[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

Politics, news, culture, society - no shills allowed

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1433591618210.png (2.36 MB, 1600x1322, 800:661, 1419914341828.png)

cd4fdb No.15306

Let's get some discussion here.

In a future National Socialist state, how much influence do you think government should have on the market? How much, and what, should be nationalised? Is it possible to have a government that helps protect the folk with economic and consumer legislation that focuses on quality over quantity, or is it impossible to avoid large amounts of regulation? Is heavy regulation even a bad thing?

My view is that other than the obvious step of nationalising the central bank and killing debt-based currency, government should have an active role in the market - monopoly busting, enforcing consumer protection legislation, preventing free trade and engaging in protectionism until industry has grown at least on par with trade partners, and always favouring national industry over foreign business, though not preventing them from doing business at all provided they follow the law.

On nationalisation, I think that most things pertaining to either national security or the health and well-being of the nation should be nationalised, like Health, Education, the Defence industry, and certain other things like roads and railways.

Ideally, regulation should be as minimal as possible, though I'm not sure how realistic that is, as excess regulation tends to effect small business more than large.

d2329f No.15313

I think the market regulation during Roosevelt 1 was very good, you had the big oil and steel corps being trust busted and split up, busted a J.P. Morgan company merger, knew why in 1907 that things were bad, actually saying the plutocracy, and he created the FDA, which to varying degrees is a good thing


aad181 No.15342

File: 1433781787358.webm (7.76 MB, 160x120, 4:3, George Lincoln Rockwell.webm)


042e78 No.15345

I think it really varies from nation to nation and whatever has actually been effective for a state and a people in the past. The common examples would be high amounts of socialism in Scandinavians and high amounts of free enterprise in the USA. Beyond that I think care should be maintained to prevent consolidation of production in corporate monopolies or government socialism when it becomes inefficient in it's size. And I would agree that most production and economic flow needs to be favoring and preferring of production in our nation as opposed to any others, because otherwise the national economy begins to run into issues and the purpose of National Socialism is lost.


67150c No.15349

>>15342

I like this webm, I've never though about the american Nazi party highly, but they have some rather logical points on dealing with the black and jewish problems.


042e78 No.15353

>>15349

I think Ted Turner came in later and fucked it all up, which is why it never gained much momentum beyond the initial flash.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]