/politics/ - News & Politics

Welcome

This board is for discussing politics and news. It's a neutral alternative to political boards that are either niche ideology or "neutral" over-moderated boards that have biased mods. This board aims to have no bias toward any particular political ideology. Free speech is valued.

Rules

1) Do not spam.

2) Do not post off-topic threads.

3) Do not necrobump old threads. There is nothing wrong with commenting on page 25 threads as long as you contribute something other than "bump".

Transparency

-Board log will always be enabled.

-Threads will be archived (through archive.is) before deletion.

Ban Limit

Maximum: 4 days (with exception to spammers).

Bans will be up to the staff's discretion.

We fully encourage you to make use both the filter feature and the hide feature. To hide a thread through the catalog: SHIFT + click it.

This will be the general meta thread. If you have any complaints or ideas on how to improve the board, post them here.

To contact BO: keloo@8chan.co

>PakiParty leading in the polls

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3498486/Jeremy-Corbyn-s-Labour-LEAD-opinion-polls-Tory-wars-Europe-toll-David-Cameron-s-party.html

>b-b-but muh Jobs

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/17/brussels-accused-of-selling-out-british-steel-industry-by-caving-to-chinese-demands/

>Leftist cunts riot in the streets about "MUH RAPEFUGEES, MUH BORDERS R A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT"

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/19/watch-clashes-in-london-as-far-left-battle-britain-first-at-pro-migrant-rally/

>David Cuckman is shit out of luck the EU is going to make everyone in Europe pay

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/19/cameron-overruled-on-migrants-commission-insists-eu-has-a-moral-duty-to-take-them-in/

>Paris terrorist cunt was captured before he an heroed for Allah

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/653997/Paris-attacks-jihadi-Abdeslam-pulled-out-suicide-bomber-last-minute

>Istanbu- Constantinople got visited by the relgion of peace

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/19/istanbul-hit-by-deadly-bomb-attack

kikes do hoax terror attack at belgium airport to kick off invasion of Syria

russia gone, so gibs be dat Syrian oil.

Just as Russia withdraws from Syria, the kikes launch their war machine, kicking off with the now standard practice ( false flag \ hoax ) terror event.

With this hoax, euro governments will be poked into greenlighting military action in Syria and Ukraine.

Bah. I should have predicted this.

One question is whether Putin backed out of Syria because he knew the US and Israel where mustering an overwhelming force. Is it possible he was so naive that he didn't expect US-Israel to roll tanks in as soon as Russia left?

Anyway, 1st job here is evidence this hoax is a hoax.

chance this thread will be shitposted by shills. The kikes always dispatch a shill army to 8chan when they do a terror attack. the /pol/ has already been shitposted to hell twice to stop any discussion.

What is the most pro-freedom ideology out there? I find myself conflicted on where I should stand politically and I don't want to be a fence sitting moderate any longer.

Brother is a staunch Bernie Sanders supporter. I talked with him today. I questioned him about what Bernie plans to do about the debt, what he thinks about the Federal Reserve, and whether or not Bernie is devoted to bringing all the troops home from all our overseas bases.

My brother gave shifty or at least ignorant answers to all of these things, and somehow thought it was sufficient to emphasize to me that Bernie "marched with blacks during civil rights" and "supported equality for gays before everyone." I literally don't care about such superfluous things. Our country's currency is probably already worthless and only sustainable given our massive foreign presence and bullying the rest of the world into private central banking system. We are the world's villain, and sooner or later more and more people are going to recognize this and demand that we withdraw our troops from foreign wars. At that point, other countries will declare our currency system as not credible and demand we repay our debt, which of course we cannot do. It's not like we can just make more money out of thin air from the Federal Reserve, because people won't accept it as tender.

Bernie Sanders doesn't address this. He's interested in a sort of Marxist struggle against the rich, which is great, except I'm not seeing any checks he has in place to prevent them from taking all their assets away and re-establishing themselves elsewhere. The rest of his proposals sound too utopic to be realistic: how does Bernie plan to negotiate with gridlocked congress in order to enact his FDR-like sweeping reforms of the nation? I'd be surprised if he accomplishes even a fifth of what he plans.

In Bernie Sanders I simply don't see the leader capable of remedying our present ills. I see an almost naive, unprepared idealist who doesn't have the skills to overcome partisan divisions. The fact that he doesn't seem committed, from what I have read, to bringing home all our troops, stopping unique aid to Israel, etc, just indicates to me that he, just like the other candidates, will inadvertently turn out to be George W Bush Mk. III.

What is your opinion on white men race mixing with asian women?

We must craft a state run by experts judging only according to competence and IQ and not by race or class. We must consolidate capital into the state and free from market chaos, but not into the egalitarian chaos of collective ownership and populism. We must remain in a centrist stance of holding unity under correct and proper hierarchy that nurtures against the ravages of the extreme left, and the extreme right. We must remain steadfast in centralizing dictatorship and re-educate the populace for a sustainable balanced and meritocratic way of life.

We must pursue the formation of this state militantly, because the old centrists who were weak and moderate and neutral were compromising and allowed themselves to be drive this way and that by the currents of the times. We must swim against these currents and forge a revolutionary centrism, bringing order out from the chaos.

Such is the way of Militant Centrism. We are not moderates.

We need to convert or purge:

>Libertarians who produce plutocracy and private monopoly

>Communists and socialists who promote the schizophrenic and destructive egalitarian idea that you can centralize all capital and then have it owned and controlled by all people everywhere

>Ethno-Nationalists who put a proxy for characteristics above the characteristics themselves and promote an irrational immoral system, while engaging in destructive racial jihad that wrecks whole continents

>Theocrats who engage in a war to impress their irrational views on society in place of good solid, grounded secular governance

>Moderates and democratic centrists who allowed these chucklefucks free reign and can't create or defend good governance

Are you with me?

Hello fellow >>>/pol/ iticians

We have a major problem on our hands.

The Jew has successfully tricked people into fighting race wars instead of overthrowing their governments;

into using corrupt government currencies instead of bit coin and a dozen other free alternatives.

The Jew has tricked them into accepting capitalism with all its government buying scandals and warmongering lies.

While some have accelerated a war on straight European Race men- others have decided that the biggest problem is Islam and the hordes coming from the Muslim lands.

The biggest problem is government and its many tentacles that infiltrate and corrupt everything they rake over.

From public education to zoning laws in cities.

From subsidization of major corporations to income taxes on individuals but not on corporate profits.

Even if you think government is necessary - the current governments in power are against man - against honest living. They perpetuate minor problems into bigger ones to make sure they remain relevant.

Know the real struggle here. A relatively few men with political and international business empires that have survived the centuries are strangling everyone to maintain their unnatural hierarchy. Humans are not a hive. Those who want leadership let them choose. And those who seek no guidance let them walk their own paths.

The modern governments consider all who aren't in the ruling ranks to be brainless drones. Are you a brainless drone? Do you not have a right to control your own body?

There is no new world to go to. And if we ever get off this earth while they still rule going to new worlds will not be as open as it was to go to the Americas.

Save this planet from these corrupt souls. Do not hide from criticism. You deserve everything you strive for. Fight for it. And the future generations will be so lucPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Subject says it all.

/politics/ needs a diverse array of political opinions from across the spectrum.

Nazi faggots and communist faggots retreating into their hugboxes whenever they're confronted with opinions different to their own is boring and shit.

How's /politics/ going to attract more lively debate in the future?

First the simple truth for which I shall provide support:

Women truly and honestly believe anything they hear within the social sphere in which they are raised. Their method of forming a conscious model of the world relies directly on the information that is conveyed to them by speech. This contrasts with the method by which men (traditionally and historically) form their conscious model of the world, which relies on objectivity; the direct sensation of events.

From the clearly apparent dimorphism of the sexes it must be assumed that there have been consistent pressures throughout the history of humanity which have made two modes of behavior respective to the two sexes. It must then be assumed that these two modes have in turn made two forms of body and mind which complement each other to support one way of life [vitae].

It is the traditional and historical tendency of women to stay sheltered and it is the tendency of men to go venturing.

Since this truth is somewhat hidden in these days, it can be most simply proved by the differences in the composition of the bodies of men and women. Women carry more fat to provide milk for the young. Women are smaller in form to give efficiency to the effort of sustaining the young amidst the necessities of survival [if they were larger as men are they would spend too much energy sustaining themselves to guarantee the sustenance of the young].

Men have a larger form and carry more muscle to aid exploration, combat, and labor, and so they excel beyond women in these tasks.

<'evolutionary' reasoning for this divergence>

So it is that the task of watching and tending the home is the traditional and historical task of women. So it is that the task of gathering information about the land [terrain, water, plants/fungi, animals, people] is the tradition and historical task of men.

So it is that two different models of consciousness were forged respective of men and women. The model of men is made and supported primarily by the direct sensation of events [the movements of the land [terrain, water, plants/fungi, animals, people]]. It is secondarily made and supported by the sPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Hello /politics/ I have scoured the internet to find a place of political discussion which is welcoming to Reactionaries and I think this would do great. I don't mean the cancerous Dark Enlightenment with their pseudo-reactionary ideas. I mean pure Anti-Enlightenment and deeply religious Reactionaries. You may notice my flag is the symbol of Feudalism (btw what is that coat of arms anyway).

I am free to answer questions about my beliefs and even discuss with other Reactionaries in how we are similar or differ.

>build the perfect country

describe what it would be like, what political system would it be, what the culture and traditions are, the races of people, welfare, the history of the nation, basically anything you want in a perfect country to live in

for me,

>social democracy

>white majority with other races as minorities

>music, culinary, architecture is asian mixed with european

>free healthcare and education for all

>independent and green party are the dominant parties

>little to no spendings on military

>gay friendly but trans are to be mentally tested and treated before they are granted any operations

>abortion legality is to be decided by the respective states/cities

>all drugs legal and let natural selection do its work

>allow true free speech, even opinions that go directly against the government

>net neutrality is supported

>loose immigration policies

>offers a diverse media, with very different thoughts and opinions being shared widely

>location is pic related, north america is a perfect continent geographically

I believe that the races have biological differences and that the data on IQ and certain genes like MAO-A paint a picture of the negro as having less intelligence on average and being prone to more spontaneous aggression.

However, while recognizing this makes me an ebul racist, I am not a nationalist. Why?

I am not a nationalist because I also believe that while blacks have some lower capacity on average, the progression of a state and the expansion of its productive capacities has little to do with the masses to begin with. The average person only maintains the current level of existence through the menial tasks that need doing. While this is vital, what actually expands the economy are the efforts of scientists coming up with new advancements in our understanding of physics, engineers working out methods of applying that understanding to real machines, and entrepreneurs working out ways of managing the usage of those machines such that we get more revenue from them then they cost to employ.

We live in a world that is rapidly automating and on the cusp of rapid unemployment of all plebs: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/519241/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/

Soon, the bulk of us must persist on universal welfare, and then we'll be removed from even a maintenance role. Whatever smarts the average person has will be written out of the picture. Black or white, it will not matter.

Introducing the black average will not destroy civilization because the white average was never responsible for each stage of civilization to begin with. Everyone at the bottom has at least maintained each stage, but could not advance it. Even Marxists recognize this, which is why Lenin reintroduced capitalism in his New Economic Policy so that capitalists could continue to expand the productive forces through their exploitation. The elites may stand upon the masses, but only those with the time and intelligence to come up with new ways of doing things Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

This board is so slow that ist's almost dead.

LONG LIVE /POL/

Death is the termination of all biological functions that sustain a living organism. Phenomena which commonly bring about death include biological aging (senescence), predation, malnutrition, disease, suicide, homicide, starvation, dehydration, and accidents or trauma resulting in terminal injury.[1] Bodies of living organisms begin to decompose shortly after death. Death has commonly been considered a sad or unpleasant occasion, due to the termination of social and familial bonds with the deceased or affection for the being that has died. Other concerns include fear of death, necrophobia, anxiety, sorrow, grief, emotional pain, depression, sympathy, compassion, solitude, or saudade.

"Donald Trump is a symptom, not a disease. The disease is the death of real political conservatism: a cool, intelligent reluctance to believe that all change is good, a love for the established, the particular and the well-worn.

During the 1980s, many people mistook Thatcherism and Reaganism, actually a wild form of liberalism, for conservatism. They lapped up the temporary riches it provided and now find themselves yearning for leaders to take them back to a world of secure jobs and secure borders.

Mr Trump, Olympically stupid and ignorant in many ways and virtually thoughtless, has the low feral cunning to spot this need and to pretend to meet it.

Of course, he hasn’t a clue how to go about it. But it’s not impossible that such a person will gain high office before long." - Peter Hitchens