/politics/ - News & Politics

Because they're really just SJWs who have tgeir own set of triggers.

Of what places are you talking? I ignore Undertale threads, the communism thread and all of /operate/.

>>5499

>people demanding discussion of certain subjects not be allowed

which subjects are those?

>>5542

if you mean non-political subjects:

this is a ###politics### board; only politics belongs here

>>5542

>which subjects are those?

I'm speaking in general.

On /v/ you'll see people that don't want certain games being discussed, instead of starting that argument they could just hide the thread.

>>5547

No, I mean which subjects have people demanded that about?

>>5554 cont

And screenshot or link the posts

I haven't seen anyone do that

>>5543

>rulecuck

Nope, politics and news. Politics is also a very general term that cover many subjects. Also a bit of off-topic threads in every board is healthy.

>>5556

>Some people are just born SJWs. Particularly the redditors stormfags who infest 8/pol/ since December last year.

Fixed

>>5557

Its usually a vocal minority that have nothing better to do than hating on a topic for no reason. Usually, shit threads and topics no one gives a shit about fizzle out by themselves. Most restrictions are either due to the general topic or purely cultural decisions. Latter is especially true for /a/.

>>5562

My god, will you get off that boogeyman. /pol/ isn't swarming with stormfags your favorite buzzword.

>>5556

I believe it to be a lack of people actually using the catalog. For awhile I didn't really get why people kept posting chaika on the front page until I realized they weren't using the catalog and were instead just scrolling down threads.

>>5611

Yes it is.

Cultural authoritarians, be they left or right wing, insist on making safe spaces for themselves at the expense of other people. The worst kind of people.

>>5621

>say nigger with black friends all the time

>none of them ever give me shit

Might help that I'm a paki, but still, white people seem more offended by it's usage than black people. What gives?

>>5927

>Might help that I'm a paki

yup, niggers don't mind when other niggers use it

Okay, I think I have an idea. It seems that many in the whole GamerGate thing went to /pol/ when they were not normal /pol/ posters. I was posting on /pol/ way back during the "glory days" of 4chan. It was always filled with "stormfags" and people making racist jokes.

/pol/ has always been a far-right broad. Always. If you don't like the threads there, not post. It was GamerGate that got triggered by /pol/ because most of them were posting on /v/, and when the moderation got really heavy handed, they went to /pol/.

Simple as that.

>>5950

>It was always filled with "stormfags" and people making racist jokes.

Sure. But I remember /pol/ actually debunking libetards when they made stupid arguments, and not just throwing the same two dozen prepared infographics and copypastas (with multiple easy to point out errors) at them, or just ignoring his arguments altogether and just calling him a JIDF shill / beaner / ahmed.

The answer should never be to delete threads you don't like but to instead post more threads you do like. One doesn't require effort beyond bitching and the other requires significantly more effort, so of course you see one argument more than the other.

>>5499

>Why are people so reluctant to hide threads on subjects they don't like?

Because humans want to keep their environments up to certain standards. If people wanted /b/ they would browse /b/.

As a result they may occasionally act to have something stamped out and in a way that hurts you in the feelings.

>>5499

Because people are lazy and they don't want to argue their position, so it's easier for them to just demand censorship.

>>5956

>I remember /pol/ actually debunking libetards when they made stupid arguments,

When the same stupid argument has to be refuted for the 10,000th time people tend to have become a bit weary and not really feeling like tediously typing out a long counter argument only for it to be ignored by the one they try to argue with. Hence the pasta and caps.

>>6269

"appeal to authority"

You produce cited infographics if you don't like debunking bad arguments, and if people find legitimate flaws by which to dismantle those infographics, the burden is upon you.

>>5499

Can we just have a thread about Natalia?

>>6318

make one

>>6300

>being a traditionalist and nationalist

>liking nipponese degenerate scribbles

nice cognitive dissonance you got there

regardless I agree with what you said, and I'm on the same boat