/politics/ - News & Politics

>>13902

I meant to say political stance. Have any of you written a letter to your government representative(assuming you live in a democracy), signed a petition, protested?

>>14432

Your brother is a cunt. Thinking back my brother would ask my mum if he could have a party, but if she wasn't here he would ask me instead, he is also as tall as me and /fit/, so he wasn't scared of me physically. Your brother has no respect and consideration for anyone.

>>14436

Could you spend the money on making one yourself?

>>14445

Glad you made it back safe lad.

>>14475

You're a bully tbh

>>14478

I did it, I just ended up playing shitty games on my phone, but then again I had nothing else to do.

>>14523

>It's annoying because I've gained all the weight I lost last year thanks to mum.

>thanks to mum

Lad you're the one choosing to eat the sweets, not your mum. Just don't eat them, so what if they get thrown away. Just becuase they're there doesn't mean you have to eat them, I have sweets in the house all the time but it's extremely rare for me to eat them.

>>14527

>If she starts shit I'll just do another Chef Ramsay on her.

Lad I want you to film this so bad.

>>14528

>It's not her fault.

>It's my fault for being so weak willed as to give into it.

Atleast you admit it lad.

>>14571

>I don't really understand this not having a nice mummy thing tbh lads.

Lucky you.

>>14329

I'm more a traditionalist than anything else, but you are quite retarded if you think anarchism and nationalism aren't closely related. Read more books.

I'm anti-globalist and just think commune/tribe/regionalism are better than nationalism.

>>11963

Thanks! I'm really just a straight anarchist, they should have a black flag.

>>14507

I agreed with everything you said.

For those who don't know about it, Troy Southgate has a site and some writings on National Anarchism, though it is similarly about groups & communities & peoples, and not so much what are called nations today.

http://www.national-anarchist.net/

>>14507

>anarchism and nationalism are closely related

First of all, I'm a Libertarian, hence the flag. Second of all, you must be the one that is retarded friend. Anarchism means that there is no government at all, and people live by an innate code of ethics.

Nationalism is a mixture of the free-market, as well as statist policies. Anarchy is the exact opposite of statist, so how could what you said be true?

>>14507

Also, it's inevitable that some sort of government would form in a state of "anarchy." Human beings are rational creatures, as well as cooperative creatures. The very being of human nature is cooperation, so what you are proposing (anarchy) is absurd. If oyu had argued anarcho-capitalism, you would have a point. In an anarcho-capitalist society, the very definition of capitalism means that people are all working together, through self-interest, to benefit each other. While I reject any anarchy on principle, pure anarchy is an absurd concept for what I pointed out here >>14541.

>>14541

>>14542

For fuck sake, read what I wrote, you're talking about leftist anarchism, I'm not a leftist anarchist and hate /anarcho/. Quit reading lolbertarian litterature and start reading european classics, you really need it because you act like a living meme.

>>14483

Really, Cruz is going to win Utah, I think even Kasich will beat Trump there. Mormans are a weird bunch.

What do you guys think of Trump being pro-israel?

>>14511

Nobody honestly knows when Trump is telling the truth or not.

>>14483

>>14496

Holy fuck was I wrong on the Democratic side..

Sanders won Idaho by 57 points with 100% reporting and Utah by 49 points with 15% reporting. Hillary won Arizona by 19 points with 79% reporting. Even though Sanders only got a couple more delegates, tonight is a huge win for Sanders. He dominated Hillary in Idaho and Utah.

I was about right on the Republican side. Trump won Arizona beating Cruz by 23 points with 79% reporting. Cruz won Utah, beating Kasich by 52 points with Trump coming in last. Kasich beat Trump by 3 points with 42% reporting.

>>14555

Do I look like I need a safespace?

>>14558

Yes.

>>14559

Well, I don't. Got any more questions?

>constitutional monarchy

>white ethnostate

>free speech

>all weapons guns legal except for WMDs., including anti-vehicle weapons.

>nationalized banking, debt-free fiat currency earmarked for public projects.

>mandatory 2 year military training for all males, after which limited benefits and 4 years of free tuition is available, public sector employees also get moderate benefits for unemployment, otherwise no welfare.

>citizenship earned through service in military or public sector if not natural citizen.

>drug trafficking punished harshly with death penalty for possession/sale of more than 10k worth of drugs, drug addiction is approached as a matter of public health instead of criminal justice and drug users are offered compulsory rehabilitation instead of jail, pot, tobacco, modafinil, and booze are legal.

>no artificial barriers of entry into the market for new firms, free market.

>Corporate welfare of any kind explicitly prohibited in the constitution.

>Government deficit/national debt of any quantity for more than 1 year is constitutional basis for impeachment, and if there is a surplus or at least a balanced budget the ruling class is given extremely lucrative commission of millions of dollars, ruling aristocrats earn 10 percent of national surplus.

>Taxation constitutionally prohibited from being more than 5 percent of GDP.

>nationalist foreign policy, if it doesn't benefit

the homeland and your countrymen it is not pursued, no foreign intervention that doesn't concern you.

>International trade is done on a barter system with direct exchange of goods, if there is comparative advantage by trading commodities with other nations it will not affect the currency and the volatility of being a world reserve currency will not be a problem, also parasitic banking cartels cannot profit from currency arbitrage.

>>14563

While I fundamentally disagree with making drug selling or possession illegal, especially a death penalty and think that if men are required to serve the military for two years then women should be required to perform a similar public service, I like how you want incentives to push politicians/aristocrats to do the right thing regarding budgets and taxation. Incentives work.

>>14380

This kind of poster is either a paid disruptor or a brainwashed divisive. Either way we need to get rid of this kind of trash with vigilant modding. This place is not active enough to survive against such completely destructive hyperactivity

>>14417

Welcome back, Rey.

>>14421

Who is Rey? Is he a board volunteer or something? This guy (>>14417, >>14347, >>14334) obviously doesn't belong on an imageboard, if he is bothered by the way we post.

I pointed out that different races have different IQ's, which is a verifiable fact. We did not all evolve evenly, and it would be absurd to insist that we did. Race mixing ruins the various beautiful cultures of the world by making us all "one human race." It also lowers the overall IQ of different people. If Rey, or whoever the fuck this is, doesn't agree, tell him to argue his point. Calling me "retarded" is the very bottom of the hierarchy of argumentation: ad hominem.

>>14537

If you haven't realized yet that you were being trolled then it's you who don't belong on imageboards tbh

>who's Rey

Google: !Ry9.FWKNDY

He used to post here, it's probably him.

>>14549

Oh shit, the guy who would post in italicized caps? I haven't seen him since December 2014.

>>14539

By vehicles related regulations I meant tests that they must undergo before they released in the market. What prevents someone from creating a vehicles in his garage that will break into parts in the road and kill everyone? What prevents other countries from flooding the market with low quality vehicles?

>environment regulations

don't know if you are agreeing with me or just commenting or what.

>drug regulations

what I meant is FDA testing process. Allowing pharmaceutical companies to dump their drugs on the market is not good, it's more free, but not good

>inb4 if you abolish FDA, independent agencies will emerge

Agencies will emerge, they won't be independent. Is FDA perfect? No. Is it the least bad solution? Yes, or at least, it's better than no giving the companies direct access to the market.

Death to anarchists, lolbertarians and commies.

>>14547

Lots of typos so I won't even bother to fix them.

Objectively it's libertarianism but it's stance on immigration isn't trendy among the alt-right these days.

>>14550

Why do you say that? Prominent Libertarians like Ron Paul have typically advocated in favor of strong national defense.

>>14564

and borders

>>14506

It seems like you are speaking from experience of the state of things now rather than from a historical perspective, as the statement to which you are referring was made from.

Summarily; what women are now is not what they were or are supposed to be.

It think we are in agreement here.

What you are remarking on is the result of the self-unawareness that I referenced. This is a good point for me to improve my argument. It's not just self-unawareness. It's unawareness of the people who depend on them. Selfishness.

>>14522

I am speaking of women everywhere and always. Women have never been selfless relative to men. More women than children survived the sinking of the Titanic.

Also

http://theantifeminist.com/angry-harry-eleanor-of-aquitaine/

>>14305

While I agree with you your post reeks of impotence and bitterness. The bottom line is that women, for the most part, go with the herd. Whatever is currently popular is what they will be drawn to, and what has been popular for quite some time is Marxism/socialism. And even though you're talking about society as a whole it feels more personal. Your only hope is to get a girl and bend her to your way of thinking. You will always be outnumbered because the media and government are against you, which makes a majority of the population against you. But there beliefs have no foundation and are easy to change you just have to have the energy, confidence and willingness to do it.

Although maybe I've read you wrong and your post wasn't personal at all

>>14534

But the proof is in the form of their bodies. They give nourishment to others from their bodies. Their form is smaller because they give form to others. They risk their lives for childbirth. They are inherently selfless. Additionally they inherently have no self like a man does, which makes them selfless in another sense. They are predominantly emotional. A man is both emotional and rational. Indeed since reason is made of emotion, an argument could be made that men are much more emotional and an easier argument could be made that men have much more complex emotion. I could provide an argument for all of this but I'm tired and I would just have to do it again tomorrow for this other thing i'm writing. But I'll post it here soon.

>>14536

I'd really like to understand where you are coming from. Can you describe more about why you think it reeks of impotence and bitterness and what you mean by thinking it's personal?

>>13285

you dont want to hear about traitors being traitors only their praises?

>>13285

Hilary Clinton=François Hollande

Rubio/Cruz etc...= Sarkozy/Les Républicains

Donald Trump= Jean-Marie Lepen

Bernie Sanders= Jean Luc Mélanchon

>>13780

>Rubio/Cruz etc...= Sarkozy/Les Républicains

I'll give you Rubio but there is no European equivalent of Cruz/tea party/evangelicals thankfully.

>>13787

they believe in the same stuff as sarkozy but republicans and U.S. politicians as whole have to pretend they're not atheist/apatheist. It's kinda funny.

>>13789

>they believe in the same stuff as sarkozy but republicans and U.S. politicians as whole have to pretend they're not atheist/apatheist. It's kinda funny.

You have no idea what you're talking about. John fucking Kasich is farther to the right than literally any 'right wing' politician in Europe. Even a Tea Party halfbreed like Rubio makes Le Pen look like Bernie Sanders. Cruz is nearly off the edge of the map even by US standards, in Europe he'd be totally incomprehensible to you cucks.

>>14512

>That really doesn't make any sense. Do they send the other agencies home and say

>Don't worry about it, nobody got killed.

yes. the number of dead that pop up in the mass media is a lie.

are they saying 34 dead now? There will never be a speck of evidence that any of them died at the airport. Most of them you won't ever see photos of or names given.

Real people have facebook accounts, friends and family. Why isn't the 34 and their facebook accounts people listed in the media?

There is the odd hoax family that are put in front of the camera. They always pretend to cry. *

Because nobody gets killed at hoaxes. The emergencies agencies are instructed only to send specially trained staff. these trained staff have been on crisis actor courses and have signed secrecy agreements. They turn up, do some pretend work on pretend victims then pack up and go back to normal work and don't talk about it to media.

* ( Incidentally do you remember the murder of Milly Dowler in march 2002? That was real. And her parents gave a real press appeal. The whole media affair was later uploaded to youtube by the police. Except one thing. The parents press appeal. Why did they miss that out? Because its would have been a benchmark of reality to compare with all the fake families crying fake tears at all the hoax events )

>Anyway, let's say that these types of convoluted conspiracy theories are correct and those of us who criticize them are wrong. So what? Where does that get you? The news that I get right now, even from pretty mainstream sources, already gives me enough data to support my views. How much time do you want to spend attempting to gather evidence for an extreme conspiracy theory?

you really don't mind sounding like a shill do you? Its ok here I spose. There is no-one here except us. They whole board has gone back to /pol/ to join in the shitfest on the happening threads.

Searching for the truth is always worthwhile. Lies stack and combine. i.e. if I was to let this one go unchecked, then other lies could be built around it, until a large completely fictitious view of reality could be given to a lot of people.

Of course this is whats happened to the goyim. The media is crammed from the 1st page to the last page b4 the sport with lies.

You are a much poorer person if you believe the crap in the media. Goyim don't realise how deeply the huge wall of fiction that have been erected to surround their view of reality by kikes and other ruthless individuals, damages them and their families.

Therefore as a matter of principle its always worth unweaving the lies in the media. Its also a fuckton of fun as an exercise in calling bulshit and seeing the truth.

>>14366

compare the brussels CCTV quality to this of some downtown shithole in some 3rd world country.

http://www.bestgore.com/suicide/couple-stroll-unfazed-suicide-man-land-sidewalk-next-to-them-cctv/

>>14441

Tell that OP, not me. I prefer Judaism Rediscovered as source on the Jewish question. Its a hard one to swallow though, because you need the bible and the Talmud to get all the references.

As much as I can gather from there, the Judaic elite doesn't give much a shit about Gentiles and more about a shit about control over all the Jews.

The video serves more of the purpose to point out that there is indeed something fishy with the material provided by the and to the media.

>IT WAS DA JUICE

Sometimes a muslim suicide bomber is just a muslim suicide bomber.

>>2233

ITT:

OP wants to try and create a mish-mash of current U.S fascist neolib/neocon that purges low I.Qs and non-compliers to create the ultimate Orwellian American Empire, run by robotic slave Asians and headed by Akhenazis

Essentially, OP is a Rothschild

>>2233

Militants centralism... so you don't believe in freedom or rights? How can you keep the peace without giving your populace what it wants in most societies?

>>14391

This is a bot. This is why we need moderarion

>>11181

Austrian economists have a variety of answers, but I think the general consensus is that:

1) Natural monopolies are hard to tell apart from the normal market process. Every producer is a "monopolist" of his product. The real issue is monopolistic pricing.

2) Monopolistic pricing, unless created by government intervention, is a result of innovation and hard work. As such, it's temporary (constantly challenged by market forces) and it's a good thing, because innovation should be rewarded.

3) Monopolistic pricing is often the result of barriers to entry, but in most cases those barriers are created by government intervention. For instance, onerous health and safety regulations, and the patent system.

4) Anti-trust regulations harm consumers by rewarding the less efficient "sore losers" at the expense of the market leaders. They are essentially protectionist measures pushed by industrial lobbyists.

5) Predatory pricing simply doesn't work. Almost nobody does it, and those who try end up worse off.

https://mises.org/library/antitrust-reform-predatory-practices-and-competitive-process

>>11199

>>11209

You guys have an extremely positive outlook on monopolies, in my opinion.

I feel it is quite easy for a monopoly to grow way out of control. Monopolies can actively reduce competition on many fields. Consider how an operating system like microsoft can influence nearly everything. It has taken many years for web applications to no longer be made specifically for ie6 (and there still are plenty that cannot move away). Every day people are plagued by having to use microsoft office and although some reasonable replacements exists, most likely exist because of government having stepped in in many cases (requiring an open standard for their "word" and so on, meaning microsoft had to tell some others about how docx and the like are implemented. In a world where they have no regulations they have to care about, I don't believe it would be hard for them to ruin that even more. Who would have heard of google if internet explorer blocked it near the start, to protect its own search engine. Alternative browser? We are the only browser you can find.

You can just look at ISPs in locations where google fiber arrived. Suddenly prices dropped and speeds increased dramatically. However you have to keep in mind that US ISPs have already been split due to how big of a monopoly they were, what if it was still bell? These corporations would have so much money that they can easily lock anybody else out. Most small competition to large ISPs have to rent the network from the large ISPs, in many cases, the large ISPs have had regulations made by government forcing them to do so. It is no longer feasable once one corporation has a giant network, to make a second one, because the corporation doesn't have to allow you access to their network in any way.

Once you become big, you can do things like buy up any actual competition, or pay off those that have any power whatsoever to block others. It is not like anarcho will suddenly mean there are no more people of power.

>>11332

> Consider how an operating system like microsoft can influence nearly everything.

Because, for a long time, only geeks cared about the lack of alternatives and the closed formats. Again, the market reflects people's preferences. To this day, everybody loves BIll Gates, and they idolize Steve Jobs. I tell you this as an Ubuntu user.

> most likely exist because of government having stepped in in many cases

Have you considered how the government had previously "stepped in" when it favored Microsoft products for official uses? Don't you think it matters that, for a long time, MS Office was a quasi-official government standard? For instance, in public schools and universities. That must count for something!

> microsoft had to tell some others about how docx and the like are implemented

The docx standard was opened shortly after ODF became an ISO standard. Governments already have a huge impact on the market. They should have less, not more.

> Who would have heard of google if internet explorer blocked it near the start

Young people wouldn't have heard of Microsoft. The company would be long dead by now if they had been dumb enough to try something like that. Apple would have stepped in and taken over most of the PC market. The rest would go to Ubuntu.

> You can just look at ISPs in locations where google fiber arrived. Suddenly prices dropped and speeds increased dramatically.

So what's your complaint? The free market fixed it.

> what if it was still bell?

Either it would be a high-quality service, or they would be facing competitors.

>>8899

>Childish, hopelessly naive nonsense

>Communist flag

That's rich, Marx boy

>>11199

>1) A monopoly must still compete if they are not a government sponsored monopoly. If they don't improve their product constantly, competitors move in with cheap knockoffs that perform essentially the same tasks, or come up with better things than them. Carnegie didn't remain the steel master by sitting on his ass and counting his shekels. He made steel cheap and easily accessible to the average American using an economy of scale, benefiting everyone significantly (and he was altruistic in the end to boot).

>

>2) Price manipulation doesn't work in reality unless you have government force to back you up. While monopolies operate on economies of scale, they are still dependent on the success of the individual businesses. When they lower prices below a certain threshold, they lose profit. A lot of businesses, due to their small nature, can afford to close down during this time. When the monopoly goes to raise prices through the roof, small businesses tend to spring up and steal their customers, causing the monopoly to lose money a second time. This happens a few times (woth consumers switching to small businesses more and more) until eventually, the monopoly decides that the region is incapable of bringing a profit in. Simply put, monopolies can only offer cheaper prices if they can maintain cheaper prices- if they maintain cheaper prices, then they need to maintain at least a similar number of staff as the small business if not more so it's not like people are losing jobs- in fact the business owner might make more per hour being a supervisor, much in the same way a personal restaurant owner might be better off cooking for a chain. The cheaper prices ensure that people also have more buying power.

screened

>>13931

Except most people with useful degrees are left leaning.

>>13926

>plans to do about the debt

Not really that important, you need a currency change/collapse to solve the debt issue, deficit is solvable, but not the debt

socialists who are addicted to free shit are selfish people deep down

they are the kinds of people i remember from my college days who would always go on about "sharing", "caring" and muh greedy people but would always take your ganja or tobacco and would never have any of their own to give back

>>13964

>Monarchism

kek

>>13484

we dont want to go there

>>5391

>The Jew has tricked them into accepting capitalism

>The Jews are behind communism

Which is it, faggot? The reason that we achieved 1000 years worth of technological achievements in 100 years is because of capitalism.

>namefag with meme political belief and obvious bait

>>14205

>meme political belief

Like anarchism?

>>14205

>anarchist

>criticizing anyone for his political beliefs

kek

I think to forsake the benefits of the Enlightenment is to spit on the graves all those who were killed to get it. If we keep what we gained, then they died for something.

>>14233

>spit on the graves all those were killed to get it

So I spit at:

>Voltaire

>Rousseau

>Locke

>Robespierre

>Jacobins

>Napoleon

And I uphold:

>Joseph de Maistre

>Louis de Bonald

>The Catholic Church

>Faithful Peasants and Nobles

I don't really see a problem at "spitting" at those philosophes and revolutionaries