[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / choroy / f / fur / ita / newbrit / wai / waifuist ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events


Comment *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.

Dear Fat Kimmy, there's a French Banker married to a grandma who's plotting to replace you with Yeong Ten

File: cc80879db23de7a⋯.jpg (62.7 KB, 722x349, 722:349, everythinglooksthesame.jpg)

File: 592851f85a7bfc4⋯.jpg (19.96 KB, 279x445, 279:445, 41QZoxrplHL._SY445_QL70_.jpg)

5a3b4a No.9729915

It is impossible to understand how the kikes have a stranglehold on the world and how absolutely fucked everything is without understanding how the monetary system works. The foundational work of national socialism, "Abolition of Interest Slavery", is meaningless unless you grok how it all works. I don't care much for economics - I prefer thinking about health, family, race, nature, etc - but usury is what funds our opponents, so we must understand why and how to kill usury.

In this thread I will attempt to explain it.


When the government wants to spend money, the National Treasury (which stores the funds of the US govt) sells treasury bonds. The Federal Reserve (privately owned central bank) then prints currency to buy these treasury bonds. Private Banks act as an intermediary between these organizations, buying treasury bonds and selling them to the Federal Reserve at a profit. The end result is that 1. the Federal Reserve has treasury bonds, 2. Private Banks make a profit, 3. the National Treasury has cash. The government then spends this currency on a variety of things - about 90% of the US budget is medicaid, medicare, the military, and social security; in other countries the spending breakdown varies but in the context of this post we can ignore where this money goes because ultimately most of it ends up in circulation.

(Note that the Treasury owes the Fed a return on the treasury bond greater than the initial amount that the bond was purchased for, meaning the government owes more currency to a private bank than there exists currency. The federal income tax was originally implemented in the US to pay the regular coupon - kind of like an interest payment on a bond - from the treasury to the federal reserve on all existing bonds)


When money enters the economy it ultimately ends up in a bank. It might change hands several times first, but it ends up in the bank account of a person or business at a Private Bank. For the last ~500 years, western banking has operated on a Fractional Reserve system. This means that only a small % actually needs to be kept in the bank for daily bank transactions and the rest can be loaned out. Whenever a bank loans out money it effectively increases the amount of currency in circulation. The person/business that takes out a loan spends the money and it ends up in another Private Bank, and the process repeats adding currency to the supply each time. Since interest is owed on every loan at every step of the way, the total amount of debt is even higher than the total amount of currency in circulation.


The amount of currency in circulation (ie. inflation/deflation), the amount of debt owed on loans, and economic growth are all proportional to one another, this causes inevitable market bubbles and crashes. When people take out loans they spend that cash to stimulate the economy and currency is simultaneously created by the fractional reserve system. This drives the bull economy of abundance that precedes every crash. When people have money, they pay off their debts. This destroys currency and causes deflation which causes a market crash. Since a much larger amount of debt now exists than the currency to pay it off, there will inevitably be (likely millions of) people who are forced to default on their loans, face foreclosure, and declare bankruptcy losing everything they own. To add insult to injury, in the most recent US recession the few banks that lost money on this were then bailed out using taxpayer money - far more numerous however are the banks that profited off the entire cycle.


The Federal Reserve is private owned by a handful of individuals (who also own the major Private Banks).

These (((handful of individuals))) make money on

1. Receiving regular coupon on treasury bonds from the Treasury (your taxes)

2. Interest payments from loans (usury)

If everyone attempted to pay back their loans, all currency would cease to exist before we ran out of debt to be paid. Republicans who say they want to pay off the national debt are talking out their asses - it is literally impossible since our entire economy collapse as currency disappeared.

Economic recessions are caused by tying inflation/deflation to a debt backed currency. Democrats who say they want to regulate businesses to prevent economic collapse are likewise lying through their teeth.

Hitler nationalized the central bank and offered interest free loans (New German families received the equivalent of $44,000 USD in today's money, and this loan would be forgiven upon having kids.)

If you want to cripple the kike-globalists, stop using banks and advocate for anti-usury.

5a3b4a No.9730622

File: b7d6c0f4f934870⋯.png (65.78 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, 1490833928195.png)


>tfw the most red-pilled thread in the catalog doesn't even get one reply.

Usury and the global financial system is literally skimming the human energy (effort + time) from the system to further enslave us.

That's energy we could be using to explore the stars.

5a3b4a No.9730733

File: 37ed2b254cc5714⋯.png (1.51 MB, 630x628, 315:314, 1491941994286.png)

File: a0805f1e0b3ec2c⋯.png (322.26 KB, 652x682, 326:341, 864d879f1f32eac4bc778843d0….png)

File: da60d42cc3931ba⋯.png (758.71 KB, 1165x915, 233:183, 1378520566816.png)

5a3b4a No.9730850


Mamonism equals JEWS

5a3b4a No.9730880

File: b82870ec3a287ed⋯.jpg (34.71 KB, 312x474, 52:79, 516P995FZTL._SX310_BO1,204….jpg)

Any good books on the Federal Reserve should be mandatory reading, pic related

5a3b4a No.9730932

>The Federal Reserve is private owned by a handful of individuals

i read this often, who, who owns it. name the exact living individuals right now.

5a3b4a No.9730962


No one has to tell you shit kike. If this is your idea of derailing a thread because you can't read a book or do a simple internet search, I suggest you kill yourself. Go to 4cuck if you want to be spoonfed. No one that is redpilled asks to be spoonfed. That's how I can tell you're a kike or a lazy moron.

5a3b4a No.9730995


so you don't know or won't tell me who owns the fed, exploding your entire argument and making everything you say irrelevant.

good job.

5a3b4a No.9731013


A simple google search will tell you. No one is going to spoonfeed you.

5a3b4a No.9731065


descirbe your pic related please

5a3b4a No.9731080


It's a book on the Federal Reserve.

5a3b4a No.9731095


why would i use google for anything? OP makes a claim without evidence, he says a handful of individuals control the world through the FED, and doesn't say who they are.

sounds like bullshit. name the people involved.

US President: Donald Trump

US Vice President: Mike Pence

US Secretary of State: Rex Tillerson

US Secretary of Defense: James Mattis



5a3b4a No.9731103



Board of directors is an open list, people who own dividend paying stock is a private list

5a3b4a No.9731105


Why don't you start with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve you fucking moron. Obvious kike shill who's derailing the thread. Filtered.

5a3b4a No.9731159


> people who own dividend paying stock is a private list

so nobody knows. okay more conspiracy bullshit to derail actual good information. enjoy your larping.

5a3b4a No.9731301


The Creature Fron Jeckyll Island is a detailed account of the Federal Reserve. The first 200 pages talk about how the Fed operates; how the Federal Reserve is allowed to create money out of nothing, and how congress and lobbyists have used the Federal Reserve to take advantage of our currency.

The next 200 pages gives the early history of central banking in general, and talks about how central bank operators manipulated national debts. This section also gets into the ties between the socialist movements and the very rich currency manipulators (as well as the rest of the aristocracy).

The last 200 pages gives the detailed history of how the Fed was created, the methods used to pass the bill, and the effects of the Fed on American history.

I highly recommend the book. Definitely read it. However, when you read it, keep a level head. Don't get angry, or swept up in despair by what you read. Attempt to unemotionally learn lessons from the actions of the central bank and politicians. Increase your awareness of these jewish tricks so that they may be used against the enemy.

5a3b4a No.9731321


The Creature From Jeckyll Island is a detailed account of the *history of the federal reserve, *as well as a handbook for how it operates.

5a3b4a No.9731355


The Executive Branch doesn't really have much control over the Federal Reserve. Historically, Congress was the entity that allowed the Fed to print money. However, politicians and (((bankers))) historically have a very symbiotic relationship.

5a3b4a No.9731371

>just pay your debts lol

Why do you think they want you as deep as possible in debt, but never so deep that you are crushed? People here have the financial sense to avoid this, as does an increasingly large proportion of youth in the western world, but not everyone. Telling them that easy credit is bad is like telling them that up is down.

Alternatively you could just convince people to pull all their money out of the bank, which is a big accelerator of any national panic situation. During these times, there's no way the bank can collect on any loans issued and subsequently starve without state intervention. Credit becomes scarce as everyone decides that such an environment is not an easy way to make money on loans.

Ironically, a normal system of fractional reserve banking, i.e. one not driven by 0% interest loans from the Fed, would be able to account for risk of this happening and adjust their reserves accordingly. They also can control their own promissory notes and keep them tied to commodity prices, avoiding the pitfalls of politically motivated inflation.


Wildcat banks weren't quite this - they printed their own notes, but they were still regulated by states. Many failed, as banking turns out to be a difficult business when you don't have free money coming out your ass, and people frequently lost their savings. For this it was unfairly characterized as a failure; failing banks, after all, were not limited to the Free Banking Era, just more common. (Only until the 30's (?) was your money insured by the federal government, and there was nothing to stop a state from doing this for wildcat banks.)

5a3b4a No.9731554

File: 959b61258adac73⋯.jpg (200.72 KB, 761x741, 761:741, AALrBwi.jpg)


>Ironically, a normal system of fractional reserve banking, i.e. one not driven by 0% interest loans from the Fed, would be able to account for risk of this happening and adjust their reserves accordingly. They also can control their own promissory notes and keep them tied to commodity prices, avoiding the pitfalls of politically motivated inflation.

Sounds familiar…

5a3b4a No.9731587


Pretty sure Russia has a Rothschild Central Bank. Could be wrong though, I don't remember if they're in the IMF.

5a3b4a No.9731627


Yeah, that picture's probably old.

Syria, Cuba, Best Korea, and Iran don't have Rothschild banks though.

5a3b4a No.9731645


That's always bugged me though, I don't know if Russia is just another controlled opposition actor. Bolshevism was started there and their current political agenda says they're against "The west" I think they may just be made to act that way. it's hard to say.

5a3b4a No.9731669

File: 7ae3bd0fa59ac09⋯.jpg (32.03 KB, 400x400, 1:1, o45NFo3c.jpg)

I don't know why people can't see what the main cause of Jewish control is. You cannot have a deep state without blackmailing elected officials otherwise the deep state i.e. the permanent government would just be evicted and probably arrested. It's logic. 2 + 2 = 4. You cannot. have. a. deep. state. without. blackmail.

They use the NSA/CIA to collect dirt on everyone and often times they will groom pedophiles for office that they've blackmailed within pedo rings set up by the spooks.Career politicians get favorable media coverage and donor money BECAUSE they are blackmailed. This narrative that they 'owe' money to their donors and that's why they always toe the line is bullshit.

Trump wasn't snared in a pedo ring hence he was not given media blessings or massive donor money but they snapped up dirt with mass surveillance after the fact and that's how they got him to strike Syria.

Blackmail via intelligence agenices is the number one tool of Jewish control and everything else is just a symptom. Only when people realize this will things start to change.

5a3b4a No.9731681


Trump had his name in Epstein's blackbook. Polite sage for offtopic.

5a3b4a No.9731725


>CTRL+F, "fiat"

>0 of 0

Anon, I told you I'd read the second draft.

5a3b4a No.9731749


The shareholders are confidential so we can only speculate but the Federal Reserve being privately owned by its shareholders is factual.

5a3b4a No.9731752


Considering the historical trends of the central bankers in relation to global politics, it is very likely that Russia is another controlled opposition actor. It's probably how they got the money for all of their cold war weapons, as well as their current war funds.

"The Best Enemy Money Can Buy" is both a good book on this subject, as well as a good phrase that sums an answer for you.

5a3b4a No.9731762


Thanks, I'll look into that book.

5a3b4a No.9732021

Richard Werner is practically /ourguy/ on banking and finance.

Some educational links:

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC0G7pY4wRE

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=MechH0ebs_c

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgl7h-aC_Dg

5a3b4a No.9732158


The Tzar refused to have a national bank installed. What happened consequently? The bolshevik kikes took over the country and murdered millions of Russians. And then they installed the central bank, to have their cake and eat it too, of course.

5a3b4a No.9732164


fiat currency isn't an issue if you nationalize the central bank

>Hitler not only engaged in barter trade which meant no discount profits for bankers arranging bills of Exchange, but he even went so far as to declare that a country’s real wealth consisted in its ability to produce goods; nor, when men and material were available, would he ever allow lack of money to be an obstacle in the way of any project which he considered to be in his country’s interests.

5a3b4a No.9733141



>the Board of the Federal Reserve doesn't exist

>the Federal Reserve doesn't have shareholders

This isn't exactly controversial or occult information, matey.


>The Federal Reserve shareholders list is conspiracy bullshit because it can't be released publicly


5a3b4a No.9733281


Hey, I'm a little foggy on the role of the Board of the Federal Reserve, as well as the role of its shareholders. Has their role replaced the role of Congress in regulating the Fed?

5a3b4a No.9733294


Or do they just make the proposals to Congress, where Congress then decides whether or not to go through with those proposals?

5a3b4a No.9733331

File: 70e254186807624⋯.jpg (25.55 KB, 260x346, 130:173, 51e3TbTmchL._SY344_BO1,204….jpg)

File: ae7d1c585b16c47⋯.jpg (61.38 KB, 498x371, 498:371, charles_lindberg_on_fedres.jpg)


>Book super related

Charles Lindbergh Sr. was a fucking hero and patriot (And a US Senator to boot). During WWI he even wrote a whole book against American entry into the war and had it published for public consumption for free (copies on street corners type stuff). Wilson had goons run around confiscating copies and even break into publishing companies warehouses and destroy the print plates so it couldn't be re-printed.

Shady shit.

5a3b4a No.9733349


Congress never had a roll in regulating the Fed. That's the entire point of the Federal Reserve. The whole point of having a private central bank is that it is supposedly immune to politics, rigging, and the like. It's supposed to be another separation of powers. That's basically the entire reason that the Founding Fathers created a national bank in the first place, before everyone realized that a central bank effectively controlled the economy and that having one, therefore, put the economy into (((private hands))) that weren't so clean or scrupulous. It's why Jackson got rid of the private central bank and why he rightly called them "a den of vipers and thieves."


The Fed isn't answerable to Congress, really. The Fed is an independent, private organization. Congress has as much say over them as they do over Apple; even less, really, considering that the Fed was established by Congress and has several (((protections))) in place that make transparency and oversight effectively impossible. Do you really think there would need to be so hard a push to get a Fed auditing bill through Congress if they already did so?

5a3b4a No.9733355



The people who make monetary policy decisions are "employees" of the fed, and the stockholders receive dividend payments on the fed's profit (that it makes on interest payments from the treasury.

Shill will say "part of the fed's profits go to the govt" but the govt's money is the treasury, and that's where the fed gets its money from, so each time the money cycles back and forth between the fed and the treaury, the shareholders take a cut out of it.

5a3b4a No.9733440



I read that throughout the 70's and 80's, congress would authorize the Fed to create money for the purposes of transferring it to failing banks and other failing industries.

For example, in 1970, Penn Central railroad became bankrupt (its shareholders were big bankers), Congress authorized a bailout of $125 million in order to save Penn Central from failing. So, Congress has (or had) a role in authorizing bailouts for failing banks and businesses. Maybe Congress even authorized the recent bank bailouts in the mid 2000's. Is Congress's role in the use of the Federal Reserve a thing of the past, or is Congress still the entity that decides whether or not something gets bailed out?

It's a confusing thing, because the employees and shareholders of the Fed have something to do with its policies, but historically, so does Congress.

5a3b4a No.9733482


It's less a role than an exceptional circumstances thing. Nominally Congress has no control, but if the Fed tries to do something outrageous they'll end up with Congress on their backs anyway, despite being technically legally allowed to. Therefore they seek Congress' cooperation before doing anything major like large bailouts. Occasionally Congress will also seek things from the Fed, which the Fed may or may not go along with. It works about the same way as the President and Congress work together.

Essentially, think of the Fed as a fourth branch of the Federal Government, except it is not elected, has no oversight, no transparency, and no accountability. The Federal Reserve is independent and can, legally, do almost whatever it wants, but the normal rules of politics still apply and so it will grease the wheels of its actions by passing them in front of the eyes of Congress beforehand.

5a3b4a No.9733528


Damn, you know your stuff! Thanks for the explanation.

5a3b4a No.9733577


It's the same way that Trump can do a lot of shit that he has the power to do, but other branches will fuck him over if he doesn't seek their cooperation. The court blocking his immigration powers is just one example.

Essentially law is a lot more flexible than people pretend it is. Hence nominal violations.

5a3b4a No.9737052




5a3b4a No.9737075

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

5a3b4a No.9737083

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

5a3b4a No.9737801


>to explore the stars


unless you can bring back a lot of precious minerals

5a3b4a No.9738026


Important to consider that the Fed is not privately controlled in every country, see Austria:

"The OeNB's capital totals EUR 12 million and is held by a sole shareholder, the federal government. The shareholder rights of the federal government are exercised by the Federal Minister of Finance. Since May 2010 this capital is entirely held by the Austrian state."

5a3b4a No.9739574

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


>They use the NSA/CIA to collect dirt on everyone

This is why stupid niggers need to stop using shit like Faceberg. "I have nothing to hide" doesn't mean shit when the press has shown how petty they can be about which minor details of your life they will attack endlessly.


5a3b4a No.9739642


How should the banking system be organized according to you? Other countries have state-owned central banks, but aside from that, the financial system works exactly the same.

5a3b4a No.9740294


>The Federal Reserve is private owned by a handful of individuals (who also own the major Private Banks)

No, you dipshit. The private banks own the Federal Reserve and the private banks are owned by stock holders, many of which are your fucking retirement fund. Update your fucking information retard

5a3b4a No.9740388


sure sure usury is interesting. but more important is property tax. if you own property you pay loads of property tax, and that money goes to huge waste on a zillion welfare programs that are abused and poorly managed and inefficient.

5a3b4a No.9741265


Yes, direct taxes. Income tax, property tax, they all go towards the Jew.

5a3b4a No.9741305


there are entire asteroids made largely of rare earth metals

But I rather think exploration justifies itself. For those of a more practical mind though, there are some incredibly valuable resources out there.

5a3b4a No.9741315


You have a hand in the system goy !

Your 6 figure retirement fund gives you a stake in how the worlds banking system works

5a3b4a No.9741327


No it's not, some of you need to do the most basic bit of research. The federal reserve is made up of 12 regional federal reserve banks which are each in turn owned by their member banks which are private banks in the region of the federal reserve bank. These private banks are the shareholders of the federal reserve, the amount of shares the own the in fed is legally determined by the size of the private bank, larger the bank the more of the fed they own. These private banks receive a legally mandated 6% a year in dividends. Hope that clears things up, what you really need to look into is who are the major shareholders of the private banks. hint: jews

5a3b4a No.9742380


>Blackmail via intelligence agenices

Trump isn't blackmailed

they just reminded him what happened to JFK after he tried to interfere with the private Rothschild Federal Reserve's control

5a3b4a No.9742669

Very interesting Thread, have a interest-free bump

5a3b4a No.9742787


Obviously the goal of the fed reserve is to end the global currency system and usher in credits forever preventing anyone of rising above the system. The fed reserve is going to crash the global market so bad that cash/ banks etc will be gone and the people on top implementing the new global system will forever stay in power.

They will suck global resources until the modern world crashes then will pretend to come along and save it ushering in the brave new world/NWO

5a3b4a No.9750282


>cash will be gone

Isn't the plan to have just one currency, with only one inflation rate, one authority that issue bonds, one only exchange price between oil and gold, and so on and so forth?

5a3b4a No.9750654


About 97% of money in the world is actually created by people taking out loans.

Booms and busts are created by banks either giving out too many loans (boom) or not giving out enough loans (bust). The 2nd situation leads to debtors scrambling to find the money to pay off their old debts, because when money is created via a loan, only the principal amount is created, not the interest that needs to be paid. But those interests need to come from somewhere, and that is new loans.

This means banks can artificially make the economy crash by stopping the creation of new loans. When the economy reaches this point of a bust again, the juden start buying everything of worth (mines, water supplies, houses, airports, company stock, …) for pennies on the dollar. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum and you have a small clique of people possessing more and more of the world's actual assets.

What central banks essentially do is make sure this system doesn't crash too hard too soon, they're there to make the boom cycle last longer, and they do this buy buying up bad debt. They can do this because unlike a bank, a central bank doesn't have to balance its books, they can just buy debt with money they create out of thin air (commercial banks also create money out of thin air but they still have to somehow balance their books).

What i've noticed is that this system has reached a point where it just doesn't work anymore (the economy is still shit and people jusst can't go into any more debt even with ZIRP) and my guess is that they're trying to do a big reset by igniting a gigantic war.

Thank you for making this thread. I've noticed that monetary policy is something a lot of people around here don't know much about, while it is one of the most important - if not THE most important - pillars of jewish power over us.

Two books i recommend on this subject are

>Web of Debt - Ellen Brown

>Barren Metal: Capitalism as the conflict between usury and labor - E. Michael Jones

5a3b4a No.9751039


>Ethnic food?

5a3b4a No.9751051


They're allowed to loan out more money than they actually have in stock, limited to a certain %. Hence the "fractional" in the name. They might only have $80k in the bank but can make $160k worth of loans, with the expectation that more than half the people will pay it back. "Full reserve" banking (like in Switzerland) means that every dollar loaned out is matched to a dollar on hand.

5a3b4a No.9751097

File: fe583d30114e914⋯.png (124.86 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, dubs yellow.png)


Jews are responsible for not letting mankind advance, what a surprise

5a3b4a No.9769749

File: a43126b5258adbc⋯.jpg (19.99 KB, 670x100, 67:10, qualitypost.JPG)

5a3b4a No.9771308

Beautiful stuff.

>Germany’s currency and trade systems begin to give one an understanding of the causes of World War II. This was stated by Hasting W. S. Russell, who wrote at the beginning of the War: “A war of financiers and fools, though most people, on the allied side at any rate, do not yet see very clearly how financiers come into it. . . . Financiers also desired war as a means of overthrowing their rivals and consolidating still further their immense power. . . . Hitler not only engaged in barter trade which meant no discount profits for bankers arranging bills of Exchange, but he even went so far as to declare that a country’s real wealth consisted in its ability to produce goods; nor, when men and material were available, would he ever allow lack of money to be an obstacle in the way of any project which he considered to be in his country’s interests.

>This was rank heresy in the eyes of the financiers of Britain and America, a heresy which, if allowed to spread, would blow the gaff on the whole financial racket.” Gottfried Feder (an early mentor of Hitler) had been advocating banking reform as early at 1917, and was ardently against interest slavery and usury. In his Manifesto he stated that the source of the banker’s power and wealth comes not from work, but from “the effortless and infinite multiplication of wealth which is created by interest.” Instead, the German State offered loans for a set price. For example, marriage loans up to 1000 marks were implemented and were repayable in interest free installments. A quarter of the loan was forgiven at the birth of each child. Via this method, people were never stuck paying off an interest charge each month like they are today with the credit card scam, but instead their payment actually went towards paying off their initial debt.

5a3b4a No.9771318

>Adolf Hitler describes the National Socialist monetary system in a succinct paragraph: “If ever need makes humans see clearly, it has made the German people do so. Under the compulsion of this need we have learned in the first place to take full account of the most essential capital of a nation, namely, its capacity to work. All thoughts of a gold reserves and foreign exchange fade before the industry and efficiency of well-planned national productive resources. We can smile today at an age when economists were seriously of the opinion that the value of currency was determined by the reserves of gold and foreign exchange lying in the vaults of the national banks and, above all, was guaranteed by them. Instead of that we have learned to realize that the value of a currency

lies in a nation’s power of production, that an increasing volume of production sustains a currency, and could possibly raise its value, whereas a decreasing production must, sooner or later, lead to a compulsory devaluation.” He added, “We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency [backed by] gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced.” The NationalSocialist economy is one based off work and production.

>The twenty-five point “Program of the NSDAP” reflected the teachings of the influential Feder. Among these points are: “10. It must be the duty of every citizen to work either mentally or physically. The activities of the individual may not conflict with the interests of the general public but must be carried on within the framework of the whole and for the good of


>Within two years of Adolf Hitler being elected, the unemployment problem had been solved and the country was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.

5a3b4a No.9771357


It used to be that a male meant food, shelter, and protection to a female. Now, a male means $ to a female. A female would be better off with an ATM to provide free money (a.k.a. welfare, ayylimony, child support, etc.) and a cat for companionship without responsibility.

Obvious (((middle man))) is obvious, and has successfully modified our genetic fitness function.

5a3b4a No.9771504

File: 8c07b07f531b095⋯.jpg (133.78 KB, 720x570, 24:19, churchilBank.jpg)

File: c5707499595c84e⋯.jpg (291.91 KB, 986x761, 986:761, churchilGermanysCrime.jpg)

5a3b4a No.9806272

File: eaedc8e0a87211c⋯.jpg (82.81 KB, 400x709, 400:709, 5d257hj415ohgf.jpg)

5a3b4a No.9806778


Nice OP for a change very succinct explanation of how money works.

The only thing I can add is look up any rouge state and I can guarantee you they do not have the proper banking system as is determined by the tribe.

5a3b4a No.9806935



Of course I have one and my name is Fred Smith look me up and add me some time.

5a3b4a No.9806976


Some time ago I read this article that says American households currently hold $4.1 trillion in consumer debts. https://archive.fo/46Kjj

Lets assume a (very moderate) interest rate of 6% across this debt. In one year this creates $246bn dollars of interest. These $246bn are not backed by added value through goods or labor (For simplicity I'm neglecting the labor that is needed to handle the debt). It's created by taking an abstract product (money) and moving it around. Basically it's money created out of thin air. The amount of money grew by the interest, the amount of goods didn't which decreases the value of money. Businesses in the US currently hold $29 trillion of debt. This generates $1.74 trillion of interest every year (if we assume 6% interest rate). So combined with the consumer credits every year around $2 trillion of interest money is being generated. That's half the federal budget. And people wonder why the value of the currency is eroding.

5a3b4a No.9830506

What do you guys think about universal basic income?


5a3b4a No.9830904

None of this makes any goddamn sense to me. Why can't we just nationalize the banks and get rid of interest?

5a3b4a No.9830950


It has everything you need to know about the Federal Reserve.

It's written by the same guy that warned of SJW's back when they only had black and white TV. If you don't know who i'm talking about then you haven't been doing your required viewing.

5a3b4a No.9830980


>Why can't we just nationalize the banks and get rid of interest?

The last time someone did that he got treated to World War 2.

Welcome to jews.

5a3b4a No.9831021


Congrats, you just cracked the code. This is why you never hear the end of how evil the nazis were.

5a3b4a No.9831550


Bill Still?

5a3b4a No.9831554


That's the excuse that libtards like to give when anyone asks "why is diversity good?", they say "because the brown people make different food and music than us", as if that's worth your women and children getting raped by shitskins, having to pay for said shitskins' many bastard children, and putting up with crimes and damage caused by shitskins, as well as losing your jobs to the shitskins who are significantly less qualified and less productive because they're willing to be paid peanuts.

5a3b4a No.9833406


Bolshevism was and is just a tool for international banking elite.

Revolution in Russia was financed by financial elites that rule America and West.

Communism was supposed to start in industrialized world in Germany and UK not in some backwater half feudal agricultural country on the edge of civilization.

It was just a experiment that go wild. Stalin probably go rogue and defied his Cabal overlords. Anyway the early Soviet industrialization was practically done by USA specialist. After Stalin death the Party come back o the fold and serve as 'enemy' of 'free world'.

Main enemy is not some commies peasants but a banking international elite that control 'democratic' governments and whole nations by blackmail an usury.

70314c No.9858776


>incredibly valuable resources out there

heavy objects are expensive to move in and out the Low Earth Orbit; if you have to re-enter something from Mars, it'll be few kilograms only, at an astronomical price:


cdc032 No.9874758

File: 67f90628c1e234b⋯.jpg (1.5 MB, 2004x2720, 501:680, banking.jpg)

some typos but otherwise accurate

958f9b No.9875729


Where did you learn about orbital mechanics? Black Science Man?

An asteroid doesn't have to be lifted out of any gravity well, just brought into Earth's gravity well, which requires only trivial delta-V.

Once in a high orbit around Earth, large solar mirrors can be used to burn the slag off of the asteroid and refine its metallic contents. With a slight initial spin, the metals will separate themselves by density. Allow your molten disk of metals to cool and cut out the rings you want.

Now how do you get these giant chunks of ore to the surface of the Earth? Easy, let me introduce you to a concept called aerobraking. A little bit of aerogel and carbon, a few parachutes and a tiny amount of delta-V is all that will be required. The Earth's atmosphere will kill the rest of your payload velocity just fine, and it's free.

Everyone familiar with astronavigation knows that atmospheres make bringing objects down from orbit easy.

f7f868 No.9876543


hi adolf

f7f868 No.9876551


good shit. I knew the kikes made ksp for a reason

8dfc6d No.9876870

I think it is better to abolish the dollar and replace with the energy unit. We use the energy constantly and it is impossible to hoard energy units for long so jews will not be able to control the world like cattle again and the federal reserves will probably be abolished. I lost the faith in the dollar cause it is not good.

a26387 No.9876977


>If you want to cripple the kike-globalists, stop using banks and advocate for anti-usury.

Such a simple solution

So easy to grasp

Why can't people see it

I knew to be weary of banks since i was a very young kid way before i ever heard who Hitler was and what the Jews were

I got tired of hearing my dad complaining about how the interest from credit card companies kept draining his salary

I've only ever used cash, whenever i've been forced to deal with banks, it has always been to withdraw my own salary, and i made sure not to leave a single coin of it so they could loan it and scam another goy, i've never took a single loan bait the offered me, no matter how harmless it looked, all my transactions have always been done in cash, and my savings are mostly precious metals i keep well hidden away from kikes

Seriously i wasn't even 8 years old when i began to fear the banks and debt slavery

by 12 i learned that paper moeny is worth nothing if the sistem collapses so i began investing in gold and silver as insurance

Not trusting the banks for me has always been common sence. and to this day it still baffles seing how people cannot realize that dealing with banks is like dealing with the devil

881c59 No.9877009

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.



This channel started making a series about fractional reserve banking, petrodollar, etc…, it's a pretty retarded way of explaining things, but that's exactly why even normalfags can understand it

Part1 in embed

b9492f No.9877058


>Now how do you get these giant chunks of ore to the surface of the Earth? Easy, let me introduce you to a concept called aerobraking. A little bit of aerogel and carbon, a few parachutes and a tiny amount of delta-V is all that will be required.

Let introduce you to a bit of engineering magic

don't send your heavy metal down in a solid lump, make a balloon out of it. The density of the metal can be balanced out with a central void such that the whole will float in water. Then you coat the outside with an ablative coating and give it a tiny kick down the gravity well with a trajectory that ends in the ocean.

e5d27a No.9877086


How do you realistically bring an asteroid into earth's gravity well using technology we have? Landing on an asteroid was a recent landmark of space science and you want to bring concept into industrial scale? This is very dangerous. I assume that you could just detonate a huge amount of explosives on the asteroid to make it turn around when it would be very far away from Earth, thus minimalizing the energy, but this requires what I assume tons or kilotons of high power explosives. The trivial delta V you are talking about is very hard to change when your asteroid is metallic and thus very fucking heavy. Conceptually one could use lasers, but these lasers would have to work with each other flawlessly and would have to be deployed from orbit to minimize atmosphere's interference. This requires billions upon billions worth of concept testing, prototype testing and then fielding. That is, if you ever go forward with this idea. Remember that predicting asteroid path is still not perfected as of now. What if you ended up with asteroid that shattered into chunks and flew towards the Earth? What if your asteroid would be estimated to bypass Earth with 1/20000th collision chance and then it would turn out that, in fact, it was in fact 1/200th posteriori? Remember that asteroids don't need to be large to completely wipe out most life on the entire planet. The safer you want to be, the more velocity manipulations it requires with technology that is still in inception stage. Maybe you could do moon collisions and moon base would salvage the metal and then launch it from lunar surface using mass drivers towards Earth in a safe way rather than a ballistic, semi-controllable asteroid. It would be much safer.

8dfc6d No.9877130

File: bc05cf8f7058407⋯.jpg (29.32 KB, 300x209, 300:209, IMG_1272.JPG)


The energy can be stored in the batteries so I think it is possible to have p2p energy economy and the banks will become obsolete because everyone have their own energy banks in the garages.

881c59 No.9877197


batteries are not, and most likely, will never be 100% efficient.

Not to mention that most commercially used ones drain with time.

Unless we get massive advancement in rechargeable batteries, we would see our savings deplete faster than inflation could ever do

881c59 No.9877201


I just wanted to doublecheck in google, and stumble on this gas2.org/2016/02/29/scientists-say-new-hydrogen-process-is-100-efficient/

fucking hell

881c59 No.9877214


>Now, researchers at the Israel Institute of Technology in Israel

Well, forget about it, just kike lies again

8dfc6d No.9877246


I look it up and it is jewy. I am aware of the battery is not 100% effective but I believe it is possible to achieve that by 2020 or later so don't discard it. We should be free from debt money. The debt money is unsustainable so it is illogical to keep them.

174bed No.9877255


nothing is 100% efficient, whats your point?

1e769c No.9877338

File: 274311dad1cf875⋯.jpg (12.81 KB, 480x360, 4:3, bill_still.jpg)


And for the illiterate, there's always youtube:


d5c9ed No.9877442

I recommend ReactionaryHippie 's soundcloud for a quick trans-national economics lesson related to the US debt

8e12cd No.9881678

What do everyone think of replacing the dollar with the energy unit?

92ad03 No.9881684


>abolish the dollar and replace with the energy unit

I like this idea.

What if a country pegs its currency to a market basket made of energy commodities? Something like this:

1 zecchino = 1/3 of 1 cubic meter of methane from Russia + 1/250 of 1 oil barrel from Saudi Arabia + 1/200 of 1 metric tonne of coal from China + 1/5 of 1 litre of biofuel from Brazil

8e12cd No.9881795


> May I buy the 6 apples please?

> Worker said sure it cost 6 joules

> swipe the power bank

> worker have a good day.

> thank

How cool would that be?

8e12cd No.9881800

File: c9666661c9648ab⋯.jpg (27.88 KB, 384x384, 1:1, IMG_1277.JPG)


Forgot to post a picture.

4742f0 No.9881831



Might work if energy prices were much more stable

35fe1b No.9881839



Sounds like a great way to multiply the vulnerabilities of an emp attack. Now not only is your defense grid down but your currency is gone.


d738f5 No.9881842


How do we make it more stable?

56ae84 No.9881846


Not possible as long as the rates of energy production and consumption are volatile.

d738f5 No.9881859


Just coat the things with the nano-copper and plastic lay over the copper.

4742f0 No.9881864


You don't actually store all the energy as energy, you issue credits for energy that hasn't yet been produced yet. So your account would have 5.123414x10^x KWh and could spend that when you use energy, or trade it for products or services.

But like I said very distant future sci-fi stuff once we've reached a period where there are no more breakthroughs which will make energy more available. A sudden breakthrough in fusion power would tank the currency.

d738f5 No.9881886


How much energy do the fusion power produces? Maybe it can be spend on the extremely expensive research and products like space colonisation and rare materials?

31eb4b No.9881982


The joke is, we have an intermediate technology with nuclear breeder reactors that would satisfy all of the conditions for pollution emissions and make energy vastly more available, but certain groups don't want that.

694125 No.9882013


This is how we destroy the (((globalists))).

8dfc6d No.9882196


Will that keep the energy economy stable for long? I like to see the energy economy in local area only as a experiment.

31eb4b No.9882220


With recyclable fuel in breeder reactors, you are looking at zero waste, no nuclear proliferation and long use life. The only downside would be large capital cost and engineering maintenance, but French are nuclear in 70% of their electricity supply so it is doable.

If we talk local, you must have a natural source of energy, like a reservoir with a dam, geothermal or the like. Without those, we are looking at normal energy exploitation and that impacts the locality as well as cost.

9ed44f No.9882248

File: 374f8677d554565⋯.jpg (19.26 KB, 300x373, 300:373, IMG_2392.JPG)


I don't want to be that guy, by I want to make it obvious to everyone that this is how the Jewish elite have power, real international and rather intimidating power. I believe it was Dr. G himself who said we are facing the most dangerous enemy on earth. I believe that.

I personally came to NatSoc and these truths through the anti-capitalist route which looks like this:

>people are poor, this must be stopped

>hear about communism and assume it's muh capitalism's fault

>read into why capitalism doesn't work

>realise it has nothing to do with merchantilism but central banking

>named the elite

>figured out they are Jews

> thatchangesthings.jpg

> oh I get it hitler actually dindu nuffin

>mfw there is actually a solution to all this in the form of labour based economies, the abolition of usury

> /pol/ seems to be the only ones talking about this openly

> feel like I'm not insane for the first time in my life

> ohk so I guess niggers suck too

I want to point this out as most people come to this conclusion through the right of politics. I think people need to realise it's just as easy to get a leftist to come to these conclusions as it is for your average right winger.

Pic related, I used to like that guy and many others out there still do to this day. It's time we realised the left share our values and there are multiple paths to this worldview. Im not a shill, I'm a genuine NatSoc that recognises that it's an ideology that serves everyone.

9ed44f No.9882252


The reason I'm pointing this out is because this stuff seems to go over a lot of right wingers heads. Leftists are already in the mindset that finance is a source of evil, they are just misinformed as to why.

9ed44f No.9882259


Okay so I can actually contribute here. I work in this industry.

Current lithium ion batteries don't offer an affordable solution, nor do they reduce carbon footprint. But they are improving rapidly.

>never will be efficient

It's not even a case of electrical efficiency, it's simply that costs haven't come down for economical reasons. It's possible to produce lithium ion energy storage at $125/kWh, but residential batteries cost around $900/kWh.

9ed44f No.9882261


Okay but why can't we base on on human labour? There is always work to be done?

8dfc6d No.9882287


>reservoir with a dam for the local community.

What if Pumped-storage hydroelectricity and solar farm is combined to ensure they keep producting 24/7?

8dfc6d No.9882295



aba816 No.9882297



You're right my dude. In my experience most people have just lost the idea of what it is to live in the west; the liberals having it the worst. Big loan capital sucks us dry, it's just a matter of how we get a pussywhipped generation to actually man up and think like our grandfathers used to.

48e255 No.9882327


Check this shit out: Free energy is real.


Tesla knew it. There's a voltage difference of 100V per meter height on average, even on a clear day. On days where solar panels would not work (cloudy / stormy) you get even more volts.

Tesla wanted to build towers to collect atmospheric energy, then use a spark gap to create AC and drive a Tesla Coil (which it is designed to operate on). The Tesla Coil is just to eliminate the cost of having to run wires to devices. If you already have wires then you can just tie into the batteries of your Atmospheric Electricity Collector.

Physanons would bitch about the voltage loss of the inverse square law which Tesla's coil (transmitter) and resonant coupler (receiver) experience. This was not a problem for Tesla because we have a near infinite amount of energy coming from the sky, so you just build more towers. The sun is electric. Sunspots are not bright because the sun does not have a nuclear furnace inside. The dark spots reveal a cooler interior. Only the surface is burning, like an electrode ionizing plasma.

"We're swimming in electricity."


Look up Hydraulic Despotism


Cure the central bank problem and you still have to worry about despotic control via access to scarce resources (like fresh water). Decentralized solutions to energy, food, water, etc. are not welcome because TPTB would lose control. This is also why nuclear is out. A city running on cheap abundant safe Thorium energy supplemented with cheap abundant safe Atmospheric energy, that produces its own food and desalinates / condenses its own water could just tell others, "fuck off, we don't need your government".

The private central bank is only an advanced version of Hydraulic Despotism applied to currency. The scarcity of the currency is the problem. Allow each state to make its own silver / gold / etc. commodity backed currency. Then even if you have small boom / busts in regions they can be equalized at the national level – people can just shift funds into a different currency. Currency monopoly = The root of the money problem. don't Deceive yourself.

3582e7 No.9882341


Russia doesn't have Rotschild central bank. Russian central bank in 100% state owned, and the 3 major banks (Alfa, Sberbank, VTB) are either partially or completely state owned. All the corporations dealing with natural resources - Lukoil, Gazprom, Nornikel etc are state-owned. The whole military industrial sector is state owned.

The kikes ain't got shit on Russia.

48e255 No.9882354


This is true.

Russia got out from under the ZOG thumb relatively recently, and nationalized its banking.

8dfc6d No.9882436


That is interesting but wouldn't the companies that are run on the profits stop that becoming a reality.

db7f8d No.9889259


good post

db7f8d No.9889261


This is why the "Big Lie propaganda" spoken by the (((media)))) about Russia being the Devil will not end anytime soon.

f92e34 No.9889403


Debt + blackmailing = the basis of the jewish power.

Debt = slavery. ((The bankers)) are interested in power by debt, not in having the debt repaid.

Wars, welfare programs, commies, niggers, gays, rapefugees, things which are usually discussed here, are only instrumental in not letting the whites to repay the debts and in driving them in to the larger debts.

((The bankers)) are not interested in a highly productive society (and a culture that is necessary for functioning of such a society) that could repay the debts. They are interested in a society of retarded hedonistic faggots whom they can held in slavery indefinitely.

They also need the corrupt politicians who would sell their own people and for that they are promoting all sorts of perverts, losers and traitors to be able to control them by blackmailing.

And that's why the whites need to elect such politicians that would be impossible to blackmail. Not necessarily powerful or experienced, but just normal and honest people, who can say "fuck off" to the jews.

ca6619 No.9890414


Let's get rid of this broken debt-based monetary system and switch to energy.

>people immediately start issuing energy debt credits

oh boy

281242 No.9890880


OP is true.

But one catch, the money and economic system works based on metaphysical ideas of how life on the planet operates.

It consume more than it puts out, you have to figure out free energy systems then you can have both a growing economy and a falling population.

Solar energy and cold fusion will make it possible to base the money on energy produced from these system (like its based on oil now) while still have an overall contracting economy population wise and territorial wise.

41912b No.9890932


Fractional reserve banking is a myth watch 97% owned and Princes of the yen. Private banks have and use the means to create money and put it into the system now.

4b4fe6 No.9891242

Isn't it possible to pay off the debt by fucking over other countries and taking their wealtch?

9588db No.9891406


This is a complete myth… Firstly, Russia has a Central Bank which prints its fiat currency out of thin air like all Western countries do. Secondly, Russia is part of the IMF exchange rate system, which means that it's obviously linked to all other Central Banks and fiat currencies world-wide. Thus the Ruble has a floating exchange rate and therefore can be manipulated by foreign exchange markets, which are dominated by the Dollar. It's really easy. Whoever controls the exchange rates also control the economic markets.

8fbedf No.9891506


Property tax did not make sense to me until I realized it was the opportunity cost of taking land out of production. It would be undesirable if some wealthy people bought a bunch of land (because it is a finite resource) and could just hold it forever without anything forcing them to keep it useful. That said, I think people who keep nature preserved on their property should be exempt from property taxes.

You are right to say property taxes go toward all sort of wasteful shit, but it does not have to be so in our new world, and can be less of a burden even in this one, as it is in many Republican states.

Also, I encourage all /pol/ users to read "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, as many have already suggested, because a revolution against the financial system is the final boss of the system.

78c356 No.9891571


>Fractional reserve banking is a myth

>Private banks have and use the means to create money and put it into the system now.

That is fractional reserve banking you fucking retard, that banks loan out money for which they have no physical assets.

That is how they "print" money, they loan out money that they don't have, and thereby create new money.

a34285 No.9901288


Russia has created an alternative to SWIFT, just in case ""someone"" disconnect them from it.

a34285 No.9902753

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

1f1510 No.9904215


Who cares about an alternative? We need to shut it down completely. Iran was disconnected from it for a couple of years. Did it in any way decrease their dependency on the things mentioned in here >>9891406 ? Of course not. The Rial was devalued and it was expensive for them to buy stuff while the petro dollar was strong plus the EU could buy their oil cheaply. They fucked themselves when they combined their fiat currency with a floating exchange rate in 2002.

Russia is completely under control financially and everyone who parrots that Russia has freed itself in any way, shape, or form should stop merely consuming and start researching for once.

c0cbe9 No.9931413


The point here is that people have "fractional reserve" in their minds as some sort of hard limit on how much they can lend, when in reality it is just a technicality that banks have to at least have some reserves most of the time (enough to cover their asses if things go south). This means that there are days when they have less reserves than they actually technically need, and other days when they will have more, so as long as this is averaged out the bank is considered "safe". The banks lend central bank reserves to each other to facilitate this balancing-out act, which is quite possibly the highest expression of Jewish business acumen (the Jew used to have to own at least some gold etc now he can write loans and search for the gold later, silly goys!!):


>It is common for banks to end up with too many or too few reserves in their accounts at the Fed.


> The interbank overnight lending market is a market where depository institutions buy or sell funds needed to meet a reserve requirement at the end of the trading day. In this market, banks can sell their excess reserves to other banks with insufficient reserves at the overnight inter-bank lending rate.

This Jewish scam has been known for so long by economists that whoever does not always point out precisely how it works (i.e. "fractional reserve" does not really apply in the way people readily understand it) is either misinformed or JIDF, just like those who think the Federal Reserve is actually the problem (and not the commercial banks themselves). End the Fed goy!!! Never mind about the practices of us honest Commercial Bankers…


>Alan Holmes, a former senior vice president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, wrote in 1969, “in the real world banks extend credit, creating deposits in the process, and look for the reserves later.”

>Vítor Constâncio, Vice-President of the European Central Bank (ECB), in a speech given in December 2011, argued, “In reality the sequence works more in the opposite direction with banks taking first their credit decisions and then looking for the necessary funding and reserves of central bank money.”

>What Really Affects Banks’ Ability to Lend

>So if bank lending is not restricted by the reserve requirement then do banks face any constraint at all? There are sort of two answers to this question, but they are related. The first answer is that banks are limited by profitability considerations; that is, given a certain demand for loans, Jews base their usurious decisions on their perception of the pogrom-fleecing trade-offs, not reserve requirements.

>If bank lending is constrained by anything at all, it is capital requirements, not reserve requirements. However, since capital requirements are specified as a ratio whose denominator consists of Shoah-weighted assets (SWAs), they are dependent upon how gas is measured, which in turn is dependent on subjective merchant judgment. Subjective judgment combined with ever-increasing hand-rubbing may lead some Jews to underestimate the likelihood of another Holocaust. Thus, even with regulatory capital requirements, there remains a significant amount of "flexibility" in the constraint imposed on Jews’ ability to scam the goyim.


Basel III limits how much risk banks can take so that if/when shtf happens they have enough liquid assets to fulfill their obligations. That's it.


>Basel III (or the Third Basel Accord) is a global, voluntary regulatory framework on bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and market liquidity risk.


>It was agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2010–11, and was scheduled to be introduced from 2013 until 2015; however, changes from 1 April 2013 extended implementation until 31 March 2018 and again extended to 31 March 2019.

>A few rabbis argue that capitalization regulation is inherently anti-Semitic due to these and similar problems and - despite an opposite ideological view on Metzitzah b'peh - likewise contend that "too Jew to fail" rightfully reigns supreme.


>“The financial crisis of 2007/08 occurred because we failed to constrain the private financial system’s creation of private credit and money”

>mfw "private financial system"

Oy vey we the Banking Jews can not sca–I mean write more loans than we have reserves!!! Why, we're just financial intermediaries!!!! Holocaust!!!1

5b7279 No.9935642


Hey Russian, may I have the source please?

2a4e0b No.9935848


energy backed currency has the same issue as gold backed currency or any other commodity backed currency

jews got their power through 6000 years of gold and silver manipulation

hitler had the correct solution–a non-usurious central bank that invests in productive activity and collects revenue only through inflation

if you dont have a nation state there is no solution. you're stuck with commodities and all their tradeoffs (fungibility vs stability vs supply vs decentralization)

6a251a No.9935860

We could have a global debt Jubilee and wipe all debt in the world including privately held debt out.

2a4e0b No.9935866


Property rights are not unlimited.

The state has an interest in ensuring that no private individual or cabal supercedes the state's power.

Excessive unproductive land ownership is treason.

Anti-competitive monopolistic rent-seeking (at a large enough scale) is treason.

Only Jews want to abolish duty.

Billionaires can only be tolerated when they are making productive use of their assets. The state has no obligation to tolerate them if they become treasonous or grossly unproductive.

74d014 No.9935870

One stale OP about reserve banking and all of a sudden /pol/ likes books what the fuck

I have an archive with fuckloads of related pdfs an nobody gives a shit fucking kill me

2a4e0b No.9935877


Welcome to the struggle. You're late.

For 8000 years free humans have been fighting the desert war god Yahweh and his chosen people.

This is literally what WW2 was fought over.

The only way the pedophile jews will let go is when a massive collapse happens, or maybe when they finally achieve their Brave New World and have nothing left to rape.

2a4e0b No.9935885


>And that's why the whites need to elect such politicians that would be impossible to blackmail. Not necessarily powerful or experienced, but just normal and honest people, who can say "fuck off" to the jews.

Like Hitler?

It is impossible for an election to dethrone the banker jews. Impossible. Maybe we can improve some things with elections but we will never upturn their system of control through their own system of control.

"Democracy" is pacification propaganda and not real.

689bdf No.9935899




Nothing is energy dense or safe enough to be a useful currency.

Plus, every time you transfer energy to another party in the form of electricity you lose a substantial % of it as heat.

>muh smartphone.

This is laughable, sorry.

Even the best batteries hold a tiny amount of energy compared to the same weight of gasoline, which doesn't suffer substantial losses when traded, regardless of how many hands your gas can passes through.

689bdf No.9935902


Why do you think they want to colonise Mars?

They make a Jewish "ark" then nuke the planet from orbit.

Now they have not only their ark world but the entire planet for their own use.

74d014 No.9935904


>things exist

>but free energy doesn't

Yeah it's jewish there are hundreds if not thousands of diy free energy devices already publig

2a4e0b No.9935942




>Why do you think they want to colonise Mars?

I don't think they do.

Its always white people that want to go to space.

Bankers just want a "sustainable" one world government (meaning their rule is uncontested)

Most Jews don't have a drive to colonize, settle, explore, or build. They just want slaves and gold.

2a4e0b No.9935952


>A city running on cheap abundant safe Thorium energy supplemented with cheap abundant safe Atmospheric energy, that produces its own food and desalinates / condenses its own water could just tell others, "fuck off, we don't need your government".

The problem of national sovereignty is not about power plants, it's about war. By focusing on engineering issues you miss the elephant in the room… violence.

The status quo is built on violence. If you were able to solve the monopoly on violence the energy issue would be easy to solve.

767580 No.9936074

File: ce35e9954051bc1⋯.png (263.11 KB, 1800x1300, 18:13, Evola involution.png)


The time will come, anon.

5e20c0 No.9936076


make a crypto currency backed by hemp products.

Food, fuel, Plastics, Clothing. Can make so many necessities.

54f07a No.9936381

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

c18c4d No.9936773


Is this a problem with capitalism or "crony capitalism"? Would a fiscally libertarian white ethnostate have the same issues?

05e65b No.9938353


>fiscally libertarian white ethnostate

internally you can have barter and time banking:



to trade externally you can set up a regular company in a nearby bigger state: every citizen will be an employee and shareholder of that company, which will trade everything in and out

330886 No.9938667

File: 3fd2ee8938107da⋯.jpg (120.5 KB, 639x960, 213:320, JuanCar fucks Spain.jpg)


The Rothschild family does, for example.


You can store energy in hydrogen through. Water + Electricity = H2 + =O2. I would be volatile, yes, but it wouldn't degrade, and wouldn't blow up if kept safely.


There's a big difference though. Energy makes industry work. Gold is just a shiny rare metal with a marginal use in electronics.

Have a bump OP. I will also gift you a meme TL;DRing how our cuck king betrayed us.

945163 No.9939705


Agreed, I came in from the left as well. Find the leftists that don't look spineless, they're the ones who would be receptive. Reaching a leftist is honestly pretty well done here but maybe not even consciously.

c18d03 No.9942222


>I want to point this out as most people come to this conclusion through the right of politics. I think people need to realise it's just as easy to get a leftist to come to these conclusions as it is for your average right winger.

Of course, and this is what actually heppened with the NSDAP, which was, after all, the National Socialist WORKERS party. Many, many ex-commies who joined the SA, and Hitler himself said something to the effect of "we were all social democrats once".

c18d03 No.9942235

File: 903bee4f5c4e562⋯.jpg (128.61 KB, 450x567, 50:63, 1466950322044.jpg)


True on all accounts. They don't have "it".

8dfc6d No.9942413


>Plus, every time you transfer energy to another party in the form of electricity you lose a substantial % of it as heat.

That is useful because it prevents the Jews from hoarding it. Money means power to them.

32bda8 No.9942573

>>9729915 (why not include some links for info? not that I could point to any bread i've baked that's as good or better)

>>9731013 get ready for clumsy spoonfeeding motherfuckers open wide and cover your eyes (figuratively only) if you want to be sighted (yeah, the PC term for people who can see tossed around to trigger you) after this

>>9731103 the dividends are paid to depository institutions (private banks)

>Dividends paid to member banks, set at 6 percent of paid-in capital by sec-tion 7(1) of the Federal Reserve Act, totaled $1,686 million.

this is from (pages 112-113 of the pdf file or 104-105 of the page numbers that appear in text form within the file) the 2014 annual report to congress and $1,686 million = $1.686 billion in case you're as retarded as I was a few minutes ago. Also on page 112/104:

>Expenses totaled $12,579 million:

>$6,862 million in interest paid to depository institu-tions on reserve balances and term deposits.

>$3,926 million in Reserve Bank operating expenses

>$711 million for new currency costs

yea, more than half of their total expenses were apparently interest paid to private banks (in addition to the dividends paid to them)

To be fair, they list income immediately before expenses as

>Income in 2014 was $116,562 million

of which $115.9 was SOMA interest (as listed in the table on the next page)

pg 315/307 has a table with a breakdown of income and expenses by branch and I would encourage anons to look at the assessments by the board section and make sure you follow down to the footnotes to see the fun bits like

>In October 2008, the Reserve Banks began to pay interest to depository institutions on qualifying balances held at the Federal Reserve Banks.


>In April 2010, the Reserve Banks began to pay interest on term deposits under the Term Deposit Facility.

after the 3 pages of that there's a historical table of income and expenses that I haven't bothered to look at yet



(told I don't have to break links anymore due to auto-italicization)

Some econanonymist who is smarter than me, please explain what in the fuck SOMA is and how they could make $115bn from it

and I'm vaguely interested more specifically in what this is since it more than doubled (and I only caught it at first because of the difference in wording compared to the surrounding context)

>The average daily balance of securities sold under agree-ments to repurchase was $233,249 million, an increase of $133,569 million from 2013

specifically, what are "securities sold under agreements to repurchase"?

or shit, let's go full-retard; what are "securities"?

46d1e8 No.9942674


>what in the fuck SOMA is

it's the drug used in Brave New World:


32bda8 No.9942683


I suppose I should've typed out

SOMA (System Open Market Account)

you twat

9db65b No.9942789

We need more threads like this. Some fraction of newfags are capable of joining us, but only if they encounter high-quality content and redpill threads like this one.

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / choroy / f / fur / ita / newbrit / wai / waifuist ]