/polmeta/ - /pol/ Meta Discussion

I agree with OP.

Please also do something about kikes posting "KIKE ON A STICK", "Christcucks"

Jews hate Jesus and get convulsions when they hear His name so if /pol/ would be officially pro-Christian the kike butthurt would be immense

>>10354

The mods and BO of /pol/ are the problem. They are openly pro-homo and pro-Jew. They allow faggotry and Jewry while placing excessive bans to anons that dare mock their fuckery.

I'm seriously banned from /pol/ for 4 weeks by "therealmoonman" for shitpost gay niggers to a Rach!!1uglyLEZbo D&C thread.

>>10357

There are five results on the front page of /polmeta/ for "4 weeks" and all of them are you bitching about getting banned for shitposting with shock imagery. Let it go, faggot.

My reasoning: "homosexual", "transsexual", "bisexual" are carefully selected neutral-sounding words. They have a "scientific vibe" to them

We should start naming things what they really are - immoral sexual desires and mental illness

This completely ruined my day. I wake up, post on a thread, and get banned for something so innocuous as calling to attention the misinformation provided by the OP.

>>10334

"therealmoonman" banned me for 4 weeks for shitposting gay niggers to a fucking Rach!!1uglyLEZbo shitpost thread

it's almost like the mods are the D&C shills themselves. actually it's exactly like that.

>>10333

your post is nothing but bitching without saying where the OP is wrong and/or right and not constructive in the slightest. It detracts from the overall quality of the board.

You write like a fag and complain like a woman.

>>10336

The board is fucked.

Please come to >>>/politics/ , it needs posters, and it honestly has the old /pol/ vibe.

The mods are fucking retarded. They'll let people sagebomb and spam good threads, then delete the thread instead of doing anything at all about the reported spammers.

Don't listen to >>10338 he's a faggot, /politics/ is a shit board as well.

The odd sticky is a good idea if it's fresh, but the mods need to show restraint. Not everyone uses the catalog.

I don't want the board to have low quality threads, but when the mods interfere, what they are "saying" is that they know best what is good for the board. We can decide for ourselves which threads we like.

This thread is suspiciously locked

Rarely see that

>>>/pol/5468027

>mods are doing too much

Mods aren't fucking doing anything retard. Just look at threads like https://8ch.net/pol/res/5470853.html

Sagebombers, spammers, nothing fucking happens when it's reported. Nothing. There is zero moderation to clean shit up. They are not doing anything. Fuck off /intl/.

>>10308

>most posters are your average bluepilled normies

Does this matter if it's history rather than ideology you're talking about?

>>>/pol/5229725

>it tells them that they are missing something core to the question in their response/belief

Er, how exactly?

Even if you're right why not just explicitly say it?

Posting some dumb picture just makes you look like an idiot.

>>>/pol/5229500

>Banning the emotional argument removes the element of human behavior that is essential to the understanding of politics

This is a forum for talking, there's a whole internet out there to observe.

>The masses are feminine, they are not inspired or recruited from the logical. they act from upon the emotional

Prove it. Even if they aren't rational now, wouldn't it be best to try to make them rational?

>these views must be presented to define [Did you really mean 'show'?] what is and is not rational.

Then those views should be presented not as serious opinions but with the purpose explicitly said.

>>>/pol/5231532

But rhetoric alone might 'prove' a point to some people

>>>/pol/5232059

>How about killing yourself because you have no fucking right to shitpost the same fucking garbage every single fucking day like a kike does?

How about answering the question properly like an honest person.

What precisely do you mean by shitposting'

I'm told it doesn't mean non-rational posting.

>>>/pol/5249327

>Free speech is an invitation to shilling and promoting group infighting or distracting group, with useless shit.

I agree but you're misrepresenting my argument:

I'm not arguing for total free speech, I'm arguing for freedom of rational speech only.

I am the OP of the /pol/ thread.

>thread ignored

lo logji cu toldra ma

What's wrong with logic?

therealmoonman is a degenerate D&C dyke lover

>If this is a happening then who's to say /pol/ is not next on the list?

It is already on the list. Hence the retard mods recent actions/inactions.

Assfaggots like "therealmoonman" are propping up D&C shills like Learningcode. Seriously I'm banned from /pol/ for 4 weeks for shitposting gay niggers to the faggots responsind to Learningcode in one of its Rach!!1uglyLEZbo D&C threads.

I'm going to keep bumping this thread until I get an answer.

I'm going to keep bumping this thread until I get an answer.

This faggot never gets his threads bumplocked and spreads his bullshit spam unchecked - Meanwhile i make a thread and within 5 minutes your autistic hotpocket lowlife faggot BO bumplocks it and hands out an overlength ban straight for a non-existing reason.

I can actually see why people are jumping ship in droves now.

Fuck you.

>>10065

>this faggot should have their threads bumplocked if you're not going to ban him.

yeah… the mods are in on it to be sure. i was just banned for 4 weeks for shitposting a Rach!!1uglyLEZbo thread with nigger faggot cocks every time someone bumped it

>>10065

>this faggot should have their threads bumplocked if you're not going to ban him.

yeah… the mods are in on it to be sure. i was just banned for 4 weeks for shitposting a Rach!!1uglyLEZbo thread with nigger faggot cocks every time someone bumped it