[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/politics/ - News & Politics

Politics, News, Current Events

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next Beta period has started, click here for info or go directly to beta.8ch.net
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Flag *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Sister Boards [ Third position ] [ National Socialism ] [ Anarchism ] [ Anarcho-capitalism ] [ Marxism-Leninism ] [ Psychopolitics ] [ Philosophy ] [ International ] [ History ]

[ Board log ] [ ###politics### ]

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: THE CACHE IS BROKEN ATM. USE THE CATALOG TO CHECK FOR NEW THREADS


File: 1447547690501.jpg (199.43 KB, 750x300, 5:2, disc_counter_terrorism_1.jpg)

fc5d04 No.6281

Do you believe terrorism is a viable option in some circumstances, or is it never ok to use ever?

fbb7ad No.6299

File: 1447572580916.jpg (41.51 KB, 640x511, 640:511, 12243488_1044430082264532_….jpg)

It's never ok because it only makes whatever system you are trying to pressure to recoil in defense instead of giving up what you want, any kind of accomplishment from dissident groups has been made in most cases by swift and strepitous action, it would be foolish to make threats and wreck shit when you have the short end of the stick.

Besides, I firmly believe that because of the aforementioned, terrorism is almost exclusively resserved to controlled opposition shaping public opinion and behavior in ways you wouldn't normally be able to.

Let's take for example the recent french attacks, let's for the sake of argument pretend the attacks were stages by the french goverment due fear of a civil uprising in the light of the immigrant invasion, propaganda has become useless due the magnitude of the event and political appeasement probably won't cut it either, so, how would you deal with countering the tribalistic sentiments from the waking population? easy, you organize a false flag attack led by the "refugees" those with common sense loathe and those brainwashed love, both will demand goverment intervention and according punishment for different reasons (simple logic and contrived "not all muslims" bullshit respectively), but said course of action will require aditional steps, such as a curfew, massive house searches, border clossing and probably even martial law, alongside other meassures that under normal circumstances the people wouldn't stand, but in this instance they will gladly cooperate, because they believe it's for their own safety and to catch the perpetrators of the massacres, and some even that it's the perfect excuse for a retaliation against the brown hordes , when in reality the criminals "do not exist" and everything was a simple ploy to keep the population in check in case they get fed up with their miscegenation program.


664f45 No.6305

>>6281

Fear is the tool for one with hedonistic desires, not one with objective agenda.


ea6468 No.6312

>>6281

Terrorism is technically a legit system of asymetrical warfare. If you're fighting an enemie that would annihilate you in open combat, terrorism and gorilla warfare are the only chances you have, systematically making his war efforts unsustainable. The problem with modern terrorism is not just that it has been hijacked by external interests, but that also that the very system it tries to pressure has accustomed to it. A terrorist attack does not alienate the goverments action from the generall population, due to it's propaganda effort it amalgamates the generall publics perceived interests with those of the goverment resulting in an even greater war effort.


b413b1 No.6496

>>6281

It only works because of the pussiefied retards in the west who give into them.

In any society with balls you'll just get your group purged.


9f59df No.6514

It just makes you look like a crazy edgemaster in the eyes of the general public.

The goal of terrorism isn't to advertise your brand, it's to scare the government, or what have you, into obeying your demands.

Why have so many people forgotten the last point? Breivik shoots up 92 people, what does he want? p-pls make a white only norway bros. Paris gets 7 terrorist attacks in a day by radical muslims, demands? Nah, just killing people, but if you could institute shariah law that would be greaaat.

I would hardly call this "terrorism" at this point, you're not terrorising people to get something (say, a hostage released), you're just being an edgelord for the sake of being an edgelord and giving ammo so that people can talk about muh extremism.


d90958 No.6516

>>6514

The only case where these kind of terror attacks "worked" I can think of are the Madrid bombings and half of that comes down to Aznar fellating Bush all the time and trying to blame the bombing on ETA.


1386b7 No.6517

Terrorism is just government soft-language for violent political dissidence.


93c419 No.6518

>>6281

It's called guerilla when you support the cause, and terrorism when you don't.


132e46 No.6527

File: 1448173480557-0.jpg (50.64 KB, 600x600, 1:1, quote-great-generation.jpg)

File: 1448173480557-1.jpg (67.8 KB, 850x400, 17:8, quote-communists-have-alwa….jpg)

It worked for Mandela.


132e46 No.6528

>>6312

The bigger problem is itself always soft targets. It's one thing to blow up a recruitment station or a hotel that's being used by a provisional government as a base, it's another to blow up a discotheque using a bomb strapped to a teenage girl. That kind of terrorism doesn't work because it just pisses people off. Leading to then wanting to fight you harder. So it is a pretty shitty tactic.


a2431b No.6547

The word itself is very subjective and sensitive to context. Though non-violent solutions are generally preferable.

>>6527

While it's hard to say that Mandela was all good, I think he was moreso a product of the system he was born in. An ideology that preaches freedom and equality will be pretty appealing to someone who's lived under an apartheid police state all their lives and doesn't really know much about politics, economics, and the world in general.

And I think SA would be a lot better if Apartheid was removed, but done in a very careful and slow manner, like Rhodesia almost did if not for fuckery by foreign powers and commies.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]