>>9282
It's almost always just one person making an obscene amount of worthless posts in any given thread and someone else, usually utilizing Tor, using this as an excuse to make sweeping generalizations and call /pol/ a worthless pile of shit.
And then it happens again and again, deriving value from repetition.
Same goes for most of the common touchy subjects that involve the exact same questions asked and answered over and over again, and when people to refuse to take part in these repetitive shenanigans, the people asking the questions immediately proclaim victory and proceed to rampant slander. The Holocaust threads that start out with baseless namecalling and trying to put the onus on the locals for perfect multifaceted proof are, of course, the prime example.
>>9297
It's funny how many parallels this has with your usual librul crowd's argumentation. Defending a black/gay/trans/whatever minority with the discrimination card, regardless of whether or not their actions or argument had anything to do with their being and how obviously appalling what they had done happened to be.
There's a way to post on /pol/, a way to post on reddit and a way to post on any particular forum, imageboard and what-else-have-you on the internet.
If your post's packaging looks like it doesn't belong and peeking inside doesn't reveal anything of value, it's likely going to get tossed aside and ignored. If it looks like it does belong, but it still isn't of particular value, it'll probably stick around.
If, however, a post has a visible amount of value and effort put into its content, the form of the post will likely not matter as much.
What determines whether or not a post belongs is a complicated topic, but like every community, there are certain practices, traditions and unwritten standards by which posts are judged, and even standard ways in which to subvert these standards. As long as you're mostly compliant or compensate with valuable content, you're unlikely to run into any trouble.