/polarchive/ - polarchive

>>7

The greatest lie ever told - The Holocaust - 2015 Documentary HD

>Full length Holocaust Documentary - Did Hitler systematically murder 6 million Jews? we will be putting some of the mainstream theories under the scope, for the purpose of analysis and revision.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmrHBT5h-BA

>>15

Does anyone have a source on this pic? I see it a lot but don't see any sources for it.

Do any of these infographics have actual sources? Most of them just state "facts" without any evidence.

>>7

Is there a source for this image?

>>725

Screenshot from this doc and is easy to verify by checking with a few mainstream Holocaust sites and books

Questions to present to Holocaust believers

Jews can be a bit of a disgruntling topic. They’re never talked about except as a sinless people that we are not allowed to criticize in Western societies, and to go from that to a place where they are constantly criticized can be quite overwhelming. It wouldn’t be such a big issue if it wasn’t a major underpinning justification for so much of what /pol/ (and many others) detest in modern society. Of course, being such a substantial pillar /pol/ is more than happy to attack it, although many people express skepticism at/pol/’s claims (such as the Einsatzgruppen’s main purpose being anti-partisan warfare). While I won’t try to get into the specifics of each or argue about the validity of evidence, there are major holes in the official story that should cast doubt in the mind of even the most firm believer. To this end, there are seven questions that should be asked:

Why would the Nazis even kill Jews?

If they had them in concentration labor camps, why kill them instead of putting them to work doing useful labor? In the middle of a total war, labor is a precious resource, and yet the Nazis are supposed to have been stupid (or hateful) enough to kill millions of potential laborers while being smart enough to manage the whole operation and keep it secret? This doesn’t seem to add up.

If they did kill millions in an organized genocide, why use such inefficient methods?

For a people so renowned for their efficiency, the Germans do not seem to possess this quality when it comes to the Holocaust. Gas chambers, gas cars, ovens… even electrical racks or masturbation machines (according to some “eyewitnesses”): all of these are extremely inefficient and wasteful. Some are downright goofy. With millions of rounds of ammunition being produced monthly, and weapons certainly not being scarce, why would the Nazis not just use a cheap bullet to kill millions? They would have the necessary materials in less than a month rather than the countless resources needed to produce deadly gases, burn people alive, or electrocute them. Would the Nazis really have chosen such inefficient methods of extermination during a war decided by resources, knowing that by choosing these more gruesome and inefficient methods they were condemning millions of their own countrymen to death? Knowing that choosing to do so would likely lead to the defeat of their country and the subjugation of their people?

Why are so-called eyewitness accounts given such weight and believed to be so trustworthy?

In modern criminal courts we do not lend such power to eyewitnesses, especially if there is a conflict of interests and they are also victims. And yet when it comes to the Holocaust, all we seem to need as evidence are the claims of the self-reported victims, without evidence or substantiation. This is a serious lapse in historical and public integrity, and yet it is never discussed. What is worse is some of the outright lies and fabrications of these eyewitnesses that have proven to be so–such as the soap and lampshades myth that was quietly dropped. If it is possible for these “eyewitnesses” to lie about this, is it not possible for them to lie about other events? Furthermore, why is there no weight given to the effects of trauma and group psychology, such as would be considered when examining the testimonies of eyewitnesses in criminal cases? Eyewitness testimonies are rarely fully accurate, and oftentimes will wildly differ from each other–exaggerating some facts, downplaying or outright omitting others, and sometimes even creating details entirely. Yet for all of this, there is no consideration, and we take claims of Nazi masturbation machines at face value.

>>889

Why are the only purported death camps investigated by Soviets?

Of all the camps investigated, it was only the ones specifically investigated by the Soviets–in zones which the Allies were forbidden to enter–that were claimed to be death camps. By choosing to believe this claim, we are, in effect, putting faith in Soviet claims of German atrocities. Given that the Soviets blamed many of their own against the Germans, fabricated other claims, and instigated countless more atrocities than could be ever attributed to the Nazis, are their claims really so valid? Should we really be giving them so much weight?

Why is it that it is only Jewish Holocaust supposed victims that are talked about?

Even according to the official narratives, Jews were only a fraction of the total number of victims claimed by the Holocaust, and yet they are focused on almost exclusively. Where are the tears shed for the millions of Poles killed? The hundreds of thousands of Russians and other Slavs? Where are the tears and Holocaust museums and novels and commemorations for these victims? If the Holocaust is truly such a horrifying and shocking event that must live ‘forever’ in our memories, lest it be repeated, why are so many of its victims forgotten? Why are they shoved by the wayside, pressed into the footnotes of history? Are they not also worth our tears? Do they not deserve reparations just as the Jewish victims received? Why is it we never see any mention of this?

Why is the Holocaust so important anyway?

In terms of the total death toll, it is not the largest. In terms of brutality, it is not the worst. In terms of the amount or percentage of the targeted ethnic group eliminated, it is not the most successful. It is not the most recent genocide. It was not the first genocide. All of this is true, and yet the Holocaust is treated as a unique horror and taught and repeated in perpetuity. Why? What makes the Holocaust so uniquely horrifying and evil? Was it simply that the targeted ethnic group was Jews? Are other ethnic groups not worth our tears? Why is there barely any mention of such horrifying events as the Rwandan genocide? Why are there no mentions of such atrocities as the Armenian genocide by the Turks, the millions of whites killed by the Soviets during the Holodomor, or the countless others killed in various other Asian states throughout the past hundred or more years? Where is the course in schools about these events? Why are they not apparently worth the media’s attention?

If the Holocaust is so undeniably true–so thoroughly established–why is it illegal in many countries to question it at all?

Why is the supposed truth in fear of criticism? Do we ban discussion and argument over whether the Earth is, in fact, round? Should it be illegal to question whether the Roman Empire ever existed? Of course not. Such thinking is preposterous, and there is no need to ban that which is, to the best that we can determine, truthful. And yet this does not apply to the Holocaust, for some reason. Despite numerous holes, revisions, and changes in the Holocaust narrative, questioning any or all of the purported “facts” will get you, in many countries, your own cell in jail–merely for espousing a healthy skepticism that is applied equally to other areas of life! It should be clear that if the Holocaust requires an environment free of criticism to survive, it is not, at least in whole, the truth.

Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews survived even longer. Most of these “survivors” were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could have exploited. There was no logical reason for them to be kept alive if the goal was extermination. The very existence of more than a million survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the basic components of the Holocaust; i.e. that the Germans had a policy to eliminate every Jew.

Why is there no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill’s six volume History of the Second World War, the wartime memoirs of either De Gaulle or Eisenhower, or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War? Keep in mind all these were written years after the war ended and thus after the Holocaust had been allegedly proven by the Nuremberg Trials. With regard to the Holocaust, the silence of these “cognoscenti” is deafening!

What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if in fact it was a death camp?

Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far-flung empire (thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while fighting a world war on two fronts) to deliver people to “death camps” hundreds of miles away to simply execute them upon arrival? Wouldn’t a bullet on the spot have appealed to the legendary German sense of efficiency?

Why, after seventy years, have historians been unable to come up with a single German document that points to the Holocaust? Should we believe the likes of Raul Hilberg that in the place of written orders there was an “incredible meeting of the minds” by the literally tens of thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude?

Why is is still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from an immediate post-war figure of 4 million to a figure of less than 1 million? Why do many respond to this observation by saying, “What’s the difference whether it’s six million or one million?” The answer is that the difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can get you three years in an Austrian jail… just ask David Irving!

All of Germany’s wartime codes were compromised, including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore, it has been insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when discussing their extermination program of the Jews–e.g. “final solution”, special treatment, resettlement, etc. Why was it necessary for them to use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies? And then why would they still use cracked codes?

>>891

The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface, which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of thousands of victims untenable.

Initially, claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the old Reich (e.g. Dachau, Bergen-Belsen). “Evidence” to that effect was every bit as compelling as what is offered for other camps–located in occupied Poland–yet without explanation in the early sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the “death camps” were located in the East (i.e. Poland), outside (some would say conveniently) the probing eyes of western scholars.

No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that personnel entered the gas chambers after 20 minutes without any protective gear, and the fact that Zyklon B was a “time release” fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another 24 hours. And that even after 24 hours the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill anyone who touched them who was not wearing protective gear.

Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap, lampshades, and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews? Could it be that in the light of modem forensics and DNA knowledge these claims are totally untenable?

Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special grids? “Evidence” of this was presented at Nuremberg–evidence that sent men to the gallows.

Elie Wiesel has been described as “the Apostle of Remembrance,” yet in his memoir, Night, which details his stay at Auschwitz, he makes no mention of the now infamous homicidal gas chambers. Isn’t this a bit like one of the Gospels making no mention of the Cross?

Virtually every survivor who was examined at Auschwitz says that he or she was examined by the infamous Dr. Mengele.

According to survivor testimony, hundreds of thousands of Jews were executed at Treblinka and then buried in mass graves in the surrounding area. Why is it that extensive sonar probing of these burial grounds reveals that this alleged final resting place for Holocaust victims has remained undisturbed since at least the last ice age?

“Proof” of the Holocaust rests primarily on survivor testimony. There is little, if any, hard evidence. The best of this has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as merely “criminal traces.” Even Judge Grey who presided at the Irving-Lipstadt Trial commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was “extremely thin.” To paraphrase Arthur Butz, “a crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence.” Where is it? There was more hard evidence against O. J. Simpson at his trial and he was found innocent.

>>892

Why has Holocaust revisionism been criminalized in at least eleven countries? What other historic truth needs the threat of prison or the destruction of one’s career to maintain itself? Should someone be sent to prison for expressing skepticism about the official Chinese claim that they suffered 35 million dead in World War II?

Why do the court historians insist that “denying the Holocaust” is like denying slavery or saying the Earth is flat? The leading Revisionists are first rate scholars who hold advanced degrees from the world’s leading universities. Is there anyone comparable among those who say the world is flat or that slavery never existed? Notice again that it is not illegal to say the Earth is flat or that slavery never existed. The truth of these things does not seem to need legal protection.

Promoters of the Holocaust have expressed concerns about remembering the Holocaust once the last survivors die. Why haven’t Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959?

Survivors of the Holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the crematoriums as they consumed the bodies of murdered victims–some eyewitnesses even claimed they could detect national origins by the color of the smoke. How can this be reconciled with the fact that properly operating crematoriums do not produce smoke of any color?

According to the official version of the Holocaust, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were rounded up in mid-1944 and sent to Auschwitz, where most were gassed immediately upon arrival and their bodies were disposed of by burning in huge open air pits using railroad ties and gasoline. Why is that there is no evidence of these huge funerary pyres in the high resolution surveillance photos taken by Allied aircraft overflying the camp on a daily basis during this time period? Furthermore, why have no remains been found, since open pit burning, even when gasoline is used, generates insufficient heat to totally consume a body?

All of the liberated camps were littered with corpses; is there a single autopsy report or any other forensic evidence that shows that even a single one of these deaths was a consequence of poison gas?

The death toll for the Holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by Jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were “missing” at the end of the war?

Why do the wartime inspection reports of camps made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions? It strains credulity that such monumental crimes could be hidden. The only explanations are that either these crimes were not occurring or that the Red Cross was complicit in a cover up.

Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter Report?

“The Holocaust was technologically possible because it happened.” Why is this intellectually bankrupt argument, which turns scholarship on its head, considered by the promoters of the Holocaust as historical truth, and considered a sufficient response to the mounting Revisionist evidence to the contrary?

What other historical truths rely to the extent that the Holocaust does on so-called “eyewitness” testimony, and why have none of these witnesses ever been cross-examined?

According to the official version of the Holocaust, the Jews remained ignorant of their fate until the very end–so skillful were their Nazi murderers in deceiving their victims. How can this ignorance be reconciled with the fact that the Jews have historically been, as a group, the most literate and highly informed people on the planet, with legendary access to the highest echelons of government?

>>7

Eric Hunt - The Shoah: The Biggest Hoax of the 20th Century?

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/08/RIR-150812.php

gaschamberhoax.com

http://gaschamberhoax.com/

Smithsonian Red-Faced after “Treblinka Star of David Tiles” Shown to be Not Jewish At All

http://gaschamberhoax.com/

Free Downloads from CHP at vho.org

http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

http://codoh.com/

More documentaries on Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

http://codoh.com/library/categories/1167/

>>7

Eric Hunt - The Shoah: The Biggest Hoax of the 20th Century?

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/08/RIR-150812.php

gaschamberhoax.com

http://gaschamberhoax.com/

Smithsonian Red-Faced after “Treblinka Star of David Tiles” Shown to be Not Jewish At All

http://gaschamberhoax.com/

Free Downloads from CHP at vho.org

http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

http://codoh.com/

More documentaries on Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

http://codoh.com/library/categories/1167/

NEW

>Eric Hunt - The Shoah: The Biggest Hoax of the 20th Century? - Hour 1

The "Holohoax" exposed in 30 minutes

1. The gassing of human beings is a well-worn theme of British war propaganda

2. Six million Jews exterminated? Impossible!

3. Children were born at Auschwitz and survived

4. AUCHWITZ, CAMPS WITH MODERN HOSPITALS FOR THE INMATES…

5.The alleged gas chamber in Auschwitz I vs real gas chambers in the USA

6. « GAS CHAMBERS » AT BIRKENAU? NO, MORGUES !

7. 1993: SCIENTIFIC PROOF

8. THE CREMATORY OVENS AT AUSCHWITZ

9. WHY THE ALLIES DID NOT BOMB AUSCHWITZ…

10. 1944: AIR PHOTOS SHOW NOTHING SUSPICIOUS

11. THE « FINAL SOLUTION »: THIS WAS THE DEPORTATION OF THE JEWS TO THE EAST

12. THE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKE AT THE LIBERATION OF THE CAMPS: HOW THE ALLIES LIED BY OMISSION

Vincent Reynouard: "The Gas Chambers" Yet One More False Witness

>A devastating–and in places, hilarious–deconstruction of "yet one more false witness" to the legendary gas chambers of Auschwitz by courageous French revisionist Vincent Reynouard.

Vincent Reynouard - Holocaust: Nothing Proven at Nuremberg

Ursula Haverbeck: The Panorama Interview, with English Subtitles

>In 2015, Ursula Haverbeck made history in a defiant interview in which she threw down the gauntlet to the biggest taboo of our times. Revisionism . . . on German TV! A seismic event.

>>68

SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD

>>>/pol/3073545

Preeminent Holocaust Scholar Raul Hilberg's Stunning Admission (censored from PBS)

>In 1976, I went to a small town in Bavaria, Ludwigsburg, which has the headquarters for investigations of so-called National Socialist crimes, an office maintained by the provinces of the Federal Republic of Germany. About thirty prosecutors were housed in that particular building, and I went there to study court records, various affidavits, and other materials. But one afternoon, they said, “We’re having a party today, would you join us?” Why, yes. They said, “we have one bottle of wine for each person.” (laughter from the audience). And after a while I chanced to talk to the deputy chief of that office, and I said to him this: I’ve been troubled by one question. And I’m afraid that I went into print with something that isn’t entirely accurate. And that is the role of Adolf Hitler himself in the annihilation of the Jewish people in Europe. Now, I know that you are only concerned here with live individuals, and that you do not investigate the dead.

>But still … what do you think?

>“Ach,” he said, “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

>We didn’t have the evidence.”

>We didn’t have the evidence.”

>We didn’t have the evidence.”

>We didn’t have the evidence.”

>We didn’t have the evidence.”

http://takimag.com/article/fear_of_a_gray_planet_david_cole/print#ixzz3TxrfJenl

HOLOCAUST DEPROGRAMMING COURSE

http://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

David Cole - The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz

>David Cole, the “Jewish Holocaust Revisionist,” made a documentary called, “The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz,” when he was a young man in his early 20s. He spent eighteen years as David Stein, the “Republican Party Animal,” working with GOP higher-ups and blogging for major conservative sites. The full story of his life as an “evil” holocaust revisionist and the fascinating account of his involvement in politics, along with the tale of his “outing” are all detailed in his book, “Republican Party Animal.”

>David describes his early years in southern California, where he started looking at holocaust revisionism in 1989. At one time he came to the defense of Ernst Zündel, the infamous political prisoner who spent more than seven years locked up in Germany on charges of holocaust denial. We learn about the time frame between the making of David’s film in 1992, to when he went into hiding once the JDL placed a bounty on his head, up to the outing by his ex-girlfriend in 2013, and the frenzied fallout that ensued. David talks about what it’s like returning to the realm of holocaust revisionism, and we discuss many of the curious details on display at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum.

>We get into everything from the construction of the gas chambers, to the 1000s of cans of Zyklon B, the blue walls in delousing facilities, human hair slippers and more. David also illustrates some of the most chilling facts that have been established about the labor camps that were in operation before, during and after the bloody World Wars, including the horrific typhus epidemic and the murder of many thousands of Europeans, some of whom were Jews. Then, David covers the crucial evidence that is in fact missing from arguments that millions of innocents were gassed and exterminated at the hands of Nazis. In closing, we zoom out to the present-day situation in multicultural Germany, where an imported rape culture has emerged and the holocaust saga continues to be propagated to create more suffering for the Germans in the name of revenge.

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio3fourteen/2016/R314-160113.php

>The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax (2014)

>David Cole in Auschwitz full documentary 1992

>David Cole - The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz

Jew Soap!

>>7

Made in Russia: 'The Holocaust' - Revisionist Carlos Whitlock Porter

Revisionist Carlos Porter expands on his book of the same title, which exposes most of the "documents" used in the Nuremberg Trials as fakes and forgeries made in the Soviet Union. With captivating wit, he takes us through many of the original holocaust stories which were so ludicrous that you can't help but chuckle and wonder how anyone could have taken seriously.

Filmed on location in Luxembourg, Mr Porter, a former American citizen, exposes a hoax of tragic proportions, considering all the people who have been executed and are still being persecuted because of this crime against justice. It also puts the Holocaust guru Raul Hilberg, author of the Destruction of the European Jews in a different light. Hilberg's research is based almost exclusively on those "documents".