[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

Politics, news, culture, society - no shills allowed

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


ATTENTION: This board has either received no owner login for two weeks, or no posts for one week, and is therefore open for board claims. To claim this board, please email claim@8chan.co. Deadline is October 30, 2015. Thanks for using 8ch.net!

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

a9a546 No.7379

Nigel Farage made a calculated gamble in the debates: Point out the NHS is spending hundreds of millions of pounds on foreign-born HIV health tourists.

Everything he said was factually based, and no one was able to discredit the numbers in post-debate analysis.

Notice the response from other parties was "SHAME ON YOU FOR SAYING FACTS, NIGEL, THE GOYIM ARENT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT."

It turns out this was an intentional trap card laid by Farage:

>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11514369/Revealed-Nigel-Farage-planned-Aids-comment-as-part-of-shock-and-awful-TV-debate-strategy.html

> Mr Farage discussed whether to deploy statistics showing that sixty per cent of newly-diagnosed HIV patients are foreigners at length with his aides before Thursday night’s television debate, and decided to go ahead after being reassured it would “motivate” the party’s base, the Telegraph understands.

>The remarks, which were denounced as distasteful by Mr Farage’s political rivals, were not an attempt to “reach out” to floating voters but instead a “core vote message”, sources disclosed.



Turns out it may have had the desired effect:
>http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-32185469
>He won some support for his views on foreigners using NHS hospitals when he appeared at a beer festival at Margate winter gardens.

>One person who spoke to him told me that he liked UKIP because the leader said the things that other politicians wouldn't say.

c8ca97 No.7391

Yeah, I could see people feeling like Nigel is compromising on the nationalist message in order to be politically correct, but I think it really did pay off. He comes off as hard-hitting and willing to face real issues. Also, you should probably try and spark discussion on brit/polpol/ about this, it needs some activity.

13e88f No.7405

File: 1428200155097.png (222.27 KB, 500x375, 4:3, 6473890.png)

>"It's dangerous, it divide communities, and it creates stigma to people who are ill, and I think you should be ashamed of yourself"
>"When someone is diagnosed with a dreadful illness, my instinct is to view them as a human being. Not consider what country they come from"

Where do these fucking people come from? How mentally ill do you have to be to think like this? And why is it almost always Women who say this kind of bullshit?

56b29f No.7410

>>7405
>protip
Most women DO NOT think for themselves

1ee590 No.7414

File: 1428201825357.gif (651.27 KB, 200x348, 50:87, 1428191551021.gif)

hey guys i made the OP post on /pol/ 3 hours ago, then someone just directly copy pasted it to /polpol/

http://8ch.net/pol/res/1649461.html

I would appreciate it if you would please write your own posts instead of copy pasting content from other boards :)

However, unlike many people, I love and support free speech so you are free to do what you would like!

6a3288 No.7416


>>7405
Emotional manipulation
Women and the generations of males they've feminized (by depriving them of masculinity) can't handle hard truth
The vast majority of women will always resort to claiming that more feelings and sensitivity is always the solution for the problems in society

a26828 No.7428

>>7414
Well that would explain the use of britcucks in the subject…

I'd appreciate people writing their own posts instead of copying shitty versions from /pol/.

c8ca97 No.7431

>>7428
Yeah, there's already a brit/polpol/, he doesn't need to do this.

a9a546 No.7434

>>7428
eh I saw what I thought was a good post on /pol/ and decided /polpol/ might be a better place to discuss this news.
I think I'm right so far because this thread has more posts in it even though /pol/ has significantly more posters
Also cuck as an insult was popularized by /pol/ so /int/ is just stealing our memes.

287390 No.7498

>>7434
Cuck was popularized by /sp/, dude. Doesn't matter, though.

c2c8be No.7502

>>7379
Of course the only response the leftists have is to appeal to muh emotions while completely disregarding the facts

313dd5 No.7916

>>7405
>why is it almost always Women who say this kind of bullshit?
because women without a strong father or husband (preferably both) have nothing to go by except social approval. The jew with the control of media saturates the female with a false sense of what is socially approved. Therefore with society full of beta cucks females are a weapon of the jew.

Know this before you let your daughters marry a beta cuck.

d4b173 No.7960

File: 1428268507959.jpg (298.08 KB, 1920x1200, 8:5, 314593.jpg)

>>7414
Considering literally all of our Ukraine and at times middle-east content has been stolen back to /pol/, and no one said anything about it simply because we just want to keep the quality here, maybe a credit would be warranted for, but you know in an anonymous board, it doesn't really change anything.

As long as OP are quality, I see no problem taking them off /pol/ if it doesn't drag the shit with it. Of course quality is warranted and I would like people to do their own shit and show at least the minimal effort to do it themselves, but hell, as BO said, I don't think /pol/ and /polpol/ are mutually exclusive boards.

>>7434
I agree with anon. At the very least maybe it was more fit for the brit/polpol/ thread, but still good enough. Let's get back on topic.

To answer to OP, this is the usual hypocrisy we get from the left all the time, sadly. Literally every political party, especially the leaders, have to go through their PR before saying anything and make sure that it would yield a good effect. To be fair, I agree it is a ridiculous practice for the "spirit" of democracy, even though for any professional political party, it is the only logical thing to do. But to have worked for one, literally everyone of them do it, and most of the time they choose to act to much more emotionally-driven situations than plain facts, purposely either lying or hiding facts to make their narrative sound better to the people they would like to attract to their party, at the risk of creating hate or violence, as long as they gain popularity.

So blaming Farage for playing the game is total hypocrisy. Like blaming Le Pen for accepting loans from Russian banks when European banks were blockading the fuck out of her and she couldn't get any loan (which had 100% chance of being repaid) because of political leanings, which is the worst kind of discrimination in so called "free countries" that can be…

dab17a No.13512

>>7410

Most women allow their emotions to control their judgement. Not a good way to my life-altering choices as their emotions tend to fluctuate so rapidly that they rarely ever stick to any single decision.


dab17a No.13513

>>13512

*Make, not my. Sorry.


cf1abb No.16759

>>7916

Then how do you explain strong right-wing women like Le Pen?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]