/politics/ - News & Politics

/pol/ is a propaganda hub now. No more to /pol/acks have honor or integrity and no longer to they even try to uphold any form of freedom.

They are the SJW hub of the alt-right.

If I were you I'd abandon ship now and start thinking of ways of distancing yourself from the general /pol/ demographic. Because they will become the SJW version of the alt-right and more than likely will fall just like GG.

They played the game. Something they were told not to do many times.

>>6331

How do you think this will make them 'fall'?

>>6368

It would be useless explaining it if you don't already understand, but suffice it to say the gamergate fell in the same manner.

>>6374

Let me venture a guess: It'a about failing to see the bigger picture and getting locked into certain patterns that will make vulnerable to either neutralization by your enemies or use by external parties for their agendas.

>>6368

Just look at their numbers. They've been loseing numbers since mid of this year. Roughly 1000 anons alone in the past 6 months iirc left already.

Right now, thanks to the France stuff they're higher again, but not for long.

They've alienated their normal userbase by creating an envoirment that doesn't allow dissenting opinions, just like SJW do.

If they continue that way, and everything points that way, they will narrow their focus on what they already determined for them to be true, and lose sight of everything else.

Should now just a group large enoug try to intervene with a different opinion, all hell will break lose and it'll end like gg, with different factions, everyone claiming to have the truth about the matter, and essentailly unable to da anything at all by their own, but still to stuborn to work together. Hell, every fucking thread where someone, just one fucking anon says something that the majority doesn't like, you can throw away since it'll evolve into a shitfest.

>>6331

>they will become the SJW version of the alt-right

That is not necessarily a bad thing. It can serve as some kind of opposition to the SJWs, highlighting their biggest flaws while at the same time keeping them busy. Also I do think that a lot of SJWs and /pol/lacks, along with even more normies, really need their hugboxes.

Also it keeps /pol/ from becoming anonamouse tier faggotry, just like GG.

What I find real shitty is the way this happened. The first BO of /pol/ seemed like he knew what he was doing. How the fuck did imkampy become moderator?

>>6420

>That is not necessarily a bad thing

Yes it is. It is most certainly a bad thing.

>It can serve as some kind of opposition to the SJWs, highlighting their biggest flaws while at the same time keeping them busy.

While also completely destroying any semblance of professionalism and honesty /pol/ ever had. Making them a joke. Perhaps a bigger joke than SJWs ever were before /pol/.

>Also I do think that a lot of SJWs and /pol/lacks, along with even more normies, really need their hugboxes.

>Some people require things which are terrible, so they should get them

Yeah I guess so but we should discourage this kind of behavior. They want a hugbox so bad go to >>>gg

>Also it keeps /pol/ from becoming anonamouse tier faggotry

Yeah, I guess. I just turns /pol/ into a alt-right facebook.

Anonymous Imageboards have anonymous in them for a reason anon.

>>6420

>How the fuck did imkampy become moderator?

Think for a second. Do people that aren't pieces of shit even have the autism to apply for hotpocket positions?

>>>/polmeta/9894

>>>/polmeta/9895

Flag unrelated: it doesn't let me select none for some reason

>>6485

/pol/ is now Nazi central. If you are not 100% onboard with the Hitler cult you are a kike shill and fair game for all kinds of dirty tricks. If you BTFO the Nazis, they start to talk about banning you. Trump used to be a point of consensus, now he's kosher controlled opposition. Hating Muslims was also the norm, now it's full of Muslim shills.

>>6331

>/pol/ is a propaganda hub now. No more to /pol/acks have honor or integrity and no longer to they even try to uphold any form of freedom.

>They are the SJW hub of the alt-right.

I tell you the problem with /pol/.

It stopped being a board where you could discuss politics, from any perspective, and entertain ideas you didn't necessarily believe in, and turned into a a political activism board, in which anything that deviated from the cause or smelled like enemy was deemed shilling or a slide thread.

Now, /pol/ has always had these people. The problem is that now they are the mods as well.

>>6331

>/pol/ is a propaganda hub now. No more to /pol/acks have honor or integrity and no longer to they even try to uphold any form of freedom.

>They are the SJW hub of the alt-right.

I tell you the problem with /pol/.

It stopped being a board where you could discuss politics, from any perspective, and entertain ideas you didn't necessarily believe in, and turned into a a political activism board, in which anything that deviated from the cause or smelled like enemy was deemed shilling or a slide thread.

Now, /pol/ has always had these people. The problem is that now they are the mods as well.

>>8678

>>8680

Poopywheels! Fix your site that Josh broke!

>>8676

>Hating Muslims was the norm

The fuck you mean? We were ALL onboard the Assad train up until the Paris attacks.

>>8684

Assad doesn't really count as a Muslim. I mean the Palestinians.

>>8688

And Muslims and Islam in general. Now you see threads saying things like "hey, Islam is great, Islam is not the problem, the only problem with Muslim immigration is that they are not white".

>>8689

Also threads insisting that ALL homosexuals MUST be killed, filled with unironic Islamist propaganda depicting the execution of homosexuals.

>>8688

>Assad doesn't count

He's an Alawite who are subsect of Shias.

>Palestinians

Palis are fine though. You don't hear about Hamas supporters raping people. Besides aren't they whitish?

>>8689

Thing about Islam is it goes in so many different directions you can interpret it almost literally any way you want. That's why both ISIS and Alevis (Think Turkish hippies) exist.

>>8690

That's trolls or JIDF methinks.

>>8691

> He's an Alawite who are subsect of Shias.

Yes but we support him as a secular leader against ISIS.

> Palis are fine though. You don't hear about Hamas supporters raping people.

Palis are sick in the head. Rape is not even the issue, all Shariah countries are pro-rape to some extent. Palis hate America, they cheereed on 9/11. They also celebrate every Hamas attack, even when they behead children.

> Besides aren't they whitish?

Ashkenazi Jews are far whiter and their culture is far more Western. I'm not saying we should support them, but I sure as fuck won't side with sandniggers and their fanatic death cult.

> Thing about Islam is it goes in so many different directions you can interpret it almost literally any way you want. That's why both ISIS and Alevis (Think Turkish hippies) exist.

Fine, but violent anti-Western currents dominate. Muhammad was a conqueror, not a hippie.

> That's trolls or JIDF methinks.

I don't know, but then the JIDF took over the board.

>>8694

>they cheereed on 9/11

They feel about US the same way Syrians feel about Saudi Arabia or Turkey, or even worse.

>They also celebrate every Hamas attack

What's wrong with Hamas attacks? If someone occupies my land and keeps expanding, nothing would be off limits (except minors). I'd go ISIS on his ass.

>>8700

So you think it's moral for Israel to keep expanding but immoral for Palestinians to fight back? Remember, what we are discussing here is your original comment: Palestinians celebrate Hamas attacks. Therefore they are bad.

The other points you mentioned are interesting, I'll come back later to comment on them.

>>8700

So what if muslims conquered territory? Romans did it, Alexander did it, everyone did it.

>Jews only have a tiny state which is rightfully theirs because it's their homeland and because they already won two wars against the Arabs, fair and square

>fair and square

I'd hardly call being backed by the US 'fair and square'

>their homeland

how? how is it their homeland?

>>8915

>I'd hardly call being backed by the US 'fair and square

Arabs were backed by Russians

>how? how is it their homeland?

Its where jews are from originally

>>8917

>backed by russians

>russians and soviets are the same

wew lad read a history book will ya.

>Its where jews are from originally

Yes. ignore the Arabs who have lived there for 1000 years.

>>8888

Nice Hitler quads.

> So you think it's moral for Israel to keep expanding but immoral for Palestinians to fight back?

I'm against the cultural Marxist moral doctrine around "asymmetric warfare" , according to which the weak is always right and the strong is always wrong, or at least, the weaker you are, the easier for you to get a moral pass on your atrocities. I despise those who attack and then play the innocent victim. If you live in a glasshouse, don't throw rocks. If Israel behaved as viciously towards Palestinians as Hamas does towards Israelis, Palestinians would be exterminated or at least expelled in no time. There's also proof that Hamas hides behind civilians and then blames Israel when Pali children die, but they don't actually give a fuck about dead Pali children (not to speak of dead Israeli children, which they celebrate). They teach their children to hate, to kill and to die for Islam.

> Palestinians celebrate Hamas attacks

You leave out the part when I said "even when they behead children". FFS, they parade their own babies with explosive belts around them. I call THAT being sick in the head. Besides, regardless of their morality or lack thereof, they are ENEMIES of Christians, they hate our guts, they cheer when WE are killed by terrorists, they are NOT our friends. That's a damn good reason not to side with them.

>>8915

>So what if muslims conquered territory?

So what if Jews conquered territory? Why the Pali butthurt? Why care? My point is not that Muslims were evil for conquering territory, my points are:

1) Muslims already have a fuckton of land, while Jews only have a tiny fraction of their ancestral homeland. Which they fought for and won. Twice.

2) Muslims are obnoxious bastards who think every piece of land they ever conquered belongs to them forever. They keep demanding Al-Andalus. Morocco complains about the tiny Spanish provinces of Ceuta and Melilla, which existed and were Spanish and Christian before Morocco and Islam even existed. I'm from Spain, so FUCK THEM, I HATE MUSLIMS, OK?

>>8941

>ancestral homeland

fallacious since although their claim is religious they are not a theocracy.

>you hate muslims

So you support jews instead?

>>8972

> fallacious since although their claim is religious they are not a theocracy.

Their claim is not just religious. There's plenty of archaeological and genetic evidence.

> So you support jews instead?

No, I just don't criticize Israel because I find it counter-productive for a pro-white movement. It makes more sense to say Israel does the right thing and whites want just the same. By the way, I don't have a problem with Muslims doing their Muslim thing in their Muslim countries.

This whole place is falling into their damn hands. Fuck the alt-right. They pervert our proud ideology into some post-modern abomination of anti-patriotic leanings.

>>8676

Replace Nazi and Hitler with Trump and I'd agree with you.

And yes, /pol/ sides with the muzzies in the case of Assad/Syria but all other muslims still need to die (just like the Jews want).

>>8678

There isn't even any activism. All they talk about is voting for Trump and how you're a Jewish shill if you disagree with Trump.

Activism threads (NWF for example) are shitposted to oblivion then bumplocked for no reason.

>>9040

I've seen people on /pol/ say that supporting Israel is acceptable because its one of Trump's platforms. When one starts to say the Jews are okay just to support a candidate, they've fucked up.

>>9096

Y'know, I support Israel and Palestine both. Why are the only "options" to either support Israel or to support Hamas?

>>9096

>Replace Nazi and Hitler with Trump and I'd agree with you.

That was arguably the case until very recently, but it's been changing for a few weeks now to the Muslim/Nazi alliance, and the mods are all for it. I've seen anti-Trump threads, pro-Pali threads, Shariah appreciation..

>>8921

>>8922

I don't really understand neo /pol/.

In the old days this would have seen a mass exodus and huge shitstorm but now they just take it like cucks. Sad.

>>9141

>Y'know, I support Israel and Palestine both. Why are the only "options" to either support Israel or to support Hamas?

I simply choose not to support either. Though I think Israel is definitely the aggressor.

But yes, I agree, they claim you can only support one or the other and that's b.s..

>>9145

>That was arguably the case until very recently, but it's been changing for a few weeks now to the Muslim/Nazi alliance, and the mods are all for it. I've seen anti-Trump threads, pro-Pali threads, Shariah appreciation..

I must be missing them.

Though I admit I am spending much less time there since I've learned the truth about the moderation.