/politics/ - News & Politics

>>13902

I meant to say political stance. Have any of you written a letter to your government representative(assuming you live in a democracy), signed a petition, protested?

>>14527

will your ceiling hold the weight though?

if you want examples of where the kikes are still doing real false flags and killing lots of people then look to the poorer countries of the world.

There, there are no agencies capable of sniffing out the jew.

>>14495

>actually killing people at an airport means the many agencies get involved.

That really doesn't make any sense. Do they send the other agencies home and say

>Don't worry about it, nobody got killed.

Anyway, let's say that these types of convoluted conspiracy theories are correct and those of us who criticize them are wrong. So what? Where does that get you? The news that I get right now, even from pretty mainstream sources, already gives me enough data to support my views. How much time do you want to spend attempting to gather evidence for an extreme conspiracy theory?

>>14512

>That really doesn't make any sense. Do they send the other agencies home and say

>Don't worry about it, nobody got killed.

yes. the number of dead that pop up in the mass media is a lie.

are they saying 34 dead now? There will never be a speck of evidence that any of them died at the airport. Most of them you won't ever see photos of or names given.

Real people have facebook accounts, friends and family. Why isn't the 34 and their facebook accounts people listed in the media?

There is the odd hoax family that are put in front of the camera. They always pretend to cry. *

Because nobody gets killed at hoaxes. The emergencies agencies are instructed only to send specially trained staff. these trained staff have been on crisis actor courses and have signed secrecy agreements. They turn up, do some pretend work on pretend victims then pack up and go back to normal work and don't talk about it to media.

* ( Incidentally do you remember the murder of Milly Dowler in march 2002? That was real. And her parents gave a real press appeal. The whole media affair was later uploaded to youtube by the police. Except one thing. The parents press appeal. Why did they miss that out? Because its would have been a benchmark of reality to compare with all the fake families crying fake tears at all the hoax events )

>Anyway, let's say that these types of convoluted conspiracy theories are correct and those of us who criticize them are wrong. So what? Where does that get you? The news that I get right now, even from pretty mainstream sources, already gives me enough data to support my views. How much time do you want to spend attempting to gather evidence for an extreme conspiracy theory?

you really don't mind sounding like a shill do you? Its ok here I spose. There is no-one here except us. They whole board has gone back to /pol/ to join in the shitfest on the happening threads.

Searching for the truth is always worthwhile. Lies stack and combine. i.e. if I was to let this one go unchecked, then other lies could be built around it, until a large completely fictitious view of reality could be given to a lot of people.

Of course this is whats happened to the goyim. The media is crammed from the 1st page to the last page b4 the sport with lies.

You are a much poorer person if you believe the crap in the media. Goyim don't realise how deeply the huge wall of fiction that have been erected to surround their view of reality by kikes and other ruthless individuals, damages them and their families.

Therefore as a matter of principle its always worth unweaving the lies in the media. Its also a fuckton of fun as an exercise in calling bulshit and seeing the truth.

>>14366

compare the brussels CCTV quality to this of some downtown shithole in some 3rd world country.

http://www.bestgore.com/suicide/couple-stroll-unfazed-suicide-man-land-sidewalk-next-to-them-cctv/

Uh so, is anyone else here literate?

Is this too much to take on? Circlejerking is hard work.

>>14444

Wasted GET. Please use a trip code so I can filter you. Your impersonation of a retard might be more suitable for a faster board, now I can see you everywhere.

>>14449

I have something to say. I have a purpose here. I have a goal.

What do you have to say?

Does anyone here have anything to say? Or is this just your pathetic excuse for a social circle? The only thing that keeps you from killing yourself like you should probably just get on with?

>>14506

It seems like you are speaking from experience of the state of things now rather than from a historical perspective, as the statement to which you are referring was made from.

Summarily; what women are now is not what they were or are supposed to be.

It think we are in agreement here.

What you are remarking on is the result of the self-unawareness that I referenced. This is a good point for me to improve my argument. It's not just self-unawareness. It's unawareness of the people who depend on them. Selfishness.

>>14351

anarchism

>>14435

It would be a stretch to call your thought half-baked.

Can you even define freedom? I'm not your school teacher asking you to see if your one-sentence definition is in line with my curriculum. Define it properly.

How can providing something that is designed to limit and destroy freedom be an act of giving freedom?

>>14351

Anarcho-Transhumanism

>>14435

any lolbertarian want to comment on this?

>14516

>flag

was just check the spelling

>What do you predict?

- Hillary wins Arizona, Utah, and Idaho winning about 2/3's of the delegates.

- Trump wins the majority of Arizona picking up all the delegates.

- Cruz wins Utah, most likely by a majority and winning all the delegates. If Trump can keep him below 50% then Cruz wins most delegates and Trump picks up a couple.

- Not sure about American Samoa.

- Kasich will probably pick up about 5 delegates.

Trump and Hillary will be the winners, but Trump's victory will be smaller than in previous Super Tuesdays.

>>14483

Really, Cruz is going to win Utah, I think even Kasich will beat Trump there. Mormans are a weird bunch.

What do you guys think of Trump being pro-israel?

>>12417

They tried to be an anti-Trump Natsoc hugbox first, but they had a revolt on their hands and switched to enforcing a pro-Trump hugbox.

>>11970

>Zionist Flag

>against progressiveness

Is the JIDF hiring retards now?

>>11963

>Anarcho-Anything

>Smart

pick one, and only one

>>14329

I'm more a traditionalist than anything else, but you are quite retarded if you think anarchism and nationalism aren't closely related. Read more books.

I'm anti-globalist and just think commune/tribe/regionalism are better than nationalism.

>>11963

Thanks! I'm really just a straight anarchist, they should have a black flag.

>>14507

I agreed with everything you said.

For those who don't know about it, Troy Southgate has a site and some writings on National Anarchism, though it is similarly about groups & communities & peoples, and not so much what are called nations today.

http://www.national-anarchist.net/

>>14334

What exactly about the book do you disagree with? Stop arguing like Carl the cuck, and give a valid argument. Race-mixing lowers the IQ overall.

>>14339

I don't have a problem with your favorite book

I have a problem with the lack of originality and substance in your posts.

You are unrelateable and divisive.

>>14347

Did you forget where you are, friend? How is the truth "not original?" I'm stating facts, and if you don't like it, or imageboard culture, fuck off back to >>>/reddit/

>>14380

This kind of poster is either a paid disruptor or a brainwashed divisive. Either way we need to get rid of this kind of trash with vigilant modding. This place is not active enough to survive against such completely destructive hyperactivity

>>14417

Welcome back, Rey.

>>2233

ITT:

OP wants to try and create a mish-mash of current U.S fascist neolib/neocon that purges low I.Qs and non-compliers to create the ultimate Orwellian American Empire, run by robotic slave Asians and headed by Akhenazis

Essentially, OP is a Rothschild

>>2233

Militants centralism... so you don't believe in freedom or rights? How can you keep the peace without giving your populace what it wants in most societies?

>>14391

This is a bot. This is why we need moderarion

>>11181

Austrian economists have a variety of answers, but I think the general consensus is that:

1) Natural monopolies are hard to tell apart from the normal market process. Every producer is a "monopolist" of his product. The real issue is monopolistic pricing.

2) Monopolistic pricing, unless created by government intervention, is a result of innovation and hard work. As such, it's temporary (constantly challenged by market forces) and it's a good thing, because innovation should be rewarded.

3) Monopolistic pricing is often the result of barriers to entry, but in most cases those barriers are created by government intervention. For instance, onerous health and safety regulations, and the patent system.

4) Anti-trust regulations harm consumers by rewarding the less efficient "sore losers" at the expense of the market leaders. They are essentially protectionist measures pushed by industrial lobbyists.

5) Predatory pricing simply doesn't work. Almost nobody does it, and those who try end up worse off.

https://mises.org/library/antitrust-reform-predatory-practices-and-competitive-process

>>11199

>>11209

You guys have an extremely positive outlook on monopolies, in my opinion.

I feel it is quite easy for a monopoly to grow way out of control. Monopolies can actively reduce competition on many fields. Consider how an operating system like microsoft can influence nearly everything. It has taken many years for web applications to no longer be made specifically for ie6 (and there still are plenty that cannot move away). Every day people are plagued by having to use microsoft office and although some reasonable replacements exists, most likely exist because of government having stepped in in many cases (requiring an open standard for their "word" and so on, meaning microsoft had to tell some others about how docx and the like are implemented. In a world where they have no regulations they have to care about, I don't believe it would be hard for them to ruin that even more. Who would have heard of google if internet explorer blocked it near the start, to protect its own search engine. Alternative browser? We are the only browser you can find.

You can just look at ISPs in locations where google fiber arrived. Suddenly prices dropped and speeds increased dramatically. However you have to keep in mind that US ISPs have already been split due to how big of a monopoly they were, what if it was still bell? These corporations would have so much money that they can easily lock anybody else out. Most small competition to large ISPs have to rent the network from the large ISPs, in many cases, the large ISPs have had regulations made by government forcing them to do so. It is no longer feasable once one corporation has a giant network, to make a second one, because the corporation doesn't have to allow you access to their network in any way.

Once you become big, you can do things like buy up any actual competition, or pay off those that have any power whatsoever to block others. It is not like anarcho will suddenly mean there are no more people of power.

>>11332

> Consider how an operating system like microsoft can influence nearly everything.

Because, for a long time, only geeks cared about the lack of alternatives and the closed formats. Again, the market reflects people's preferences. To this day, everybody loves BIll Gates, and they idolize Steve Jobs. I tell you this as an Ubuntu user.

> most likely exist because of government having stepped in in many cases

Have you considered how the government had previously "stepped in" when it favored Microsoft products for official uses? Don't you think it matters that, for a long time, MS Office was a quasi-official government standard? For instance, in public schools and universities. That must count for something!

> microsoft had to tell some others about how docx and the like are implemented

The docx standard was opened shortly after ODF became an ISO standard. Governments already have a huge impact on the market. They should have less, not more.

> Who would have heard of google if internet explorer blocked it near the start

Young people wouldn't have heard of Microsoft. The company would be long dead by now if they had been dumb enough to try something like that. Apple would have stepped in and taken over most of the PC market. The rest would go to Ubuntu.

> You can just look at ISPs in locations where google fiber arrived. Suddenly prices dropped and speeds increased dramatically.

So what's your complaint? The free market fixed it.

> what if it was still bell?

Either it would be a high-quality service, or they would be facing competitors.

>>8899

>Childish, hopelessly naive nonsense

>Communist flag

That's rich, Marx boy

>>11199

>1) A monopoly must still compete if they are not a government sponsored monopoly. If they don't improve their product constantly, competitors move in with cheap knockoffs that perform essentially the same tasks, or come up with better things than them. Carnegie didn't remain the steel master by sitting on his ass and counting his shekels. He made steel cheap and easily accessible to the average American using an economy of scale, benefiting everyone significantly (and he was altruistic in the end to boot).

>

>2) Price manipulation doesn't work in reality unless you have government force to back you up. While monopolies operate on economies of scale, they are still dependent on the success of the individual businesses. When they lower prices below a certain threshold, they lose profit. A lot of businesses, due to their small nature, can afford to close down during this time. When the monopoly goes to raise prices through the roof, small businesses tend to spring up and steal their customers, causing the monopoly to lose money a second time. This happens a few times (woth consumers switching to small businesses more and more) until eventually, the monopoly decides that the region is incapable of bringing a profit in. Simply put, monopolies can only offer cheaper prices if they can maintain cheaper prices- if they maintain cheaper prices, then they need to maintain at least a similar number of staff as the small business if not more so it's not like people are losing jobs- in fact the business owner might make more per hour being a supervisor, much in the same way a personal restaurant owner might be better off cooking for a chain. The cheaper prices ensure that people also have more buying power.

screened

>>13931

Except most people with useful degrees are left leaning.

>>13926

>plans to do about the debt

Not really that important, you need a currency change/collapse to solve the debt issue, deficit is solvable, but not the debt

socialists who are addicted to free shit are selfish people deep down

they are the kinds of people i remember from my college days who would always go on about "sharing", "caring" and muh greedy people but would always take your ganja or tobacco and would never have any of their own to give back

>>13964

>Monarchism

kek

>>13484

we dont want to go there

>>5391

>The Jew has tricked them into accepting capitalism

>The Jews are behind communism

Which is it, faggot? The reason that we achieved 1000 years worth of technological achievements in 100 years is because of capitalism.

>namefag with meme political belief and obvious bait

>>14205

>meme political belief

Like anarchism?

>>14205

>anarchist

>criticizing anyone for his political beliefs

kek

I think to forsake the benefits of the Enlightenment is to spit on the graves all those who were killed to get it. If we keep what we gained, then they died for something.

>>14233

>spit on the graves all those were killed to get it

So I spit at:

>Voltaire

>Rousseau

>Locke

>Robespierre

>Jacobins

>Napoleon

And I uphold:

>Joseph de Maistre

>Louis de Bonald

>The Catholic Church

>Faithful Peasants and Nobles

I don't really see a problem at "spitting" at those philosophes and revolutionaries

>>14000

>>gay friendly but trans are to be mentally tested and treated before they are granted any operations

what are the tests and treatments?

>>14273

>what are tests?

Are you trans?

Yes: mentally ill

No: not mentally ill

>What are treatments?

>>>/oven/

>>14204

>retarded

butthurt because I'm not white? What are you going to do about it? report me?

>group that needs health care the most isn't given healthcare

if they want to kill themselves slowly they might just get it over with.

>humans who have consciousness just like you

higher rates of domestic violence, child molestation, divorce, STDS, etc.etc. you know the stuff

>define illegal content

pedophilia, LGBT and LGBT supportive content, anti-government propaganda, pornography, along with standard crime like online drug dealers and scammers. 8chan included tbh.

Just looking at your anarchist flag tells me that you and I hold nothing in common and that you are a moron who believes anarchism won't just gradually drift to a rule of the strong/wealthy and enable oppression again

>What do you have against the Chinese?

Nothing. It's just the simple political reality that people who look alike are cooperative and friendly to each other. And I won't genocide the papuans, papua is their home. The petrol sniffers are another thing though.....

>The top 20% in US pay 84% of the total income tax

The top 1% own 42.7% of the private wealth in the US in 2011. Yet they don't pay 42.7% of income taxes.

Using the US as a measuring stick in financial wisdom is moronic.

>>14300

>The top 1% own 42.7% of the private wealth in the US in 2011

>Yet they don't pay 42.7% of income taxes.

1) It's income tax, not wealth tax.

2) The top %1 pay nearly half of federal income tax indeed.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/13/top-1-pay-nearly-half-of-federal-income-taxes.html

>Using the US as a measuring stick in financial wisdom is moronic.

"moronic" is how you must feel like right now.

>>4100

>>4391

wew

OP is crying now.

>>4391

>You're not a patriot to anything at all.

>

>Nothing distinguishes you from a liberal except your refusal to call yourself one. Your ideas are disgraceful and people like you will be the death of the West.

>>4629

>freddit

D/intl/du spotted

>>3946

>racial Jihad

Are you the same guy as the Militant Centrist guy?

>>14218

Yeah. I'm "trolling" both times. I like to try and make arguments for things I don't actually believe in.

>>4165

>Parents are often encouraged to play classical music to children in the womb. They actually have an appreciation for music. They prefer music that has the same tempo of their mother's heartbeat.

How far along in the pregnancy, though? I found this study, but the youngest fetuses are 28-32 weeks in:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15603288

>The child is pretty much fully formed by two months

That's not at all the case. The brain connections necessary for the perception of pain, for example, only start to develop around 22 weeks in or so.