29e67b No.5817
NEGOTIATIONS BREAKTHROUGHWe got a "framework" guys, President capitulated to the Ayatollahs - and now will have to face the wrath of the Good Goyim in congress, Israel and the Saudis!
President Ooga Booga to Congress: We got a deal, Please don't kill my legacy>The parameters are not a final agreement, however, and negotiations toward a signed deal will continue through June. In his address outside the White House, Obama stressed the importance of these negotiations, saying that an eventual agreement would be far superior to the alternatives of increased economic sanctions or another war in the Middle East.>In his statement, Obama said negotiators would brief Congress on the details of the preliminary agreement and said he welcomed a “robust debate” in the coming months. He said he would speak with congressional leaders Thursday and emphasized, “The issues at stake here are bigger than politics. These are matters of war and peace.”>But he also issued a direct warning to lawmakers who have been critical or skeptical of the negotiations: Don’t do anything to jeopardize the talks. >“If Congress kills this deal not based on expert analysis, and without offering any reasonable alternative, then it's the United States that will be blamed for the failure of diplomacy,” Obama said. “International unity will collapse, and the path to conflict will widen.”>>https://archive.today/Gqn6U | http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/04/02/obama_to_congress_dont_kill_nuclear_deal_with_iran_126135.html————–
Senate wants congressional review of Iran Deal:>It is important that we wait to see the specific details of today’s announcement, and as the P5-plus-one works toward any final deal, we must remain clear-eyed regarding Iran’s continued resistance to concessions, long history of covert nuclear weapons-related activities, support of terrorism, and its current role in destabilizing the region. If a final agreement is reached, the American people, through their elected representatives, must have the opportunity to weigh in to ensure the deal truly can eliminate the threat of Iran’s nuclear program and hold the regime accountable. Rather than bypass Congress and head straight to the U.N. Security Council as planned, the administration first should seek the input of the American people.>>https://archive.today/IOrcE | http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/02/sen-corker-wants-congressional-review-of-iran-deal/————–
Fox News says the solution is Reagan-style regime change:>Our policy toward Iran should not be Obama-style capitulation, or Bush-style war, but Reagan-style regime change, where we push their economy to the brink and Iranian people rise up and demand change. We have enormous leverage to bring against Iran, if we chose to. We could push for a better deal by imposing punitive sanctions. We could freeze them out of the world banking system. We could tighten the economic noose around Iran’s neck. We could encourage the pro-American, pro-democracy movement in Iran to challenge the mullahs. We could tear down Iran’s cyberwall, so their young and literate population can see what the rest of the world is like and launch a social media driven revolution of their own. More than 70 percent of Iranians are under the age of 30. How long will they tolerate being ruled by a handful of 80-year-old mullahs who have pushed their economy into freefall? The Iranian people took to the streets in 2009 to demand government change, but President Obama turned his back on them. Could we encourage them this time?
>>https://archive.today/SNQrB | http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/04/01/obamas-folly-in-iran-needs-page-from-reagans-playbook/——————
Breitbart decries it as Munich II, also asks for regime change:>The question, simply, is not whether there will be war, but whether Iran will be able to obtain a nuclear weapon. And while President Obama promised Thursday that the framework agreement closes off all paths to a bomb, that is simply not true. Iran maintains a significant amount of control over international inspections. It has been forgiven for its past cheating, and allowed to maintain significant nuclear assets. And it may have other secret nuclear facilities, including military ones yet unknown. The negotiations took place as if in a vacuum, separate from the role Iran is playing in the region—as if its ongoing “non-negotiable” pledges to destroy Israel did not matter, as if Iran were not supervising the slaughter of innocents in Syria, or trying to bomb an embassy in Uruguay. (..) There is only one way to close off Iran’s path to a bomb, and that is to depose the regime. >> https://archive.today/wsKk3 | http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/04/02/iran-deal-munich-ii/ 29e67b No.5829
Washington post released a copy of the press briefing, I'll be posting screenshots since I can only submit one screenshot at a time.
>>http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/parameters-of-plan-on-iran-nuclear-program/1507/Page 1
29e67b No.5831
>>5829Page 2 of the Briefing
29e67b No.5832
>>5831Page 3 here, one more to go.
29e67b No.5834
>>5832And page 4.
There's a page 5 but it's blank with just ### there.
832fb8 No.5845
>>5817This is encouraging because it's shown that there is a limit to the Israeli government's lobbying in the US.
I was amazed back when public opposition was able to stop the US from attacking Syria so I never expected any sort of official reconciliation with Iran.
29e67b No.5852
MOAR NEWS, MOAR LINKS:
Reuters coverage seems pretty impartial
>>https://archive.today/ALwDB | http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04————
Foreign Policy's coverage is really impartial and neutral, worth a read
>>https://archive.today/iTNEb | http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/02/world-readies-for-breakthrough-on-iran-nuclear-talks/They have a soft-paywall of 3 or 5 articles a month - just open the link to articles on an private/anonymous/incognito window and you can get around it.
————
The Blaze: Negotiations full of lies - no fatwa against nuclear weapons.>Obama stated: “Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khameini, has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons.” (…) former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy penned a post on just this topic in response to similar comments from Secretary of State John Kerry, and before him Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. McCarthy wrote: [T]he “fatwa” in question does not exist. The invaluable Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) has done extensive research into compilations of Khamenei’s published fatwas. (…) No such fatwa has ever been published.>In a sharia state, particularly the one in Iran that is actually run by the country’s top sharia jurists, fatwas are important statements of governing law, like statutes are in the U.S. Yet despite repeated requests, Iran has never produced the purported anti-nuclear weapons fatwa from Khamenei.>>https://archive.today/OXloq | http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2015/04/02/factcheck-did-you-catch-the-thoroughly-debunked-statement-obama-made-in-his-persian-new-year-address-to-iran/————–
Iran doesn't honor nuclear deals:>The Wall Street Journal reported last November that a Nov. 17 report from David Albright and his team at the Institute for Science and International Security, based on findings from the International Atomic Energy Agency, found Iran had lied to U.N. inspectors; Iran had tested a model for an advanced centrifuge, which violated a 2013 interim agreement, as well as hiding evidence of a nuclear-weapons development at Parchin.>> https://archive.today/z1AHg | http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/obama-iran-deal-historic————–
Israel: Oy, vey! Munich II! Another Shoah! - you noticing a pattern?
>“Today’s deal paves the way for Iran to eventually obtain a nuclear weapon, to further destabilize the Middle East and to continue spreading terror across the globe,” Bennett said. Bennett also wrote: “’Peace in our time’, 2015,” likening the agreement to the historic capitulation of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to Adolf Hitler in the 1938 Munich Agreement.>Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party accused the negotiators of being “detached” from reality. “The smiles in Lausanne are detached from wretched reality in which Iran refuses to make any concessions on the nuclear issue and continues to threaten Israel and all other countries in the Middle East,” Steinitz said in a statement.>The negotiators “caved to Iran’s dictates and the framework agreement will only lead to an Iranian nuclear bomb,” an unnamed Israeli official told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, calling the agreement an “historic mistake that would make the world more dangerous.”>>https://archive.today/opPL0 | http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/02/capitulation-detached-from-wretched-reality-negative-reaction-to-iran-nuclear-deal-pours-in-from-israel/ fba03c No.5859
OY VEY THIS IS ANOTHER MUNICH AGREEMENT!!!!!
REMEMBER THE CZECHOSLOVAKIANS GOYIM!!!
a3a17c No.10323
Updating this. Last week the Executive branch was bragging about it's "Historical deal with nuclear Iran", today it all came tumbling down:
>Iran will begin using its latest generation IR-8 centrifuges as soon as its nuclear deal with the world powers goes into effect, Iran’s foreign minister and nuclear chief told members of parliament on Tuesday, according to Iran’s semi-official FARS news agency.
>Iran has said that its IR-8 centrifuges enrich uranium 20 times faster than the IR-1 centrifuges it currently uses. According to the FARS report, “Iran’s foreign minister and nuclear chief both told a closed-door session of the parliament on Tuesday that the country would inject UF6 gas into the latest generation of its centrifuge machines as soon as a final nuclear deal goes into effect by Tehran and the six world powers.”
>The Iranians are taking pains every step of the way to portray Obama as defeated. They’re not making even the smallest rhetorical gestures to act like the reasonable partners-in-peace Obama and his train-wreck foreign policy team are desperate to portray them as.
>Iran won’t permit inspections at any of its military facilities. “There is no such agreement. Basically, inspection of military facilities is a red line and no inspection of any kind from such facilities would be accepted,” said Iranian defense minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan. This is the end stage of the Lausanne farce, in which Iran’s only objective is to see how much they can humiliate Obama before he finally backs away from the deal.
>>https://archive.today/D9dcn>>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/08/obamas-historic-iran-deal-falls-apart-as-mullahs-rev-up-high-speed-centrifuges/In all, it seems someone's only legacy will be being the first black president.
8e9b86 No.10334
>>10323So are they still gonna "deal" with Iran being the clear victor, or has everything been cut off? I think the bigger deciding factor will be if they stop being friendly with Russia and the BRICS banks because of this "deal".
a3a17c No.10338
>>10334Right now it seems that the deal is still "up" because Washington isn't backing away from it yet Iran is not backing down from it's nuclear program at all, it just won't build new installations it seems and will still keep is military nuclear facilities closed for inspectors. If the deal goes through, Iran will be the clear victor.
42aadc No.10359
>>10323God I hate most political cartoonists.
Make a decent point about overhyped social rage stories, but then mix that with absurd fear over Iran and nuclear bombs
af758f No.11518
7a98c2 No.11520
The next president will declare war on Iran and Obama will be remembered as a peaceful Gandhi-like character who tried his best to bring peace to the two sides, only to be ruined by the evil hate mongering Republican who gets into office next
4d7b61 No.11536
>>11520>Republican who gets into office nextwe should be so lucky
3a6312 No.12281
>>5817>Iran and US agree to make an agreement at an indeterminate time.>Political shit storm ensues.This thread is Top Kek.
a6d120 No.12285
>>11536Are you ready for Hillary?
d97b88 No.12299
>2016
>Jeb gets elected
>starts WWIII
>history blames it on Obongo
>Obama forever remembered as just another White president
top kek
8e57ed No.12319
>>12299source on the webm?