>>5502496
You have provided no refutation for any claim of mine. If what you perceive to be my "ideology" is so "retarded", surely it would be easy for some one so wise as you to provide the simplest refutation? Why have you failed to do this in such a lengthy response? All you do is ask so many questions. The implication is that you wish to learn from me. But you are so rude. Do you have no education? What is the source of your arrogance?
Calm down, stop being rude, and learn.
>Prove it. Prove that this is specific to women.
I never stated such I thing as you imply that I have.
The root of your concern is clearly addressed
>a string of logic so meaningless that it can't even be addressed other than to state it is so
You speak as though everyone has your disabilities
>What "purpose in life precluded and destroyed"? What ideas? When were people less submissive?
You have wasted a lot of breath before coming to your questions, and continue to waste breath after asking. You lack a basic education. You are ignorant of the nature of civilization. I will address these questions and try to encourage the start of your education.
>You just said women evolved to be fundamentally different from men.
No.
You imply that having a unique subset of instincts makes one fundamentally different. You do not address the quantification and weighing of these instincts (while this judgement is valuable to my assertions I further assert it is not necessary to support my assertions). You imply that a difference in form is a fundamental difference in being. You do not define what is and is not fundamental. Your objection is easily deflected. Because you do not articulate the implications of your objection, I will not refute them.
You fail to display literacy and read what your uncontrolled emotion forces you to read. You are clearly upset by my accurate judgement of the average user of this forum especially because it applies to you well.
Now for your questions that came from this statement:
>The media gives people who have had their purpose in life precluded and destroyed ideas to fill their heads with.
Happiness comes from a way of life. A way of life comes from purpose. Purpose comes from will. Will comes from emotion and reason. Emotion comes the reaction of the body to the world. Reason comes from the reaction of human essence [intelligence and wisdom] to emotion, and so it's nature is to dominate emotion.
The predominant tasks of men and women respectively are to deal with reason and emotion. When men lose reason, their people lose purpose. When women lose emotion, their people lose purpose.
Men lose reason when their will is dominated. Their will is dominated when the force of their will is overcome by the force of another will.
Women lose emotion when their will is dominated. Their will depends on the will of their men because they are more deficient in reason than men are deficient in emotion. So when the will of their men is dominated, their own will is dominated.
It is easy to see that civilization is built from the pattern of the domination of one will over others. Instead of allowing those whose will was broken [its function is destroyed; the way of life is disrupted] to die, they are supported so that they may serve the stronger will. In order to perpetuate servitude, the necessities for re-forming the broken will are precluded by the dominating will as well as may be without providing enough for the reformation of the broken will.
A way of life creates a unique set genetic characteristics. Domination interrupts this way of life. Even after the way of life is interrupted, its pattern is still present in the genetics of the dominated. The consciousness of the ideas of that way of life is suspended, but the instincts made from those ideas remain. The preservation of the instincts requires consciousness of the ideas to remain intact, though because the instinct comes from the solidity of genetics, it is slow to be weathered away. The preservation of the being depends on the preservation function of these instincts. So substitutes must be approximated and supplied by the dominating will to keep the whole being of the dominated functioning to some degree in order to serve the dominating will. The media provides such substitutes for ideas for the sustenance of the mind. Agriculture provides such substitutes for foods and drinks for the sustenance of the body. Indeed every industry supplies such substitutes. But these substitutes are not only designed to sustain, but to foster growth in a particular direction.
The aspects of the dominating will are imposed in this way so that an approximation of the dominating will grows in the dominated.
[The more perfect the approximation, the higher in the hierarchy the subject tend to rise.]
I'll have to leave it at that for now.