>>7494First you will need to define conspiracy.
The legitimate definition is: a group of people acting together for a common goal not announced to the public. Most definitions will add "unlawful" to that as if it had any meaning.
Though if you take "unlawful" as part of the definition then a bunch of people planning to go rave on E are in a conspiracy.
So people add "theory" to the term so it is a conspiracy theory. Here an unscientific definition of theory is required for it to make sense because a scientific theory would mean that conspiracies that have been revealed and proven are now conspiracy theories. Theory in the laymans terms means something like hypothesis or a yet unproven idea.
What people mean when they try to use the term conspiracy or conspiracy theory as an insult is that they somehow know that this plan did not happen even though they lack the data. If you think about that then it really has no power over a rational discussion because it is the definition of a buzzword; ambiguous meaning and definition and assumed authority and knowledge on the part of the accuser.
What people mean when they start using buzzwords like conspiracy theory is "anything I don't believe is not real and you are crazy to disagree with me".
Now back in the 50s when there were studies both for negative and positive effects of smoking cigarettes no rational individual that looked at all the studies would just sweepingly dismiss the negative ones. So why is that done today for all the known chemicals added to food that may either be in extreme amounts compared to natural levels or simply synthetic and toxin in any dose?
As for political conspiracies I would return to the unlawful part. Most of what you do can be found to be unlawful in some way to at least your local bylaws unless you use law as a bible and fanatically read it every morning before acting.
It is not a "guess" or a hypothesis that jews have been pushing multiculturalism.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that soy and soy derived ingredients deregulate your hormonal system.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that the net effects of complicated tax codes that can be bypassed by international corporate legal teams but not by the average man cause you to get poorer if you are not already near the top and actively jumping hoops.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that society as you know it has a European flavour including all the internet and developed cities.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that when all of Europe and the irrefutably European countries like America, Canada and Australia get flooded with non Europeans that the world will change drastically.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that many people with billions of dollars at their personal disposal become insane with power as they age.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that modern Main Stream Media is a tool heavily manipulated for jewish interests.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that genocide can occur by indirect means and is happening right now on all European people.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that feeding unlimited welfare to the laziest and dumbest of society causes future generations to have higher ratio of those incompetent people.
It is not a "guess" or hypothesis that international banking and fiat currency is designed to finance all this destruction.
The military industrial complex where soldiers die for psychosocial experiments and corporate investments is confirmed.
None of this is as earlier defined is unproven and much of it is openly discussed through euphemisms like overpopulation and equality.
So you ask for conspiracies which is people asking together for a common goal not announced to the public, look at the facts and draw conclusions. Even the rational definition of conspiracy doesn't apply to these rarely discussed plans and systems because it is not hidden or secret, it just isn't popularized except in fiction. Why would something that is known to be happening be reinforced as fiction in Main Stream Media? If you want to say that it is innocent, random, and unconnected then you may in fact be involved in believing unproven things. In all these cases disproven things. It is not an accident that pesticides get used on crops even though we have studies that in as little as a decade lands without pesticide use and without monoculture crops end up outproducing the others. There are groups that get satisfaction from exerting control and they have far more power than they need just to live comfortable and luxurious lives.