/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

>>15899

I remember when this started, it was after the Namibia project went up in flames, you guys sort of just disappeared. Then again looking how Namibia turned out that's probably for the best. I'm actually surprised this went anywhere instead of just imploding.

>>15900

I think it disappeared because the board owner neglected the board and left it subject to shitposting. I only found out about it a couple of months ago when it was mentioned in a thread, and we started up a little discussion that has grown and progressed pretty well, and now we have control over the board. /namibia/ was an awful idea, and the white nationalist shitposting just made it worse for their reputation when VICE wrote the article about them. We have Greenlanders and other members of Nordic passport countries in the discussion and we have been in contact with the government.

>>15901

Colonizing the desert is a stupid idea, the fact that they planned to create a white nationalist strong hold on a place called the skeleton coast says everything.

The Greenland idea could work if you simply create a small settlement for a strong community for whatever your goals are. Taking over Greenland isn't going to get you anywhere; especially once oil is discovered under the retreating ice.

Isn't it impossible to own land in Greenland? Would make for a precarious position to have to continuously depend on the consent of the government in order to be allowed to do your business.

I still think Botswana is the best option.

>>15899

is it a white-ethnic (nationalistic?) environmentally-friendly settlement or am I misinterpreting this?

I would love to lend a hand if I can be useful