[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

Politics, news, culture, society - no shills allowed

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1452180405667.png (128.01 KB, 400x300, 4:3, gex_shill.png)

b3e780 No.16912

I've just visited endchan pol

http://endchan.xyz/pol/res/2294.html#q3960

and probed to see if the kikes are running it.

There is a simple bench-mark test to detect kikes : do they assert GEX was a grass roots movement and not a kike shill operation?

The initial answer is : endchan/pol/ thinks GEX is grassroots, and in no way a shill operation.

They are kikes.

So ideally i wouldn't migrate there.

Otherwise it'll be the same cycle again. They will stay /pol/ for a while, but when the shill armies comes the gates will be open, and the mods and BO won't lift a finger to stop them.

c97606 No.16913

>>16912

Bluepill here.

1) Why do you think GEX video was produced by shills? What do you think they are trying to achieve? Who might benefit?

2) Even if the video was sponsored by someone, isn't the message true? Isn't it an effective action against population replacement in Europe?

>endchan/pol/ thinks GEX is grassroots therefore they are kikes

You should've added some evidence to claims that GEX vid was a shill operation, because you make it look like it's common knowledge and it isn't.


27f410 No.16915

>>16912

The best bet might be to make a board here and lay out a clear position so that everyone is on the same page.

My position would be something like:

There's a Jewish conspiracy

It's not the only conspiracy

Aliens and UFOs are disinfo

Most shilling is done by a type of software or AI (woah) in addition to the paid hacks.

A lot of history and current events is distortion of the truth or fakery

>>16913

Isn't it common knowledge?

As for 2, no it's not. Marino Balletili reposted it when it came out, can you believe that? He probably identifies with the guy going "What's up? Muh knee! Muh knee!"


208a3a No.16916

What is end chan?


102244 No.16922

>>16915

> Why do you think GEX video was produced by shills?

a.)

It was a series of footages very rapidly switching from one to the next, sometimes as fast as 3 to 4 per second, something i call flick framing.

The effect of this is : the viewer simply doesn't have the time to consciously interpret what he's seeing. Instead the imagery just washes thru his mind, into his subconscious without his conscious being able to overlay an interpretation or understanding.

This doesn't mean he can't gain an interpretation of what he's , it mean he can't form his own thought out conscious interpretation. What he gets is a simplified base emotional interpretation from the imagery and emotive music.

In other words the gex vid wasn't an appeal to your sanity, reason or logic, it was an appeal to your animal instincts.

Such media is the antithesis of /pol/, which should appeal to all able minded people to use their minds to rationally break down the illusions cast on them by kikes who control the media.

Such media is typical of kikes, who want goyim to be base animals controlled by feels rather than logic.

b.)

It had the /pol/ emblem on it. We rarely do that. infiltrators or mimics of a group often want to falsely ascribe work they have done as work of the group. This is a very old trick.

A familiar example : When a bomb goes off somewhere in the world and within hours the media declares the terrorist group responsible for it have come forward and admitted it was them… it most likely was not them : it was a infiltrator or mimic. more than 98% of the time it is not useful for a minority group to reveal itself to large groups as a trouble causer.

In our case : What if some powerful leftwing lobby was offended enough they decided to shutdown 8/pol/ ? Don't kid yourself, we couldn't do much. We are a tiny minority group surviving on a shoestring budget and a single patron, we are not strong. Lefty groups have literally hundreds of millions of dollars and millions of SJWs, some paid, most unpaid who can lobby and work to shut us down.

If gex is smart and hardworking enough to put together that vid, he should know not to put the /pol/ emblem on.

c.)

Gex was uploaded 4 days before the paris hoax. It too much to think this was a coincidence. - one of the biggest productions attributed to /pol/ happens in conjuction with one of the biggest hoaxs for years.

d.) The shitposting on gex threads was unusually high, even for /pol/. Nothing could be intelligently discussed. The only thought possible was " OMG! FUCKING SHITSKINS RACE WAR NOW ".

Thats exactly what the kikes would want.

e.) The vid went viral rapidly. the youtube video has by far the most hits for any vid purportedly by a /pol/ack, and its gained those relatively hits fast. This was well beyond any expected or demonstrated capacity of /pol/ which is a small community, of which >90% are not active in propagating our ideas on to the rest of the net media.

Seem a hidden hand was helping the vid become popular.

f.) Gex, the creator of the vid, played himself as an experienced /pol/ack dedicated to the cause of /pol/. Yet he didn't exist until this vid, except to post a couple of early versions of it. Now the assignment is over, he's disappeared as quietly as he appeared.

Where is he? Where are his threads discussing immigration numbers, discussion rightwing cell formations, discussing how to lobby the government to close the gates?

As with the other unlikely coincidences, that gex would choose to appear and disappear in sync with the paris hoax compounds the chance that he was part of a shilling operation on /pol/


9fc145 No.16926

>>16922

a, c, and much of d are not convincing

d is easily explainable by influx of newfags. a could just be amateur work, I've put together videos before and never thought this deeply into this element of it. As for c, Muslims are attacking everything all the time, I'm sure within the next three months there will be another big attack somewhere, this isn't much a of a coincidence.

Let's stick with the more convincing evidence

b = this is true, it is uncharacteristic for the /pol/ emblem to be on something and it is extremely counterproductive. This is solid evidence.

e and d = it is true, Gex came out of nowhere and the first threads were treating him as an established entity. Things like "based Gex dropping redpills" when nobody actually knew who Gex was. Newfags who didn't want to be left behind saw this and pretended to know who Gex was and what was going on. I was quite taken by this, in fact I had suspicions at first as it had all the markings of a concentrated shill effort. I then put my suspicions on hold when I saw just how much of /pol/ was in support of it.

I'm torn on the issue. It's very clear that Gex and the video is the effort of a shill campaign. What I'm not clear on is whether it's an intentional psyop meant to work against our interests OR whether it's just a kid from /pol/ looking for e celeb fame for himself.


102244 No.16928

>>16926

>a, c, and much of d are not convincing

Seems you are not savvy with numbers \ probability or compound probability.

Or logic for that matter…

>Its very clear that Gex and the video is the effort of a shill campaign

>What I'm not clear on is whether it's an intentional psyop meant to work against our interests

> Its clear that y = x

> but I'm not sure if y = x

I'm not sure if kids can be this stupid of you're a shill just shitting up the thread.


d97761 No.16930

File: 1453685733333.jpg (212.57 KB, 500x750, 2:3, Wizard 010.jpg)

>>16915

>implying aliens don't exist


8dc5a1 No.16933

>>16928

>I'm not sure if kids can be this stupid of you're a shill just shitting up the thread.

Stop being overly defensive, it's worthy of looking into and you're not doing it any service by focusing on the parts that aren't convincing and then screaming shill.

The point about quick cuts between scenes is such a non-issue, 10 people who aren't video savvy can make a video and you'll see it in 9 of those videos. Same for your other point about shitposting, go on /pol/ right now and 9 out of 10 threads be guilty of the same shitposting you're talking about in the Gex threads. "Compound probability" is a completely irrelevant notion when talking about issues present in almost cases.

>Its clear that y = x

>but I'm not sure if y = x

This is just a blatant straw man. Yes, it's clear that shilling inflated Gex and turned it into a thing. Shilling has lots of purposes behind it, what's not clear is the intention of that shillling is. Some shilling is nefarious with a political motivation, some is shilling is meant to sell a product for profit, and other shilling is for fame. So your x=y, y!=x comparison was illogical in this debate.


102244 No.16934

>>16933

since I know most anons fail their school maths or scrap by with a C grade ( means they dont know shit, but can parrot the easy stuff ), and will never do a single lesson in logic or statistics in their lives, I will take time on the chance u are not a shill and just a ignorant goyim. I'm one of the poor few who has done tertiary education in maths stats and logic.

>The point about quick cuts between scenes is such a non-issue, 10 people who aren't video savvy can make a video and you'll see it in 9 of those videos

There's no easy way to explain it to a non maths person, but by by your estimate of 9/10 vids have the same attributes of a kike propanda piece, i would have only to find 9 other attributes where kikery has equal proportion ( 1 in 10 ) to have a decent case i.e. around 63% confidence of correctness.

Its something a maths-noob will never grasp. The best I can try with you is a 10 sided dice. The dice is a special dice because it is unknown whether it is loaded against rolling a 1. You rolled it 10 times. It doesn't come up 1 on any roll. Even though its 90% chance of not being a 1 on any roll, the compound probability of rolling not one 10 times is 36%, i.e. its 63% chance of being loaded.

When I present this problem to kids most of them refuse to believe it because they've never seen loaded dice, only after I give them loaded dice do they get the mindsets right and work on the probabilities to get correct answers most of the time.

( cant let kids handle the loaded dice cos they feel the weight immediately and know its loaded, so don't bother working out the probability cos they already know the answer )

>me for your other point about shitposting, go on /pol/ right now and 9 out of 10 threads be guilty of the same shitposting you're talking about in the Gex threads.

This is what I mean about you talking shit.

I just checked /pol/ and out of 374 threads in the catalog only 2 of them are at the post limit. thats about 0.6% ( even britpol fails to have one with >740 replys atm ) . The gex threads hit 750 replys within a few hours of being posted, and later gex threads repeated this.

https://archive.is/8TKXH

On this alone, the odds are at least 166:1 in favour that gex was being specially shitposted by shills.

>This is just a blatant straw man.

" pure coincidence " that you set up a straw man about 90% of /pol/ threads being shitposted ( only 0.6% of threads even reach the bump limit ) as hard as gex, then in the next sentence accuse me of straw manning. In the moment of committing a crime, a fleeting moment of guilt in the crook's mind is quickly converted into accusing your opponent of your own crime.

There's no excuse for letting stuff like this slip when u are writing, you can review what you've written and see these gaping freudian slips. Unless your a kid or a retard - then you won't see freudian slips.

Fuck…. reading your last paragraph just confirmed you a as kid \ retard. Just lurk more and stop wasting my time. If you are pining for attention go on /b/ or e-chat.


95617f No.16939

>>16934

>Even though its 90% chance of not being a 1 on any roll, the compound probability of rolling not one 10 times is 36%, i.e. its 63% chance of being loaded.

Are those exact probabilities, anon? I was never great with statistics/probability stuff, but I seem to be getting different answers.


102244 No.16946

>>16939

the actual value approximates 1-1/e as n tends to infinity. for n=10 then chance is 0.9^10 = 0.3487 to 4 s.f.

but u are being pedantic


254e76 No.16965

>I posted a single thread on a website.

>They responded this way.

>Clearly this website is a jew controlled honeypot and nobody should ever visit there and you should just all stay here on 8chan even though there have been serious problems with the ownership and mods.

>please don't leave guys you gotta stay here in the little 8chan fence.

W E W L A D

E

W

L

A

D

Inb4 strawman




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]