>>10089
>in the case of Bashar Assad
He's actually far less of a dictator than portrayed, the real power in Syria is state security, though the Iranians and Russians run the show now
>Gaddafi
>while gross domestic product had been $3.8 billion in 1969, it had risen to $13.7 billion in 1974, and $24.5 billion in 1979.[69] In turn, the Libyans' standard of life greatly improved over the first decade of Gaddafi's administration, and by 1979 the average per-capita income was at $8,170, up from $40 in 1951; this was above the average of many industrialized countries like Italy and the U.K.
>From 1969 to 1973, the RCC introduced social welfare programs funded with oil money, which led to house-building projects and improved healthcare and education.[74] In doing so, they greatly expanded the public sector, providing employment for thousands.[74]
>Compulsory education was expanded from 6 to 9 years old, while adult literacy programs and free university education were implemented; Beida University was founded, while Tripoli University and Benghazi University were expanded.[75] These early social programs proved popular within Libya
Most of the other guys follow similar patterns. Sure they're autocrats and suppressed opposition to their rule, but is that really all that different from the west?