276fa4 No.11728
Somewhere in the future, I hope on submitting a more concise and detailed report as to why England has been the absolute worst thing to happen to Europe and how, at almost every point since as far back as the 17th century, they have destroyed European sovereignty at the behest of their jewish masters. I've been reading almost all day and I can't simply hold in my rage anymore and want to point out just a few examples where England dropped the ball.
>Queen Victoria submitting to the jewish court to destroy the Boer nation so that jews could control all resources (gold, diamonds, etc.) from South African.
>World War 1, Treaty of Vienna, Balfour Declaration, etc.
>World War 2 and damn near everything about it.
>Slavery of white Irish and forced miscegenation of Irish women with black slaves
>Allowing Rothschild and his mercenaries to court the throne to such an extent that the English might have well tied the strings to their own hands.
>Alongside the Balfour Declaration, the creation of Mandatory Palestine and subsequent failure to repress the jewish insurgency and pave the way for Israel via being a little bitch.
They took the proud nation of Boers and destroyed them so jews like Alfred Beit, Moses Montefiore and all their cronies could consume every resource without question or dissent. Look at South Africa now. Holy fuck look what the did to Ireland…..enslaving the Irish and forced them to breed with black slaves, and that doesn't even cover forced emigrations of Irish and the Irish slave trade during the 17th century. They let the jews run every financial institution and decision without question. They sent their own ilk out to die for the profit of a demonic tribe, and not once, not fucking once did they fight back. Rothschild showed up and dangled a couple shiny coins in front of the crown and since then, the English have been the henchmen for their jewish masters.
I used to be pissed when I saw shit like pic related and hear how bad things have gotten in Bongistan. But after diving into their history and pulling just a fraction of their history, things like Rotherham don't even piss me off anymore. Motherfucking centuries of running around, destroying white sovereignty and now the chickens are coming home to roost. Considering what they did to the Irish, how can anyone here actually listen to someone from England actually say they give a fuck about white pride or anything else related to that discussion? They forced their own white brothers and sisters to destroy their genetic heritage, and they fucking profited from it. These people are the fifth column, the stranger in the house, and they're on their way out. Especially now considering they're importing immigrants like America imports Apple products.
>inb4 shill and EDL kosher-tier rage
Let's talk about this and if any of you teacuppers want to chip in, I'm really interested in what you people have to say for yourselves.
80e645 No.11757
yeh OP ive thought about this a lot too. there has been no greater servant to the international kike than the british. while its sad to see their people suffer, if theres one nation that deserves to be sacrificed so the rest can live, britain should be it; its poetic justice in a way.
97afc2 No.11787
What England did to the Boers and to the Rhodesians is the most criminal act of genocide over the past 500 years of human history.
6ca10c No.11796
Wow, I never thought about these topics from this standpoint. However, it makes fair sense. As a Norwegian-German descendant, I am, for the first time- sorry we didn't finish the job.
55e4d2 No.11806
Wow you are so close to getting it. It's not the English race but the Whigs! Like Moldbug said "the Devil was the first Whig". Their political tradition is the root of all Leftism and is descended from the Puritans/Dissenters fanaticism and moralistic materialism.
d7649e No.11812
Is it really in their genes to do these things? These are interesting historical events, but should we really shame them for the things they've done in the past? If not their culture has certainly changed and shown a significant portion of the English that they need to make friends with other whites or else they'll find themselves living in a complete hell right before they go extinct.
3f7b26 No.11813
Make no mistake about it there are still worthy British people out there as there has always been in the past. They have and will continue to contribute much to the European race. But for having tempted by Mamon the nation will pay the price.
3f9204 No.11814
It started with the English Civil War because Cromwell was funded by "merchants" from Amsterdam. Unless I am wrong.
5748c0 No.11826
>>11806>MoldbugOh fuck off you Jewish supremacist cunt.
>>11787Wouldn't that be the Holodomor? Yes the British actions in Africa were horrific however far more Christians were killed by Jews in the 20th century.
>>11812>Is it really in their genes to do these things?Possibly. Anglos' the world over are pretty degenerate and susceptible to Jew programming. I say this as an Australian too.
0a7890 No.11862
>>11728And every time England tried to correct themselves they didn't listen.
>enslaving the Irish and forced them to breed with black slavesFucking straight cuckholdry right there. The thought of some tea sipping limey forcing a ginger together with a nigger disgusts me. Why couldn't the English men at least man the fuck up and stick it to the black sows like Yank slave masters did?
3fdcdc No.11872
>>11728The English really are the Jews of Europe. I would like to add the backstabbing of the Dutch with the Secret Treaty of Dover.
71d677 No.11878
The ruling class of Britain has quite clearly had a symbiotic relationship with the jew, just as today the British/American ruling class does.
Does this mean the British are scum?
Does this mean the Americans are scum?
Fact is, the jews attach themselves to the most successful nations, and move on once they've extracted all they can, and a new host beckons (see America last century).
Are the nordics scum for having stolen British and Irish women?
By the way, white slavery was not reserved for the Irish, but many of the British, too.
Also, there was a far more significant anti-semitic element within the British establishment last century, than there is in America today, and the full scale of jewish subversion has only come into fruition in America, whereas some moral standard was maintained under the British paradigm.
Stop confusing "England" and "Britain".
452e48 No.11912
>slavery of white irish and forced miscegenation of irish women with black slates
Op I'm Irish and I cannot describe the impotent rage I feel whenever I am reminded of this
Not at the English (I'm not a retarded leftie) for shit their forefathers did hundreds of years ago, but at the faggots who "well ohohoh whites invented skavery and enslaved all the poor blacks ohohoh "
003b7b No.11928
>>11912Any links about that topic? I haven't heard much about it before.
3ddd81 No.11935
>>11787>genocideoy vey
I bet you're going to post images of malnourished civilians now too.
f7c954 No.11943
>>11812>whigs>implying the monarchy hasn't been enslaved to kikes since the fall of the Plantagenets>>11935>I bet you're going to post images of malnourished civilians nowI very well could. Whether the British delivered whites into the hands of African warlords for slaughter or directly slaughtered whites and displaced white settlements themselves in the case of the Boers, only Jews have done more to intentionally remove the white race from white settlements than the British.
2ad80b No.11946
File: 1428760959424.jpg (125.91 KB, 748x533, 748:533, Britcucks reap what they s….jpg)
>>11728No shit.
The Brits from Cromwell till now were and still are complete fucking scum.
They also smothered their own last hope. For example here:
>>11862Quite frankly, I have always admired the Germans more anyway.
eec855 No.11980
This is true, but it is sad that the cuckold traitor WW2 vets will not be the ones who pay. The poor degenerate chavs of today were betrayed by their disgusting great-grandparents, they don't know better. The only thing worse than boomers is the generation that birthed them. The "greatest generation" deserves to be despised for their murder of the West. This needs to be a meme.
Ausfag here, proud to say my grandfather did not betray the West in WW2.
c2db06 No.11988
>>11748Anyone have this pic without the knight in it?
3ddd81 No.11990
>>11943The internment of Boers in camps was not an act of genocide. There was no attempt to displace the Boers.
3fdcdc No.11997
>>11990>there was no attempt to displace the BoerenYou can't be serious
3ddd81 No.12001
>>11997100%
Why did we fight in the first place?
190cb4 No.12038
>The British are all scum
>The Rhodesians (who are fucking British) are "based" though
Either divide and conquer kike or suffers from brain problems.
Funny too seeing that I'm sure many shitting on the British hold up their many achievements when talking about White achievements.
8ed7f3 No.12067
They aren't called seakikes for nothing.
276fa4 No.12069
>>11990>>12001I'm just going to go ahead and say fuck right off. Keep your retarded version of history to yourself and drop the amorphous arguments, mr questions.
>>12038>RhodesiaAnd even the 'homeland' turned on them and tried to force a majority rule of black Africans over white Rhodesians.
>Funny too seeing that I'm sure many shitting on the British hold up their many achievements when talking about White achievements.Well, not shit sherlock. Obviously that's going to happen, but that doesn't remove the fact they made a mess out of everything. Holy shit, they made a mess of themselves! For such a mighty empire, the standards of living for the middle and lower classes were horrendous.
3fdcdc No.12082
>>12067B-but I thought the Dutch had that title
172ed6 No.12175
>>11757Okay, so I sometimes have thoughts that come to me (or visions) in agreement with your point regarding England having to be sacrificed for the world to survive. If you look at any prophecies that have been recorded in the last 100 years or so, many of them mention England being obliterated (some say by Russia, others don’t mention by whom) in the upcoming global conflict. I think in the future the Anglozionist empire will be destroyed and a global reset will ensue. In order for this to happen I believe that Israel will be destroyed and that England (as well as parts of the US) will have to be utterly destroyed as well for this to come true. You already see the machinations in progress as we speak. California is being turned into a desert so the Mexican invasion of Atzlan backed by Russian intelligence forces (FSB, among others) will be an inhospitable area. This is a strategic move to save countless western US citizens’ lives and further strengthen the core of the country. This also will happen to most of the US southwest. I believe the global reset is going to make the US into a much smaller (geographically speaking) country or groups of allied countries. Southern nationalism is starting to pick back up (take a look at dixie/pol/ for a prime example on 8chan) and alliances of states are starting to spring up. I see Missouri currently being pulled into Dixie’s sphere of influence. Northern California will remain US-led as well as the Pacific Northwest states (Northwest Front, anyone?). They will take many of the fleeing southwesterners. For those that move back east they will move to Texas or states in the Midwest.
172ed6 No.12176
>>12175>[cont]I have numerous other thoughts that come to mind about the US, including Texas being the first line of defense in the invasion, but I’ll get back on track and return to England. I believe England is to be sacrificed because it is the root cause of all the current world ills. Yes, everyone on /pol/ knows it’s the jews but England has given refuge to the Zionists more so than any other European country. As a result, we see a world on fire and the potential for even greater catastrophe if nothing is done to stop them. So, in my visions I see London utterly destroyed (not sure if by nuke or bombing campaign) and many of the highly populated areas (i.e. Manchester) in ruins. England will be no more. Its people will flee once London is gone. Some Anglos will move to Europe as it is nearby and the logical choice. For countless others they will have to move back to the Commonwealth countries because they will not be welcomed in continental Europe any longer for their prime role in this global conflict. Yes, we all know most English civilians have done nothing and are being unfairly treated; however, it was their government that brought this disaster upon the world and their government that fully backed Zionist policies that brought chaos around the world. Thus, the English will move to Australia, NZ, Canada, South Africa, and the old US colonies (particularly New England and the South). The English people will live on but their old homeland will be sacrificed as a peace offering to continental Europe and the rest of Eurasia.
172ed6 No.12177
>[cont]
The Anglo-world will lick its wounds after this event and remove Zionist filth during this process. Eventually, Europe will expel their invaders and bring about a golden age and the Anglos will form a greater Anglo-union more fully integrated than ever before after expelling their invaders as well. Don’t know if I’m totally off-point here but sometimes I get these strange feelings where I understand the mood of the world at an incredibly deep level and things appear to be rearranging themselves for a NWO-type event. However, unlike many on /pol/ I think the NWO will be the opposite of what everyone fears and actually one of great purifying, discovery, and ascendency. Like I said, I could be totally wrong but I have this gut feeling that I cannot shake that these events are going to unfold. Does anyone else have these feels? I hope I’m not the only one feeling crazy about these things.
59b738 No.12197
I posted this book in another thread but I originally had it in mind for this one, couldn't remember the name of the book.
https://archive.org/details/TheControversyOfZionThe relevant parts are several chapters in (technically it's all relevant) but it has quite a bit of history on how England got played by the Zionists. The footnotes alone are worth something, lots of references
55mb PDF or a small txt file, available for free at the link
3330d7 No.12198
>>12038Hate to break it to you m8 but it seems half the time the achievements everyone espouses on when talking about Whites belong to the Italians, Spanish, French, etc. Not to say britcucks don't have plenty of achievements too but c'mon….Edison
3f9204 No.12211
>>12198A Britcuck by the name of Newton basically invented science.
c8e85c No.12219
>>12211Arguably that would have been Francis Bacon.
b3533a No.12222
My quads agree, britcucks deserve what they're getting.
c71c05 No.12228
>>12219formally writing about something doesnt mean you are the first to think it or say it
276fa4 No.12230
>>12222are you fucking kidding me
bfaea8 No.12259
>>12230not hard to make gets on a board as slow as this one m8, no-one cares.
polite sage
a1b2f4 No.12268
>>11878oh look. no replies.
3e1a7e No.12283
>>11812>These are interesting historical events, but should we really shame them for the things they've done in the past?That's exactly what Hitler said. Look what happened! The Brits have been given a chance time and time and time again and they just can't stop sucking kike dick.
3e1a7e No.12284
>>11878>Does this mean the British are scum?Nah, it just means that history proves you can't ever fucking trust them and that you shouldn't even count on any help from them in our struggle.
It would be nice if they came to their senses, but there's no historic precedent.
77e060 No.12303
>>12283It's because they've been in massive debt to the Rothschilds ever since 1815, when they spread false rumors that Napoleon had won at Waterloo so they could cash in on government bonds. That's how they roped them into the Crimean War.
c10ee1 No.12352
>>11728What about the Scottish and the Welsh, do they deserve the same fate?
3330d7 No.12372
>>12211
>basically invented scienceLolno, he was a physicist. A brilliant one who everyone only knows about a bullshit allegory of an apple falling on him and not his countless research and
mostly true theories that are still used today. But inventing science lol? Kind of a broad term there m8
d60c29 No.12656
>>11872>English are the jews of yourpno you fucktard the jews are the jews of europe.
d60c29 No.12658
>>11980Does killing japs count as betraying the west?
1db21b No.12659
>>12069> For such a mighty empire, the standards of living for the middle and lower classes were horrendous.Name ONE nation in europe that had a higher GDP per capita in the 19th century than the UK.
4e919c No.12689
>>12659Why does it matter when your GDP has no connection to actual physical labor. Britain was nothing but the first nation to give themselves over to the Rothschild central bank, which gave them a short boost to their economy in exchange for a constantly rising debt. The country always had population problems and poor lower-income housing, and such issues peaked in the 19th century for a variety of reasons.
1db21b No.12691
>>12689>Why does it matter when your GDP has no connection to actual physical labor?Because working as an accountant still brings home a paycheck.
> The country always had population problems and poor lower-income housing, and such issues peaked in the 19th century for a variety of reasons.True, but of all the nations in the 19th century, Britian was the richest, Germany was catching up but about a decade behind, Russia was a fucking fudal state and Argentina was richer than france,
4c1a2d No.12707
>>12691The only reason England reached the level of affluence that it did was because it was extremely efficient at siphoning off the worlds resources. It's called colonialism.
ebaca6 No.12714
>>12707>Colonialismyou say that like its a bad thing
833d53 No.12727
not to mention, the British always sought to keep the continent disunited.
cc8a1d No.12816
>>12659First of all, you're cherrypicking the 18th and 19th centuries as if it means something, when, for much of its history, standards of living were deplorable in relation to its advanced standing in the world.
Second of all:
>GDP>wages>standard of livingPick none, they aren't the same thing. There is often a correlation, but it is not a 1:1 correlation and there are many examples of there being a large gap between GDP and standard of living, for better or for worse. The conditions that the lower and middle classes in England have lived under, even to this day, have never lined up with its standing in the world.
3ddd81 No.12829
>>12707So? Our prosperity was sustainable. Those resources were put to good use, they found a purpose with the Empire that they wouldn't of had anywhere else. It's not as though there wasn't an industrial and technological revolution to show for it.
If the Krauts didn't fuck everything up with their envy, we'd all be in a better place right now.
>>12689>The country always had population problems and poor lower-income housing, and such issues peaked in the 19th century for a variety of reasons.It doesn't matter. The British poor lived far better than the European poor. Would you rather that our poor be poorer provided that our rich be less rich?
2ad80b No.12838
File: 1429051608180.jpg (125.91 KB, 748x533, 748:533, Britcucks reap what they s….jpg)
>>12829>If the Krauts didn't fuck everything up with their envy, we'd all be in a better place right now>Minding their own business on continental Europe>Fucking anything up in BritainThe subhuman bong still havent learned.
They deserve EVERYTHING coming for them. Scum.
3ddd81 No.12842
>>12838>expanding west>minding their own business>expanding east>>minding their own business>expanding south>minding their own business>striving towards european hegemony>minding their own business>Hans hat nichts falsch gemacht. Hans ist ein guter Junge!Where are you from anyway?
0cb859 No.12843
>>12842Let a player play.
They weren't invading the British Isles.
b20682 No.12848
>>12842"expanding"
Pushing agenda or just ignorant of history? They were reclaiming German land that was taken.
3ddd81 No.12849
957ca2 No.12852
>>12658No, but fighting for ZOG does. Fighting Japan certainly didn't help the west in any way.
4c1a2d No.12859
>>12829Sustainable my asscrack. What, the british could have maintained their presence in India even in the World Wars didn't happen? The independence movements were already afoot, the wars merely accelerated them. And yeah, the colonies could very well have used their own resources if Britain hadn't stolen them. Face it, though Britain produced some of the most extraordinary innovations in finance, technology and government the world has ever seen, it also propogated a self-destructive liberal ideology that's made it one of the most cuckolded faggots nests in the world today.
4c1a2d No.12862
>>12842Aww the stupid Brit is trying to mount the moral high ground on germany. Did those concentration camps hurt your feels? I'm sure Britain never did anything similar *cough* Boer War *cough*
3ddd81 No.12872
>>12859Whoa, careful there solider. You need to work on your reading comprehension. I said two different things in that post.
i) Our prosperity was sustainable. Prosperity being something that is not contingent on Empire. If we could have kept the Indian princes at each other's throats and the Chinese indentured for even a little longer then so much the better. With a bit of luck the Colonial Office would still be around today in some vestigial form instead of being a source of collective white guilt.
And what could the preindustrial backwater civilisations do with their oil and mineral wealth – a wealth they weren't even aware of until the evil Tommies came along and "stole" it? Whatever we took, we put to a better use than they could ever. If you want to see what happens when an undeserving country is allowed to become mineral rich by reason of geography, look to Arabia, Venezuela or Libya.
ii) Europe and the world would be a far better place if the Krauts were able to contain their appetite for destruction. Germany was already powerful, already industrial, already united. Most of Central Europe was under their aegis. Was this not enough? Why wilfully violate the delicate balance of power?
The answer is simple. The Krauts are Huns and to destroy is their wont.
> it also propogated a self-destructive liberal ideology that's made it one of the most cuckolded faggots nests in the world today.I don't deny this. What do you reckon caused this though? inb4 JOOOOOOOZZ. Liberal self-hate is the backlash from the Nazis being such colossal failures. Liberalism before the WWII wasn't the destructive SJW bullshit you see today. What we have today is the product of several decades of American and Soviet political and academic subversion. If you want someone to blame, blame Hitler for losing to a bunch of slavic subhumans and anglo cuckolds. The allies wouldn't have pushed toxic liberalism so hard if he didn't exist.
>>12862Sweet, it looks like I caused some major butthurt without even trying.
cef406 No.12878
>>12872Creation and destruction go hand in hand. We created England when we destroyed the British. Later we created the U.S. and destroyed the native American way of life. The salient quality of european culture is it's dynamism. The idealistic destruction and reinvention of itself. A purely masculine quality. Not the a quality of superficial subversive effeminate island poofs. Have you noticed lately the names of the most famous turncoats and traitors? Blair, Snowden, Manning, Assange, so many more. Why not relax and enjoy the show?
8794a7 No.12881
>>12872>Europe and the world would be a far better place if the Krauts were able to contain their appetite for destruction. Germany was already powerful, already industrial, already united. Most of Central Europe was under their aegis. Was this not enough? Why wilfully violate the delicate balance of power? >Helping own Allies>Equal to attacking others>Britcucks NOT causing WW1All these disgusting revisionism.
Germany DIDNT cause ww1, YOU caused it because Germany in the late 19th century was the single biggest achievement of Europe, surpassing all other powers combined. Just like the Third Reich.
>Liberal self-hate is the backlash from the Nazis being such colossal failuresAnd who worked TIRELESSLY to get so much more help, to the Point that Germany's defeat was inevitable? The Brits.
You are scum. Anglos are kikes' slaves. In the coming Crisis all Anglos scum will be sarcrificed for the Germanic Regeneration. Justice will be served and God will remind us of goodness again.
8794a7 No.12882
>>12872I also want to add:
>The answer is simple. The Krauts are Huns and to destroy is their wont. AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
This is why all those Composers and scientists were Germans right?
Britcucks are truly disgusting kikes' slaves subhumans. You will never see the light.
957ca2 No.12883
>>12872>JOOOOOOOZZOnly shills use this term.
0cb859 No.12887
>>12872>Europe and the world would be a far better place if the Krauts were able to contain their appetite for destruction.They did the fucking same the UK and France did.
The only difference is they wanted to do it in Eastern Europe instead of Asia, Africa, N-America, S-America.
023f46 No.12888
>>12222Its not as if we weren't warned.
0368ae No.12898
>>12284It's easy to play the moral superior, when you have been proven the practical inferior (see: niggers).
So the French, Dutch, Germans, Russians, Portugese, Spanish, Italians etc which all made their claims for glory, but were ultimately bested by the finest of Europe's nations get to scream "PERFIDIOUS ALBION!" indignantly, whilst living far more comfortable lives than we, or any of the other European nations would have, had any one of them matched or bested us.
The idea of the French or Germans (for example) being more noble or decent than the British is absurd.
There is an excerpt floating around on the internet, written by a Boer, which says that the British may have been all-powerful and arrogant, but they were on their own as far as respecting the vanquished was concerned.
The noble ideal of a white man is one whom passes judgement as impartially as is possible and to the benefit of the great many: this has been the role of Britain for centuries.
Blunders are inevitable - all are fallible; but were it not for Britain, then all of Europe would have been dominated by Napoleon, or by Hitler, and the less powerful nations of Europe would have seen just how little the French or German people cared for the concerns of those around them.
0368ae No.12900
>>12727Eugh. Spoken like a true American retard.
The idea of European unity as you imagine it is fucking unworkable and completely undesirable.
Go, tell the Italians that they're "Europeans", and are the same as the French of the Germans - see what happens.
The only thing that maintains stability is a powerful source of authority - this was Britain. And in Britain's splendid isolation, the nations of western Europe were left to be by a nation which could likely have achieved as Napoleon had envisioned.
Of course, to the American nitwit the Germans, French, Spanish etc were all about "european unity", but these dreams were snuffed out by the British.
It boggles my mind that someone can be so historically illiterate as to see the one nation which kept the power of Europe balanced, and the nations therein from perpetually tearing each other apart, as a fly in the ointment - keeping Europe from achieving greater unity.
2ad80b No.12905
>>12898>Blunders are inevitable - all are fallible; but were it not for Britain, then all of Europe would have been dominated by Napoleon, or by Hitler, and the less powerful nations of Europe would have seen just how little the French or German people cared for the concerns of those around them.>Brits fucks thinking this is somehow badFuck you and your subhuman inbred island. There is NOT a single Europa changing war that you have fought by yourself.
You are the Jews of Europa. Subhumans who know only of subversion. Both the French and Germanic people have proven themselves through art, technology and sheer will.
Only YOU swoop in like vultures and destroyed everything. Just like America. But then, you know that better than I do right?
Scum.
Britain will burn first.
>>12900>>12900>It boggles my mind that someone can be so historically illiterate as to see the one nation which kept the power of Europe balanced, and the nations therein from perpetually tearing each other apart, as a fly in the ointment - keeping Europe from achieving greater unity.>All this moral righteousnessAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Just like modern SJWs.
Eat shit and burn.
The works of "Great" Britain has directly created this modern work. Consider how you praise it so much, enjoy.
0368ae No.12906
>>12905Both the French and the Germans have proven themselves and their will to be inferior…or are we not having this discussion….in English, no less?
Also, what nation has ever fought entirely alone in a "Europa changing war"?
0e809b No.12907
>>12898>>12900This sounds like a shitty trolling copypasta. Is this a jewish troll? Or a britcuck loser who actually thinks he has a good life in a totalitarian surveillance state with no free speech, where natives are second-class citizens behind criminal muslims and niggers who are endlessly mass-imported in order to destroy the native population?
I really think this is a troll, since nobody who honestly goes to pol for information could be stupid enough to be nationalistic and spout off the "we" rhetoric unironically. It's like this idiot actually believes he has played any part in important wars of political decisions, instead of being an useful tax-paying for a jew-controlled government that hates the very people who sustain it.
Reminds me of those sport fans cuckold loser who live vicariously through their team or some successful athlete while they get nothing done in real life and pay thousands of Euros for "their" team's game tickets and merchandise.
0e809b No.12908
4c1a2d No.12910
>>12900I don't see where in the 19th century Britain did much of anything to keep Europe "united". Stable perhaps, so they could hawk their industrial products to them, but Britain didn't care about national unity. True, after Napoleon was defeated Britain supported numerous insurgent nationalistic groups, but only because they wanted to subvert the ancien regime. Basically they did every thing to prevent expansionism, especially by Russia.
0368ae No.12912
>>12907I detest what modern Britain is….but then, I detest what the west is, generally.
But then, this has little relevance to the discussion in question.
Also, the very essence of /pol/ would appear to be one of nationalism.
To identify by such a "we" is natural and right.
You have not even really acknowledged anything I said, much less refuted any of it.
0368ae No.12914
>>12910>I don't see where in the 19th century Britain did much of anything to keep Europe "united".Implying I suggested such a thing and didn't actually say the idea of "European unity" is retarded. Britain maintained relative stability because:
> they did every thing to prevent expansionism, especially by Russia.Expansionism which sort of nixes the notion of "European unity", thus proving my point.
Britain was top dog, preventing the likes of Italy from being subsumed by France.
0cb859 No.12917
>>12898Good luck rebuilding your Empire, UK. You're gonna need it.
2ad80b No.12918
>>12906>French and the Germans have proven themselves and their will to be inferior>Being subverted and played to fight on too many "enemies">"inferior">Brits not responsible for the modern American monster>Brits not giving everything they have ever had to Americans to beat up "inferiors"As I say, Brits are pathetic.
0368ae No.12919
>>12918Brits are responsible for virtually the entirety of the modern world, both good and bad.
How's that for will?
>N-n-n-no….s-s-s-subhumans subverted usWhat the fuck are you even getting at?
Do you actually believe in some European utopia, which was destroyed by Britain?
Are you actually retarded enough to believe that the French, Germans, Italians etc would have lived in perfect harmony were it not for the machinations of Great Britain, which had far less to do with the internal affairs of Europe than its constituent nations?
The point I made in the first place stands: Britain won the race for glory through superior tactics, will, technology, culture and a sense of separateness from the ever-fighting continentals.
Or did the imperial forces not rout the French wherever they attempted to stand in their way?
The French, whom attempted to conquer much of Europe.
Was the industrial revolution not the product of the genius of Britons?
Is not virtually every modern institution in any nation with even vague pretensions of being civilised a product of Britain?
2ad80b No.12920
>>12919>Britain won the race for glory through superior tactics, will, technology, culture and a sense of separateness from the ever-fighting continentals>Latest and most significant events required the help of Americans>"Boys did we win by ourselves!"Yeah sure you won. Embrace this brave new world, winner.
You WON.
So pathetic. Brits killed Europa and themselves, and they STILL refuse to see this. Indeed pathetic and lower than the people of continental Europa.
The fact remains that this current world IS the product of British machination.
276fa4 No.13212
>>12888>background music written by a jewit's like the person who made this is retarded
c71c05 No.13265
4ad89b No.13283
So the people who were ruling England were giant dumbasses who let a group of Jews come in and ruin their country?
Sorry but both the European and American congresses are still primarily run by Whites and in the past especially they were predominantly White.
As a common citizen I can only seek to blame them first before I blame those Jews.
c71c05 No.13301
>>13283>Sorry but both the European and American congresses are still primarily run by Whites and in the past especially they were predominantly White.>As a common citizen I can only seek to blame them first before I blame those Jews. 38aa94 No.13619
>>12849
>September Program
>The Septemberprogramm (German: "September Program") was the plan for the territorial expansion of Imperial Germany, which was prepared for Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, in the early weeks of the First World War (1914–18).
>prepared in the early weeks of the First World War
So after a war had started they prepared to go on the offensive.
This is a bad thing now???
The best part will be when the English realize they speak a dialect of German.
c71c05 No.13719
>>13619
>English realize they speak a dialect of German.
A dumbed down dialect.
868a43 No.13722
>>13619
>>13719
This is dumb on many levels. First of all, English is largely Germanic in nature and is based largely on a dialect of a hypothetical ancient proto Germanic language. What we call "German" today is also descended from a dialect of ancient Proto-Germanic. Of course, these two "dialects" met with differing levels of exposure to other languages throughout their history which led to the development of two very different languages that share a common source and common vocabulary from that source.
To say one is a "dumbed down" version of the other is borderline retarded. They are very different languages that require complexity in some areas based on the the nature of how their vocabularies developed (included what loanwords were adapted from languages those languages came into contact with) and streamlined in other areas (where the other may not have been) also due to what individual words are capable of representing and other varying cultural factors.
To call English a dialect of "German" is dumb on many counts. German, Dutch, and Frisian are much closer to being dialects of a similar proto-Germanic language. English is its own subset of proto-Germanic with its own very different history.
Calling English a "dumbed down dialect" of German makes you sound like somebody completely ignorant of linguistics at best and a braindead Germanboo at worst.
c71c05 No.13723
>>13722
>To call English a dialect of "German" is dumb on many counts. German, Dutch, and Frisian are much closer to being dialects of a similar proto-Germanic language. English is its own subset of proto-Germanic with its own very different history.
>
>Calling English a "dumbed down dialect" of German makes you sound like somebody completely ignorant of linguistics at best and a braindead Germanboo at worst.
Anon I wanted you to figure it out for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_in_English#Decline_of_grammatical_gender
An interesting read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_death#Types_of_language_death