>>587
"Free" education creates degree inflation. Every year a young man spends in school is an additional year he could have been gaining practical experience while learning/paying back into the system. Business or govt. under gommunism now requires a degree to do shit that should be learnable on the job. How else can the business measure "success" other than tests or degrees? Since most likely the teachers' union banned employers from giving "unreasonable tests" because they classify as on-the-job work, you'll now have to rely on degrees and licensing, and you can bet your ass that there's someone lobbying to make licenses more restricted and harder to get probably the older union folks who don't want to lose their cushy jobs to the fresh young worker out of college. Now you've got a mess of people with useless degrees because everyone went for either A) What they thought sounded good because they NEED education to succeed, or B) What paid the most now, but will likely be useless in two decades making them welfare whores when the system is over-saturated with workers in a steadily-shrinking/lower-paying field Petroleum Engineering, anyone? A Mechanical or Civil engineer can do 90% of their job if you replace Petroleum with "mining."
"Free" education breeds Marxism. You know who loves free education the most? Liberal arts majors. With art standards lowered as mentioned above you'll start seeing feces art and transniggers around every corner. It's only a matter of time. Your "homogeneous" nation will begin feeling guilt because of their high standards produced by trade and other means, and therefore will begin to turn to degeneracy and miscegenation.
>But the USA doesn't have free education
It doesn't have free education for the successful. The gibsmedats of society receive free education through FAFSA while those who can afford it pay for it so they have their pretty and utterly useless BA. Those inbetween get screwed the worst because they can't get FAFSA, but they get just enough aid that they think it's beneficial to go into debt for college anyways.
Ultimately, free education is a farce. People in advanced societies will become more educated at a linear rate. You can temporarily inflate it at an exponential rate, but you will eventually hit the curve and either cause a crash from "over-education" (what the west is experiencing right now), or you will stagnate and possibly fall behind your linear curve. Let people get educated at their own fucking rates, even if that involves being stuck in the trade skills stage for a few decades.
NatSocs are a little more understanding of the issues of "free" education though they're naive and think they can prevent the degeneracy it breeds, but you can spot a progressive from a mile away because they glorify education.
The progressive will never shut up about education, they will go on and on about the benefits of free education, and they will shame you at every corner for not being educated. They will consider it a badge of honor. Never mind the fact that you could easily obtain their degree in about half the time. If you go into a trade skill, they will think of you as "dumb" for not being educated. If you get your BA/BS, they will claim their knowledge is superior, or boast about their going for a useless masters or doctorate. They equate education levels with status symbols, and fail to realize that autodidacts can easily rip their arguments apart. They will assume away the uneducated via automation without considering its effects/transitory periods, and then they will become enraged when people don't want to support this new "uneducated" class they've created via welfare.
Leading into the next subject...
2) Welfare is bullshit
I don't want to repeat the above, so lets wrap this into a few short lines.
1) Welfare is a safety net
2) Safety nets undoubtedly protect bad habits
3) Bad habits are propagated among the children of these welfare recipients
4) Within two-three generations, these bad habits become the norm among the welfare "class"
5) The welfare class has lost values such as honor in favor of gibsmedat
6) You've created a generation of useful idiots who will obey the state in order to live through the state
7) If you try to take this away from them, there WILL be violence
8) They WILL vote for the candidate that promises the most gibsmedat, and they WILL try and get more welfare coverage for more bullshit
9) You can tell the welfare recipients to "not be lazy" and to try and uphold standards, but these standards will ultimately be reduced to nothing by voting and/or societal pressure.
Maybe tomorrow I'll discuss...
3) The Military is Indoctrination