid retort to one of her arguments, she pounced on him. It's not my place to speculate, but I gained the impression that she might be dealing with personal issues which she chose to vent during class."

>>5447514

>Never back down from an attractive "feminist." You'll have her crawling on the floor in lacy panties begging for the D in no time at all.

I don't even think women really believe this shit; they just follow what is already established. Honestly, I kinda want to ask that one girl out, get to know her, then fuck her senseless while taunting her about being railed by a "ring-wing asshole." Maybe she'll loosen up. And honestly, she is kinda cute; some dry skin but otherwise OK.

Drop the shitty course and fill your humanities requirements in a class that isn't totally pozzed, I stupidly took sociology for the core requirement and first week I shit you not we had to read a book on white privilege and write a paper about it, I dropped the class and took intro to western civilization instead (professor is redpilled as fuck). There are unfortunately a few colleges where you literally can't fill the core requirements without dealing with this bullshit but chances are you should be able to find a class that isn't completely pozzed.

>>5446999

If the class isn't explicitly required for your degree, drop the class. If not, attempt to see if you can join a concurrent class/sign up for one next semester under another instructor. By the second letter, the bitch is determined to tank your GPA for daring to question and you'll be fighting her and likely the dean as well for the next 8 weeks.

If you feel so inclined, ask her to document proof of how you're lacking and grating her patience. You seem like an intelligent fellow, and I guarantee she's let darker, less intelligent students get by with a hell've a lot less.

Fuck off Judeo capitalist shill

Don't back down faggot. Just remember, don't get distracted by her language.

Make sure the whole class knows hitler was fighting against what he called "capitalism" too.

>>5447634

This is university. Not backing down = getting kicked out of school or having a 2.5 GPA because the entire department now has a vendetta against you.

The best you can hope for is snarky comebacks and making her look as ridiculous and childish as she's being to her colleagues.

>>5447557

I met my ex-wife the same way, sorta.

These women need to be told what to do and to a lesser extent, told how to think. Once you assert yourself, they are like putty in your hands.

She may even blow you off at first, but then when her friends aren't around, she'll pick up the phone and call. You'll be her little secret at first, but once you start showing her that you care appropriately, she will ditch the Tumblr and femi-cunt friends and follow you around like a lost puppy. Take her fishing, get her in touch with nature. I'm willing to bet you can make her an honest lady if it's not too late.

Again, these women want real men and have become femi-cunts because there's a shortage of men who can wrangle a wild woman without leadership.

This all occurred to me while training dogs.

Dogs are submissive by nature and only desire leadership and dominance so they can be submissive. If a dog is allowed to be the dominant one in their pack, they become aggressive and anxious nearly all the time. Truthfully, most dogs do not want the responsibility of being the "Alpha." Women do not want to be dominant and become aggressive and anxious when asked to do so. When a presence of dominant male accompanies a woman, she becomes like a well trained dog. Eager to take commands and will do most anything for a small treat. Good dogs are seen and not heard. With proper dominance, women very much enjoy the same.

>>5447532

That's a good idea, if it comes to that, but it's kinda tattling too.

>>5447664

>This all occurred to me while training dogs.

I guess this is why women are called bitches then.

After reading this, I'm kind of tempted to ask for her number and do some shit with her. Maybe I can eventually fuck the Tumblr out of her and fill it with RWDS.

>>5447718

And my ID keeps changing, what the fuck?

>>5446999

Fuck this red, and double down. Call her out on the essay requirement and that she is acting in bad faith or she is negligent in her failure to inform you of the prior essay. Tell her you feel betrayed and you will inform the dean about her bad faith/neglect.

>>5446999

I'd say be proactive. Go to the best advisor (or "advisoror" haw haw this professor is illiterate) you know and say you're being harassed in class. Bring statements from students you trust. If you REALLY want to go all out, bring a letter from a lawyer too - you can get them fairly cheap, especially compared to the cost of getting kicked out of college. And say you don't think you will be comfortable in the class anymore, so you need to take some other one for credit - or better yet just be given a "pass" so that you aren't punished for the school's error in hiring this person.

If you're thinking you want to take some kind of nuanced approach to this, forget it. Clearly this teacher is going for scorched earth. Respond in kind.

>>5447218

Computer Science.

The class I'm is a requirement for every student in the honor's college.

>>5447718

The analogy works well because both dogs and women are submissive by nature and because they really only misbehave when they lack a dominant figure who gives them direction.

With proper direction and leadership, both are your best friends and companions for life.

Some dogs and women are harder to "break" than others, but once he technique is learned, it can be applied to most dogs and women.

However it's worth noting that some dogs and women are just too far gone to break properly. Once the feminism or once they've been abused too badly, unfortunately no matter how pretty, they need to be put down or ignored totally.

>>5447764

It's taught by other professors, correct?

>>5447431

>You should drop out of the joke degree you're taking and take a degree with a math class.

I'm majoring in computer science. All my other classes are engineering classes. The class this professor teaches is a requirement.

>>5447776

Yes, professors that only teach that one class.

>>5447812

You can drop this class but retake it with another professor. Or hell, at a community college, talk to your academic adviser. There is no way they can cage you into taking a class with only one professor.

You can retake the class OP.

Are you sure its not too late to drop?

I actually got kicked from one of my classes for trying to go against the flow. I tried to take an anthropology class to get a required gen ed out of the way. The teacher kept trying to teach the students that gender and race were social constructs and when I tried to counter that I ended up being forcefully removed from the class.

>>5446999

Nice trips. You say you don't have a history of bad behavior, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. Just make doubly sure from now on that you're not giving any non-verbal cues that you think she's spouting bullshit. As >>5447288 said, no chuckling or eye rolling. Go to the stupid meeting ASAP and just smile and nod. Smile and nod in class too, but when it comes time to discuss Marxism, absolutely do not back down. Very politely blow her the fuck out with economics. If you don't know how to do this, read up on the concept of price signalling. Marx did not understand this concept, none of Marx's cultists understand this concept, and when you articulate it well, none of them can refute that a lack of price signalling is exactly why Communism has only led to poverty and famine wherever it has been tried. Mention Communism's kill count. We had a really great thread on here the other day where some anon broke down the number of people killed by Communist states and famines as the result of Communist policies in the 20th century (well over 100 million) and came to the conclusion that it was equivalent to one 9/11 terrorist attack happening each and every day for the entire century. If you need a good philosophical/emotional argument, point out that Marx took an entirely materialistic view of humanity. Ask your classmates if they believe that a person who has more stuff will necessarily be happier and better off than a poorer person. I can guarantee you that hardly any of them will agree to this statement. And yet, that is exactly the lens through which Marx viewed history and society. It is a shallow and hilariously limited view of humanity, so it's no surprise that Marxism is a shallow and hilariously limited social and economic theory.

Your professor will then try to strawman you by saying that totally unrestricted capitalism has issues too. This is true, which is why you should never take this position. Point out that the discussion is about improving America using Marx's ideas, and that the status quo in America already allows for some governmental oversight of the economy. She'll probably mention improving healthcare by socializing it. If she does, mention what a clusterfuck Obamacare is, and how socialized medicine in European countries is generally extremely inefficient. Ask any Brit their opinion on the NHS and you'll quickly learn why. If you really want to show your power level, mention that Trump's healthcare plan is the best there is right now because it removes the state markets for health insurance plans and instead creates a much more competitive national market where common sense indicates that prices will be driven lower. It also removes barriers to importing cheaper foreign medicine as long as it is safe, which will go a long way towards making medicine more affordable. Both of these are free market solutions that solve the healthcare problem in America far better than the status quo's socialist garbage. Economics will also help you dispel any notions that rent control, minimum wage, price controls on commodities, or a guaranteed annual income are good ideas. All of these introduce inefficiencies in the market and lead to a less-than-ideal distribution of goods.

In short, be polite, be courteous, and be absolutely ruthless as you tear her antiquated ideology a new asshole and turn the entire class against it. If she says you were being confrontational and rude again, get people from your class who are willing to back you up and say otherwise. Make the argument that she is letting her ideology corrupt her teaching and that she is the one who should be disciplined. That is how you deal with Marxist indoctrination in college.

Friendly reminder that OP is that sperglord in class who doesn't know when to shut the fuck up.

We have these types of threads every few months and they ALWAYS pretend they dindu nuffin

>>5446999

Nice trips. You say you don't have a history of bad behavior, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. Just make doubly sure from now on that you're not giving any non-verbal cues that you think she's spouting bullshit. As >>5447288 said, no chuckling or eye rolling. Go to the stupid meeting ASAP and just smile and nod. Smile and nod in class too, but when it comes time to discuss Marxism, absolutely do not back down. Very politely blow her the fuck out with economics. If you don't know how to do this, read up on the concept of price signalling. Marx did not understand this concept, none of Marx's cultists understand this concept, and when you articulate it well, none of them can refute that a lack of price signalling is exactly why Communism has only led to poverty and famine wherever it has been tried. Mention Communism's kill count. We had a really great thread on here the other day where some anon broke down the number of people killed by Communist states and famines as the result of Communist policies in the 20th century (well over 100 million) and came to the conclusion that it was equivalent to one 9/11 terrorist attack happening each and every day for the entire century. If you need a good philosophical/emotional argument, point out that Marx took an entirely materialistic view of humanity. Ask your classmates if they believe that a person who has more stuff will necessarily be happier and better off than a poorer person. I can guarantee you that hardly any of them will agree to this statement. And yet, that is exactly the lens through which Marx viewed history and society. It is a shallow and hilariously limited view of humanity, so it's no surprise that Marxism is a shallow and hilariously limited social and economic theory.

Your professor will then try to strawman you by saying that totally unrestricted capitalism has issues too. This is true, which is why you should never take this position. Point out that the discussion is about improving America using Marx's ideas, and that the status quo in America already allows for some governmental oversight of the economy. She'll probably mention improving healthcare by socializing it. If she does, mention what a clusterfuck Obamacare is, and how socialized medicine in European countries is generally extremely inefficient. Ask any Brit their opinion on the NHS and you'll quickly learn why. If you really want to show your power level, mention that Trump's healthcare plan is the best there is right now because it removes the state markets for health insurance plans and instead creates a much more competitive national market where common sense indicates that prices will be driven lower. It also removes barriers to importing cheaper foreign medicine as long as it is safe, which will go a long way towards making medicine more affordable. Both of these are free market solutions that solve the healthcare problem in America far better than the status quo's socialist garbage. Economics will also help you dispel any notions that rent control, minimum wage, price controls on commodities, or a guaranteed annual income are good ideas. All of these introduce inefficiencies in the market and lead to a less-than-ideal distribution of goods.

In short, be polite, be courteous, and be absolutely ruthless as you tear her antiquated ideology a new asshole and turn the entire class against it. If she says you were being confrontational and rude again, get people from your class who are willing to back you up and say otherwise. Make the argument that she is letting her ideology corrupt her teaching and that she is the one who should be disciplined. That is how you deal with Marxist indoctrination in college.

FUCKING CRIPPLEKIKE LET ME POST

>>5446999

do you have a facebook group for the class?

if so, shame the cunt for being a two-sided bitch

liberals respond well to this kind of shit.

had a cuckold try and put me down a few times, so

I just made people in my group have a very low opinion of him.

Shared his private "put-downs" with others.

My bro was a student representative with some power, so I just told him what a cuck he was.

and guess what

a month later the guy is greeting me in hallways, and being all polite to me and shit

OP, I don't know what you look like or sound like, so its difficult to determine what COA you should take. I would go to your dean and look intelligent yet confused as to why dissenting discussion on this topic warranted this level of intellectual babysitting by your professor. Don't look like an idealogue unwilling to listen to your professor. Make it sound like it was a passionate discussion on all sides and only your opinion was penalized. Bring a print out of the email to back this up. Be prepared to concede your beliefs a little bit to avoid looking like an unreasonable person. Something like: "I'm willing to agree that Marxism has produced interesting results e.g. Soviet Union and China, but the professor seemed willing to overlook the horrific humanitarian consequences, e.g. Chernobyl, of such a system." I didn't attend your class, so I can't say if this sample sentence matches what actually happened. You got into an Honors college at a university, so you're probably smart enough to understand how to tell admins what they want to hear. Good luck, my fellow faggot.

>>5446999

Maybe contact these guys http://thepiratebay.se/

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with asking or calling into question the professor's methods. Nothing in your OP sounds like you made it impossible or even difficult for her to teach.

The fact that she even reported you shows that she is the one who has a problem with her shitty biased curriculum being called into question.

>>5448025

What the fuck, meant to link this

https://www.thefire.org/

>>5447967

Thank you for this. Right now, I'm just not sure if smiling and nodding will be the best option a my meeting with the dean. If I agree that I was wrong for calling her out (more wrong than just the general disrespect involved in interrupting someone) then they'll probably try to dock a letter grade or something.

If I smile and nod and get nothing more than a slap on the wrist from the dean then my professor will be vengeful and will probably make it nigh impossible for me to get higher than a D (doesn't meet the requirement) for the class.

I think the only way to actually get credit for this class at the end of the semester is to either request a transfer to another class based on the extenuating circumstances, or somehow get an injunction against the teacher for lying and attempting to manipulate the administration.

I don't know how likely the first option is and the only way to get the second option is to point out all my professor's bullshit to the dean.

>>5446999

>The problem was, every time anybody said something, the prof rebuked them and said, "well socialism and capitalism are on a spectrum. You can't rule one out. You need to have a nuanced viewpoint." just completely without any sense or indication that she even listened to the student speaking. She was visually flustered the whole discussion. I grew incredibly angry and it is true that I may have chuckled to myself at one point when she was stupidly calling a student's viewpoint "un-nuanced."

>At the end of the discussion, the professor says, "Well we have a very-very pro capitalistic class today. I hope after you read Marx's Capital you will have a much more nuanced view of capitalism."

you need to video this shit op

there are so many small cameras that you can get to record this marxist bullshit

best way to expose these tools is the court of public opinion

don't let these fucks subvert society and then hide behind the "university rules" to try and cover their tracks.

You have absolutely no chance of getting higher than a B in that class. I'd drop. I'd also talk to your adviser about why you're dropping.

>>5448025

>still using inferior piratebay

Come on over to KAT niggue

>>5448047

Don't drop shit OP

don't let the fucker win.. no employer looks at your fucking grades anyway, its all lies

>>5448053

THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED DUE TO DMCA REQUEST

>>5448061

>no employer looks at your fucking grades anyway

>:^)

control your 'tism

ok OP, then convert the course to Pass/Fail so it doesn't affect your GPA.

>>5446999

>What should I do?

on second thought … you should just start 88 in the middle of class

fuck em

>>5448025

>Maybe contact these guys http://thepiratebay.se/

fuckin kek

>>5448053

>thepiratebay and kat

Oh God, normalfags are disgusting.

These are torrent sites:

torrentproject.se

torrentz.eu

btdigg.org

>>5448159

I usually find what I need at KAT, stopped using Piratebay a while ago due to the constant shifting nature of the site.

Plus my 'net connection too shitty to join a private tracker.

>>5447395

Can't tell if jk but they are made in the US of A

>>5446999

> What should I do?

You should have filmed it.

What I'd do now if I were you is COMPLETELY roll over.

THEN film it.

Everything.

Secretly.

Go from there.

You fucked up a bit, but there's still time to turn things around.

Chances are, this isn't the first time this professor has done this OP. As long as the school you attend isn't in the most liberal part of the country, the dean probably won't take the prof's side. Dress moderately nicely when you go talk to you the dean and try and discern if the prof has a history of sperging out at students. Look blameless and act incredibly nicely. Your dean probably isn't out to get you, especially if you look more reasonable than your professor does. Ask whether a transfer is possible. Tell the dean that your prof strongly implied that you are getting a D or F solely upon the basis that you disagreed with her. A personal vendetta from a professor is usually enough to transfer to a different professor should one exist.

R**e her in her house. In my experience women who act tough like this have a fetish about getting banged forcefully by the people they hate. Try it and report back.

>>5446999

>I'm a college student at a state university

thats your problem

>>5447144

Goddamn, I remember when my philosophy professor in high school said "Marxism is on the same level of being scientific as astrology is".

When I saw the class' local champagne socialist get visibly seething with rage after class I started laughing so hard my sides never hurt so much in my life since. People thought I went insane.

>>5447144

>>5448236

This is good.

>>5447664

>I met my ex-wife the same way, sorta.

>This all occurred to me while training dogs.

>ex-wife

>training dogs

>ex-wife

>When a presence of dominant male accompanies a woman, she becomes like a well trained dog.

>ex-wife

>With proper dominance, women very much enjoy the same.

>ex-wife

LOL

You better hope you're wrong, otherwise she just left you for a MORE dominant ALPHA man!

>>5448247

>>5447144

The whole science vs religion argument is old

if you've actually done any research into it you realize the two are compatible, and when you get to the high level science the bible mirrors the ideas almost exactly .

Also, don't lump the Jew old testament with the new testament

>>5446999

She is worried that thing that happened in class could be you snapping. That is why she wants you to meet professional who can help you.

Bring the papers you wrote, and the guidlines, with you to the dean. If you actually followed them then cite it to him. Then cite your participation grades.

The real issue in question is your wrongthink. Just say you'll transfer to a different college if this isn't rectified. The college is there to make money first, indoctrinate second. If that doesn't work, escelate it. You can teach her how capitalism really works.

If you have a chance again advocate for national socialism and put her in a coma.

>>5448281

It's not about science vs religion. Most Marxists are atheists and think they are scientific. The truth is they are just another universalist cult where god is replaced by the state ideology.

Marxists didn't get in power by sperging out in their freshman history class. Similarly, you should seek to damage control as much as possible to your dean. Don't abandon your beliefs, just make your professor seem like a bit of a stubborn idealogue (she already gave you this evidence in her first email). Express your disbelief that an honors college would trample so easily upon different points of view. You keep saying "smile and nod", but there's more nuance to it than that. Express concern that your professor has it out for anyone who challenges her. Make her look unreasonable.

Employ the same tactics the Don does to minimize his attackers by being as honest as you can be without going full 1488 and question an honors college which doesn't encourage passionate debate over issues that matter.

>>5448281

The thing with comparing it to religious theories is that Marxists are usually atheists, religion is the opiate of the masses in their eyes and they're enlightened and think that they are scientific, above the dumb masses.

If you PROVE to them that Marxism is pretty much on the same level of being scientific as religious theories, they lose their shit, amygdala hijack and all that.

>>5448345

>>5448329

I agree its a good tactic, but your just perpetuating ANOTHER Marxist lie, that they use to wedge themselves between God and Man. That science and religion are not compatible.

Atheism IS a tool of the Jew and Marxist.

>>5448198

>>5446999

Okay, I marinated on the second part, and here's what I got:

Meet with the Advisor AND the Dean of Students.

Explain to them what happened as reasonably as you can.

If you could get another student or 2 to support you as a witness, especially one you don't personally know, that would be very helpful.

> Thing to discuss

This could actually be fun.

> An escalating pattern of

Explain to them that this was entirely responsive on your behalf, in regards to an escalating pattern of anti-capitalistic and subversive behavior and attitude in class on behalf of the professor, which includes speech as well as dismissive or extremely agitated facial expressions and non-verbal gestures while others are speaking.

Note

> The incident blah blah blah in which the professor blatantly engaged in subversive Marxist rhetoric in front of the class, warranting interruption.

> This is a red flag that the professor may be a Marxist subversive, that may need extra oversight if permitted to engage in the academic process, in order to alleviate concern over Marxist subversion of impressionable students.

> The essay assignment

Details required OP.

What'd you do?

>>5448035

I think you're exaggerating, but I could be wrong, as regards the 'the only way to actually get credit for this class…' bit.

In your position, I would take the previous advice which I offered, and I would add the following:

1. Suggest that, if this sort of far-left rhetoric is going to be employed without reprimand, you would prefer to be transferred to another class, for the benefit of all involved.

2. If such is not feasible, instead merely accept the conditions as they are, but urge your advisor and the Dean to pursue investigation of this matter, as Marxist subversion on behalf of an educator is not a matter worthy of dismissive handling, in your humble opinion, of course.

3. Complete all assignments as-per the directions (as written) and on-time. Feel free to shitlord it up, just don't get out of hand or be unjustly disrespectful. Record (video and audio) all interactions with this professor going forward, including verbal and written interactions (ie, have a copy of all assignments, perhaps request an extra copy for your records or ask another student to do so).

Still waiting on a few questions:

A. Can you get any other students to back you up? The less they know you, the better, frankly.

B. What did you do as regards the essay that evoked the response in pic 2?

>>5448260

In truth, she left me for some 50 year old grandpa-looking guy.

I believe this is mostly the fault of her father, who hardly spent any real time with her. She never received that fatherly love which all young ladies need to become well-rounded women.

Remember I said some can't be saved. She was wanting something that I could never give her, Alpha dominance aside. FWIW, they are divorced now too. If I'm honest with myself, she was probably too far gone for redemption before we even met.

Some of it was me not knowing much about women. We were each our first actual relationships, and if I could do things over again with what I know now, things would probably be very different.

>>5448392

Do not think that I disagree with you, however Marxists have to be knocked off their high horse because them being ousted as hypocrites and traitors is the worst thing that can happen to them, and I mean this literally. I remember reading some article about how after he got ousted as a hypocrite on live TV, some liberal journalist described it in an interview as the worst experience of his life, that he couldn't eat, sleep etc. for days. The interviewer even asked him if it was really actually worse than his son's death, after which he had to backpedal and say that he forgot about that and that his son's death in fact was the worst experience of his life. And the army general who ousted him as a hypocrite didn't even blatantly say that, he did so indirectly, which hurt the journalist even more.

>>5448614

excuse/accuse

brain fart

>>5448614

We need a new term for professor privilege to punish students who disagree with their subjective bullshit.

>>5446999

I am filled with rage just reading thos emails, If i received an email like this I would be filled with such a rage its difficult for me to explain.I would even think about sending her a fuck you in a professional way and changing classes.

>>5448537

>some liberal journalist described it in an interview as the worst experience of his life, that he couldn't eat, sleep etc. for days.

its an ego death they experience, they have to realize their whole world view is a lie

most will fight to the death to maintain the illusion they are right.

>>5448244

Czechd

>>5448537

Oh fuck, I forgot about that. It was Mike Wallace. It's mentioned in "Touching the Raw Amygdala."

Video is " 7. Under Orders, Under Fire (Part II)" here: http://www.learner.org/resources/series81.html#

The devastation starts at 33:30.

>>5448299

As a state school they could technically be sued under the civil rights act for violating constitutional rights.

>>5446999

Double down. Request a meeting with the dean and calmly explain the situation.

Claim that you are being discriminated against for your political beliefs. (Because you are.)

Bring up the fact the she admits guilt for pushing her personal beliefs in class and is trying to suppress your free speech by punishing you.

>>5446999

>Advisoror

>Followed by tone correction and not so veiled threats

Gotta watch your power levels, Anon.

>>5449003

Kek. I just thought of something. If you really want to stir the pot OP, make the second E-mail public and ask if the other students if they think punishment for free-speech is ok, or if the claims against you seem reasonable.

>>5448329

This is my favorite. Whenever we get into "WE ALL HOOMANS" I always say, "so you believe that evolution doesn't exist then?"

Alright, nigger. Here's what you're going to do.

Be incredibly positive and happy go lucky in the meeting with the advisor. Say that you didn't realize that you'd had any problems with the professor in the past and this is all a surprise to you. Mention that you spoke with the professor after class and apologized for interrupting her. Everything is fine. Everything is okay. But you're worried that the teacher may be grading you unfairly now, reference her e-mail. Request to to drop the class, since its late in the semester you'll probably need some signatures but you have a legitimate reason. Take it to the dean if necessary. The professor will back down

>>5449075

>But you're worried that the teacher may be grading you unfairly now, reference her e-mail

This

>>5446999

>I stayed after class and half-apologized while also stating that she certainly was rude to the other students by claiming their viewpoint was un-nuanced.

big mistake, anon. you never apologize or explain yourself to a lefty. if they smell blood in the water they're gonna go for the throat

>What should I do?

drop her class if you don't nee- jk fuck that whore, go behind her back and meet the dean and the advisor and tell them your story. if she's the fucking commie you say she is this probably won't be the first time she started trouble.

>>5448281

>defending creationism

for the love of God, don't be that guy

>>5449173

>defending creationism

>be in biology class: evolution and ecology

>teacher lists the uniformity of vertebrate physiology as a proof of evolution, and proof against a creator

>i innocently point out the uniformity of automobile and aircraft designs, and ask her whether form determines function

>>5449202

>comparing the evolution of inanimate objects to the evolution of living organisms

for what purpose

>>5447288

>Look at them with sincerity

That's what he was doing, shitdip. Smiling and treating them like non-idiots is what's disingenuous.

She accused you of "litigious" behavior? What did you do that was litigious? Did you threaten to sue her? Does she even know what that word means?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/litigious

Unless you actually did something litigious, I would probably show that to the head of the department as evidence she is insane.

She also accused you of "an escalating pattern of dismissive facial expressions." What the fuck does that even mean? Is she the facial-expression police? Is 20% of your grade based on facial expressiveness? If she hates you for some reason, but that's the best she can come up with then she obviously is afraid to write down the real reason that she hates you.

Teacher here. If you hint that you think her behavior towards you is because you're a male, they legally have to bend over backwards and give you the benefit of the doubt, according to Title IX. It could be worth a shot.

>>5448614

>Go to the dean and excuse her being biased, treating you unfairly because your opinions differ from hers, she's attacking you because of a perceived "white privilege."

Make sure you're wearing a star-of-david pedant when talking to the Dean.

>>5449409

>Does she even know what that word means?

maybe she thought calling him "judgmental" was too tumblr so she tried to find a synonym that sounded more """"academic""""

>>5446999

1) Never get into such a discussion with someone with no witnesses

2) If you do, immediately report them, waiting makes you look like the guilty party

3) She's clearly being bias towards the subject, it's not academic and if she's not being academic how could she possibly recognise and mark an unbias paper if she sees one?

Report her on the grounds of academic bias, don't make it a personal thing, make it a professional thing.

Don't back down.

I found myself defending Mel Gibson and Apocalypto against a gay 1930's New Orleans budoir photography expert teacher and an Anthropology lesbian Aztec Bowl Doctorate student.

Don't be an autist, be a man, don't make it personal.

Their body language, off color comments and unprofessional ism won me the "discussion" half way through.

I was forced to go full shitlord when I asked a simple question about the range of jaguars and their symbolism on certain artifacts. I could tell the Dike saw me as nothing more than some Cis white male, so I made her pay by simply making her show her true self.

>>5449446

Bruh, that might be the best advice you get here today. Maybe even put on a rainbow bracelet just for the meeting.

OP are you just fucking with us? Are you still here? It seems like you just made the starting post, then a few follow up posts and bailed.

I should also add, make this situation apparent to your other classmates, ask if they consider your behaviour aggressive.

Just tell her that marxism killed 150 million people

>>5447288

What is it with right-wingers and just making apologies for the enemies?

It's fucking pathetic. Utterly disgusting.

"I bet you were making faces."

"You have to pretend in order to satiate the enemy."

"You have to just go along with it - life sucks!"

Just fucking kill yourself already and do us all the favor of ridding the community of your faggot-minded defeatism.

OP's only mistake is feeling any guilt or confusion. He should come out ten times stronger and I bet other students would support him. The point of school is to think critically. If the professor is threatening students into agreeing with her political views and making a show of it, that's fucking unacceptable.

If the administration is going along with that, it's unacceptable.

Yeah, it's going on everywhere. Yeah, it's "normal." But it shouldn't be.

Right wingers act like a bunch of fucking faggots. You don't stand up for your values at all and you wonder why you're fucking losing everything.

This is disgusting behavior from the professor and the administration which supports her behavior. They should all be demoted or removed from their positions.

I stand behind you, OP. And I bet a lot of other people in the class do too.

>>5446999

>That flip-flop

She was originally pleased that you stood up to her and her ideas. She was thinking with her vagina in the first e-mail.

Second e-mail it seems like she went to sleep or something and then work up and decided that you're not the alpha her vagina says and decided to take action.

Continue to challenge her ideas and make sure to clearly cite your reasoning without sperging out. You could probably stick your dick in her by the end.

>>5447983

The last post I made was a bit over the top.

This is the best advice here, follow it to a T. Saved.

>>5446999

Blow it the fuck up lad.

If you have other friends/acquantainces who will vouch that you have never been a bad influence in classes, they have never have out-bursts or interrupt; that'd be awesome. Get it in writing, have them hand-sign it. Don't make out like you're going to bring down the marxists; just frame it as you want to have 'proof' of your good behaviour for your hearing.

Keep a copy of her email. She essentially admits that she is indoctrinating people; that her views are 'anti-capitalist' (RED ALERT, RED ALERT!).

Hit up your local 'right-wing' newspaper and blow this story. Contact Trump, contact Breitbart, contact your local Church, contact your local newspaper. Expose the anti-capitalist, marxist agenda in universities.

Now is the time to pounce. The populace is angry and ready to tear down the 'un-American' establishment. Trump has given you an opportunity, and you are blessed with being able to set-up a deadly blow against our foe.

Hit 'em good lad. Sieg heil!

>>5449910

There's really nothing worse than a girl going from hot to cold on you. Shit sucks.

I actually think there is a lot of value in this post though. Stay alpha in everything you do. Worry about yourself. Fuck these people.

>>5448479

A: There was one kid that came up to me after the class and said, "you didn't do anything wrong." I think I could have him speak for me.

B: I wrote an essay 200 words shorter than the suggested minimum. That was on me. She didn't even look at the essay though (as admitted by herself) and she gave me a 64. I literally don't care though, I never brought that up with her and the only reason she mentions that in the email is get the Dean to side against me.

>>5450163

>I wrote an essay 200 words shorter

This is how they fucking get you. It could've happened months ago but the moment the Prof. decides she hates you, and all of a sudden it's "I think we need to take a serious look at your academic growth" and shit like that.

But, yes, if it is brought up in the dean meeting mention what you said, that it was in the past, and that it was never a problem after the fact. This literally has nothing to do with why she's so steamed, she just looked for a reason to pick on you.

There are some Profs. who simply never grew up. They stayed in the same "I'm always right" mentality that they went to college with, because they never left, and think they can be biased and unprofessional because they're the instructor and not you. So be careful.

>>5448031

unbelievable amount of shit on that free speech section, thanks for the link. fire seems like a decent organization

>>5449973

this!

>>5449819

>OP are you just fucking with us? Are you still here? It seems like you just made the starting post, then a few follow up posts and bailed.

I'm here. I'm currently looking over the advice given and trying to formulate a good draft of what to say at my meeting with the dean.

>>5450511

Dude, seriously consider contacting FIRE in the meantime.

>>5450570

I'm familiar with FIRE. I want to wait to contact them until after I've had my meeting with the dean.

If the dean sides against me FIRE would be really useful, but I don't want to assume that. If the dean takes my side, sees how unfair and obviously unstable the professor is, then there's no need to get FIRE involved.

>>5450626

Google her name, she might have done shit like this before, alumni shit talk.

>>5449941

Doing all that only serves to escalate further though. There is already enough bullshit in college. I don't want to have to manage the normal bullshit of college and the added bullshit of organizing a retaliation of that scale.

If I could make it so this never happened, I would. Sadly, that is not an option.

>>5450626

You can call them for advice before you see the dean, they may highlight some things you didn't consider regarding this. You don't need to get them involved right away.

>>5450665

Up to you lad. Keep it open as an option, if they fuck with you, fuck with them. The beast leaders have always been those who did not want to lead, but were put into positions where they were forced to.

Hail victory, and know that we are all on your side here.

>>5447764

>2016

>going to college

>going to college for computer science

>learning nothing relevant

>not learning anything beyond fizzbuzz and basic queues and bubble sort

>not being able to code your way out of a bag when you get your piece of toilet paper

>expecting a 100k starting salary

>still using notepad++

>getting yourself tens of thousands of dollars in debt to finish behind literally everyone who is self-taught

tip fef m8

>>5449409

I thought that was odd as well. I think I'm going to bring that up during my meeting. Maybe say, "I don't understand what [professor] means by my 'litigious behavior'. I assure you that I have made no threat to sue her or ASU or anyone else and I currently have no intention of doing so."

>>5446999

Why the fuck did you apologize you fucking cuck????

Never fucking apologize you fucking cuck. Confidence is everything. By apologizing to her you are just telling her that you recognize she has some innate authority over you and you were wrong to question her. That's all she got from your apology.

At this point you should just drop the class.

What you should have done is to go to the Dean and suggest that the professor is being intellectually dishonest / lowering academic standards which questions the academic integrity of the university - but only if you can legitimately demonstrate this to be true.

If it is just "I disagree with what she says in class" - that isn't going to be enough.

For example, a previous anon had an English professor that was making mandatory all this feminist critique bullshit for her class ("english from a feminist view"… "gender equality in literature" - stuff like that). He went to the dean with the list of books assigned and basically argued that it had nothing to do with English and it lowered academic rigour and reflected poorly on the university. Based Anon was actually able to get the professor kicked out of the class for lowering academic credibility of the university.

My guess is you were spilling all the spaghetti. If not and you can legitimately argue that professor is doing a shitty job teaching, then go to the dean and try to fuck with her job. Otherwise just fuck off and take the class a later semester.

Either way it's better to drop the class. If you try going to the dean then you should still drop the class because it's a vote of no-confidence in the professor and underscores your point about the professor not doing her job properly.

>>5450751

>go to the Dean and suggest that the professor is being intellectually dishonest / lowering academic standards which questions the academic integrity of the university

this

academic bias, she clearly is biased an being unacademic

>I apologized after class

That's where you fucked up. Never ever apologize to marxists, they'll perceive it as weakness and attack just as she has.

>>5450793

That would work really well actually. There was one or two students who said something along the lines of, "Capitalism keeps poor people poor and rich people rich". Each time those students spoke, she said "wow now we're getting to some real discussion here." After that she tried to call on those students more, but couldn't really because they didn't want to say anything beyond that (I assume because they had nothing else of interest to say).

That's certainly an example of her lowering the standards to enforce her own beliefs in her students.

>>5447967

>>5447983

this

also from >>5448333

>"question an honors college which doesn't encourage passionate debate over issues that matter."

this.

OP, argue this to your dean:

"At an Honours College it reflects poorly on the academic integrity of the college if important issues cannot be openly debated and students are trained to avoid expressing dissenting opinions. If (the professor) cannot tolerate dissenting opinions in the court of public opinion, then perhaps it is her own ideas which need questioning and perhaps she has allowed her own personal beliefs to influence the material she is teaching and should be removed from teaching the class. She's already confessed to as much in her email to the class."

Then you can even point to your "apology" to show that you may lack tact but were only trying to express an opinion different from that of the professor's, and that you apologized afterwards to clarify that you were only attacking her ideas and not the professor herself.

If you do plan on dropping the class, make it very clear to the dean that you're dropping the class because the professor teaching the class is injecting her own personal beliefs into class material and it lowers the academic rigour and calls into question the academic integrity of the college.

This is the best thing you can do. Colleges take their academic integrity seriously and if there is a perception that a professor is destroying that integrity then the professor is fucked.

>>5446999

Forward the email to your entire class, as well as the advisor/counselor. Get the word out: this is how they deal with a difference of opinion.

>>5451209

>Just don't be an autist and sperg anymore.

>Be a Jew and a Faggot instead

You're not as smart as you believe you are.

>>5450665

>Doing all that only serves to escalate further though.

That's the point mate. If you want to bend over and receive your daily dose by all means do. But if you want to win this and be vindicated you must keep escalating in steps until you get what you want.

>>5448025

thought you were implying he should just drop out of college and torrent his education instead

>>5448203

>Recommended software (torrent clients) are µTorrent for windows

WTF. looks like a nice site, but what a shit recommendation. deluge is pretty good for windows

>>5450668

This.

>>5450793

That would work really well actually. There was one or two students who said something along the lines of, "Capitalism keeps poor people poor and rich people rich". Each time those students spoke, she said "wow now we're getting to some real discussion here." After that she tried to call on those students more, but couldn't really because they didn't want to say anything beyond that (I assume because they had nothing else of interest to say).

That's certainly an example of her lowering the standards to enforce her own beliefs in her students.

>>5446999

Report it to Fox News.

>>5450644

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/

>>5450668

Agreed, in the same vein as, "Even an innocent man needs a lawyer."

>>5450570

>>5449973

That thread where I learned about FIRE was one of the last few good things to come out of Metafilter before it went full-on SJW.

>>5450738

Do not mention any form of the word "sue" unless they've already directly brought it up, it will make them see red.

If you value a smooth finish to your academic career, you don't want to seem in opposition to basically anything.

>>5447557

>I don't even think women really believe this shit

Women will believe whatever they are told by anyone who holds a position that is trusted and considered to be an authority in some way.

I've redpilled a dozen or so people I've come into contact with over the years, as well as my entire immediate family. The women are the easiest by far. If they trust you and like you, they will believe you. If they consider you clever or intelligent, they will listen to almost anything you have to say and give it weight, and if you have even the slimmest evidence to factually assert it, they will take it as the gospel truth.

Men are much more difficult to redpill. They want citations. They want notarized documentation. They want photographic evidence and proofs, and even that sometimes isn't enough. Because men think logically, they are paradoxically more difficult to convince of the truth, because they more actively engage in cognitive dissonance. To redpill a woman is the work of a few conversations. To redpill a man is to wage an uphill battle against an ego that does not want to believe that most of what it considers to be the structure of the world is a complete fabrication.

While I would not go so far as to say that feminists are feminists 'simply' because they have never met a strong and opinionated man who projects legitimate masculinity, such an individual does seem to be an amazingly exotic creature to them.

Most feminists are feminists because they were taught to be feminists by older feminists. Older feminists learned it from the feminists before them, all the way back to the original feminists, who were Bolshevik agitators, Communist plants, and bulldyke manhaters. Simply pointing THAT ONE THING out to a woman, with the proper sources to back it up, has not only never failed in my experience to turn a woman against feminism, but to make them rabidly despise it. I made one woman I know deeply paranoid of "stealth Commies" as she calls it with just this alone. After this, she readily believed my explaination of Cultural Marxism with no further examples needed, and said on her own that she would not have a television in her house for her future children, and would carefully consider whether to even give them access to the internet.

Women are easy. It's the men that are the hard ones to deal with. All men are Scullys. All women are Mulders. They want to believe.

>>5451783

>Men are harder to redpill

They're also less likely to backslide. You might be able to easily convince a woman but the instant that another man in their life takes the opposite stance with just as much info on his side they'll be leaning that way. Women are fickle.

Drop out, get a refund, go to trade school, become a plumber or electrician. Problem solved.

Destroy Marx in a prolific essay to her

Drop out of the Marxist indoctrination system that we call college nowadays. Unless you are getting a worthwhile degree, which most degrees aren't, even most stem degrees, just fucking go to trade school or go kill sandniggers for Trump's Royal army if he gets elected.

Just checked, unless you are connected do not expect shit from comp sci, no matter how talented you are. If you want to actually work with computers maybe join the airforce.

>>5452156

This tbh. Much harder to permanently redpill a woman unless you make sure she makes her friends at a non-cucked church or something. Women are more susceptible to peer pressure and indoctrination, because they probably don't care about philosophy or debate theory, instead preferring whatever makes her feel better. As much as it sounds like I'm an authoritarian D&C shill, it's the only way to make an average woman worthwhile.

>>5447083

This is an intimidation tactic, and I would frame it like that to the dean. I failed classes because of this, but stood by my principles and retook the class in subsequent semesters and passed with less shit professors.

Drop the professor.

>>5450751

Yes, if you act apologetically, the Dean can use it as a bargaining chip.

In the first email, she basically contradicts herself between the third and fourth paragraphs.

However, be careful of setting the ball into her home court, by turning the conversation toward a discussion of the definition of capitalism.

The basis of the defense would be academic integrity: holding the correct viewpoint being more important than the analytic process.

It is proper for a professor to argue against every student argument, however it is not proper for a professor to become emotionally involved in pushing a particular viewpoint.

You might consider directly asking the dean where the line lies between a professor presenting important viewpoints and emotionally pushing one particular viewpoint on the class. Ask what the university's opinion is on the matter. For example, maybe it's fine for the professor to present whatever viewpoints in whatever manner in class, as long as the grading process focuses on academic analysis.

By asking the dean to clarify this point, you will reframe the conversation to a discussion of the rules governing the behavior of the professor. She will be the one on the defensive, as she considers the higher standards of the university.

Main point: you need to control the frame.

>>5447983

based price signaling

>>5448035

Do not admit fault. The professor unprofessionally escalated the temperament of the room by speaking condescendingly to students, after soliciting opinions and discussion. She was basically calling the students stupid and using the word "un-nuanced" and she admitted this. Print the letter out that she sent to the class as evidence.

Let the dean know you have nothing against Ms. SjwMarxist, and have no problem with the reading assignments, and that you're enjoying the class discussion.

The professor asked for opinions, and then proceeded to correct every opinion she disagreed with. If this is not provocation, then it is indoctrination.

>>5448035

>somehow get an injunction against the teacher for lying and attempting to manipulate the administration.

If you've learned anything from /pol/ I hope its to archive everything.

PRINT HER EMAIL APOLOGY TO THE CLASS

This is evidence that she acknowledges she is responsible for the provocation.

>>5448629

Quid pro quo

There is already a term for it, it's called "Quid Pro Quo" or "something for something" or "this for that" in Latin.

> the exchange of goods or services, where one transfer is contingent upon the other.

This is generally a business ethics violation, and the common example is female workers are encouraged to submit to sexual favors for financial gain… but this is no different.

OP is being asked to submit to Marxist indoctrination, or the subjective opinions of his professor, for good grades. If OP doesn't submit, the teacher will abuse her power and fuck his GPA based on her feels.

>>5446999

get a voice recorder and keep it with you at all times, in her class and around her.

you will need evidence of her batshittery when she finally decides to melt down (as all libtards do, when they get shorted out by logic and reason).

>>5447178

>If you don't like it, quit.

>Not dosing the professor's coffee with nicotine as per the anarchist's handbook.

Jesus, it's like you never murdered a sociopath before.

>>5448695

>>5452156

>They're also less likely to backslide.

That's also true. It's a Yin Yang thing.

The point is that you can more easily redpill groups by using women to redpill men. It's what I do.

You get someone's wife or girlfriend first, and then use them to much more easily convert the men in their life.

Women give you numbers and inroads. It's why I target them first. It's why you should, too.

Redpilling men gives you singular converts. Redpilling women helps you create a culture of awareness, which is much more valuable, and greatly eases the redpilling process.

>>5446999

Simply put, get your classmates as witnesses and spread the word that you're being targeted for free speech in a place of higher learning. Also, feel free to point out that Marx was a fucking moron who thought the revolutions of 1848 was Communist in nature.

>>5453593

>>5447083

For this matter, forward that delightful little email to your classmates.

>>5446999

if she's cute ask her out for coffee and some nuance.

>>5447083

she will try and say you were doing micro agressions, which is what she implied in the email by 'non verbal gestures'

WEASEL WORDS

>>5448695

Men should teach boys. Women should teach girls. Men should never teach girls. Women, under no circumstances, should ever teach boys.

>>5452156

>They're also less likely to backslide.

That's also true. It's a Yin Yang thing.

The point is that you can more easily redpill groups by using women to redpill men. It's what I do.

You get someone's wife or girlfriend first, and then use them to much more easily convert the men in their life.

Women give you numbers and inroads. It's why I target them first. It's why you should, too.

Redpilling men gives you singular converts. Redpilling women helps you create a culture of awareness, which is much more valuable, and greatly eases the redpilling process.

>>5446999

Jump through your hoops because you are in college and on the debt hook already, might as well complete it.

Wait 3 months until everything dies down.

Then slash her tires.

>>5453685

up to which grade level?

>>5447983

>price signalling

Excuse me for being a pleb, but how exactly does this btfo Marxists? I looked it up, and it just seems to be a way for companies to make a statement on their product using prices, allowing them to control supply/demand a little bit.

>>5453756

All the way. There is no reason for a woman to ever teach a man, or have any formal position of authority over him. At all. You cannot name one benefit of it, and the drawbacks are numerous.

Go full biblical. "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."

If anything, the entire concept of the education system is a bad idea. Buchanan was completely correct when he stated that the "true liberator" of the modern woman was no political movement at all, but the stove, the washing machine, the vacuum cleaner, and the microwave.

With the conveniences granted by technology, women no longer needed to work all day to keep a house in order. That gave them enormous amounts of free time with nothing to do, which generally leads to boredom, which leads to things like fucking the poolboy or feeling that the grass is greener on the other side of the hill and that you deserve a job, when the reality is that jobs are shitty and we do them because we have to, not because we want to or because they're "empowering."

Feminism would not exist, period, if these modern conveniences did not exist. Women would be too busy cooking, cleaning, and doing laundry to spend their time championing for Cultural Marxism.

If you want to fix this, fill in that free time with something productive and traditional. In this case, HOME SCHOOLING. Fuck the establishment, all organized attempts at education are shitty these days anyway, and they're getting shittier. Why should you pay (or the state pay) for a subpar indoctrination education when every study on the subject has proven that homeschooled children are smarter, healthier, happier, more talented, more athletic, and better educated than their system equivalent peers?

Parents can educate their children better than the state can. This is a fact. You want to un-poz women, you push for homeschooling. Your wife can use her time to educate your children, and you can help in your free time. You'll be a stronger and more closely knit family for it, your children will be better functioning members of society, and your wife will be happy, busy, and content. She won't need feminism. Women never needed feminism. We need to teach them that.

She's trying to burn you down.

There's nothing you can do, unfortunately. She'll just play the victimized woman and the dean will support her. Find another college.

Went through similar shit myself.

Let me be very clear about this. College is not now a place for open discussion about anything. You attend the college because you want a degree. They do not give you the degree unless you do your work in a way that pleases your professors.

If you want to complete your degree, then just agree with your professors. Don't fucking argue with them. It doesn't matter whether you win an argument with a fucking professor. Just parrot back their indoctrination and get your fucking degree or drop out. I mean, do you really think they don't know what they're doing? They know full well that they are indoctrinating students to a certain viewpoint, and the whole organization is on board with that shit.

If you wanted to be given a degree by people with pro-capitalist views, then you should have done your research and went to a college like that, not whatever sjw-controlled hell hole you ended up at.

>>5447083

Just answer me this fuck-tard, are you in STEM and you're just taking this shit course as a mandatory "elective" or are you in the humanities?

If it's the latter, you deserve whatever you get pozzed fucktard.

ayy lmao.

>>5453972

I've said this a couple times, but I'm a computer science major. The course is a requirement for being in the honors college.

I have perfect grades in all my other classes (all engineering) except this one.

>>5454046

Then why do you even give a fuck about this bullshit? Drop the course, or just fucking tell the bitch to fuck off and go to hell.

She and her cucked Dean can't touch you.

>>5454073

Because muh indoctrination.

>>5446999

>>5447083

>Revealing your powerlevel in class

I shiggity diggityy be-bop ba-doo.

>>5447769

>implying feminism is not abuse

>>5446999

Take the email sent to only you and forward i to everyone on the list of the first email except the "professor" Let them badger the "Professor" while you are absent attending your re-education

>>5453830

https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem

https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Economic%20Calculation%20in%20the%20Socialist%20Commonwealth_Vol_2_3.pdf

Prices coordinate supply with demand and ensure adequate balance and resource distribution. Without private property and with a command economy where the government owns all means of production, no rational pricing can be obtained since there are only internal transfers of goods and money, making rational allocation of goods impossible under socialism. Prices are not determined by any one firm but by the aggregate calculations of all consumers and suppliers in a market based on each of their inputs. It is common for pinkos to completely miss the point and claim "but economic calculation isn't a problem because we have computers!" as if computers can do anything to address the crucial input from billions of individuals in a market.

Government interference in pricing can have a similarly distorting effect, for example, the trillions of dollars in oil subsidies allow big oil firms to do oil extraction projects that would never be profitable without subsidies, therefore artificially inflating supply relative to demand and driving prices down, this causes unsustainable overconsumption of fossil fuels, without government interference in the energy market and OPEC cartelizing the market, many extraction projects would be unprofitable, thus contracting supply and increasing prices, the high fuel prices would be a strong incentive to research and invest in alternative energy sources such as nuclear or fusion research, but because of government intervention in the energy market research and investment into these sources are artificially suppressed.

>rated participation

is US college = highschool? In Europe you just sit in lecture and take exams. We dont participate in class, but actually learn stuff since highschool. US colleges truly are expensive daycares for adults.

>>5447279

Funny part is if he hadn't apologized he wouldn't have gotten in trouble. Remember folks, never back down, double down.

>>5447431

All degrees are overrepresented thanks to immigration.

>>5447830

I wish someone had told me this back in the 90's.

>have MCS, go to work for M$ then Amazon the Jewgle

>burned out, dropped out, can't stand "working" on computers and rightfully fear where Big Data is heading

>became an electrician, make a ton in pay, overtime, union benefits, always am put on any network install

>work a fraction of time that I used to.

Seriously, anons, look at the trades. Plus a TON of redpilled people await you. Go be an apprentice, learn a trade or three (I am learning to weld on my off time now).

>>5454576

foreign students pay the most in tuition

hence why even state universities now give more room for foreigners than their own state students.

>>5454424

https://archive.is/fUEDB

Here's the archived thread

may be of use, op. got a lot of the same kind of advice

>>5454694

Thanks, I'll read through that in the morning.

>>5454694

>>5454706

You think you could repost the images of your essay?

>>5454706

We both did some right and some wrong.

My main fault was not taking shit seriously until it was too late.

I believe you'll be fine- again, best of luck

>>5447976

>implying that would be a bad thing

>>5454765

forgot to

>inb4 bad writing

It'll be ptsd for me, I swear don't make fun of me guise ;_;

>>5454763

>talking about the Anarchists cookbook

>not suggesting mixing LSD with DMSO and loading it in to squirt guns

I bet you only read the online version and not the old school paper version which is completely different

>>5454765

I despise the fact that women are shamed for being traditional mothers and wives. I think your writing could be improved, but I agree with what you say completely. This professor is garbage.

>>5454765

lmao i remember the first time you posted this. youre from arizona right

>>5454802

Ive read both. the pdf is better

>>5455079

Sorry to hear that, anon. ACLU is as dildos as it gets. I wasn't expecting much from FIRE, but they take this shit seriously and live up to their mission statement.

>>5455109

I don't know if FIRE was a thing when this happened, I certainly didn't know about it. This shit went down 2014.

>>5447288

these Hitler dubs tbh fam

you have to realize that we 1984 nao. be Winston, be quiet, but be alert, and be ready.

>>5454959

You need to listen to this anon OP, only the threat of a lawsuit and media exposure will make them reconsider, otherwise you're entire academic career will be forever tainted by this cunt

>>5454765

>for every Bell Curve-esque argument there are 100 refuting it

LOL dat appeal to majority

The right thing to do would probably be to take a picture of her and paste it into a picture of Marx and a bunch of his rat faced communists friends.

Fuck i'm sick of the word "nuance."

It has lost its meaning when leftists use it.

To them it means something like, "here is why this is wrong according to critical theory, and why it is right because I'm so wise and you are stupid." It serves as both a way to dismiss anything presented to them, as well as a sort of signalling that they are a better and wiser person than everyone around them.

>>5446999

you should write back and ask them if the meeting has any importance for your academic future and if it is it may be advised to consult a lawyer for this.

This should make this meeting a "talk" without any legal consequences.

I'll assume the "professor" will do a snarky "I guess it's about ethics in game journalism" when you oppose her.

Why do you try to be an outsider on a Marxist battlefield, OP?

>>5446999

Whatever you do, NEVER go back on your opinions or apologize.

If you ever do they will eat you alive.

>>5455927

All the advice he needs right there

>>5449057

I do the same, however wording it differently for maximum butthurt:

>Ah, so you're a creationist?

>>5449340

Showing that objects obviously made by intelligent creators undergo evolution too. Creation and evolution aren't mutually exclusive, whether we're talking about cars or living beings.

Creationism, unlike what the idiots of modern quackademia would like you to believe, is compatible with today's state of scientific knowledge. It's unlikely to be true as per the Occam's razor heuristic - but it has definitely NOT been disproven in any way.

I personally don't believe in creationism, but it's a fun hypothesis to ponder.

>>5449808

And wear high heels, for completeness.

>>5451209

>If the professor ever saw you with a gf, which is a low probability since you're on our chan

topkek

>>5454765

>>5454791

>3.4/5

You could have worked on your argumentation.

Instead of focusing on the gene pool aspect of women in the workplace, you could have attacked how women are the default caregivers (milk, love of children, etc), and how paying for a caregiver allows their children to be molested or raised to the standards of someone else. You could also compare the act of dumping children on a caregiver to the act of reptilian child rearing.

A caregiver will never be able to fully attend to the needs of a child.

You could have also brought in Elizebeth Warren (the pinko bitch that wants to take our guns) and her insights to the dangers of being forced to raise a family with two incomes.

You could also go back to pre-history and bring in the qualities that allow us to be so successful when compared to Neanderthals (division of labor).

Lastly, you could have attacked the women in leadership roles. The Swedish study that showed women to be terrible executives further cements the idea that women should stay at home and raise a family.

>>5454959

I filled out their online form and submitted it the day after I made the thread. I never heard back from them- it's just been too long. The SJeW doesn't work there anymore and has a history of "college hopping." I assume it's from her feminist bs I don't think she'll have much of a career; only being in her mid 20's and all.

>>5458302

shoulda coulda woulda.

I never got to show you anon's the paper I wrote after this one with citations and whatnot about the failed welfare system.(I got .3 extra points, you be the judge if this paper was only .3 better than my feminism paper) actually, I'll copy+paste below:

( NOTICE: she added her own brackets within my work in order to dispel these horrid untruths right then and there, so look for brackets to denote her writing)

___

The Problem with Welfare

Anon

12/7/15

In a wealthy country there will inevitably be wealth inequality. A common solution, according to most politically inclined individuals, is to enact welfare to those living an uncomfortable life due to their financial situation. The myth that poverty can be effectively treated and eventually destroyed through government safety nets and welfare is easily disproved when looking at the trends and statistics throughout history, specifically U.S. history in this instance.

In an effort to “relieve the symptom of poverty,” Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson said, “ to cure it, and, above all, prevent it.” He declared an “unconditional war on poverty” on January 8th, 1964. In a little over 50 years since the government declared war on poverty, $19 trillion was spent collectively in 126 federal antipoverty agencies. In 1966 Americans below the poverty rate was 12.6%. in 2015, that rate is up to 15%. From its start, an average of $107 billion (current year) dollars was spent fighting poverty on the federal level every year. Currently, the U.S. government allots almost one trillion dollars every year on antipoverty programs. Even when taking population increase per capita, this is a 320% increase. $19 trillion dollars was taken from taxpayers; excused with the promise of reduced poverty, at the very least. What the country found itself was a rate even worse than before the war on poverty. Most of the decline in poverty occurred prior to 1972. Since World War 2, the poverty rate had been declining around .1 percentage point every year up until around 1973 when the average rates of poverty have been ticking upwards steadily but surely. In the last 40 years only one third of such improvement occurred, despite these massive increases in spending.

When looking at the quality of life of those in poverty in 1966, problems like malnutrition and poor access to education and communication, and housing, have been eliminated for the most part; the spending on welfare continues to increase, however. These improvements were not the cause of welfare, one must be mindful that the improvements in technology to make products less expensive allowed for such access to poorer individuals. In the 1960’s one fifth of the U.S. population and a third of those under the poverty line did not meet the Recommended Daily Allowance for a balanced diet. 266 counties across the U.S. were labeled as “hunger areas” because of how scarce access to food was. According to the Department of Agriculture(USDA) only 5.6% of Americans today, approximately 7 million homes have “very low food security.” With roughly the same guidelines as the study in the 1960’s, currently only 18.5% of those under the poverty line are found to have “very low food security.” In 1975, more than 2.8 million renter households were described as “severely inadequate” which is described as “units with physical defects or faulty plumbing, electricity, or heating.” Currently the number has dropped to 1.2 million. 17.5% of the renter households did not have plumbing. Today that number is 2%. Consumerism in general has improved greatly and provided means for those in poverty to have access to higher technology. In the 1960’s only a third of poor households did not have a telephone. Today, almost all households have some sort of land line or cellphone. Not only that, but nearly half of households reported to be under the poverty line own computers. 98% have televisions, and two thirds have more than one television. Less than half of poor people in the 70’s owned a car, now more than two thirds do. Poverty has been made far more comfortable throughout the years, but has welfare done anything to treat and prevent the causes of poverty?

>>5458490 -continued-

Clearly, it is not the goal of welfare to just make being poor a bit more cozy. The aim intended to lift those out of poverty. Socioeconomic mobility has remained stagnant since the 60’s, leading anyone to believe that $19 trillion was essentially wasted. The unintended consequences of a welfare state are dire; less poor people are graduating high school and more people are having children outside of marriage. [It’s unclear how graduation rates and children outside of marriage are the consequences of welfare. What makes you think that? Some recent studies suggest that drop out rates and children outside of marriage are some of the consequences of wealth inequality. Among others, Robert Putnam’s Our Kids makes this case.] These two factorsThese two factors coupled with the lack of a stable full time job create a recipe for disaster. Even with the same job, high school dropouts are 2.3x more likely to be in poverty. 63% of poor children reside in single parent families, and only a whopping 2.8% of full time workers are in poverty. Only 15% of part time workers are poor; juxtaposed with unemployed adults where 23.6% are poor, it’s readily evident that maintaining a full time job is key to not being impoverished. What welfare programs should focus on to help lift people out of poverty is simply not happening. Instead of building work skills, work ethic workshops, or anything that would target the sources of poverty, most people would rather go after symptoms. These programs can often be a disincentive for finding work. “In our 2013 study, “The Work versus Welfare Trade-Off,” we found that a mother with two children participating in seven common welfare programs—TANF, SNAP, Medicaid, housing assistance, WIC, energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP), and free commodities—could take home income higher than what she would earn from a minimum wage job in 35 states, even after accounting for the EITC and CTC. In fact, in Hawaii; Massachusetts; Connecticut; New York; New Jersey; Rhode Island; Vermont; and Washington, D.C., welfare pays more than a $20-an-hour job, and in five additional states it yields more than a $15-per hour job”(Tanner 17) [So this study found that it’s possible to make more money from welfare programs than employment. Have any studies found that people actually abuse welfare in this way? If so, have the studies found that welfare abusers are not just isolated cases but constitute a general trend? If there was good evidence to answer the last question affirmatively, then the argument would be more convincing,]

We all wish for a society in which everyone can live comfortably and can contribute to society in whatever way they can for a decent wage. The fact is that there will always be poor people, but that number can be reduced depending on how much we wish to educate and reform our culture so as to allow individuals to help themselves. Simply handing out money has not solved anything, as it treats a symptom of the real problem that is social disfunction. With over a third of U.S. citizens participating in some form of welfare program(Jeffrey 1), it is clearly unsustainable. One can take the homeless off the streets and into a beautiful mansion. That mansion will not be that beautiful mansion if one does not teach the homeless people the value of keeping things clean and orderly, to pick up after themselves, and to respect the framework of the house. If not, the house will return to the slovenly conditions from whence they came.

Jeffrey, Terrance P. "The 35.4 Percent: 109,631,000 on Welfare." CNS News. CNS News, 20

Aug. 2014. Web. 06 Dec. 2015.

<http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/354-percent-109631000-welfare>.

Randolph, Erik. "Making Work Pay in Illinois: How Welfare Cliffs Can Trap Families in

Poverty." Illinois Policy. Illinois Policy, 10 June 2015. Web. 06 Dec. 2015.

<http://www.illinoispolicy.org/reports/modeling-potential-income-and-welfare-assistance

-benefits-in-illinois/>.

Tanner, Michael, and Charles Hughes. The War on Poverty Turns 50: Are We Winning Yet? N.p.:

CATO Institute, 2014. Web. 6 Dec. 2015.

<http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa761_2.pdf>.

_______

Aaand this was her responding email.(I skipped class b/c we were watching this "pruitt igoe"-look it up- a documentary and I'd know the discussion would be "they dindu nuffins."

Hi Anon,

See attached for feedback on your 4th paper. You received a 3.8/5.

-SJW Jew

>>5458498

The attatched feedback, a fucking essay of butthurt:

A note on the thesis - In the introductory paragraph, the thesis is that welfare spending has not eradicated poverty. That is certainly true. In other places of the essay, however, the essay seems to imply that welfare spending is wasteful because it has not eradicated poverty. That argument would rely on a false dichotomy. That argument assumes that either welfare spending will eradicate poverty or welfare spending is a waste. The essay claims that the former is obviously

false, so the reader is left with the latter option. However, there are more possibilities than these two. Welfare spending might improve the lives of millions in poverty without completely eradicating poverty. Welfare spending might enable these people to feed themselves, attend schools, raise families, or get by on part-time work in ways that they could not have otherwise. Even very well-known conservatives have needed to get by on food stamps for periods of their lives (Ben Carson, Phil Drake). Thus, even if welfare spending does not eradicate poverty, it can still be worth keeping around. A note on the historical proof - The essay claims that welfare spending is ineffective, and it’s proof is an interpretation of U.S.history. The essay claims that while welfare spending increased from 1964 to today, rates of poverty have gotten worse in some ways. This proof is shaky at best, though, as this doesn’t provide the entire picture of U.S. history from the 1960’s until now. Perhaps something else going on in the country at the time, some hidden third variable, could prevent welfare spending from being as effective as it would have been otherwise. That third variable just might be - economic inequality. Remember that we watched Inequality for All in class. From the mid-40’s to the late 70’s, the U.S. saw a boom in economic prosperity, and wealth inequality was at an all-time low. Note that your essay argues that poverty had actually been declining for exactly these same decades. Poverty stops declining around the mid-70’s - exactly the same time that that economic boom winds down and economic inequality began its upward trend that has been increasing until today. Could it be a coincidence that the inequality trend matches up pretty well with the increasing-poverty trend? Or could inequality be our hidden variable here - perhaps it’s the severity of economic inequality that prevents welfare spending from being as effective as it could be otherwise. Economic inequality does hamper upward social mobility, and when this mobility is low, fewer people can make it out of poverty, no matter what. Thus, perhaps the proof the essay offers here isn’t the entire picture. A note on the research - it’s great that you did research outside of class. Be careful, though. The neutrality of the CATO institute and their findings can be disputed. This is a libertarian think-tank funded by Charles Koch, so many say the research funded by this institute will be partisan: the researchers and funders here have special interests in results that support their political positions. Results from independent research would be more convincing.

It would be interesting to compare the results of welfare spending in the U.S. with that of other wealthy, democratic countries. Some want to expand their welfare spending. There have been a lot of experiments with Universal Basic Income since the 1970s, and some find the results of these experiments to be very positive - so positive in fact, that the Netherlands and Finland have seen increased support for implementing UBI in their countries. Perhaps the reason that welfare spending is ineffective is because we spend too little money on it.

f9f201, here

On a side note, I ended up passing the class, but my gf didn't.

Funniest shit- when she never participated in any class discussions and got a 18/20 in participation points and I got 13/20, and I talked every single day.

wake_me_up.gif

>>5447967

Underrated post.

Takes notes from this Anon.

>>5446999

Wait a minute, that's not STEM.

Are you telling us that you spend your money WILLINGLY studying PROPAGANDA? IN YOUR OWN TIME? NOT AT A GUNPOINT?

Wow, OP. Just wow. Are you sure you're not /leftypol/ material?

>>5455079

What school? I'm in WA, so I want to avoid it.

>>5458490

>>5458498

>>5458504

>>5458650

>.3 points more than an objectively inferior paper

What the fuck.

I commend you on your effort, and in a proper place of higher learning, this would receive high marks.

The fact that you improved your work based on the feedback of the previous paper indicates a will to better yourself, which should have meant something in the grading.

>The essay claims that while welfare spending increased from 1964 to today, rates of poverty have gotten worse in some ways. This proof is shaky at best, though, as this doesn’t provide the entire picture of U.S. history from the 1960’s until now. Perhaps something else going on in the country at the time, some hidden third variable, could prevent welfare spending from being as effective as it would have been otherwise.

She marked you down for not writing an entire thesis paper to defend the ideas you've put forth in your assignment.

What a crock of shit.

>Perhaps the reason that welfare spending is ineffective is because we spend too little money on it.

WEW

>>5458650

>Funniest shit- when she never participated in any class discussions and got a 18/20 in participation points and I got 13/20, and I talked every single day.

WEW

YOU'RE A BETTER MAN THAN ME

I walked out in the middle of a sociology class and dropped it when the department head stated, "The idea that genes influence behavior is a myth."

>>5458798

WSU probably. Yakima isn't too far away from a satellite campus.

Any well known school in Washington pushes this shit hard, even the community colleges.

>>5458798

Go have fun with "wsu vancouver social justice" on youtube.

>>5458828

Thanks, man. I'm just so glad I'm done with those types of gen eds.

I loved that bit too about welfare spending not working b/c we don't spend enough on it.

sums up her whole intellectual capacity tbh family

>>5446999 (checked)

> An escalating pattern of litigious behavior, which includes dismissive or extremely agitated facial expressions.

>The indicent in which you lashed out verbally at me. This is a red flag that you may need extra support.

God Almighty, you have my sincere condolences. All Antifa fags at my university notwithstanding, I can barely fathom living in the sort of Marxist hell that penalizes you for "dismissive facial expressions". Does you get taken out back and shot if you don't clap hard enough as well?

>>5458828

I go to a community college west of Seattle, and we have a dean who sends out campus-side emails about how the administration "stands with the principles of social justice"

>>5458698

Read the fucking thread, retard.

>>5446999

nice blog. not your personal army.

responding anyway because of trips.

1. you did nothing wrong

sorry you were raised by a single mother / had a weak father figure

you do not apolognize if you are right.

you do not have to be uncontroversial.

this is oddly convienient, however im 100% serious. check out trumps stuff. videos, books, talks, everything. and learn some integrity and self respect.

get a bunch of psychology books on the subject.

2. tell your dean that your teacher is biased, tried to manipulate class ad is generally emotional and predjudiced about her political views. such that this not only transcends into class but permeates it.

there is nothing she can do, since all the class saw it.

you have declared war, now you have to stick to it.

but hopefully you have learned that useful idiots are not worth your time and that thus you should not directly engage them and instead discredit them after class with your fellow students.

note if your dean is amrxist too you have to go with the poltical view angle. and absolutely assert and insist that you did nothing wrong. DO NOT APOLOGNIZE. remember they willt ry tot urn that onto you. you did nothing wrong.

3. something to know

useful idiots are generally not aware they are useful idiots.

they can have clear moments. but they have been programmed in a certain way and only emotional trauma can undo that.

4. welcome, newfag.

>>5458698

I took mathematics in university and I still had things like history, theology, and many classes in philosophy as part of my required core.

>>5448203

thanks man, really good search method.

got tired of searching individually on each of those sites.

>>5454633

Where is Big Data heading? Maybe there's a way to subvert them.

>>5457846

>Showing that objects obviously made by intelligent creators undergo evolution too

by said intelligent creators constantly redesigning them and building new versions. living things redesign themselves and don't need a creator to come into being or evolve.

>is compatible with today's state of scientific knowledge

>has definitely NOT been disproven in any way

but anon, something that cannot be disproved is by definition not compatible with science.

>I personally don't believe in creationism, but it's a fun hypothesis to ponder

I guess it's always a good mental exercise to consider new ideas, but creationism doesn't even qualify as a scientific hypothesis.

>>5454959

Are you the anon that had to battle against your spanish teacher?

>>5454765

>That bell curve refutation

It's almost like they have no idea what they're talking about and put ideology before truth.

Golly gee that couldn't be true could it

That prof doesn't even try to refute but still graded you poorly on how you think, writing aside.

>>5459716

nice edge signalling

You know, threads like this teach others how to deal with their own problems in Jewniversity.

>>5450163

>you didn't do anything wrong.

Hitler did nothing wrong.

>>5455927

Great idea, am gonna do that now.

>>5458214

I don't think the professor has ever met my girlfirend, but most of the kids in that class have.

>>5462907

When I was in first year, I got a terrible grade because my TA disagreed with me.

I was arguing for communism.

>>5446999

OP

Send an email to your professor saying that you've realized the error of your ways and that you would like to do a presentation on why capitalism is evil.

Then just outright say that Wall Street bankers funded the communist revolution,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c

>>5465385

> I was arguing for communism.

Communism is one of those opinions that is wrong.

>>5454765

>>5462907

how do you prove something has not been refuted?

I once was told that statistics can always be picked apart by a relativist. I don't understand.

>>5454765

What were the instructions for this assignment?

>>5466589

It was literally "write a half-assed short essay about a problem you see in the world. Citations not needed."

I did two prior that were written in the same vein with no issues.

>>5455079

Eastern eurofag here. Your story sounds exactly like one of those my grandfather used to tell me of life under stalinism. Scary how that cancer metastasized. Stay strong.

>>5458798

Every school, dear friendo.

>>5447514

>Hell, maybe the right dick would even make them find Jesus.

Filtered

>>5446999

Demand a full refund of your tuition right now OP!

Anything less is you getting fucked up the ass by literal Bolshevik communists. Just make them feel lucky you didn't shoot the fucking place up.

>>5448537

His depression and sleepless nights was because of the trial he was put through, not the panel with the army colonel. Two different events.

>>5454651

Makes no sense, they pay more because the state aubsidizes some of the native's tuition. School still gets the same amount of money.

>>5454765

The writing wasn't perfect but her typed response reveals her to be the paper tiger that she is. Socio economic status doesn't reflect intelligence?? It's highly correlated with iq. Watching one Molyjew video can tear her feminist indoctrination to shreds.

>>5455130

Fire has been around i think

You're getting a sweet ride, OP. I wish someone cared this much about me when I

was at university.

>>5458504

>citing the sleepy negro

Also, poverty caused by income inequality. Not having money causes you to not have money. This bitch can fuck right odd.

>>5447297

>If she's ugly, put an American flag over her head and fuck her for old glory.

poetry

Good for you OP. You found your limit. That's growth as a person.

Probably the most significant thing that you will learn and have happen to you in college. Besides taking some good acid, having a threesome, that sort of thing.

>>You can't rule one out.

Sure you can as Communism FAILED everywhere it was ever tried.

The emails are a laugh. The one to the class is because the bitch got nervous about being found out. The old cunt has probably been doing this shit for years.

The second is also bullshit and insulting. She's suggesting you have some sort of problem for questioning her.

It's all baby shit and a joke.

>>5469645

Real communism hasn't been tried :^)

ITT nobody understands academia

You take both those emails straight to her department head. If that doesn't work, you take them and any communications with the department head straight to the dean of her school (NOT THE FUCKING DEAN OF STUDENTS), then to the provost, then to the president. It'll be resolved by the department head most likely and the dean almost certainly, though.

Too bad OP is long gone, assuming they even weren't a troll

>>5446999

You capture more bees with honey than vinegar OP. The best way to change her mind, but much more importantly getting a good grade is to talk to her individually.

Connect with her, use the points within socialist policy that work and talk to her about their merits, after that talk about the issues of socialism and why capitalism might answer them. DIscuss with her and remain 'open', fake it if you must.

I will fucking guarantee you that she will like you and you give a good grade. Remember that you are there to get a fucking degree that will help you in your further career.

>>5474461

Clearly you haven't ever argued with a totalitarian. They don't care what you think, they want you to obey. OP isn't under attack for sperging out, he's under attack for thinking. If he wasn't thinking, he'd be used to claim "look how stupid the people who disagree with me are".

Know your enemy. Know their tactics, their goals. Then, you can fight them.

You're like the stronk wymyn who go to mudslime countries to show that they didnu nuffin, then get raped and murdered (in not necessarily this order) within days.

>>5447297

Your like the perfect caricature of how our enemies view us based on that gawker article. Good jorb.

>>5474461

That's what I did after the class. She seemed to come around and agreed that I would come to the next class.

Then a day later, she sent the e-mail posted in the OP.

Send the private letter to all your pro capitalist class mates. Show what a commie bitch she is. Subvert them, before she does.

You could be all like

>I am convinced. Karl Marx is right!

>Proceed to shill hard for communism.

>Shill harder than your professor

>Shill so hard you actually push your class more towards capitalism.

Anons are right. You don't learn shit for CS in college. The curriculum is very impractical. I know from experience.

>>5478256

Gawker article aside, my assertions aren't exactly false.

I don't know of this Gawker article that you mention because I don't read online leftist rags, even for the lulz, but women have a serious problem and they lack strong assertive male figures in their lives.

Since the media has pitted men against women, it drives men away from their families and has told women that they all deserve a multi-millionaire James Bonds and "dey don't need no man, honey chile!"

This has left a serious void and an intimate and secret craving for actual men among these broads. If that narrative is playing into the hands of Gawker and Tumblrites, then perhaps the saying of a broken clock being right twice a day is apropos here.

Also,

>Muh PR.

Who gives a single fuck that Gawker thinks my views are sexist or my soggy knees? Women still want dominant men and that won't stop any time soon.