/polmeta/ - /pol/ Meta Discussion

I serriously think there's actual shilling going on with the Trump threads. /pol/ has never supported Neocons like this in the past

>>8647

>/pol/ has never supported Neocons like this in the past

That doesn't matter Anon, Obongo did far worse then Bush ever did.

No Anon, it's not all Shilling.

Trump seems the least shit so he has genuine supporters. Rand lost his base when he voted yes for the Fast Track, and Obama made it pretty clear it doesn't matter who is Left or Right in the elections it's just a matter of picking your poison.

Can we please get a rule about Trump threads? I don't mind threads discussing political candidates, but there are currently 22 threads about Trump. And anytime you make a post that doesn't suck his cock, you are called a shill. For real. There is something going on here.

Trump threads are the new AoC threads.

Remember how threads about age of consent were all over the place? Every single one of them ended in a shitfest. Eventually it was limited to one thread, and now you hardly see many AoC threads these days.

The same thing needs to be done about trump, because it's the exact same problem. Nothing new is being said, it's just a rehash of the same old shit, and it's spread across dozens of threads instead of one.

>>8677

We need this fast.

>>8596

>07/14/15

Holy shit.

It's been over one month and we still have these threads spammed all over the board.

What a whiny kike of an OP. You can easily hide the threads.

You made it quite clear you're disingenuous when you say you're concerned with the quantity of threads because all you discuss is muh trump is ebil shills :( :( :(

/intl/ or /leftypol/, either way fuck off and die

>>8677

nobody who works here can say that

>>8856

precisely

>>8596

YES, theres like 5 trump threads at a time and they are usually clogged up with shills and shitposters.

>>8856

>>8859

Are you guys fucking serious?

You can justify every kind of sliding, spamming and shitposting with this reasoning.

>it's not a problem if you can hide it.

We might as well have threads about your favorite gay anime if you think so.

You are not even trying to make an argument against this being so much of a problem it HAS to be hidden.

More importantly it doesn't work.

Yes you can hide them.

Are enough people going to bother?

Is everyone even aware of what's going on?

How many are not going to hide them because it goes against the spirit of chans and they don't want to?

If people seized their country right now and enacted just laws politics wouldn't be an issue.

If people stopped taking drugs they are addicted to addiction wouldn't be a problem.

Your solution is imaginary.

We need a solution that doesn't require an "if".

I'm not even suggesting to removal of these threads, just the merging of general trump threads.

If you really believe Trump is such an important issue there is no reason to spread the same arguments over multiple threads.

Having less threads means you can see all points being made without missing some made only in one of them.

There is nothing efficient about having to defend your standpoint in 5 different threads at once.

>You made it quite clear you're disingenuous when you say you're concerned with the quantity of threads because all you discuss is muh trump is ebil shills :( :( :(

I don't know about OP but i would lament any other topic being spammed to the point it's done by trump threads right now.

It's disingenuous to call someone a kike and suggest he has ulterior motives when there is absolutely no evidence of it.

>/intl/ or /leftypol/, either way fuck off and die

I'm just gonna let this stand on it's own.

>>8863

>How many are not going to hide them because it goes against the spirit of chans and they don't want to?

Meant to say:

"… and they don't want to feel like they encouraging a hugbox mentality?

>>8863

>goes against the spirit of chans

the spirit of chans is to see what is meant to be seen, not what is not meant to be seen

>If people seized their country right now

countries are memes

>If you really believe Trump is such an important issue there is no reason to spread the same arguments over multiple threads.

for every anti-trump thread there is a pro-trump thread. until the anti-trump shilling stops, the pro-trump bias won't stop.

>Having less threads means you can see all points being made without missing some made only in one of them.

that can only work of all anti-trump rhetoric is combined into one post: politics spreads like an octopus into every facet of political discussion. it's why >>>/pol/ discusses politics and not >>>/a/

>There is nothing efficient about having to defend your standpoint in 5 different threads at once.

i agree

>It's disingenuous to call someone a kike and suggest he has ulterior motives when there is absolutely no evidence of it.

there are no trump shills here >>>/pol/3036811

>>/intl/ or /leftypol/, either way fuck off and die

>I'm just gonna let this stand on it's own.

/pol/ is neutral

Try all you want, the mods are too busy suckin' eachothers dicks to actually take action. Literally all they do is sticky retarded shit, they could care less about shills

>>>/leftypol/

Wow the kike shills got into the meta board. So this is where all you guys went off to, to suck each other off none the less. Not supporting trump is supporting a collapse favored to give Kikes control. If you are actually not shills then you lot are just fucking plain retarded and straight up brainwashed. Trump is the only opponant so far with a plan that goes completely against the norm of the kikes plans. And the fact that the media has done nothing but slander the fuck out of him (whether you think its intentional to give him more popularity, or muh shillary popularity boost) it actually shows the fear from the kikes of losing and potention for their plan to go bad. Anybody that replies to me without a valid counter argument and instead calling me out as a kike shill is in fact a kike shill. Presenting no opposing argument while calling me out is just proof you have nothing to counter me with and therefore have to result to insults in order to demean my statements.

>>8879

How about the mod being anti-Trump?

>>8879

How does is having the whole front page plastered with these threads necessary?

Please make an argument why we need more than 1 trump thread.

>>8647

Trump isn't a Neocon you fucking moron

>>8647

There's probably some shilling but I think /pol/ and by extension the chans appreciate him simply because he upset the status quo and revealing how phony his opponents are by making them break their routines.

He is vengeance of corruption. He has grown strong on what they have let fester and now they can no longer fight this electoral disease. Trump is a symptom that shows the status quo is dying.

That doesn't mean things are going to get better though…

>>8894

>anti trump shills

Filtered. Saging this thread sinve the Trumpgoys have gotten to it.