NYT runs story about Obama forcing every girl in a local high school to endure a man in their changing rooms because he identifies as "trans".
Massive redpilling of normies and even SJWs ensues
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/03/us/illinois-district-violated-transgender-students-rights-us-says.html?_r=0
#3 readers picks, 2 of them NYT picks (that's right, the libcuck NYT staff agrees with the readers that transgenderism is bullshit):
>Every time I read a story like this I think about how dysfunctional the federal government has become. So many important regulations are never enforced, but they will beat up a local school district that made a reasonable effort to deal with a difficult situation.
>593 upboats, nyt staff pick, poster is located in "silicon valley" (SJW central)
>The transgender kid is not female. He was born with XY DNA and will remain so till he takes his last breath. He will never have female XX chromosomes, not matter what he does with his genitals. Too bad a strong coalition of parents of girls couldn't convince the courts of the basic rights of their daughters. If I was one of those parents, my young daughter would not be showering with a male, she'd be in a private school faster than it takes a an ACLU lawyer time to primp for the cameras.
>536 upboats, nyt staff pick
>I wouldn't want my teenage daughter sharing a dressing room with a biologic male. Does she have any rights or are rights only conferred to those who do not conform to general societal norms? The school district seemed to make a reasonable accommodation but apparently that is not good enough for the civil rights police.
>410 upboats, reader pick
>Have we really come to this? We have to debate whether a human being with a penis should be permitted to be naked in a girls locker room? Every human deserves protection under the law, and transgender persons require and deserve every protection and decency afforded others, but this ruling is a weak capitulation to political correctness.
>387 upboats, Portland Me (another SJW hotbed)