Nope.
The last paragraph from the late justice Scalia's 3rd Obamacare dissent:
"Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
will attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act
or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Court’s two
decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through
the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation
they have performed (“penalty” means tax, “further [Medi-
caid] payments to the State” means only incremental
Medicaid payments to the State, “established by the State”
means not established by the State) will be cited by liti-
gants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence.
And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth
that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some
laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes
to uphold and assist its favorites.
I dissent"
You should read some of his opinions/dissents, the man was a true strict constitutionalist - not some Judicial activist hack trying to legislate from a court. I used to read his dissents even before he hit the news a little while ago. They're only a few pages long and always very interesting.