>>4505>Now that it didDid it, though? I did see an improvement in the bans (props to volunteers on that, sincerely, we see you actually actively working), but not so much in the quality of posts, anon.
>>4504Very curious about that, what's the big deal with it? Last I checked, /polpol/ specifically said multiple times that both boards could very easily coexist as they targeted different demographics.
>>4511/polpol/ack here, anon, and I think you did good, it's true that whether OP likes it or not, this was off-topic, and I agree with the removal
of kebab or other forms of shitposting.
Now a question I wonder, is if I actually make a contribution in a thread, and see it turning to shit/being slid to death, while reporting the fags, is it also acceptable to you that I point out in the end of one of my
related productive posts I happen to point out to a relevant polpol thread?
This is mostly regarding Ukraine threads which are insufferable
when they even exist on /pol/, and most of the time the OP getting really pissed real fast about that. I usually don't post about /polpol/ on /pol/, but in these times, it's okay to point towards our board?
Thanks for the answer.
>>4512That was a good ban, mods.
>>4516hahaha holy shit anon, calm down rofl. Ya I noticed also shills beginning to lurk polpol, but BO is doing really good work banning their asses, we are getting more bans/deletion than some top 25 boards, and he started recruiting volunteers as well, so it shouldn't turn to shit easily, people care about keeping it shill-free.
>>4521We understand the situation, keep working on that, Anon. But please do accept that people feel like they need an alternative, even though I think that ban was motivated, please look up for my question, thanks.