/politics/ - News & Politics

See: Germany.

>>7124

what about economy?

>>7126

I don't think it's of any consequence, but I imagine Bernie is too weak to implement anything he wants.

Hes pro-amnesty. 11 million low-skill workers able to be legally work would JUST fuck shit up

Cucked to shit, Bernie would be almost worse than Hillary, at least Hill has some balls to do what she wants, albeit the things she wants being extremly shitty and not in the best interest of the country.

>>7142

perfect!

1) Much more debt

2) Corporates and wealth flee from US

3) More authoritarian laws

4) Racial tensions increases

5) Catastrophic economic collapse

An economic happening is available, he would make it much bigger.

>>7153

*is inevitable

>>7122

With about double the deficit and debt it currently has.

He would die of being too fucking old during the second one. I don't want to imagine how more a full on zionist could fuck up even more the US.

ITT: Normie cucks speculate on how they think the pwesydint himself actually changes things.

TET

>>7182

>underage faggot who thinks the boogeyman controls everything

A far better place in general. Regardless of whether he can actually enact important change all on his own (spoilers: he can't), the stigma of "socialism" will finally have ended.

The only thing I'm sure Bernie will eventually accomplish is ending the welfare state as a result of his disastrous socialist policies.

>>7216

Whether he gets rid of the federal reserve and regulates the banks, cuts back our corrupt campaign finance system, cuts down on the private prison industry and our insane "war on drugs/freedom", or goes full welfare state and speeds up our inevitable economic collapse I think the end result of whatever he does will be an improvement over our current system. I see light at the end of the tunnel with Bernie, even if I disagree with some of his policies.

>>7122

>Bernie

>WSJ publishes article about Bernie's attempts to give college students free tuition

>the tuition program is supposedly going to be paid from a new tax on "financial transactions"

>to generate a $750bn trust fund

>such trust fund would cost every American citizen $6.43 a day in taxes

>this just breaks even, generating a small surplus

>this includes children pitching in as well

>this doesn't even touch expanding medicare or the other policies he's suggested

Oh boy! I can't wait to pay $30 of the $55 a day I earn to the US government so senior members of big government and big business to embezzle it!

>>7218

>I can't wait to pay $30 of the $55 a day

And here in Europe we're already effectively taxed ~80%.

I honestly hope he doesn't win. I hope he goes up against the worst he can and loses right at the end.

If he did win though I'd imagine it'd just be liberal reforms and liberal reforms hopefully without the recent idpol twist.

>>7407

Why would he support amnesty? That would devastate the working class.

I'm guessing either he thinks its "the right thing to do" or just wants to secure democrat votes

>>7410

can't wait until Trump destroys him in the debates

collapsed

>>7122

Two terms?

Country wouldn't last one...

>>7122

Nothing would get done

Sanders, much like I suspect Trump will be would be fairly lame duck since he'd be fighting both political parties

>>8231

>what are executive orders?

>>8231

>Sanders, much like I suspect Trump will be would be fairly lame duck since he'd be fighting both political parties

That might not be such a bad thing. Who don't hate all of those politicians?

>>8314

>>what are congressional vetos?

>>8314

fairly ineffective tbh

They're politically unpopular and can get cut by congress withholding money, moreover, they rarely last

A potential president like hillary would be a lot more dangerous in that she could get a lot of her agenda worked through congress due to her ties there

>>8465

When was the last the time republicans used them against Obama? Trump's executive orders wouldn't be as bad.

bump

>>7142

you forgot to show that after the nice houses there is more slums

>>9894

You are missing the point.

First pic: some are poor, some are rich

second: everyone is poor

You are talking about ratios.

Dead