>>7286
>/pol/'s user count used to be higher before all of this shit happenedNo, not really. Since the second exodus we've always hovered around 2700 - 3000 UIPs, about the same as now even after all 400 of you fucked off to your hugbox.
>the mods trying to claim the "serious discussions" were driving people awayNobody ever claimed that, this is a ridiculous strawman. The claim is that everything
except NatSoc-themed serious discussions were being driven away, even though /pol/ used to allow fun and serious discussion to coexist (and it used to not actively discourage non-NatSoc views)
>Neither do I. And I'm reluctant in taking your word for it because you sound like a shitposting faggot. Shitposters are always in the wrong.So instead of judging his argument by its merit you label him a "shitposter" (which is just a buzzword)? The amount of shill paranoia has decreased back to first exodus levels now that you retards left the place, and I'm fucking glad of it. Maybe if you weren't so concerned aboyt silencing people you don't like, and more focused on actually spreading your ideas and setting an example for others, people wouldn't be so annoyed with you guys right now.
>Because we should totally care about the opinions of a bunch of faggots which have no relation to the board anyway, right? Do you also care about the image that /pol/ has to the outside world? Any type of mainstream culture is utterly rejected on /pol/. The opinions of normalfags and other outsiders have about the board should be irrelevant to us.I'm surprised you can say things like this and not see how much of a hugboxing faggot it makes you appear to be. For some reason, you morons can't get it through your thick fucking skulls that
people browse multiple boards: yes, there is a lot of overlap between /int/ and /pol/, and yes our sitewide image does affect the auantity of posters who will come to the board.
>Again, see my fucking pic, you shithead. It must look like a paradise to you, doesn't it?Im seeing a few cherrypicked posts, that's about it. Do you think nobody should have the right to call you names or disagree with you on 8chan? Do you thonk that only threads you personally like should be allowed to stay up?
About 80% of the threads on /pol/ are similar to the type of threads we had with stricter moderation btw, so I don't even know why you're complainig. I guess you won't be happy until every single post is a NatSoc wall of text and everyone who steps out of line gets permabanned, is that it?
>Ignoring it won't make it go awayToo bad, you don't get to decide what other people post, as long as it's related to politics on some way. When people tell you to ignore what you don't like, the implication is that you don't
have to like every single thread on /pol/. By barging into threads you don't like and sagebombing them you're acting like an entitled babby.
The userbase is pretty much the exact same as it was last week btw, minus the /polpol/ guys who left.