No.6724
Is this the true /pol/? It looks like the 4chan /pol/ before it got infested with sjw's and reddit shills.
No.6727
>>6724
Yes, this is the real /pol/. Its a bit slow right now because of site issues, but one the infinity migration happens, this place will spring back to life and become usable again.
No.6729
>>6727
Fucking kikewheels needs to fix his shit
No.6730
>>6724
Or maybe 8pol after the first exodus and before the second. There was a Golden Age before the dark times, before imkampfy.
No.6780
Yeah, for now. If it gets popular cripplekike will install his own mods and destroy it, though.
No.6800
>>6730
>before imkampfy
You mean before CrippleKike removed the original board owner and lifted all bans
No.6811
>>6800
Okay, but you are not implying imkampfy isn't an abysmal mod I hope.
No.6813
>>6811
Of course not. There are way worse mods than imkampfy out there, even on this chan...
No.6819
>>6811
I don't see how you could get that out my comment. That guy was wrong about the the length of when /pol/ was pretty fucking great, and I corrected him. Things had been cancer for much longer than imkikefy. Imkikefy has only been in the spotlight since Trypt and his animu-lolbergs resigned (or so they claim).
No.6821
Interest Free Banking: Russia Debates Unorthodox Orthodox Financial Alternative
>A significant debate is underway in Russia since imposition of western financial sanctions on Russian banks and corporations in 2014.
>It’s about a proposal presented by the Moscow Patriarchate of the Orthodox Church. The proposal, which resembles Islamic interest-free banking models in many respects, was first unveiled in December 2014 at the depth of the Ruble crisis and oil price free-fall.
Anti-Christian shill status: cucked like their father in Evangelions.
>This August the idea received a huge boost from the endorsement of the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. It could change history for the better depending on what is done and where it further leads.
>>6724
>http://www.globalresearch.ca/interest-free-banking-russia-debates-unorthodox-orthodox-financial-alternative/5495331
>https://archive.is/SNuBE
Now, if China actually does endorse Christianity within the next century, the picture will definitely be true.
No.6822
>>6821
From my perspective they might. You gotta remember China, historically has been a mercantile cronyist society for centuries on end. Their little experiment with Communism is coming to end I suspect before this century goes out.
If anything they would most likely recognize Orthodox Christianity, as it would make them more compatible with their neighbors, and it would be a more controlled religious alternative to say the Falun Gong being given any power.
No.6826
>>6821
Orthodox China, Catholic Japan, and Protestant Korea
Things could get interesting in Asia
No.6840
>>6730
They can still do some funny shit sometimes, but it's in a horrible place right now. I can't see it getting better. The Gex video really hurt the place.
>>6811
Him and therealmoonman are both the toppest of kikes
No.6854
No.6856
>>6826
Add Nestorian Mongolia to that!
No.6865
>>6840
>The Gex video really hurt the place
And why is that? It's one of the few times /pol/ got shit done and redpilled a bunch of people.
No.6866
>>6840
The Presidential nomination race hurt the place more than the Gex video. It's very "you're with Trump or against us" and that has carried into other topics. You can't argue with nuance any longer, if I even point out some weakness of Trump what seems like 100 IDs will jump in an call me a shill or "chaim". While I actually support him somewhat, but don't have much faith in the democratic process, and just wish people would talk frankly about him if they're going to take over the board for over a year and dedicate it to a candidate.
Also fuck kampfy for pinning his own threads, I've seen him pin threads with zero replies several times, enough that it has identified his style to me and I can pick out his other threads. He's the single worst offender on the board for calling non-shills shills just for disagreeing. While letting obvious shitposting shills continue without action.
I'm just checking out this board for the first time (at least in a long time). Other than having flags is looks good, and I'm not even sure flags is bad but I'm not sure I see the point
No.6867
Also if you want more users you could try to court brit/pol/ (in a constructive and positive way). They've been getting negative attention on /pol/ for awhile now because the 300 post error limit has led to them making more threads, which I guess is interpreted as "sliding".
Then again with the lower rate of new thread creation here it might actually fill up the catalog. Anyways, you may try to court them after the switch to next if you want. They have interests outside of brit/pol/ and would probably contribute to other threads. It's a specific sub-community that I've seen consider migration in the recent past
No.6872
>>6867
Brit/pol/ really doesn't get along with the mod-sponsored /pol/ autism brigade. Plus, we have their flag already.
No.6876
>>6724
>>6727
What exactly do you mean by 'the true/real /pol/'?
No.6879
>>6876
I assume he means /pol/ if it didn't suck and have the shittiest mods in existence.
No.7207
I hope I can express an opinion without getting called a "kike" or a "pig" now.
No.7208
>>6724
It is. Until it gets too popular. Then the trolls and shills from every ideology show up and ruin it.
No.7210
>>7207
I think the point of /politics/ is not becoming a safe space for anyone.
No.7212
>>7207
That's going to happen anywhere you go. If you ignore those arguments, then who cares?
No.7223
>>7210
The point I think anon is trying to make is that on /pol/ or it's lefty counterpart just shout a buzzword at you and a circlejerk occurs, causing a stifling of ideas.
No.7224
I was banned from /pol/ for being fed up with how 90% of threads are about race and thus making a thread proclaiming that a great man does not obsess over something like that.
I then discovered that there was a /his/ board on 4chan. There was a thread about how NatSocs exterminated Jews. I of course said they didn't, and was banned.
Those are two places I'll never go to again. I'm hoping this place is more balanced. Haven't been banned yet at least!
No.7226
>>7223
That won't be a problem if the mods remain neutral. /pol/ and /leftypol/ try to please the users by autosaging/deleting threads that upset them. Also shouting shill/troll makes sense in a hugbox where group thinks. Half of the flags here are considered shills for /leftypol/ and /pol/.
No.7227
>>7226
>in a hugbox where group thinks
*where groupthink exists
No.7229
>>7226
>Also shouting shill/troll makes sense in a hugbox where group thinks.
*only makes sense in a hugbox (where groupthink exists)
No.7265
>>7212
Kike.
>>7226
I think the mods need a few non-political rules that they follow and not touch anything else.
No.7278
>>7265
>I think the mods need a few non-political rules that they follow and not touch anything else.
There are no political rules. Extremely off-topic threads get saged or at worst, deleted, that's it.
No.7280
Amount of disappointment I have with 8/pol/ is extreme.
kampfy and realmoonkike are two jews fucking with the users and the people on /pol/ don't seem to care.
one look at the ban list and they should have all switched to another board or forced those kike mods out by burning down the board.
No.7284
>>7280
>kampfy and realmoonkike are two jews fucking with the users and the people on /pol/ don't seem to care.
anti-jewish threads take many requests to get stickied, and they don't last long, maybe a day or something, but anything else can get stickied for days after a couple of hours of posting.
I prefer /politics/ style, no stickies at all, except for ongoing event, like a debate or something.
No.7348
>>6876
He probably means " a /pol/ where we can discuss politics with memes and people that disagree with us, instead of discussing memes with politics with people that all agree with our hugbox"
Dividing /pol/ and /leftypol/ was retarded, with no oposition or divergent opinions, there's no discussion on either boards, not in the level you'd expect anway.
Having one board for discussing politics makes much more sense. You don't rule a single country with 2 or more governments at the same time anyway.
Let's just hope everyone remenbers how shit /pol/ and /leftypol/ can be so we avoid doing the same here. I just hope admins do ban low-effort bait or memetastic threads since those are never about good discussion, just memespouting and they atract the worst userbase possible.
Hopefully, if everyone actually literate moves over, we can forget about /pol/ like everyone forgot about /int/.
No.7350
>>7348
>Having one board for discussing politics makes much more sense.
I agree. I learned things here that I would have never learned in /leftypol/ or /pol/.
No.7359
>>7350
>>6724
>>6840
>>6866
>>6865
gex's with open gates was a great success
we need more like it on other issues too
No.7372
>>7348
The problem is the moderation on /pol/, how they decided that /pol/ is an ideology and not a board for discussion.
You wouldn't really have a utopia of discussion if both were combined either, used to be on 4/pol/ when the Leftists got mad they just shitpost the board with interacial porn and "red pill me on car batteries" threads.
No.7377
>>7372
>You wouldn't really have a utopia of discussion if both were combined either, used to be on 4/pol/ when the Leftists got mad they just shitpost the board with interacial porn and "red pill me on car batteries" threads.
I think /politics/ can work out. The difference here is that each group has its own safe space (/leftypol/ and /pol/), so the people who come here are open for discussion with different people. There's no need to sperg out.
No.7499
>>7224
>I was banned from /pol/ for being fed up with how 90% of threads are about race and thus making a thread proclaiming that a great man does not obsess over something like that.
Yeah, /pol/ is really bad about race recently. Used to be one or two threads, and you could actually discuss something there. Now it's edgy young faggots whining about being born with brown/green eyes instead of blue and how it's made them doomed for life.
Yeah, I don't think being born with green eyes is the reason you're a NEET virgin loser, pal...
>I of course said they didn't, and was banned.
Being a "muh holocaust" revisionist is a pain when you don't wanna hang around with the circlejerk /pol/ crowd...'cause you've basically got nowhere else to go.
No.7539
>>6730
the dark times on 8/pol/ didnt start with the 2nd exodus. They started 2 months later in Dec 2014 - Jan 2015 when there was an admin upheaval and doorways left. Since then its been run by kikes as a controlled opposition magnet.
No.7540
>>6724
its a rerun of /pol/. I talked to the admin and they've set it up just like 8/pol/ and 4/pol/ before that. So if it ever gets the traffic and the shills, it will fail just like the others /pol/s did. The only shield protecting this place is lack of traffic.
No.7603
>>7207
oink vey?
>>7359
it was very fishy
Gex himself may stand for /pol/ in the sense that he uses it, but /pol/ should not blindly follow him
No.7604
>>7603
what's fishy about it?
No.7611
this board already got inveded whit morons that talk out of their ass and project their frustration on nations or entic groups?
No.7667
yes it is OP,
I just found this place and I am very excited about it
GODSPEED /politics/