8c3e13 No.31
Welcome
This board is for discussing politics and news. It's a neutral alternative to political boards that are either niche ideology or "neutral" over-moderated boards that have biased mods. This board aims to have no bias toward any particular political ideology. Free speech is valued.
Rules
1) Do not spam.
2) Do not post off-topic threads.
3) Do not necrobump old threads. There is nothing wrong with commenting on page 25 threads as long as you contribute something other than "bump".
Transparency
-Board log will always be enabled.
-Threads will be archived (through archive.is) before deletion.
Ban Limit
Maximum: 4 days (with exception to spammers).
Bans will be up to the staff's discretion.
We fully encourage you to make use both the filter feature and the hide feature. To hide a thread through the catalog: SHIFT + click it.
This will be the general meta thread. If you have any complaints or ideas on how to improve the board, post them here.
To contact BO: keloo@8chan.co
Post last edited at
1714dd No.33
8c3e13 No.34
>>33
I'm too poor to buy an ad
f2480a No.48
>>34
Well, I`m here now. So yeah, wii politics and such.
425cae No.59
BO
-Were you always the owner of /politics/?
-Are you a global mod?
-Are you friends with HW?
425cae No.109
If you want the board to work you will have to buy ads (only costs $5) and hire some mods or be more available. It has not been few hours and the board is already flooded.
719ad7 No.110
ban >>97 and sticky it to the top as an example
2986f6 No.116
>>110
>Normies did nothing wrong
e1791c No.120
>>116
I actually lol'd at this.
8c3e13 No.125
>>48
Thanks man, want to be a volunteer? Btw, what board was this advertised on?
>>59
no no no
>>109
I'll look for some mods, want to be one? also I have no idea where all these people came from
8c3e13 No.126
contact me at keloo1o@yahoo.com if you want to be a vol or something
425cae No.128
>>126
>"keloo1o@yahoo.com":
>SMTP error from remote server after transfer of mail text:
>host: mta7.am0.yahoodns.net
>delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (keloo1o@yahoo.com) [-5] - mta1158.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
8c3e13 No.130
>>128
try this
keloo1o@yahoo.com.sg
719ad7 No.135
>>125
>what board was this advertised on
>>>/liberty/10686
>>>/leftypol/379377
two threads on /pol/
first one got 404 so I made a new one that said 'internet politics is still politics' in it in case it got deleted by a vol for being meta
that thread got me banned because it was a copy
both threads are now 404
719ad7 No.136
Is internet politics on topic for this board?
Why?
8c3e13 No.140
>>136
Internet politics? sounds fine to me
Post last edited at
964c2c No.176
>>31
you might want to check out >>>/ubf/ , this board seems like it would fit in.
691f58 No.180
>>31
>This board is an alternative board for /pol/ and any other political board with moderation problems. This board aims to have no bias toward any particular political ideology.
So in other words it's just /pol/
Gotcha.
8c3e13 No.185
>>180
I reworded it slightly. Better?
5ab6c9 No.200
Hi. I'm the admin of >>>/thirdpositionist/ I was wondering if you'd like to make a deal?
I'll advertise your board as a "sister board" on my board if you do the same for mine.
We can both get more users that way.
What do you say?
f5bf0e No.209
dadd5c No.234
>>190
This is the first step on the road to being imkampfy
8c3e13 No.239
dd65ec No.240
>>239
Add the board log to the announcement.
8c3e13 No.241
d65553 No.242
dd65ec No.243
8c3e13 No.244
5ab6c9 No.250
>>239
Cool. I'll add it to the "welcome" sticky.
5ab6c9 No.251
>>239
I put it up there. When you get a chance put mine up as well.
8c3e13 No.252
>>251
I put it on the address bar
719ad7 No.253
5ab6c9 No.255
>>240
The person who posted this isn't the admin of /thirdpositionist/ but he had a good idea, so I'm cool with it. I'll add your board to my announcement section as well.
>>253
Are you the board admin? If you post as the board admin, I'll change it from >>>/politics/ to ###politics###
In the mean time, I can't do it because I need to know that I'm talking to the admin of the board and not a random anon.
2b2a0e No.262
Hi /ggunited/ here! In the midst of the GGHQ censoring and divisions caused within Gamergate's 8chan community I decided to make a new board as a possible replacement for HQ where no opinions would be censored and mods would step back and not be part in running anything and let anons be the leaders like how the movement started and hopefully allow for a re-unification of 8ch's GG community.
Seeing as /politics/ is also an anti-bias politics board I want to exchange support so we can get the board up and running and a couple discussions going. Also we could always use some more comrades in arms so what do you say?
8c3e13 No.292
>>255
BO here. In the announcement bar, type
Sister Board [ <kek href="https://8ch.net/politics">Politics</a> ]
replace kek with a. This creates a hyperlink.
>>262
yeah sure, what sort of support do you have in mind?
8c3e13 No.293
>>292
confirming this is me
5ab6c9 No.298
>>292
Alright. Do you still want >>>/politics/ changed to ###politics###?
8c3e13 No.299
>>298
nah, I don't think thats necessary
5ab6c9 No.300
>>299
Alright.
If you need anything else let me know.
c47b72 No.326
/international/ is a dead board, you should add /int/ instead.
also add /his/
8c3e13 No.330
>>326
If /international/ doesn't work out, I'll remove it. but I'll keep it for now
I'll add /his/
000000 No.346
719ad7 No.347
Please allow threads to be made without uploading an image
f812a2 No.358
>>347
no thanks, makes threads too confusing to tell apart.
f812a2 No.361
/n/ should be on the top bar too.
8c3e13 No.371
>>346
see >>130
>>347
Images look better. the image doesn't have to be related. When I start a thread and don't know what image to use, I just upload a scenic picture of Switzerland.
>>361
I don't see why. /n/ is the 4th most used board
2224b5 No.406
What is the point of IDs on a supposedly neutral board? Only buttblasted paranoid stormweiners care about "shills" so I see no reason to have them here.
Not that actual shills would even bother to come to a board with like ten people on it lol.
e54fa1 No.410
>>31
Why not use TOR or a VPN browser extension if you don't want your posts to be linked? Many people find IDs useful. Let's say you are arguing with someone, other people jump in, how can you tell them apart? You need to know to know the participants so you can address the points they made to you in earlier posts (as part of the discussion). Without IDs, discussions get really messy. It would be like starting from scratch with every post.
e54fa1 No.411
e54fa1 No.413
d936c4 No.415
>>410
It contradicts the idea of anonimity. You should be replying to posts (and the thoughts they contain) and not to individual posters. Might as well go to some shitty forum if you want that.
Or, people can always tripfag/namefag if they value their series discussion identity so much. No reason to force it on everyone.
b11ce0 No.416
>>415
It's not about post history, it's about holding a single discussion within a thread. Ideally, IDs would be optional, someone suggested that at /next/ and Josh like the idea. A checkbox in the reply form allows you to hide your ID.
and no trips are not alternative to IDs, trips attract the worst kind of people who want to build online rep, it also requires an extra effort. A checkbox to opt-out is the ideal way.
590782 No.420
>>31
Dear board owner. I like this new board and I hope it grows fast.
I have a request. Can you please enable the system where you can click on the filename of a picture, and the save box automatically comes up?
/b/ and /pol/ have this and it's very useful. It means that you don't need to right click then save as and then put in your own name for files. You can just click on the filename, say "logical fallacies", and then the save box will pop up and you can just save as, retaining its name.
It's not a big deal, petty really, but it's quicker and has some utility the normal right click save doesn't have, so user experience is enhanced.
590782 No.421
>>180
No, because /pol/ is absolutely biased as fuck. Just go on polmeta and see the complaints.
I think the hope here is that the mod will allow any topic that is political at all instead of anchoring "irrelevant" threads or "slide" threads.
We can still handle /ints/ raiders by banning any non-political topics, and the no spam and no duplicates rules takes care of that well.
Getting that middleground will be hard, but I wish this board luck!
590782 No.422
>>421
(cont)
Obviously, a natural bias will emerge and I hope the BO is okay with that, because the point is about unbiased moderation not perfectly equal discussion.
4b7e0c No.425
Captcha on OP should be enabled to stop spam bots.
no early 404 though since it can kill good threads with low responses.
dc2d1a No.433
stop spamming on /pol/. i know this pile of feces board exists. if i wanted to come here, i would. instead i go to /pol/. only to see you've shat it up with "come to my board with different bad moderation." no thanks you waste of air.
5ab6c9 No.435
>>433
I love the butthurt in your comment. He can advertise his board wherever he wants.
Oh and greetings from /thirdpositionist/.
dc2d1a No.439
>>435
then you won't mind me advertising my opinions here. thanks for the go-ahead.
dc2d1a No.455
>>435
>>439
wow the mod sure got butthurt :^)
7138a0 No.457
>>433
Yo, imkampfy! Don't burn your tongue, man!
719ad7 No.477
>>371
there's a risk of images derailing threads and tor users cannot upload them so they can't make threads
8c3e13 No.480
>>420
I know the option you are talking about. For some reason that option is now only enabled for file board types.I would love it if that option was made available for regular board types again. talk to Hotwheels.
>>477
Tor users can upload images. I'm sure you can find some image related to the subject, even if its loosely related.
719ad7 No.482
719ad7 No.484
Also please delete >>427 for being a duplicate of >>41
comments have been moved
f29a98 No.486
>>484
Not BO, but I think these are different.
5820c6 No.488
5820c6 No.489
>>421
Nearly anything would be better than 8/pol/.
5820c6 No.491
>>482
Those look mostly fine, hotpocketing is what killed 8/pol/. Only offtopic spam is what you should worry about.
Also I'd like to see a rule saying no one will be banned for more than 3 days (unless it's illegal stuff like cp or mass spamming)
f29a98 No.492
>>491
>Also I'd like to see a rule saying no one will be banned for more than 3 days (unless it's illegal stuff like cp or mass spamming)
Good suggestion. /pol/ mods covered almost all of ISP's address space. It takes alot of connect/disconnect attempts to get an IP that's not banned. They once permanently banned me for posting a poll. Reason: Data mining. Even though they allowed other polls (they were probably the ones who posted them).
f29a98 No.494
>>492
*my ISP's address space
dc2d1a No.504
>>482
>pointing out your butthurt mods are hypocrites
>unconstructive
43ad11 No.515
Reminder that the mistake that 8/pol/ made was having moderators get too involved in the content of /pol/ rather than letting users decide the political content. They sticky retarded bullshit constantly, ban anything that they don't approve of, and just generally make the board shit with their moderator clique.
The following is my personal opinion of how to run a successful /pol/ board.:
1.) Don't try to control or promote the political discussion content. Content should be for and by the users. Moderation should be strictly for the rules specified in this thread.
2.) Moderators should not post with their moderator tags unless absolutely 100% necessary. Posting with tags just makes you the same as a tripfag or namefag, derailing the discussion needlessly.
3.) Let things be a little chaotic, the chaos is what made /pol/ so great in the first place. If there's a bit of shitposting, honestly that should be fine as long as it doesn't get too out of hand.
Again these are my humble suggestions to the board owners/mods, by no means a "demand" or definitive, just my opinion based upon what I've found to be most enjoyable. If anyone else has anything else to add feel free.
b5abb5 No.540
>>415
>It contradicts the idea of anonimity. You should be replying to posts (and the thoughts they contain) and not to individual posters.
Rubbish. It fragments the conversation for no benefit. Shills can change IDs. No valid reason to force everyone to deal with individual "thoughts".
7138a0 No.555
>>540
I agree. It's good for debate to have in thread IDs. You are still "anonymous" across threads.
Not having IDs is more of a /b/ suited thing, personally. :^)
a3077e No.556
>>555
Speaking of /b/, nice get.
719ad7 No.558
>>491
there is a difference between deleting a post for being unconstructive and deleting a post for disagreeing with one's political stance
the list in >>482 was not chosen based on the political opinions expressed (if any)
>>504
explain to me how a post on that list pointed out anything
9fcd54 No.568
>>558
This is an image board for discussion.
How would you like it if someone hovered around your discussions and told you to be quiet when you said something they deemed "unconstructive"?
7138a0 No.574
File: 1445213134388.png (32.62 KB, 1570x760, 157:76, nazi commie libertarian fl….png)
>>480
Ah, I see.
Scratch that then. I have a more achievable request then: add /sen/ to the sister boards. It's been a little dead for a while now, but it's a good match for this board, since we discuss politics of all sorts in detail here and then we can use the senate for actual politics roleplay.
>>556
Thanks.
f29a98 No.576
Deleting posts and files should be disabled. People use it to invisibly bump their threads. I also think if you post something anonymously it belongs to the board/people, especially if it received replies.
82ce9c No.595
>deleting the thread about circumcision
welp another dead political board.
d0012f No.601
I thought we were supposed to be better than /pol/
>>>/polmeta/9493
>>595
and yet >>336 was left up
what were the contents of the OP of the circumcision thread?
d0012f No.602
I think bans should be used sparingly as IP addresses are not good indicators of identity (same goes for ID codes as they are based on IP address)
d0012f No.603
I think bans should be used sparingly as IP addresses are not good indicators of identity (same goes for ID codes as they are based on IP address btw)
000000 No.604
>>601
>pic
I'm a volunteer. It was child porn. BO reversed the ban 2 days ago:
>hidden 2 days /politics/ Removed ban #79174 for cde3f3cfbf
A maximum ban limit is being considered, and we already started including archive link + ban reason to be more transparent.
https://8ch.net/bans.html already shows the post, but we include archive links to make it easier to reference and view directly from the board log.
>and yet >>336 was left up
>>336 was bumplocked yesterday
>hidden 1 day /politics/ Bumplocked thread #336
Bumplock icon is disabled by default I guess, it will be enabled. The thread was not deleted because it's not completely off-topic as shown by the first few replies.
>deleting the thread about circumcision
Archive: http://archive.is/rwTOM
It was off-topic. As people pointed out:
>Could be politics if it was rephrased to do with government policy on circumcision.
>Whether the government should do something about circumcision is politics, but this thread seems to be asking personal preference.
Feel free to rephrase and post if you were the OP.
000000 No.605
285b7c No.607
This board is shit.
dropped.
719ad7 No.610
>>607
how?
why?
stop it with the non-constructive posting please
000000 No.628
>>515
>Content should be for and by the users. Moderation should be strictly for the rules specified in this thread.
That's what /politics/ is all about, no need to worry.
000000 No.629
Thread updated
Changes:
-Maximum ban limit.
-Transparency section added.
ed2a9a No.641
>>604
>It was off-topic. As people pointed out:
>
>>Could be politics if it was rephrased to do with government policy on circumcision.
absolute horseshit.
this is the same shit on 8/pol/, don't phrase something in a way a hot pocket approves of then thread gone.
>>628
lol
f40ad4 No.732
>>239
>>200
Feel free to advertise your boards on >>>/shill/
8c3e13 No.743
>>732
/shill/ just looks like an even deader /boards/
48cca5 No.744
Stop shilling your board on /k/ you cuckold.
8c3e13 No.762
>>744
I have only ever shilled on /b/
8c3e13 No.774
Small announcement here
/politcs/ is continuing to rise in position on the board list and we are not far from breaking into the top 25. Once we get the ad out this will be inevitable. While this is great, it comes at a price. The price being spammers. Lantos and I are not on 24/7.
If any of you you like to be a volunteer contact me at keloo1o@yahoo.com.sg
Of course, if you don't care about this board, there are alternatives. (pic related)
d0012f No.777
Why hasn't a link to the ###politics## tag put at the top yet?
for if people want to go more in depth on a niche board
d0012f No.778
ec249e No.814
>having rules
>on an imageboard
I really wish /pn/ had gotten more popular instead, but at least the rules that you guys have here are way more reasonable than what /pol/ has. Considering how much /pol/'s community enjoys having their shit pushed in by their retarded moderators, this may be the best setup that can be reasonably hoped for if we want people to actually migrate to a place where people don't get indiscriminately banned for no reason.
You have my support. Just please be limited in your use of mod powers, and in return I'll try to make some nice threads here (and I hope others will do the same).
fb3d1e No.816
>>814
>>>/pn/ was fucked from the start. It was advertised as /b/ + extra dose of politics.
719ad7 No.860
are there any non-biased political boards that ban shitposting?
or maybe here we could have people put '[Shitpost]' in the subject line of their shitposts so they can be filtered
the second one would be better to avoid dividing the community unnecessarily
d87a8f No.865
>>860
>or maybe here we could have people put '[Shitpost]' in the subject line of their shitposts so they can be filtered
maybe spoiler the shitpost text and/or images too?
719ad7 No.911
There should be a rule that forces people to tag local politics with their country by putting the name of their country in square brackets and putting that in the subject line
e.g. trump threads will have '[USA]' in the subject
f7bcc5 No.918
>>774
I made posts critical of the board higher up but it seems like you've fixed those issues so I'll back the board again.
d87a8f No.921
>>911
>forces people
>forces
>force
f7bcc5 No.923
719ad7 No.928
>>921
constructive criticism as to why this is a bad idea is welcome
719ad7 No.930
why was >>376 bumplocked but not >>639, >>545 or >>336?
8c3e13 No.931
>>923
done
not sure what happened there
719ad7 No.938
maybe just put >>911 in the sticky as a suggestion if people are too uncomfortable with the idea of forcing people to do anything (although I don't really see the problem in it and would welcome some criticism)
f5cd72 No.945
>>860
>>865
Or how about, you know, we try to have a politics board without autistic rulefaggotry for once? Like /pol/ was back on 4chan before everything went to shit?
What is it with this gay reddit tier SJW crap wanting to ban anything you dislike? Just fucking use the hide button you retards.
Nobody even knows what "shitposting" is supposed to mean; it's just a vague term you use for anything you personally consider "low quality". It's always a slippery slope and should never be part of any set of rules.
I mean I've been browsing /pol/ for years and I never reported even a single thread. I used to skim through the catalog and simply ignored the threads that didn't interest me. You know, that kind of thing is actually possible!
>>814
>>816
I'd have migrated to /pn/ if it had ever gotten real activity. But it appears most people love their rules and are unable to live without them.
c56c8f No.956
>>945
>Nobody even knows what "shitposting" is supposed to mean
What the foolz autists and their dick sucking crew do
719ad7 No.960
>>945
>Nobody even knows what "shitposting" is supposed to mean
I use it to mean non-constructive posts or bad arguments/fallacies
you might be right about it being subjective but I think there's at least two objective quality standards:
Examples of shitposting:
* posts (or parts of posts) that contain nothing but 'I agree', 'I disagree', 'this' etc without giving a reason why
* the blatantly, obviously off topic
>>956
what is that supposed to mean?
719ad7 No.963
>>960
>>>956
>what is that supposed to mean?
just ignore that I realise he meant the mods and their supporters now
736901 No.1002
>>31
Hi i am bo of /rulecuck/ i think we should be sister boards
0854e9 No.1100
>>960
Off-topic is already in the rules. I don't mind blatant off-topic threads (as in: "What should I have for dinner, /pol/?") getting deleted as long as the moderation doesn't go full autismo-"quality control" mode and starts removing any thread that might not be 100% serious.
The content of threads should generally never be moderated unless there is an actual case of malicious, deliberate spam aimed at killing a thread or making it unusable. That's how it is handled on /n/ and it is working perfectly fine there.
The more rules you add and the heavier you moderate, the more you increase the chances of creating drama. It basically invites shit-stirrers like certain /int*/ posters who just come to boards to cause butthurt and chaos. Taking it easy, encouraging self-moderation and a relaxed atmosphere is the best thing you can do to avoid that sort of thing.
f6b09e No.1109
we should have a link to >>>/pn/ at the top for people who want less rules
1da335 No.1123
>>1109
there's a tag link ###politics### and >>>/pn/ is dead
87d7c3 No.1199
>>31
>Neutral
>Politics.
Yeah good luck with that.
719ad7 No.1223
>>1132
explain why you fucking shitposter
post hidden
>>1199
it's about unbiased moderation (>>>/polmeta/8895)
3e30f1 No.1288
The Christian/anti-Christian shitposters are here. Will anything be done about them and their pissing match if it starts to take over the board, like it did in /pol/?
1da335 No.1324
>>1288
Why not just filter their ids or posts?
719ad7 No.1330
>>1324
>>555
>>540
>>the rest of the conversation about ID codes I can't be bothered to cite
ip addresses, which ID codes are based on, are a poor indicator of identity:
1. they are usually shared by people using the same internet connection (say everyone using WiFi at the same pub or cafe, living in the same house, using the same VPN etc will have the same IP)
2. they are easy to change just by switching proxies
if you want proper per-thread identity we really should be using an AnonTalk clone
719ad7 No.1331
>>1330 should be in the sticky if you ask me
1da335 No.1343
>>1330
> 2. they are easy to change just by switching proxies
You are assuming that people who post off-topic posts usually change IDs, which is false. Filtering 2-3 IDs usually cleans up the thread. Same for spam. Changing a proxy is an overhead.
> 1. they are usually shared by people using the same internet connection (say everyone using WiFi at the same pub or cafe, living in the same house, using the same VPN etc will have the same IP)
Rarely happens that people with the same IP post in the same thread and one of them need to be filtered. Even when that happens, it's a good compromise. Get rid of off-topic posts at the expense of missing a couple of legit posts.
IDs are per thread. So the effect of filtering an ID is limited to the thread.
Also you can filter REPLIES instead of IDs. It's usually 2-3 replies that start the off-topic discussion.
Add filter -> Post+
Will filter the post and ALL replies.
b29639 No.1686
The board should just be politics, there's already /n/ for news.
3e30f1 No.1693
Any way we can wordfilter niggerspeak?
fe13bc No.1728
6575b7 No.1733
719ad7 No.1780
>>31
>Threads will be archived before deletion.
what about before editing as well
8c3e13 No.1785
719ad7 No.1797
was >>1750 (https://archive.is/P9VcO) deleted for being a duplicate of >>1209?
719ad7 No.1798
>>1797
well, not really a duplicate but certainly the same topic
d5363b No.1831
>make thread that the mod(s) disagree with
>immediately bumplocked
nice board you have here. :^)
8c3e13 No.1838
>>1831
I'll unbumplock it if you think it will go anywhere. I don't understand what you were trying to say there.
d5363b No.1861
>>1838
>I haven't lurked enough to understand it so I'll just bumplock it
fam
8c3e13 No.1863
>>1861
I admit, in hindsight I shouldn't have done it. But its not like I deleted the thread.
dc9e5c No.1878
Finally. A place where I can circlejerk about my middle of the road, tolerant levelheaded views and how bigoted stormfags are. Vote for bernie.
dc9e5c No.1879
>>1878
lol how do le epic name codes le work??? lol this plac is gr8 i love how tolerant it is here
d5363b No.1889
>>1878
you can post whatever views you want fam; the board is only neutral from the point of view of the administration. the content itself is decided by users
d35f99 No.1947
remove IDs
put it to straw poll
c8c38b No.1952
c8c38b No.1954
d5363b No.1957
he's right though
no reason to have IDs
25a539 No.2032
Board owner of /aus/ here - fuck off and stop advertising on my board, you fucking spammy cunts.
bb62c1 No.2037
Already ruined the board with that image OP.
The picture is loaded with informal logical fallacies; yet it presents them as formal ones.
d5363b No.2072
>>2037
what's the difference tbh
719ad7 No.2078
Why was the tagging section taken out of >>31?
It wasn't even archived first
8c3e13 No.2082
>>2078
DownWithImpkikefy? that you?
Do you check your email? I have sort of been trying to contact you.
I took it out because I thought it was an unnecessary feature/requirement
719ad7 No.2095
>>2082
>unnecessary
maybe but it's still useful
like it said in the section it will mean people can filter out threads that aren't relevant to them
also see >>938
2432cf No.2099
the /pol/ name needs to be incorporated somehow.
like referring to the board as /pol/itics or something.
77782d No.2124
>>1889
That's how many boards started out, but trust me, this place will be as tolerant as ever as soon as the reddit hordes start getting into /politics/
77782d No.2125
>>2099
We aren't /pol/, you god damned bigot.
df784a No.2126
>>2124
Probably not. There are already niche ideology boards, people who come here want to have discussions with people from all sides of the political spectrum. It's advertised as a neutral board from the start.
e22286 No.2140
Here is a UIP, as long as non-naziboos are not banned instantly this place shuld be 10 times better than /pol/.
/intl/ did nothing wrong
719ad7 No.2145
>>2129
>>2140
I suspect these posts are psyops to make people associate this board with /int*/
719ad7 No.2154
>>31
>2) Do not post duplicate threads.
>3) Do not post off-topic threads.
Should add off topic and duplicate posts to that?
719ad7 No.2155
I think it needs to be clearer that the moderation is what's supposed to be unbiased not the users' posting
0a073f No.2161
Stop shilling on other boards. You're not better than /pol/ and you never will be.
719ad7 No.2162
>>2161
we have unbiased moderation, /pol/ doesn't
see >>>/polmeta/8895
0a073f No.2163
>>2162
No one gives a shit about you niggers if you're going to spam other boards.
d5363b No.2169
>>2145
>being associated with /int*/ is somehow a bad thing
wew
d5363b No.2170
>>2163
Sorry anon, which board are you from? I'll personally visit it and apologize for all the spamming we've done. :^)
5bd235 No.2200
>>2126
Not so fast, hans. This place will be full of neutrals who will dominate over the bigoted stormcucks and the left wingers at /leftypol/ that we denounce to make ourselves look better even if we agree with 60% of what they say. No one will stand in our way. Go back to /pol/, stormfuck.
000000 No.2272
>>2200
>neutrals
>bigoted stormcucks
>left wingers
Boy, that sure sounded like a neutral position :^)
naisu torippu desu
064855 No.2344
>>2170
>impersonating a mod
how old are you?
719ad7 No.2512
Can we use some flags from >>>/liberty/ and >>>/pn/ ?
be sure to put the name of the country by the party flags
d5363b No.2579
5ae36c No.2645
>>2272
You're just mad at my level headed, god-tier, neutral, middle of the road ideas, you stormcuck.
48cca5 No.2698
So how much protection against /christian/ raids can we expect here? Biggest thing killing /pol/ right now.
6cd59f No.2730
>>2698
>"Mods mods please help I can't hide threads or use filters :( :( : ("
Crying for mods help is what destroyed /pol/, it encouraged them to unleash their autism, faggot.
fe13bc No.2876
>>2698
>mods pls help ;___;
f53bdb No.2989
Fuck off with your shitty advertising
719ad7 No.3054
So why can't we have >>2154?
4c5899 No.3097
>>2730
MODS SAVE ME ARRGGHHHHHHHH
fe13bc No.3106
253f93 No.3121
public notice
If tranny threads become a problem i will OP post flood, its a bait agenda to get people talking about .00001% of people who are freaks.
To the Muh speech fags, muh bad rule fags, enjoy your butt hurt
i cant be banned.
7abf4f No.3124
>>3121
>self-hating tranny detected
It's good that you are trying to fight your brain, but keep it to yourself, don't shit on others just because you have issues.
720771 No.3142
>shilling on /wx/ of all places
also why does /pol/ need three boards in the top25?
3e30f1 No.3156
>>3142
>shillling on /wx/
Not sure why BO would want cuck porn enthusiasts on here
719ad7 No.3161
>>3156
why do you presume it's the BO?
deb3dd No.3164
253f93 No.3229
Kelo Deleted post #3221
Are you fucking kidding me, explain yourself, you want to come at me like pol mods.
Your playing with fire
6e340c No.3248
Can we bring back Shitposting Saturday threads?
That was my favorite thing on /pol/ that used to piss off the no funs/that imkampfy banned (I got a fucking month long ban from imkampfy back in February for making one).
Can I make a Shitposting Saturdays thread this Saturday, BO? and can we set it to sticky/cycle?
6e340c No.3249
>>3248
Obviously unsticky/delete it after Saturdays.
8c3e13 No.3271
8c3e13 No.3272
>>3248
We can probably do that
6e340c No.3279
9f6e31 No.3283
>>3271
>it was spam
This is unbannable, and i don't like mods who lie.
No it wasnt it was the seal post where everyone was shit posting in the thread your mod shit on.
You fucked up bad dude, you just saw me come right back after you banned me.
f039b7 No.3285
jesus christ, bo how many fucking threads have you bump locked?!?!
f039b7 No.3288
>>3271
bullshit it was spam. explain yourself. you didnt delete any other posts in the thread, which was going to shit anyways. were were content and happy there, now the whole board is up for grabs imo tbh
smfh bo. you cucked up this time
8c3e13 No.3291
>>3283
"Rules 1) Do not spam."
"Bans will be up to the staff's discretion."
I banned for spam, see https://archive.is/rmSQu
>>3285
not that many tbh
>>3288
the navy seal post was an accident, I thought it was a repeat, but it was different. I apologize for deleting that.
f039b7 No.3292
>>3291
>"Rules 1) Do not spam."
we werent spamming, those were all different variations, all oc tbh
>>3291
>bump locking threads
-_- smh
unbannable it the one who needs the apology
9f6e31 No.3293
>>3288
>>3288
>bullshit it was spam. explain yourself. you didnt delete any other posts in the thread
Yep he just picked that on (me) for some anal reason.
I am unbaanabe and an /baphomet/ level oldfag who fucking HATES LIERS.
9f6e31 No.3294
>>3291
>the navy seal post was an accident, I thought it was a repeat, but it was different. I apologize for deleting that.
That was me faggot
Unbaanabe here, just leave shit posting threads alone faggot.
Good to finally admit you fucked up, i was about to email bomb you and fuck all your boards
8c3e13 No.3295
>>3292
>those were all different variations
I don't believe it
8c3e13 No.3297
>>3294
>leave shit posting threads
I generally do, but the hacked text stuff isn't cool
9f6e31 No.3298
>>3295
Fuck with me again and i will send a virus to your email and own your ass
9f6e31 No.3299
>>3295
>>those were all different variations
>
>I don't believe it
Yes they were all different faggot want me to post 10 right now, all close but different
9f6e31 No.3301
8c3e13 No.3303
>>3299
they may have been the same sequence but they were still by the same person
8c3e13 No.3304
wait are we talking about the weird text or the navy seal pasta?
9f6e31 No.3305
>>3297
>but the hacked text stuff isn't cool
Then dont start shit faggot
9f6e31 No.3306
>>3304
>>3304
>wait are we talking about the weird text or the navy seal pasta?
Both, you deleted my post i text hacked
Unbanable
9f6e31 No.3309
>>3303
>they may have been the same sequence but they were still by the same person
yes 2-4 where shit posting, i posted different pasta each time, but you dont read shit and thought it was the same.... its an old fucking joke.
People post different versions for the lulz
26b312 No.3311
>>3306
>>3309
Can you maybe not spam? Seriously there is funposting and then there is spam
8c3e13 No.3316
>>3306
>>3305
>>3309
well how about a fresh start? Lets just avoid a repeat of all this in the future.
9f6e31 No.3319
>>3311
>Can you maybe not spam? Seriously there is funposting and then there is spam
This is how it is, mod deletes my shit for no good reason and im going to fuck shit up, im going to ban evade, i, going post hacked text all over, Im going to send an email virus and hack your fucking PC, then im going to email bomb you with 1000s of emails
Now fuck off
26b312 No.3321
>>3319
What did he delete exactly I still see the seals shitpost thread
You are really angry over nothing anon
9f6e31 No.3322
>>3321
>What did he delete exactly I still see the seals shitpost thread
Shut up kiddy the adults are talking
e5d699 No.3324
>>3295
>I don't believe it
better believe it
>>3297
>I generally do, but the hacked text stuff isn't cool
its pretty fucking cool tbh
>>3303
>they may have been the same sequence but they were still by the same person
bullshit, two were mine
>>3321
lurk more faggot its in the bump locked thread
26b312 No.3326
>>3322
>>3324
The fuck are you niggers so mad over, Compared to the dud and imkikefilled this aint shit.
Fuck at best '(for your argument) he deleted the wrong shitpost on a NON shitposting board. Calm the fuck down or go back to /pol/ and enjoy being rulecucked forever,
There is a reason small boards never beat the global kike boards and the reason is paranoia and implosions before the get the chance.
9f6e31 No.3329
>>3324
Thanks anon, you get it
Unbannable
a5bb24 No.3331
>>3326
you deleted a post needlessly on a literally contained shitposting thread.
SUDDENLY
SHITPOSTING INTENSIFIES
BUT only to prove a point. now we are here, and picture is 100% related, faggot
>>3329
no probs fam, glad i was here tbh
26b312 No.3334
>>3331
Whatever you say fam you see assmad as fuck tho
3e30f1 No.3338
>>3326
>There is a reason small boards never beat the global kike boards and the reason is paranoia and implosions before the get the chance.
It's like it's being manufactured from someone, somewhere. Maybe on this very site. Gee, I wonder who would do such a thing, ruining small boards to prop up big boards managed by retards that they shill against?
26b312 No.3484
>massive faggot
The massive faggot is somebody who reports this thinking we'd ban for it.
Report and opinion discarded
f739e8 No.3493
An idea to improve the board
Because this board strives for neutrality on a site occupied by extremists at both ends, and by virtue of the posting design in general on the chans, would it be prudent to start two rolling stickies for the discussion of UK and US politics as a means to centre the political discussion of this board on a more fact-by-fact interpretation, with regards to the activities of each nation's house of representatives?
Encouraging a sense of discussion on the basis of each nation's constitutional activities may be potentially informative for anybody interested in current events and provide a more neutral common ground for posters from across the site in general.
(The rolling sticky might be updated once every few days with information regarding bill drafting, chamber debates, and whatever - with links to their respective televised channels)
It might be fun to actually have a discussion with others on the separate and diverse interests that move policies and institutional bodies, and the general processes which guide the day to day government of a country.
ebe6f0 No.3501
>>3493
Why exactly UK and US politics? What about EU politics, I think that's more relevant than UK politics?
f739e8 No.3521
>>3501
It was a question of national focus for the suggested stickies; if a European politics thread is of more interest for a broader range of posters then I guess it's better in general.
That being said, the European Parliament tends to convene on supranational issues; domestic concerns will be of more interest to posters who are from the respective country, so the quality of discussion may be better.
In short, US and UK politics tends to be both more interesting and more topical. It would however fall short for German, French, and what have you posters, as you pointed out
b09da1 No.3546
Make me a vol and you'll have a person who removes spam and does it for free.
ec249e No.3573
>>3546
tbh I wouldn't recommend adding any more vols unless you explicitly need them. All other things being equal, having more vols is worse than having fewer vols.
The way it tends to work is, each volunteer that gets added will enforce the rules in a way that he personally sees fit. This is nearly unavoidable; even if you lay down very stringent rules for what the volunteers can and can't do, you will still get people who even interpret the rules you lay out in different ways. There will always be situations that fall into a grey area, and when those situations arise some people will be more prone towards 'letting things slide', while others will be more likely to ban mercilessly.
The more volunteers you add, the likelier it becomes that between all of them, they will develop inconsistent ways of managing the board. One volunteer who browses at night might allow a certain thread to stay up, while a different volunteer who stays on during the day might ban a user for that exact same thread. These inconsistencies turn posting into a game of Russian roulette for the users, where it becomes unclear what types of threads and posts are or are not okay.
By adding too many volunteers, you also increase the risk that one of your volunteers will be stupid, or will make a 'mistake'. Imageboard communities tend to be very unforgiving, and you really only get one or two chances as board owner before they stop trusting you altogether. I know it's not fair, but that's just the nature of sites like these. Trust is difficult to build, and very easy to break.
For a board of this size (190 UIPs, 15 PPH), and for the level of moderation you have, you really only need one or two mods: the board owner and perhaps one other guy. Since you already have two people, I would strongly recommend not adding any more for the time being.
Source: I've been a volunteer on like 5 or 6 boards on 8chan, including 7 months spent as a volunteer on /pol/. I've seen this shit play out repeatedly.
ebe6f0 No.3634
>>3573
>For a board of this size (190 UIPs, 15 PPH), and for the level of moderation you have, you really only need one or two mods: the board owner and perhaps one other guy. Since you already have two people, I would strongly recommend not adding any more for the time being.
That depends very much on how high the level of autism the mods have, how much time they're willing to waste keeping an eye on the board. Besides, the board owner can remove bad mods at any time anyway.
>>3521
With the migrations shit going on, European politics is pretty supranational at the moment, even when it's each country doing stuff on their own.
8c3e13 No.3680
>>3573
do you have an email?
22797f No.3703
Hey Keloo, unbannable here.
Lantos deleted my post in https://8ch.net/politics/res/3341.html
WTF, was a on topic decent post, come on man, its better hands off than this, looks like he went on a delete spree.
Thought police....
8c3e13 No.3708
>>3703
When was your post deleted and what was it about?
22797f No.3710
>>3708
Made it last night it was about the 4th one, now its gone, talking about naming conventions.
Dude, i made a couple text hacks posts, and will chill for now, if another one of my posts is deleted, especially in a short time frame for no good reason its on.
I will burn it down
22797f No.3711
>>3708
This is worse than POL, having things deleted here that would stay up on POL
wtf wtf wtf
082ce0 No.3712
>>3710
>LARPing underage faggot
22797f No.3713
>>3712
>LARPing underage faggot
ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ ฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎ํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํํ
082ce0 No.3714
>>3713
Thanks for proving my point.
26b312 No.3809
26b312 No.3810
I love how so many people keep trying to bait into rulecuckery.
I am not going to delete jack shit unless its bot spam. Get over it rulecucks.
cb2a86 No.3820
>>3810
what about >>3723? its not technically bot spam tbh
694c83 No.3881
>>3820
So a post you don't like is called "spam" or "bot spam" , technically of course, lots of justification there or what some would call bullshit.
ec0e5d No.3912
Could you add /sen/ to the sister boards list? It was a good idea but its kinda dead now. Be helpful supporting it. It fits since we can discuss politics here and then do political roleplay there.
131db9 No.3928
6a6430 No.3939
So I told the BO to make a good politics board.. he actually did it the absolute madman
hahahahahahaha!
97dcb1 No.3953
Got any plans to add a filter to coonspeak to piss off the autists who use it?
733d11 No.3998
>>3953
that would be censorship tbh fam
ec0e5d No.3999
>>3928
We could resuscitate it this way and live in symbiosis.
9c90c5 No.4037
>>3881
I dont think that should get rulecucked tbh. its got its uses. i was asking the bo what they thought of it seeing as how its technically not botspam, which was refereed to in >>3810
694c83 No.4042
I have never had a post deleted on /k/ /fit/ /tv/ /tech/, i have made 1000's of posts on /k/, 200+ on /tech/ tons of posts on those 4 groups.
but in 5 days on /politcs/ i have had two posts deleted that were totally normal posts, im not some newfag that doesn't know right from wrong with posting, this place is worse than /pol/ with deletions.
322e80 No.4043
>>3912
>>4042
2 posts, 11 hours apart, and you didn't mention what these posts were about or where they were posted. Sounds like you are just trolling.
694c83 No.4048
>>4043
the BO knows what im talking about
Its above in this thread, im the guy who raised hell after the deletions and was banned 6 times in 9 min ( skills he he )
The typical line from the BO is what did you say, guess you need to save a posts so when they get deleted you can PROVE what happened.
The MO of this board is to say your lieing/shill when in fact the BO/Mods are really fucking stupid
ebe6f0 No.4054
>>4048
Let me repeat. What did you post?
694c83 No.4059
>>4054
This i need proof and to tell Again what happened is getting old, but here goes.
One was in a thread that was kind of lame OP, a mod came in and started admonishing people to straiten up or he was going to kick some ass, that went well, at that point i hadnt posted in that thread at all, more people posted and Keoo/BO came in and said mod went to far, the people started having fun and shitposting in that one thread, a ways in i had some fun like eveyone else, BO just starts deleting (some) posts without reading them, because he thought they were "spam"
Two, thread talking about naming conventions of economic theory, guess my post which was totally normal went against a mods likes or who the fuck knows, deleted.
So i bring these up with BO and just get flack, i need to PROVE what i said, who the fuck saves every post.
My point still stands never a delete on /k/ /tech /fit /tv/ in damn near one year, but two here in a 48 hr time frame, THIS PLACE IS WORSE THAN POL
ebe6f0 No.4061
>>4059
Cool.
I wonder how does
>-Threads will be archived (through archive.is) before deletion.
apply in this case.
d5363b No.4063
>>4059
this needs addressed tbh
694c83 No.4067
>>4063
BO addressed both of them above,
one he finally admitted he fucked up after a ton of back and forth and flack from people who saw what happed and told him he fucked up,
the 2nd is just my word against the GOD/MODS because im a lying scum spammer... who dared to stand up.
d5363b No.4069
>>4067
your posts are not very clear fam
082ce0 No.4076
>>4054
he's an underage faggot who spammed the board last night
https://8ch.net/bans.html
I hope the mods ban him again for ban evasion or at least for being this retarded at trolling.
694c83 No.4078
>>4069
The mods come in here (this thread) and post without identifying themselves as mods trying to deflect, other people above have noticed this also.
694c83 No.4080
>>4076
>he's an underage faggot who spammed the board last night
News flash i just said that above and admitted it.
Your a mod and i know which one
694c83 No.4083
One more thing, i was giving the board 30-40 UID's a day to boost it and posted up to 6 OP's a day, never again.
d5363b No.4108
>>4083
>>4080
>>4078
pretty autistic posting fam
can't take you seriously i'm afraid, sry
8c3e13 No.4128
>>4059
>thread talking about naming conventions of economic theory
I don't know anything about this. I don't think the mods do either. Regardless, this has turned into a finger pointing game that will get us no where. Can we just put this behind us and move on?
b75448 No.4134
>deleting the pulling out thread
694c83 No.4138
>>4128
I wont be posting here again except to fuck shit up, bump old posts or posts that suck, some text hacks, bait and so on, mods fall asleep and i will flood, you know you cant ban me.
Cause Mods dindu nuffin, mod dindu nuffin, forget about it please move on, classic, of course they aren't going to admit it...faggot, GOD/MOD
Nuke the current mods and maybe i will chill
the text hack i made above is left up to try and make me look like the bad guy, who its obviuos is from a mod, don't start nuffin wont be nuffin
>>4134
>>deleting the pulling out thread
Very narrow what is ok on a slow board, just shows how anal all or some of the mods are, BO fucked up his mods are power tripping.
Over moderation will kill the board.
Now a mod will come alone and hide that he is a mod and deflect.
Burn it down
694c83 No.4140
Since you need PROOF
This text hack is left up because a snaky mod hiding as a normal fag (happened many times in this thread) thinks he wins, what a tard.
Mods posting on meta should always post as mods, BO and the other mods have all done this here.
fucked with the wrong person
7628ef No.4245
Please turn off page 5 autosage, it is extremely annoying and useless when spam bumps and thread creation of trash threads can slide good threads off the front page just because a bunch of people haven't said a few words talking about them.
7628ef No.4248
>>960
>Examples of shitposting:
>
> * posts (or parts of posts) that contain nothing but 'I agree', 'I disagree', 'this' etc without giving a reason why
>
> * the blatantly, obviously off topic
those types of "shitposts" are encouraged with a board that doesnt allow a 25 page catalog without a page 5 autosage
7628ef No.4252
>>3338
is the the site owner that pretends to be some cripple and pretends the BOs of pol change when they havent ever?
733d11 No.4339
>>4252
>when they havent ever?
what makes you believe that?
26f87f No.4347
FLAGS SHOULD BE ENABLED
>inb4 B-but /politics/ will just turn into an /int/ board
26f87f No.4348
FLAGS SHOULD BE ENABLED
>inb4 B-but /politics/ will just turn into an /int/ board
000000 No.4429
Why are there so many shit theads on this board?
8c3e13 No.4435
>>4429
hide & filter man
hide & filter
5f0a5c No.4441
>>4429
Read OP:
>To hide a thread through the catalog: SHIFT + click it.
/politics/ is about minimal moderation. Content is for and by the users.
8173e3 No.4482
>>4347
this tbh because politics is an international issue smh silly willy
r8 my oc fam
88422f No.4484
>>4482
>>4347
Flags break anonymity. The only thing that should be relevant is the reply, not the poster. If you want to know more about the poster, 4/pol/ or a forum might be for you.
8173e3 No.4487
>>4484
>Flags break anonymity.
on a site where you have to force anonymity tbh
smh youre petty dumb, arent you?? y u no r8 my oc?
8c3e13 No.4491
>>4347
Slovenia pls
just trip if you want attention
b9ba6f No.4492
>>4482
8/10 breddy gud oc tbh
imho flags should be enabled tbch fam
t. voice of reason
6cc030 No.4493
>>4492
>samefagging
Thanks. The board could really use these extra UIDs.
26b312 No.4498
>>4059
I really want to know which mod that was actually if this really happened.
Can you show which threads/posts it was in the board log? I can probably tell you who it was
26b312 No.4499
>>4347
Would not mind having flags on
11485b No.4507
There is literally no reason to have flags. Everything would turn into country banter, and this would become another /int/ with a slightly stronger focus on politics. Just take a look at 4chan /pol/.
I don't mind /int*/ boards and enjoy posting on them myself, but I don't think every board should be one.
11485b No.4508
>>4506
>>4507
Could you please allow post deletion, polmod? Especially with the cripplekike's broken site frequently fucking up and making me doublepost.
000000 No.4512
>>4508
Once a post is made, it belongs the users/board. Especially if it was a therad and received lots of response. Mods already delete duplicate posts, you can report them too to make sure.
26b312 No.4559
>>4508
Eh its up to popular demand but I do see your point. It's whatever you guys want honestly this is a board of the users not "of some irc cabal" for once.
9f4e8c No.4595
https://8ch.net/politics/res/4594.html
don't delete this thread you god damned hot pockets.
012c2e No.4599
File: 1446235421949.jpg (456.88 KB, 595x695, 119:139, Even Idols can tell you wh….jpg)
11eec4 No.4626
>>4595
birth control = politics
unbumplock it
5d7246 No.4644
>>4626
Foolz != serious bio politics discussion.
3845d8 No.4742
>>4644
>serious discussion
>>>/pol/
63f451 No.4776
>>4742
Shove it Rugga Smalls! A board where you get banned if you doen't toe Jannies' line yet doesn't does anything about troll threads which content has been disproved for days is not a good platform for discussions.
44a9b5 No.4830
675d12 No.4831
Down to 118 UIPs, the dream is ogre, time to take out the cyanide capsules.
It is a weird phenomenon that after the initial wave of posting on a new and promising board (and /politics/ was fairly active during the first few days!), people just seem to leave again. Altboards always end up either dead or extremely small and slow splinters with just a handful of dedicated people still posting. Users prefer the higher posting speed even if it means they have to endure cuck moderation.
This is why freddit's system is fundamentally broken.
b916fc No.4834
>>4831
The UIP count was bound to drop regardless of PPH. /politics/ was being shilled in every board, so you had people who have no interest in politics or in the board visiting just once.
I think it might be early to give up hope. Mods are considering ads, and it's inevitable that /pol/ mods will fuck up again, and when they do, /politics/ should be ready (i.e., not dead).
Personally, I don't think /pol/'s PPH is desirable. Maybe 70 PPH is ideal, beyond that it just turns into noise.
b916fc No.4835
>>4831
>Users prefer the higher posting speed even if it means they have to endure cuck moderation.
>This is why freddit's system is fundamentally broken.
I totally agree. How do you think the system can be solved?
e0113e No.4838
>>4834
I never expected this board to overtake /pol/ in terms of activity; that'd be a ridiculous notion. I just hope(d) this could turn into a somewhat active politics board and at least remain in the top 25. You know, when a fledgling board loses activity that usually creates a vicious cycle leading to its death, because the less activity there is the less people will be motivated to post. Well, maybe we can revitalize it with ads and some more shilling. I sure hope so!
>>4835
I don't believe there is an ideal solution. The conventional method would be to just have a set number of boards made by the admin, and hope he doesn't get corrupt or fuck shit up. Another option which has never been tried and which might work is creating a system similar to 8ch, but where the mods/BOs don't have the power to delete posts or ban users.
cf4a02 No.4839
>>4838
>where the mods/BOs don't have the power to delete posts or ban users
it's called >>>/ints/
go check it out.
cf4a02 No.4840
>>4835
force captcha site wide.
have two versions of the board, one which shows all posts made and the other showing the moderated version.
only content deleted by the globals is removed from the unmoderated version and people banned from the moderated version can still post on the unmoderated version.
b916fc No.4859
>>4840
that's a solution, another one would be "moderation feeds", though there's another problem, the top 3-4 boards end up having 90% of the site's traffic, even if the rest of the boards are very different. Users just use the top boards to discuss all topics because they are very active.
ea017f No.4956
>>4776
>Shove it
Love it, kid
>>4831
>>4834
>>4835
Whoa now, are you trying to have serious discussion?
>second picture related
21461b No.4962
>>4831
I don't see why this is a problem.
Morons who are uninterested in productive conversation stay on their cuck-moderated containment board.
c029bf No.4974
>>4956
>are you trying to have serious discussion?
Yeah sure why not. You got a problem with that, kiddo?
>>4962
The point is, it'd be nice to have an at least somewhat active politics board. I browse several very small and very slow boards, which have their own value. But for a board like this one in particular, a bit more activity would be nice. I hope we can somehow revive this again although I'm not sure.
c9a7ef No.4980
>>4974
Yes, as a /intl/ user he has a massive problem with that.
c029bf No.4997
>>4980
Tbh I used to browse /intl/ quite a bit myself and I actually had some bretty gud serious discussions on there before the big spam happened and everything collapsed into never-ending drama.
Some posters are just unoriginal, tryhard meme-spouting fags.
ea017f No.4999
>>4980
i aint even mad tho
t. /int*/
ebe6f0 No.5046
>>4840
You know, this has been proposed to /next/ already. I don't know if it will be a feature though.
ebe6f0 No.5048
>>4839
>>4997
Guess what? Having more "chaotic" board active would spread out the shitstorm, because there's only a limited number of spergs. Right now everyone spams and shitposts on /int*/ splinters because they're the only place where you can do it (also it gives them moral satisfaction, but let's leave this topic for now). If at least half the boards were like this, it would spread out more and as a results boards would look quite normal, if you ignore the occasional shitspree.
a713c1 No.5103
So is someone false-flagging you or does one of you guys really think spamming other boards is a great way to advertise this one?
21461b No.5107
>>5103
it worked to get me here.
If you don't want people spamming your board stop being a hugbox with power-tripping hotpockets.
a713c1 No.5110
>>5107
So what, this board's the appointed rulecuck police?
ebe6f0 No.5152
>>5110
yes
this board is /int*/ affiliated
now be a good anon and stay away from this board since it hurts based hotwheels
7628ef No.5233
1 how do we bring people from halfchan here so that 4chan dies?
2 how do we bring people from pol here so that tripfag moderatorship dies
What's the best way to advertise to the other small political boards without creating rifts?
867677 No.5291
>>5046
rulecucked as fuck tbh
>>5152
since when?? dont be getting my hopes up to dash them now....
506c06 No.5318
Daily reminder that /polpol/ existed.
>successful board
506c06 No.5319
>>5318
>heavy moderation works
ebe6f0 No.5322
>>5233
> 1 how do we bring people from halfchan here so that 4chan dies?
lol nobody new is coming on 8chan
>2 how do we bring people from pol here so that tripfag moderatorship dies
every time there's a shitstorm on /pol/ remind people of this board and pray butthurt /pol/ mods don't spam this board like what happened with /vvv/
>What's the best way to advertise to the other small political boards without creating rifts?
Convince people to crossboard. With multiboard system it would be simpler, but we have to work with what we have.
30629a No.5324
>>5322
>multiboard system
?
ebe6f0 No.5336
>>5324
opening multiple boards simultaneously like /politics+news+pn/ would load threads from all three boards
719ad7 No.5339
>>5322
>lol nobody new is coming on 8chan
why not?
ebe6f0 No.5362
>>5339
Probably because of high levels of obsession in majority of users and a closed circlejerk of glovols and major board owners.
Sadly, I don't see 8chan's future as any brighter than what 7chan and 420chan experienced.
d9087c No.5364
>>5362
I'd argue otherwise , 7chan could have held on if it didn't completely obliterate its user base on every board.
00df75 No.5368
>>5339
The poor management of 8/pol/ drove off large amounts of users that would be interested in 8chan.
/a/ here is overmoderated and has no life, no reason for people to move from 4chan.
Lack of organization and difficulty finding boards, if you want to talk say cosplay you just find the board on the front page of 4chan and off you go, here you have search a list and the board probably isn't active.
557995 No.5387
>>5368
>/a/ here is overmoderated and has no life, no reason for people to move from 4chan.
From your perspective. I could also claim that no one from /a/ wants to come to 8chan because /am/ exists.
The truth there looks a little different: After knuckleheads shilling the board to the max and problems developing on /u/ for a long time spilling over to 4/a/ and here have made it develop a irrational hostility towards 8chan.
The last problem you have mentioned has been already addressed in next. The problem lies in the software using as foundation for this place.
21461b No.5394
>>5387
I stopped posting on 4/a/ when some hot pocket called pic related "porn"
Btw, feel free to keep it.. for...uhh.. "science"
bbfdfb No.5430
I've noticed the active user count here is dropping. Did a lot of people migrate back to /pol/? Or did they just get tired of 8chan server issues? Just wondering out loud.
8c3e13 No.5434
984cb4 No.5440
5c7dab No.5471
>>5387
>have made it develop a irrational hostility towards 8chan.
That's just an excuse, you can meme idiots into hating anything which is probably what the 4chan mods have being doing.
3e30f1 No.5475
>>5368
>Lack of organization and difficulty finding boards
I'd like to think I've solved that problem
>>>/dir/
>>5387
The shilling had a very negative effect, yeah. The people still on halfchan hate us.
>>5430
Considering /int*/ took over /polpol/ through the claims system, if /pol/ thinks their bunker's gonna be safe during a raid, they're gonna have a bad time.
c40822 No.5476
>>5475
>Considering /int*/ took over /polpol/ t
How do you know?
ebe6f0 No.5508
>>5476
don't you know son, /int*/ pulls all the straws
hint: josh and nunu are /int*/-affiliated
ebe6f0 No.5509
>>5364
>7chan could have held on if it didn't completely obliterate its user base on every board.
how is that different to erratic banning sprees on /pol/ and /v/?
d9087c No.5513
>>5509
its localized rather than site wide.
it would be even worse if was far more pervasive and affected the other boards
d3ecd0 No.5515
>>5508
Anyone else just want to discuss politics, but recoil in disgust at having to read and react to all the mod/owner/dev drama?
d3ecd0 No.5516
>>5515
*Does anyone else...
947338 No.5522
>>5516
yesss mista rulecuck! wes gon do whachoo want do from now on, umm hummmm yessuh!!
719ad7 No.5544
What's the problem with putting that tag suggestion in the sticky?
Key word: suggestion
No rules required if you really don't want them that much
c40822 No.5553
>>5544
you are developing a very unhealthy obsession with tags.
719ad7 No.5558
>>5553
I don't understand why the suggestion had to be removed
also it will be helpful: people can filter the threads that are not relevant to the country they are from
c40822 No.5561
>>5558
how old are you? (serious question)
719ad7 No.5584
>>5561
I don't see how that's at all relevant
6a1627 No.5587
>>5584
Men under 25 tend to want to win all arguments. The tag system doesn't work that well. There is nothing wrong with tag suggestions. The problem here is a eventual replacement in about a quarter to a half a year at maximum when Infinity Next gets rolled out.
It supplements the tag system with a list of recently active board, a frontpage with all recent posts and images and featured post on top and a adventure mode that leads you to a random recently active board. Shilling >>>/dir/ or working on the planned selfserve ad in >>676 would be more effective. I know, these are just patchwork fixes. Please consider that development on infinity have been ceased since May.
c40822 No.5588
>>5584
so you are an underage faggot, as expected
6a1627 No.5589
I forgot to link to Infinity Next's development site.
https://infinitydev.org/
You can test all the supplements to the tag system here.
719ad7 No.5592
>>5515
internet politics is still politics
719ad7 No.5595
>>5588
again, how is that relevant?
also you have no proof of my age
095819 No.5596
>>5592
No its not. Its quarreling about site policies without actually understanding them in the cases present here.
19c469 No.5627
Did this board recently add thread IDs or did I just never notice them until now? You should really go back to /bwithvideogames/ or the gamergate boards if you can't handle having a truly anonymous argument.
630a48 No.5692
000000 No.5730
Note
8chan serves a cached version of the catalog and index, sometimes the cache doesn't get refreshed for +1 hour. "Editing" posts is one way to force the the site to refresh the cache, that's why there are many "Edited post #31" log entries. #31 is the sticky.
Hopefully the problem will be solved when 8chan upgrades to "Infinity Next", which is currently under development.
719ad7 No.5747
>>5587
>Men under 25 tend to want to win all arguments
that doesn't mean you have to know my age though
I feel I need to post this because I made >>5595 when before that you posted a reason
719ad7 No.5814
>>>5378 bumplocked
internet politics is still politics
719ad7 No.5815
ignore >>5814
> >>5378 bumplocked
internet politics is still politics
719ad7 No.5816
We should promote this board by referring to politics as /politics/ on other boards
be1dab No.5908
>>3573
I have to agree with this guy. Check the ban list on /a/ and you will see rules are stringently enforced by volunteers while the board owner only bans people who are way out of line. I've largely stopped posting there since the addition of volunteers attracted elitist shitposters.
Since shitposting here includes what you would generally expect and fallacious arguments, are we going to see stringent moderation on posts that aren't intentionally fallacious? Suppose I attempted to make an argument and didn't account for the irrelevancy of some anecdotal evidence. Rightly so somebody would then point out the irrelevancy of the anecdotal evidence and the discussion would carry on. Would the post containing the irrelevant anecdotal evidence be removed or see a ban?
8c3e13 No.5910
>>5908
>are we going to see stringent moderation on posts that aren't intentionally fallacious?
no
>Would the post containing the irrelevant anecdotal evidence be removed or see a ban?
no
hide and filter, always hide and filter
32b6db No.5918
>>5910
The thing is with filtering IDs is that a constructive post might come from that ID as well as the shitpost they were filtered for.
22b1b8 No.5919
>>5918
Filter: Post + (Hide post and all replies).
Doing this for 1-2 pots in a thread usually cleans it up.
9b9e7d No.5923
>>5919
Many people reply to many posts in one post
22b1b8 No.5929
>>5923
there are no perfect solutions. Without this, you won't be able to read the thread at all. Losing one legitimate reply is better than losing all replies.
22b1b8 No.5930
>>5929
>>5923
It's usually 1-2 posts that trigger a shitstorm of replies, oldfags just ignore them, you won't miss much
8c3e13 No.5973
Political Ideology flags
yay or nay?
6e340c No.5976
File: 1447131795993.png (50.02 KB, 398x476, 199:238, 11745325_1054865684541100_….png)
>>5973
Sure, I'd love to be able to call statists out while watching flaming retards respond to my ancap flag instead of the content of my posts.
22b1b8 No.5981
>>5973
We can give it a try. If it has any downsides we can turn it back off.
8c3e13 No.5986
>>5981
>>5976
alright, it may be temporary though
8c3e13 No.6106
You guys want css? I was thinking about stealing some from >>>/midpol/
8c3e13 No.6114
Alright, flags are in. If you want a change to the flags, or want any added let me know. I'm trying to keep it simple political ideology flags. No philosophy flags, no religion flags, no country flags, no political party flags, etc.
7628ef No.6145
Gentlemen!
I know most of you do not approve of pol and want to see a vibrant 3k user board vying for top position here.
However pretending to be of the opposite belief and being dismissive of other arguments won't make heated debate. In fact it will drive away users who want discussions.
Now if you want to blame x board for posting here in jest that can be your belief. But we do not need this, it used to happen on 4half before 2012 elections took off too so maybe its just shills but it doesn't help discussion.
Even if you're starved for posts having this annoying non productive shitfest in top 10 replies of all threads is just damaging to the board.
Now since moderation is transparent and Owner and vols are good with short bans why not sparingly use the so called 3 second ban which is just a warning?
So since we have archive and log, some of these posts should be outright deleted.
Up to you. I'm here for an honest and superior pol.
you can
8c3e13 No.6168
Trying a new css. If you guys don't like it, I'll remove it.
3cb866 No.6176
>>6168
most of the transparency is nice, but the transparent arrow options become very messy when colliding with post text
d9087c No.6181
>>6168
tone the transparency down or remove it entirely for the quick reply.
it gets messy
719ad7 No.6197
Why does >>6196 appear stickied in the catalog but not on the thread page or the index?
Was it stickied then unstickied but 8chan hasn't caught up? >>>/operate/42627?
If so why was it stickied on the first place?
719ad7 No.6198
Why were >>6196, >>6050 and >>3854 stickied?
719ad7 No.6199
I thought >>6197 didn't go through
719ad7 No.6200
8f02b0 No.6229
>>6200
BO is probably the OP of both.
719ad7 No.6433
Put >>>/dir/69 in the address bar by ###politics###
8c3e13 No.6434
8c3e13 No.6438
>>6200
I believe they were edited to add the stream links
e0d5f1 No.6522
To funny, 14th to 80th on the board list
You bo/mods that went mod-god nuts and killed a good thing, i hope you learned something with all your deletions, then your lies to cover it up, people look at the log and see delete after delete, then the ban list and see all the bans ( i baited you into that one, ha ha ha) and you look like idiots that are power tripping (you were)
I never lied, and don't like being made out to be one.
The fire Rises
oldfag unbannable Buwahahahahaha
fad501 No.6580
>>6106
/midpol/
make it stop. Leftypol was stupid enough. No one needs their own drinking fountains.
719ad7 No.6618
Posting to try and set my flag
719ad7 No.6620
>>6618
Not all the flags show up in some threads and some even don't have the flag selector at all.
14a329 No.6770
I'm pretty sure that because you are not the legacy board, I'm supposed to call you /intl/ or /ints/ or fug I dunno
You shill you! grrrr!
ebe6f0 No.6774
>>6770
Hi m8
it wasn't me who bumped a shitload of old threads btw
287a95 No.6797
Hey BO, I've noticed that among the Sister boards are Third Position, and National Socialism, perhaps you'd like to collaborate with >>>/fash/ too?
8c3e13 No.6801
>>6797
It looks pretty dead
199af6 No.6807
>>6801
Perhaps, but it may not be so dead if more users here knew about it.
199af6 No.6808
>>6801
Even so, if you regard /fash/ to be too dead then oh well.
Perhaps cross linking >>>/tdt/ for Knowledge or Library, something like that?
8c3e13 No.6812
>>6807
/natsoc/ covers fascism already and Its almost dead, why not merge? But if you insist I can add /fash/ for a month or so, if it continues to remain dead however, I may remove it.
199af6 No.6817
>>6812
Doesn't bother me either way mate, just a suggestion.
0a0532 No.6855
>>6843
get a life, cumstain
69489a No.7015
8c3e13 No.7016
3758d3 No.7158
a.) i want to know how red-pilled the admin of this board is.
i) Was gex a shill trying to get a stormshit movement going so o-nigger and Israel could greenlight miltary actiopn in syria?
ii) Was november Paris terror a hoax?
No need to discuss, I just want to know if admin are old-fag red pills or young, neutral minded kids who still believe half of the news on the kikebox.
Assuming this board becomes a main exodus rendezvous point and a popular /pol/ board, the admin will face decisions that 8/pol/ admins faced. Their shit decisions were based on their underlying philosophy and red-pilledness or lack or it, or most likely just being shills.
Since /pol/ often comes under sustained and organized psy-ops attack, do you as an admin, consider yourself to have a war-games mindset ready for when the kikery hits?
Or are you hoping that strict enforcement of fair rules is all that is needed to stop kikes from destroying intelligent discussion on PiC topics?
8c3e13 No.7165
>>7158
>Was gex a shill trying to get a stormshit movement going so o-nigger and Israel could greenlight miltary action in syria?
I haven't really looked into it so I would say no
>Was november Paris terror a hoax?
I would assume no, but again, I haven't really done too much of my own research to form a solid opinion
>do you as an admin, consider yourself to have a war-games mindset ready for when the kikery hits?
>Or are you hoping that strict enforcement of fair rules is all that is needed to stop kikes from destroying intelligent discussion on PiC topics?
I have faith in the users of this board to hide users when necessary. And report users when breaking a rule.
I always encourage users not to make logical fallacies.
3758d3 No.7177
>>7165
In that case you are no different from the endchan admin, or the old 8chan.co/pol mods. Its the same approach and philosphy tried again and again and again. All previous attempts derail once the board population goes up and the shilling starts.
I can't understand why anons strive to create free speech boards, and get admin positions there, but rarely if ever themselves partake on those boards enough to get redpilled.
Typical of mods, u even openly admit you don't even try wise up on Politically Incorrect topics to form opinions. I don't like this mentality, I don't understand. Where else in healthy society do we have admins who themselves are not experienced in the gist of a group, yet admin them?
There is one group of people who do it, and we all know who they are. Its just plain kikery.
I have another, quite different test for you, but now that you've given your answers identical to endchans admin, I think I already know your answer.
8c3e13 No.7180
>>7177
suit yourself
I am curious as to what your test is
d414ac No.7211
>>7158
>everyone who disagrees with me is a shill
>everything is a conspiracy
This kind of mentality is what will kill /pol/, not the scary CIA psy-ops attacks.
Even if there actually were shills on 8ch, any damage they could do would be more tolerable than a climate of constant suspicion that effectively prevents many discussions from happening.
82689c No.7213
>>7211
That's why hugboxes will always be cancerous, there's constant suspicion that someone is shilling or trolling to ruin the hugbox.
d414ac No.7215
>>7213
Exactly, "shill" is /pol/'s equivalent of hubski's "troll".
1ea94a No.7315
enable bold, underline, strike and italics codes.
7fc69d No.7316
>>31
Stop shilling your board on every board faggot.
8c3e13 No.7319
>>7316
I am not. Others however, are.
8c3e13 No.7320
>>7315
They should already be enabled
6031e0 No.7331
1c3fb3 No.7424
>>7177
>hurr durr the shilling
shut up cuck
1c3fb3 No.7425
b7537f No.7427
>>7425
I think IDs are necessary for holding a conversation, but as an experiment, I support turning it off for a while.
8c3e13 No.7453
so should I disable ids for a temporary period?
a08a16 No.7463
>>7453
yes, and make sure to leave a note in the sticky so people know it's temporary.
8c3e13 No.7506
Alright, ID's have been disabled for a temporary period. We'll see how this goes.
000000 No.7515
Why was my thread deleted?
8c3e13 No.7517
>>7515
What was it? You sure it wasn't eaten by hotman?
a5ce55 No.8448
Ban brit/pol/ before their cancer completely engulfs the board. They spammed /pol/ with 850+ threads of shitposting and traps. They are /intl/ or at least as bad as them. They already have their own containment board >>>/britpol/ send them there.
074e62 No.8450
>>8448
Not BO. Why not just hide/filter? Self-moderation is very encouraged here. I think brit/politics/ threads should be deleted when they reach the limit (so they don't push other threads out of the catalog), but I don't think they should be banned.
ebe6f0 No.8558
>>8448
>They are /intl/
im jew
02216c No.8559
>>8558
same IP for +4 months. How does that happen? VPN? Stable connection?
ebe6f0 No.8562
4b8067 No.9431
There's one thing really bugging me here, chances are there's an option but I can't find it.
On /pol/, when you click on a filename it saves the image with the same filename into your automatic downloads folder. Now here clicking on the filename opens the image in a new tab, it does not download it. To save images on this board you have to right-click the image, open in new tab, right-click again, save the image, type the filename, and choose where to save. Again on /pol/ all you had to do was click once on the filename and it saved automatically.
Sounds really petty, but when you have threads based around image sharing, it can take 10x longer to save the images and is incredibly tedious. Just a nice little thing I wouldn't mind ironing out.
8c3e13 No.9448
>>9431
"save as original filename" is only an option for file board types.
there is no option available for image board types unfortunately. It used to be an option for all board types, which is why /pol/ and /v/ have it enabled. This is no longer available.
email coldroller if you want it changed
f6d322 No.9668
>>31
Would you consider adding /liberty/ to the "sister boards" list?
8c3e13 No.9811
>>9668
Correct me if Im wrong but I assumed /liberty/ was more of a general discussion board, like /pol, /leftypol/ and /n/
f6d322 No.9845
>>9811
I don't think it is any more general than the ones you have listed. It might be redundant as you already have anarchism and anarcho-capitalism listed, but I appreciate your consideration nonetheless.
9e4beb No.10016
Really looking forward to using this board. /pol/ is at a state where they will censor any opinions that differ from their own. Can't stand it when I share an opinion of mine and everyone in the thread calls me a shill as a means to dismiss what I said.
I'm glad this board exists so people with differing political views can engage with each other in a proper fashion.
d4d67e No.10309
>>7427
>as an experiment
Goddamn this shit is killing me. Just turn off fucking IDs, we never needed them on /new/, we didn't need them on fucking true /pol/ before all this moot sellout shit happened and now since muh shills are the great fucking moral panic of our time anonymous goddamned motherfucking imageboards have IDs everywhere. This is like fucking anontalk and it's making me want to drive off a fucking cliff.
f13e38 No.10315
>>10309
you can't have discussions in a politics board without IDs. The discussions are rarely one exchange. Usually, you end up having discussions with 2-3 people in the same thread. IDs allow you to build up on what you already said, no need for repetition.
f80468 No.10320
c4f02e No.10472
>>10315
>you can't have discussions in a politics board without IDs.
Yes you can you fucking newfag, nearly all the discussion we've had on imageboards regardless of the board was without IDs, IDs are a recent and unwelcome intrusion on anonymity and the only people who defend it are dickheads that never got to experience imageboards the way they were before all this paranoid schizophrenic shit came into vogue. Why you people don't just go to a regular forum is beyond me.
a9cf4a No.10475
>>10472
you can't have discussions = you can't have a meaningful/non-confusing discussions
If you are discussing something with someone on a thread, and someone jumps to comment on something you said to him, how do you know whether it's him or someone else? his reply contradicts his previous replies and you need to point that out, but you don't know if it's him or not.
You're probably just a shit poster/samefag who never engages in a real discussion/debate.
>Why you people don't just go to a regular forum is beyond me.
I don't need to see his posting history. I only need to identify him within a single conversation. That's how humans communicate. You don't start from scratch. You build on what you said earlier. Ideally, there would an option to opt-out.
>>10320
not a mod/BO and even if I was, I don't see how would that make me a rulecuck.
c4f02e No.10497
>>10475
>you can't have discussions = you can't have a meaningful/non-confusing discussions
We had meaningful discussions on /new/ all the time. I would say we had more meaningful discussions there than here since people were more concerned with discussing the actual ideas in posts than combing post IDs for gotchas.
>If you are discussing something with someone on a thread, and someone jumps to comment on something you said to him, how do you know whether it's him or someone else?
It doesn't matter. You suck it up and address the argument of the post instead of worrying about identities.
>his reply contradicts his previous replies and you need to point that out, but you don't know if it's him or not.
You 'need' to point that out? What exactly will happen if you don't?
>You're probably just a shit poster/samefag who never engages in a real discussion/debate.
Maybe I'm just not a fucking newfag and remember a time before all this anontalk bullshit was the norm.
a9cf4a No.10508
>>10497
you don't need to post in 8chan, what exactly will happen if you don't? that's how retarded you sound.
43fde8 No.10626
>>10508
There was not even an attempt.
1fa623 No.10799
do not listen to these shills demanding an end to IDs
In October 2014 these SAME shills tried to fight against IDs on /pol/. They said it went against the nature of image boards. They said it would lead to paranoia and rulecuckery, that it would make people gullible.
As we know NONE of this came to be! IDs worked great and now /pol/ is a font of high quality serious discussions. For this board to succeed we HAVE to have IDs.
Let's be honest. Image boards were NEVER about anonymity.
eec6de No.10814
>>10799
/pol/ is /pol/ because of /pol/ mods, not IDs.
eec6de No.10816
1fa623 No.10824
>>10814
>>10816
This is why ID's are so important! How else would you be able to spot that I am a shill, report me, and ensure that I'm banned for the next four weeks.
The system works.
ebe6f0 No.10868
>>10799
>font of high quality serious discussions
nice /intl/ may may, kid
54db54 No.10953
ce0612 No.11971
Stop. Fucking. Shilling your fucking board on every. Fucking. Board.
f80468 No.12084
>>11971
ur the one that needs to stop going to every board u kike. who the hell does that??
7628ef No.13184
>>10824
No because of VPN and a dozen other ways of getting fresh IPs
>>13118
Remove IDs
7628ef No.13185
>>10799
>In October 2014 these SAME shills tried to fight against IDs on /pol/. They said it went against the nature of image boards. They said it would lead to paranoia and rulecuckery, that it would make people gullible.
>
>As we know NONE of this came to be!
Nice argument. /pol/ is rulecucked and full of gullible government supporters just because Trump has a chance to win.
7628ef No.13188
>>2124
it wont be as long as we remove IDs
With IDs people constantly use ad hominem and shame people for doing things like not supporting Trump.
8e07ae No.13485
Hi, newfriend here. How do I redpill myself on politics in general?
c11a1d No.13506
>>13485
Read Plato. Read history. Think for yourself. Get far away from this retarded circlejerk.
c2300c No.13898
petition to remove id's.
first off, the idea of id's letting people know which anon wrote which post kills the idea of being anonymous anyway, and also, there are ways to get a different id each time you post.
second, please delete the autism that is the brit/"politics"/ threads.
third, are there any of you that actually have done something other than post on this board to help your political sta
73102b No.13902
>>13898
>IDs
why don't you want to be identified within a single thread?
>I don't like X please delete it
hide/filter
> are there any of you that actually have done something other than post on this board to help your political sta
You should finish this. I think BO should consider buying an ad.
814043 No.14086
c2300c No.14125
>>13902
I meant to say political stance. Have any of you written a letter to your government representative(assuming you live in a democracy), signed a petition, protested?