[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/polidicks/ - Politics

No dicks

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1425466909703.jpg (49.39 KB, 500x437, 500:437, Concealed carry.jpg)

 No.788

Gun freedom thread!
2nd amendment stronk!

 No.790

>>789

Well, NBC is a very specific category, and it wouldn't be ridiculous to limit people's access to those specific compounds. You'd most likely just be using the same language that the UN does.

 No.868

>>789
Don't think so.
Better legalize nukes to keep ideologically consistent!

 No.871

>>789
>>868

Nukes already are legal to own, at least in the US. The only requirement is that you were the one who mined and processed the fissile material yourself.

 No.908

Why keep'em guessing when you can open carry and let muthafuckas know?

 No.933

>>871
I guarantee you that there are hundreds of laws and several agencies that would stop you from undertaking any of the steps required to build and deploy a nuke.

So my point still stands, nukes are illegal to build or detonate (perhaps not to possess), but should be legalized.

 No.1043

Considering the current rape culture, do you really think it is a good idea to support gun freedom?

Feminazi shoots guys down, claiming, he raped her, and the court will vindicate her, mainly due to SJW media pressure.
So she does that again and again, not because of rape, but because she really hates men and thinks she is doing the wymynhood a favour by thinning their ranks and she has an infinite "get out of the jail free" card.

Is this the future you want?



[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]