[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

Politics, news, culture, society - no shills allowed

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1430164857874.jpeg (70.39 KB, 487x365, 487:365, large-family_med.jpeg)

d5d474 No.13958

Given that traditionalist Catholics are one of the few sectors of the white population that is maintaining a stable-to-growing birthrate, and simultaneously tends to be either opposed or ambivalent about Zionism (unlike white Evangelicals and conservative Protestants), why do some White Nationalists engage in targeted antagonism towards Catholicism? How is that a sound strategy?

d2f46a No.13959

File: 1430165593464.jpg (2.05 MB, 2462x1759, 2462:1759, 1426801564030-0.jpg)

I don't think Hitler was for it due to the innate internationalism of the catholic church which kind of fucks up the whole nationalism part, and the current Pope has done nothing but weaken faith and get involved in nonreligious affairs. There's also the connections of Jesuits which I do not know enough to accurately comment upon, and general issues with current church structure (Vatican II). That's also why most white nationalists tend to prefer Orthodox Chrisitanity instead, because it has the same strict ideals and structure of the catholic church, but without a singular figure to run it all, and a nation-specific basis.


39d6d4 No.13966

>>13958

My guess is that it's purely related to the where said white nationalists are from and their country of origin, which ought to shape their perspective and view of catholicism quite a lot. In my own home country these both things tend to be in the exact same side.


3996e1 No.13978

>>13958

>why do some White Nationalists engage in targeted antagonism towards Catholicism? How is that a sound strategy?

Because most of the white nationalists you read from on the internet are not nationalists. They are a mix of useful idiots and fake identities made by anti whites.

How is this even difficult to understand?

2 + 2 = ?


d2f46a No.13980

>>13978

Mind clarifying that statement m8?


3996e1 No.13991

>>13980

If the most discussion you get with nationalists is online then you have no proper way to tell who is and isn't an actual nationalist. You will encounter roleplayers and cosplayers as well as pretend nationalists that do anything from intentional abuse of stereotype to troll around because they are actually scared of niggers.


b6da08 No.13992

It goes both ways buddy.

Who sends millions and millions of dollars to Africa?

Christian and Catholic charities.


39d6d4 No.13999

>>13992

How is that contradictory? Humanitarian aid doesn't immediately equal accepting mass immigration and multiculturalism. In fact, it ought to be the complete opposite. The best type of aid you can give someone is to allow them to establish themselves.


d2f46a No.14002

>>13999

The current excess of "humanitarian aid" combined with US/Israeli?IMF destruction of potentially rebellious nations is one of the main causes behind the current swarm of immigrants rushing by the boatload into Europe and Brittan.


b6da08 No.14004

File: 1430228690698.jpg (855 KB, 1583x4000, 1583:4000, japan.jpg)

>>13999

Shipping in food by the boat-load and other aid by the boat-load, while also helping to "establish communities" doesn't help, it just lets them pop out and more and more and more little niglets that will never contribute anything, begging for more foreign aid.


39d6d4 No.14005

>>14002

>>14004

That's true, good point. I admit I was thinking less about UN-style aid and more about smaller catholic-sponsored missions to communities.


177de1 No.14010

>why do some White Nationalists engage in targeted antagonism towards Catholicism?

have you actually witnessed examples of this outside of autistic pagans/faux-pagan shills on the chans?


d5d474 No.14011

>>14010

Does Alex Linder count? He probably spends more time excoriating Catholics than Jews.

To be fair his influence pretty much only extends to internet forums, making him relatively unimportant in the grand scheme of things.


d5d474 No.14012

>>13992

Criticizing Pope Francis and the U.S. bishops for their position on immigration, among other social issues, is fair. I do it too and so do most traditionalist Catholics I know.

Still, when I see traditionalist parishes doing tangible work to assertively defend the West, and white trad Cath families having loads of kids, I question the practicality and sensibility of anti-Christian white nationalists. Just seems like a counter-intuitive tactic to me.


d2f46a No.14021

>>14012

I don't think many people are negative towards the goal of producing a lot of white babies and raising them right, but I would agree that a lot of "white nationalists" and people from our political community have a tendency to have their head in the clouds, focused on projecting the purest forms of their ideology rather than working with what is practical.


f4afc4 No.14026

>>14021

Agreed. It's the LARPers who obsess over ideological purity, and who can be the most right-wing, that will be the death of us. I first got into /pol/ because it tried to talk about reality, about what's really going on here and now and what we as individuals can do. Even the theory and abstractions are meant to serve reality, rather than trying to warp reality to serve abstractions and daydreams. That's bluepill shit right there.


cfaad2 No.14038

>>13959

>the current Pope has done nothing but weaken faith

I'm not Catholic and I don't pay a lot of attention to Pope-related news, but whenever I see mainstream news sites touting some left-wing proclamation from the Pope, I take it with a large grain of salt. I tend to assume that there's a hell of a lot more context to his statements, and what we see in the news is mostly loose English translations of what gets printed in Italian tabloids.


72e5c2 No.14041

File: 1430332840171.pdf (970.76 KB, The Plot Against The Churc….pdf)

Catholicism is not inherently bad, the problem is the fact that it relies on the Vatican, which has been known to have been infiltrated for over a decade or two. Non-Papist Catholics are perfectly fine, the problem lies in the fact that a lot of Catholics accept the Pope as an authoritative figure. The current one is not THAT bad but the problem is that he is more liberal than what would be desired.


f4afc4 No.14056

>>14041

Agreed; the pope is a more liberal than one would hope, but this whole idea that he's a leftist is straight-up media fabrication. There really is a massive disconnect between what the Pope says and what the media reports; reporters who specialize in Vatican affairs have pretty much straight-up admitted they all but make shit up, or twist and take statements so out of context they can report the opposite of what was said. I'd recommend "The Vatican Diaries" by John Thavis for further reading on the subject.

The media really does hate the Church; by creating the narrative that the Pope is a leftist and a progressive they can further marginalize Catholics who are more traditional. Then whenever he says something they can't twist, he's "suddenly become far-right", or when the church elects even a mildly more conservative pope they've "regressed", they're "going back to the middle ages."


fabce6 No.14073

>>14038

He said trannies are worse then nukes, insulted the Turks, stood up the Dalai Lama in favor of trying to get the PRC to stop messing with the Catholic Church, and says his whole worldview is based on a cautionary Catholic sf book similar to 1984(Lord of the World). He's fucking awesome.

t.Trad Catholic monarcho-distributist lurker


f4afc4 No.14076

File: 1430372441731.jpg (132.57 KB, 680x497, 680:497, image.jpg)

>>14073

>Trad Catholic monarcho-distributist lurker

I was worried I was the only one.


943e63 No.14082

>>13958

Aren't most traditionalist catholics hispanic?


d5d474 No.14083

>>14082

I don't have any hard statistics, but going by experience I'd say trad Caths in the U.S. are mostly white, with a noticeable Hispanic minority of course.

Hispanics tend to prefer liberal NO parishes just because those churches are more likely to be openly friendly to illegal immigration, or at least make an issue and focus of it over other things.


943e63 No.14084

>>14083

Huh.

I remember reading latin america had a huge trad. catholic population, but I didn't know Americans really had one either. So I figured most trad. catholic churchs would be majority or predominantly hispanic.


c45ba3 No.14085

>>14073

>>14076

Ayy mein negers.


d5d474 No.14086

File: 1430407138521.jpg (58.28 KB, 397x575, 397:575, christ-enthroned.jpg)

>>14085

>>14076

OP is a Catholic Integralist. Just came here to get a clearer and first-hand understanding of anti-Christian nationalists.

Pleasantly surprised to see that there aren't any such people here.


d5d474 No.14087

File: 1430407518395.jpg (55.83 KB, 431x579, 431:579, Joan-of-Arc.jpg)

>>14084

There hasn't really been any concerted effort to collate the total number of traditionalist Catholics, which is why I'm going mostly on anecdotal experience here. By all accounts France seems to have the largest proportion of traditionalists.

As I said, within the US, and even in the large city I live in which has a big Hispanic immigrant population, traditionalist parishes have tended to be majority white as far as I have seen.


367fd8 No.14093

Religion is a big blue pill. A useful tool to guide the weak minded, sure.

Thing is, Catholicism is a twisted, double edged tool as it's been used for so long by so many people of differing interests, each one adding their own twists and turns.

Look at how dated the bible is. Things that where "common sense" back then are now obviously ridiculous, as our understanding has deepened and become more sophisticated.

My main grievance with organized religion is that it does not ever adapt fast enough, becoming quickly dated and unwieldy.


d72f2b No.14102

As much as I do not like the CC in this they were right. For their coffers they needed the family unit so no matter what their motives were the end result was a large family unit with a moral compass.

I believe they should have done more for families to support them instead of just demanding respect. Religion is all about control and fear. Faith is about grace and peace. Taking your faith to church destroys it and you.


d5d474 No.14104

File: 1430427423091.jpg (193.88 KB, 395x500, 79:100, godfrey.jpg)

>>14093

>>14102

Do either of you have real life experience with Catholicism, especially in traditionalist circles or parishes that celebrate the Tridentine Mass? Have you read any of the Church Fathers, Scholastics, or other authoritative sources of Catholic theology, spirituality, and/or philosophy?

These are sincere questions. I have no intention of bringing hat or fruit maymays into this.

>I believe they should have done more for families to support them

You're right about this, as regards the modern Church in the West, if nothing else. I would agree.

Also, if the Church has only ever operated for the sake of self-gain for the clergy and hierarchy, as you fellas seem to be asserting, why is the Catholic Church pretty much the only large denomination of Christianity in the West that stands opposed to divorce and contraception? Under the self-interest thesis it seems like the Church should have caved in on these issues decades ago.


d2f46a No.14108

>>14104

Does Orthodox Christianity support divorce and contraception?


e5a5e3 No.14109

>>14108

No it doesn't.


f70033 No.14115

>>14109

>>14109

To be fair, I doubt these denominations have much place or availability in most of western culture, Eastern Europe and Greece being the exception, so I see why you wouldn't count it as an alternative.


26c34c No.14129

>>14115

not really. Large cities have them. Theres like 10 here in the Houston Metro Area


99aebe No.14138

>>14010

What's wrong with pagans? I was raised as Asatru, so it's always been my belief. I've also never run into the LARPers or roleplayers that /pol/ is always talking about. Is there something inherently wrong with the virtues of Asatru?


d2f46a No.14145

>>14138

Most of the Pagans on /pol/ are probably jews hiding behind a false nordic visage to spew their immense personal hate of Jesus Christ, you can just tell by the tone and the bitterness of their personage. There's also a few people that spam the same tired arguments and pictures in any thread that's remotely related to Christianity.


d5d474 No.14374

File: 1431028850589.jpg (30.7 KB, 460x288, 115:72, Pope-Pius-XII.jpg)

Bumping.

I like discussing Christianity with my friends at /polpol/.


16b05e No.14385

File: 1431040210607.jpg (229.55 KB, 645x877, 645:877, 1425635636554.jpg)

>>14145

>Asatru is somehow jewish maymay

>projecting pagan motives this much

Everything you said goes for the same Crusader DEUSVULTfags who spam the same tired arguments and pictures in any thread that's remotely related to Paganism.

Shitposters are the majority on both sides of the shitfling fests that are religion threads.


1bf241 No.14387

>>14138

There is nothing wrong with Paganism, the problem lies with fedora tippers being wannabe Pagans and with shills simply using it as an excuse to steer people away from Christianity in countries that have little to no Paganism.

>>14385

>>Asatru is somehow jewish maymay

It is used by shills though, most of the people praising Paganism on /pol/ can barely name any god other than Odin and I don't think any of the fedoras shilling for it even know Paganism outside of Scandinavia exists. There are indeed plenty of Pagans, but shitposters like to inflate this value in thread even REMOTELY mentioning religion.


16b05e No.14388

>>14387

You can't just lump up fedora tippers with pagans, only because they both bash on Christianity m8.

And the anti-asatru meme is that of muh heritage mericlaps instead of ignorant viking worshipping snowniggers.

But you are right, those retards do jump on any opportunity to shoehorn in their views in unrelated topics. And once it starts the thread is dead between the 'kike on stick' vs 'lumber' shitflinging.


1bf241 No.14389

>>14388

>You can't just lump up fedora tippers with pagans, only because they both bash on Christianity m8.

I am not saying they are fedoras because they bash on Christianity, I am saying that a lot of them clearly show a lack of understanding in the belief they are trying to push for. And the attraction towards this kind of shitposting is that Paganism is older than Christianity, which makes them think that one is "more traditional" than the other, while failing to realise that religion seeks to consolidate tradition and is in itself not enough to be considered as culture.


16b05e No.14390

File: 1431045058296.jpg (153.38 KB, 1201x860, 1201:860, 1419887593269.jpg)

>>14389

I think you are misinterpreting what the pagans' motives are for their arguments about tradition/heritage. But let us just agree to disagree on that split hair. We are pretty much on the same line on the rest anyway.


a144ce No.14641

>>14138

For me I've always found three things that turn me off from the Asatru. One, many of them are far too pushy about their favorite brand of polytheism, pushing all germanics to adopt the scandinavian branch and even trying to get non-germanics to adopt a faith alien to their heritage while babbling on about heritage.

Two, many of them are far too out of control of their emotions when it comes to Christianity, in much the same way as the more annoying atheists. It comes across as bitter exes

Three, I find the prevalence of people who believe in the religion because they think it is useful but don't have faith in the Gods to be distasteful. Religion as the opiate of the masses was proposed by a jew, we shouldn't adopt it.


b43eec No.14646

File: 1431603020400.jpg (315.51 KB, 1024x680, 128:85, Milan.jpg)

>why do some White Nationalists engage in targeted antagonism towards Catholicism?

It has to do with the current international viewpoint of the Church, as well as the sense that the Church is moving from being initially a Western religion to more of a global/3rd world religion in terms of most of its followers

A lot of posters are really only going to have experience with some of the more liberal Catholics, especially in the US

As far the paganfags go, their problem is their movement is inherently tainted by new age spirituality, and they really don't have a lot of touch with their roots, frankly, as long as they try to live moral and just lives and care for the family and extended family, I could care less

you just have the shitposting LARPers from both sides shouting "kike on a stick" and "muh crusades, deus vult" at each other all day on most imageboards though, so not exactly the height of argument.

What are you defining as Trad Catholics? That's probably the key argument in this fight

I think that Catholics can be perfectly compatible with Nationalists, it does depend on the specific viewpoints of that Catholic though

the overall trend of the Church would concern me however as it appears to be shifting leftwards

They also need to clean house on the cathedrals of Europe and drive out the corporations and tourists as well as do more to defend the Christians of the middle east, but thats my personal opinion

t. deist




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]