/politics/ - News & Politics

About 5-6 million kikes (and millions of gentiles, but only the deaths of the Chosen truly matter, goy) were killed by the German government, using various means such as shootings, poison gas, and starvation. There were different kinds of camps with different purposes, including labor camps and extermination camps.

>>6334

They'd be a lot more credible if they just claimed that a lot of the victims were asking for it.

over-discussed.

The 'Holocaust' was the burning of Germany.

The extermination of all concentration camp inmates was a inevitable function of NS German civil service. Especially when the entire system was confronted with the total collapse of its supply chains and a typhus pandemic that followed it. The testimonials concerning the Holocaust reach from factual, over gross exaggeration and rumors to corny outright bullshit legends and often contradict each other. Raul Hilleburg, the historian behind The extermination of the European Jews was one of the first people to complain about the unreliability of the sources. Over the years, many war propaganda fables like gas showers simply faded and the numbers got corrected down. What really grinds my gears is the omission of the actual purpose of the vast majority of NS concentration camps: Jailing enemies of the regime and convicted felons alike in cheaply made jail town to be forgotten by society at large. Another aspect is, that all concentration camp systems are hilariously fragile. For example: if the US would have been faced with the same situation Nazi Germany had to, it would have committed a holocaust on the Japanese it had imprisoned into concentration camps during WW2, simply because first the supply would have collapsed and second bureaucracy would have managed the situation by minimizing the numbers of inmates or simply not giving a shit.

tl;dr

People died in the NS concentration camps. The number doesn't matter so much. Stop trusting exact numbers in history!

>>6359

Even though it was completely unethical, it's way less of a stretch to say that the Holocaust victims deserved it rather than distorting the evidence to say it never happened. The Jews were overrepresented among Bolshevik leadership, and the German population was justifiably afraid of another revolution like the one that was put down in Bavaria.

I'm not sure, if I were at war with the whole world, the least I would think of doing is spending so many resources on making an enormous extermination network right in the middle of it, involving 12 milion people. Peacetime? Sure, but again, here you're fighting the whole world, I'd recommend expulsion of the jews somewhere to madagascar or israel, and extermination at least when you won the war.

I guess hitler was just crazy like that? This feels more retarded than anything.

Regardless, what's more pressing is not that the holocaust didn't happen, or had less than the official 6 milion killed, but the whole industry it creates.

Every year has an official holocaust movie that gives the author a few multikulti points, other than raking large sums of cash, the holocaust industry gives jews enormous leverage, develops a victim complex etc.

I can talk about how the water is blue for as long as possible, but the deal is: the shoah is not the most killing humanity could do, many other leaders did even worse stuff, yet we don't have 5th generation genghis khan survivors talking about how terrible it was (and it certainly was!), schools don't do visits to katyn, you won't see steven spielberg direct a movie on the circassian genocide.

The holocaust is singled out because of its convenience to the narrative, you like white people thus you like hitler, hitler did the holocaust, so you want to put all non-whites in ovens.

>>6332

>So what happened?

War. Supply lines were bombed. People died.

>Was there a holocaust?

Depends on what you define it as.

>Were they extermination camps or simply interment centers?

Labour camps. No different from the ones in america or canada.

>Were jews killed in gas chambers by the thousands?

No. Can you give me a plausible answer why the germans would take the effort to design this completely inefficient killing system. Bullets are cheap. Soviet gulag labour till you drop is cheap. When you're fighting a war and you really need supplies the last thing you'll do is murder potential free labour unless there is a risk of uprising.

>How many really died?

in what? World war 2? Over 50 million.

Jews were rounded up and put into internment camps because most of them were communists or communst sympathizers.

Hitler gave them the chance to return to Israel in the 30s. Most of them didn't want to go.

By the end of the war, 271,000 of them had died in camps. Most of the deaths occurred in the last year of the war because the camps could no longer be run properly.

There were no gas chambers. That's a bunch of crap. If the Germans wanted to exterminate a people, they would have used bullets.

Here, watch this.