[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/politics/ - News & Politics

Politics, News, Current Events

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Flag *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Sister Boards [ Third position ] [ Fascism ] [ National Socialism ] [ Anarchism ] [ Anarcho-capitalism ] [ Libertarianism ] [ Marxism-Leninism ] [ Psychopolitics ] [ Philosophy ] [ int ] [ History ]

[ Board log ] [ ###politics### ]


File: 1457894695803.png (31.63 KB, 2006x1258, 59:37, Flag_Map_of_the_United_Sta….png)

470976 No.12255

Why does America Still use a Winner take all system when everyone knows it's shit?

8a4194 No.12291

America's owners are happy with it, so it stays.


005332 No.12540

History.


513f30 No.12555

There's too much imported rot in America for any system to work besides Jefferson's original vision of state supremacy, and even that would only 'work' in the sense that it'd lead to balkanization and a handful of the US remnants would be good places with good government.


4ad9a8 No.12568

If Trump wins this may change. A surge in the power of non-establishment parties could force a change or at least force an additional round of election for the executive and proportion for Congress though the cut off would be wayyyyy above 5%.


2e3b17 No.12626

>>12255

Probably because it's a fairly old system of democracy that arose completely apart from any monarchy.

The parliamentary systems, which I agree are way the fuck better, were meant to give a broader voice balancing out the authority of a monarch.

I also wonder if they gave as much thought to political parties in the 18th century and how the American system tends to create a 2 party duopoly. There is no mention of political parties in the American constitution.


2e3b17 No.12694

>>12255

Probably because it's a fairly old system of democracy that arose completely apart from any monarchy.

The parliamentary systems, which I agree are way the fuck better, were meant to give a broader voice balancing out the authority of a monarch.

I also wonder if they gave as much thought to political parties in the 18th century and how the American system tends to create a 2 party duopoly. There is no mention of political parties in the American constitution.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]