defend this

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1425516573479.png (132.33 KB, 1920x946, 960:473, banned for not having a po….png)

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 00:49:33 a5b93d No.5562

defend this

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 02:12:55 dc5522 No.5575

"No posting history" means that this was his first post on 8chan.
In other words, he's probably someone who was banned before.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 02:59:44 a5b93d No.5580

>>5575
Or he has a dynamic IP
i change my IP all the time, also hotwheels said you shouldnt ban for evading because you cant know for sure

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 04:23:13 306355 No.5584

Not just the fact that he had no posting history, btw. He had been spamming the same comment in the thread over that mgs patriots speech. Regular anons were discussing how comparable it was to real world situations, this guy showed up to just shitpost that comment constantly to try and derail. Instead of adding seperate ban notes for every IP he used, I deleted all his posts and banned the last IP used. I wouldve banned each IP individually if I hadn't forgot to set the bans before hitting delete by IP, and theres no confirmation once you hit the button.

There you go, ban defending. Go away /int/.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 05:02:58 a5b93d No.5590

>>5584
I dont use /int/, stop trying to act like everybody who questions your faggotry is just trying to stir shit.

Furthermore if he was spamming you should've banned him for spamming and not for not having any post history, this isnt fucking reddit you faggot post history shouldnt matter.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 05:20:52 306355 No.5591

>>5590
We're making an effort of ensuring our ban reasonings reflect exactly what the individual post is for, rather than expecting users to realize they have additional context behind them. So in the future, this kind of ban will just say "spamming" instead.

Sorry, I assumed you were /int/ because you were stirring up trouble over 2 week old bans that not even the banned poster complained about.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 05:49:07 5e3dd3 No.5594

File: 1425534547224.jpg (85.16 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, [Doremi].Go!.Princess.Prec….jpg)

What will you guys do when you ban every new poster for not having a history and posting a "bluepilled" opinion? You won't have anyone to "redpill."

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 05:51:34 a5b93d No.5595

>>5594
This, we want more people to migrate to 8chan

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:16:05 306355 No.5598

>>5594
That's not going to happen. Point out a case where it does, aside from the one the other day I had publicly apologized for (and learned from).

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:23:48 a5b93d No.5599

File: 1425536628469.png (61.29 KB, 912x773, 912:773, pol mods banning people th….png)

>>5598
pic related

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:32:46 306355 No.5601

>>5599
I don't have records for this, it was unnecessary back then. Its a clear bait thread, though, and he had prior posts calling blacks niggers and (if I remember correctly) mexicans spics. If you can't even keep your shitposting consistent, how do you expect it to get past moderation?

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:36:49 a5b93d No.5602

>>5601
so again what you're doing it redditizing 8chan, peoples previous posts should not matter. I've argued with people on /pol/ who were for controlled coloured migration and they called blacks niggers and muslims mudslime because THIS IS A CHAN RETARD, thats the lingo we use.
that ban was completely because the volunteer disagreed.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:45:08 306355 No.5604

>>5602
No, it just seems like you want blatant bait to be allowed. If newfags don't understand why this is considered bait, they should lurk moar, it is not the mods fault if they enforce the rules after the newfag refuses to read them, or bother understanding what is meant by them.

That thread would absolutely be allowed if it hadn't gone straight to ad hominems and personal incredulity fallacies. And next you'll say "Youre going to ban all logical fallacies!", to which I say no, they are just indicators (but not the sole basis for) of shitposting.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:51:45 a5b93d No.5605

>>5604
did he make a thread? Or was that post a comment?
If a comment then is 100% should not have been banned, what you're doing is silencing dissent

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 06:55:24 306355 No.5606

>>5605
It was a thread.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:05:05 a5b93d No.5609

>>5606
well as you said it was an "indicator" of shitposting, do you think if he'd be insulting leftists or some other group you wouldnt have acted so harshly?
b

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:08:42 853305 No.5610

>>5580
this.

have a logical reason, not be a redguard maoist.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:11:42 306355 No.5611

>>5609
We see ironic shitposting like that at least a few times a week. Yes, I do.

Is a 1 day ban for blatant baiting what you consider harsh?

>>5610
nocaps shitposter spotted, you are pretty well known here because you never bother to change your post style.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:12:19 a5b93d No.5612

>>5611
i dont think he should be banned at all

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:13:05 a5b93d No.5613

>>5612
i accidently posted

I meant to add

>We see ironic shitposting like that at least a few times a week. Yes, I do.
show some examples of you banning non leftists for "baiting"

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:13:37 853305 No.5614

>>5611
we have co-intel pro stickied for a reason, D&C.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 07:29:08 306355 No.5617

File: 1425540548835.png (70.69 KB, 1146x694, 573:347, 57475.png)

>>5613
Sure. Most of these are pro/pol/ opinion shitpost threads, no? I have plenty more, this is only through about 1/3 of the banlist. We usually just use "shitpost" for these, even when referring to cases like the OP image that is baiting, it will say shitpost/bait or just shitpost most of the time.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 08:12:26 5beeea No.5628

>>5617
only 2 of those were rightist in any way

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 08:22:43 306355 No.5630

>>5628
He didn't ask for rightist. He asked for non-leftist.

Anonymous 05/03/15 (Sun) 11:11:38 d8e56e No.7864

>>5562

I believe it means that even though I shitpost thoroughly that the few posts I make that aren't calling people faggots keep me from getting banned.

If you post on multiple IPs then mods pretend that your purpose is whatever the few posts you made imply it might be.

Anonymous 05/03/15 (Sun) 11:13:51 79ce1c No.7867

mods resigned

what they did is absolutely indefensible, but they are gone now.

Hopefully, time will heal all wounds.