>There is a real chance that in four months’ time Britain could be casting off from Europe’s shores.
Were a massive group of Islands with a rich maritime history. I think we would fare well even if that is what leaving the EU meant.
>As financial markets woke up to the prospect, the pound this week fell to its lowest level against the dollar since 2009
Unrelated to the referendum.
> It would imperil Britain’s security, when threats from terrorists and foreign powers are at their most severe in years
Having greater control over who comes here will further imperil us? The free movement of peoples is a major benefit to the terrorists. I don't understand the logic of the article here. If I'm missing something someone please elaborate on it.
>And far from reclaiming sovereignty, Britons would be forgoing clout, by giving up membership of a powerful club whose actions they can influence better from within than without
Again, how is regaining much control over our own laws, fishing rights, economy giving AWAY sovereignty? Further, that club's actions are mostly internal and are therefore irrelevant when we leave. It's outward actions are very much questionable and member nations have very little leeway regarding the course of those actions.
>Those outside Britain marvelling at this proposed act of self-harm should worry for themselves, too
Would that be the minority who don't want the EU to collapse? Euroscepticism is only gaining traction across the whole of Europe.
> Poorer, less secure and disunited, the new EU would be weaker
Excellent.
>At a minimum, the EU would allow full access to its single market only in return for adherence to rules that Eurosceptics are keen to jettison
They're in trouble then. Giving we're the biggest exporters to other member nations the EU being up its own arse will only create more Euroscepticism within the Union. Ask Napoleon how his continental system worked out.
>Yet the gain would be partly illusory. In a globalised world, power is necessarily pooled and traded: Britain gives up sovereignty in exchange for clout through its memberships of NATO, the IMF and countless other power-sharing, rule-setting institutions.
And we need to leave those too. However, this is an EU referendum and is ergo gobshite. If i had multiple localised tumours i would not say "no point in removing one with all these others".
>And reducing the numbers of immigrants would hurt Britain’s businesses and public services, which rely on French bankers, Bulgarian builders and Italian doctors
Fallacious. Our graduates are having a heavy time trying to get jobs because of these people. This is mainly a problem in London, i should have guessed the author would be from that pozhole. If they have that much skill and are needed they will have an easy time coming here.