/politics/ - News & Politics

>>7155

The United States developed this way.

"Before turning to fascism, Mosley had visited America where he witnessed a higher standard of living linked to a highly developed technology. The secret he found rested on the existence of a large home market protected from the competition of low-waged imports because America was large enough geographically to become self-sufficient in food production and raw materials. Restricted immigration also maintained a shortage of labour that gave the unions more clout to push wages up to a higher standard of living for the workers, thus giving them the purchasing power to buy the goods they produced. The elimination of the need to trade with the rest of the world by being self-sufficient solved most problems.

So why not do the same with the resources of the British Empire?"

http://www.oswaldmosley.net/the-political-aims-of-british-union.php

This what I like about Fascism. A thriving economy with well paid workers consuming what they makes is better than the cosplay.

Although we wouldn't love these Uniforms. (see pic)

>>7209

Yes. We can use "fascist" economics without repressing free speech, or generally busting heads.

The main problem is people cringing when they hear the world "Nationalist" and shitting themselves in terror when they hear the word "Fascist".

Europeans, I am told, are esp. terrified of nationalism.

>not wanting a National Socialist racial worker's state