/politics/ - News & Politics

fuckbots -> less demand on women -> women market value drops -> women try to adapt by being less bitchy, annoying and more reasonable, ..etc

Sounds good to me.

>>674

There is a women market?

>>673

Have you read the studies on pornography users? They've become sub-human addicts because their caveman brain hasn't evolved to handle 24/7 hyper-stimulation.

Have you read/tried yourself not using porn and seen how you become more positively social?

Anyway, Sexbots will make some people stay home fucking, only coming out to earn money and get food. They will never be happy, merely pushing the pain away via another round of botsex, like how an alcoholic drinks away the misery of their addiction.

The true connection with their fellow humans is what they need but it will never be provided as they sink deeper into their sexbot and into depression.

Because these bots are so human like, the users develop subconscience tendencies to project sexual slavery and objectification onto normal humans, and become misogynists.

2 cents

>>675

There's a market for everything anon

>>688

>They will never be happy, merely pushing the pain away via another round of botsex, like how an alcoholic drinks away the misery of their addiction.

Life is shit anyways. Who the hell cares.

>>688

>Because these bots are so human like, the users develop subconscience tendencies to project sexual slavery and objectification onto normal humans, and become misogynists.

Are you a feminist by any chance?

>>701

terrible argument anon

>>709

It wasn't an argument, it was a question.

>>688

>Doesn't post any studies

Here, have one.

http://www.vocativ.com/news/205435/study-suggests-porn-addiction-isnt-real

>>952

>inb4 "study paid by the porn industry and covered by men, the primary audience of porn!"

>>1067

What about the less advanced option I was talking about?

>>2615

>There's absolutely nothing wrong with robots. There's only one reason to fear them. And it's the fact that they may force you not to be a horrible person for once in your life.

That would explain why Feminists, jews, and various militant religious types are all against them.

>I would like to bring one to the table, sex dolls and the possibility of advanced sex dolls, robots are still too far but what would be the next logical step? probably sex dolls with voice and a number of sensors and programming to react as the user wants.

Perhaps unrelated - it doesn't have to be attached to the robot, but artificial wombs.

I think it could solve a lot of social issues, especially on abortion when the father wants the child to be born, and the mother doesn't. The simple solution with the technology is to just transfer the fetus.

I think it can also help with the biological constraints women face, like the risks of a child being born with downs syndrome or some other defect increasing after the age of ~33 (that and balancing furthering their own career).

If that topic ever gets brought up to a public discussion, I can't help but imagine feminists also wanting that banned despite the benefits to womankind.

>>2883

Something like "we are being objectified! we are not just baby factories!!"

>>2883

Artificial wombs and sex robots terrify them because it replaces women in the same way that they talk about artificial sperm production replacing men.

This is the future they chose, but not the one they wanted.

>>4002

Its all coming to pass

>>673

>Because a lot has changed in all these years, countries ban porn, erotic cartoons, concepts of rape, cp and the like being stretched, etc.

Feminism is a short and putrid breath from the mouth of the jewish beast. It is already destroying itself with women who continue having 1 or more kids showing complete dislike of everything feminism offers. The few who are intellignt and have intelligent husbands (above 90IQ) can also see feminism was never the driver of change for any of the women's rights that women in the west enjoy.

>>688

Everyone who drinks becomes an alcoholic amiright.