[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/polpol/ - Politically Incorrect Discussion

Politics, news, culture, society - no shills allowed

Catalog

The development of the fully open source software behind 8ch.net that anyone can use ("infinity") is a massive undertaking. Please consider supporting the Infinity Development Group on Flattr by clicking here. Your donations also contribute patches back to vichan, infinity's upstream and engine on which more than one hundred imageboards rely worldwide.
8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C | Buy Bitcoin easily in the US | Buy Bitcoin anonymously all over the world | Bitcoin FAQ
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

950492 No.7907

You may have seen names like Julius Evola, Rene Guenon, or Frithjof Schuon mentioned from time to time on /pol/ish type boards but don't really know what they are all about.

Here is a one hour lecture by the late Jonathan Bowden explaining the ideas and context of Julius Evola. The lecture itself it fast paced and entertaining and covers Evola's ideas presented in the books Revolt Against the Modern World, Ride the Tiger, and Men Among the Ruins.

f0ee54 No.7918

Rene Guenon was a race and cultural-traitor, who abandoned his home continent to life in Egypt and marry an Egyptian wife!

I want nothing to do with people of that ilk.

488380 No.7921

I've heard a few things about Evola and he's on my reading list, so I'll bite.

3d0861 No.7957

>>7918
You clearly do not understand what Ride the Tiger means. Men dream about the societies Guenon had knowledge about and to ask him to "live" in the 20th century is a farce.

f0ee54 No.7961

>>7957
>You clearly do not understand what Ride the Tiger means. Men dream about the societies Guenon had knowledge about and to ask him to "live" in the 20th century is a farce.
What does that have to do with betraying you race, culture and ancestors?

You think Islamic Egypt is an improvement upon 20th century Europe? Your just going from mild decadence to a more extreme form of decadence.

454a77 No.7963

>>7961
It's going to be some /fringe/ tier bullshit
He's not talking about Egypt
I need to finish reading Evola though he at least wasn't degenerate
I haven't heard of Frithjof Schuon though Thank you OP

3d0861 No.7976

>>7961
It's not about location, friend. The idea is that, no matter the area that he was in, the world was not even close to being a Traditional society. In this case, if he found a woman suited to him, and I mean in the Traditional sense, her being Egyptian does not matter at that point. In his estimation it is the decline phase of the world (Kali Yuga). You are right in saying he went against what his ancestors wished, but he could say the same to them. Ultimately, he did not want to subject any children to a non-traditional world and offered great books for the future generations. Can you blame him for taking a wife while experiencing the Egyptian mysteries?

454a77 No.7983

>>7976
That was a better answer than I though it would be
Good job anon still to make a Traditional society I believe you must have a clear race.

f0ee54 No.7984

So let me get this straight, he betrayed his race, his culture and his ancestors, because the world wasn't "traditional" enough for him?

I get the idea that what you call traditional is really some anti-white movement, in truth, there is no such thing as traditionalism, just a bunch of oddballs mixing all kinds of esoteric and religious doctrines and dreaming about an age that never existed.

3d0861 No.7985

>>7983
No disagreements there.

3d0861 No.7992

>>7984
Why don't really actually read the books to get some context.

f0ee54 No.8007

>>7992
>Why don't really actually read the books to get some context.
I see, instaid of awnsering me, you just claim I must read his books…. I have, bye!

3d0861 No.8054

>>8007
The answer is that it wasn't traditional enough for him. Traditionalism also isn't a movement. It is a force that permeates throughout time, rise and fall. Claiming that it stagnates individuals into non-action is a fair point, but to claim the movement is anti-white is ridiculous. Also, Revolt Against the Modern World gives plenty of examples of Traditional societies.

f0ee54 No.8070

>>8054
>The answer is that it wasn't traditional enough for him
What Europe? Why?

>Traditionalism also isn't a movement. It is a force that permeates throughout time, rise and fall.

No, it ends in a ism, making it automatically an ideology, not some esoteric whishwash.

>Claiming that it stagnates individuals into non-action is a fair point, but to claim the movement is anti-white is ridiculous.

If becoming a traditionalist leads white people to abandon their race, culture and ancestors, then yes, it's anti-white.

>Also, Revolt Against the Modern World gives plenty of examples of Traditional societies.

I bet non of those societies have much in common besides being mostly bronze age and having wizards?

ab6144 No.8082

>>7976
The issue is that after the Kali Yuga if you follow his path the next age is still comparatively more degenerate at its' apex. His path wasn't "Riding the Tiger because it is preserving nothing, not even the soul, and it isn't even slightly aspirational.

Not a traditionalist per se, but to draw a comparison to another philosophers terminology I always took Evola's concept of an aristocrat of the soul to be like Kierkegaard's Knight of Faith. Guenon is the Knight of Infinite Resignation that rejects the possibility of perseverance in the face of a debased world in hope of some nebulous future resolution. It's not "Riding the Tiger" it's just giving up.

3d0861 No.8095

>>8070
I respect the more 'rational' view you have put forth. There is a lot of disagreement with what the terms 'Traditionalism' and 'Perennialism' actually mean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_School

There are some in-depth explanations of what the traditional societies were. Though, it would require a lengthy exposition not suited for this median, which is why I referred to the books early on, to make clear.

Being a traditional type doesn't necessitate a path for an individual. It places the Will of the reader to his own devices. If your Will is to make a change in the modern world, that is your choice, but Evola will remind you of the hardship he faced along the way. You cannot expect that everyone to have the will to fight or leave their slave-morality. I would say physically Geunon did give up, but his books are a great contribution for those that are interested in these 'primordial' ideas.
>>8082
That's an interesting interpretation. I'm still working my way through Plato and Aristotle, but I'll make sure to add this to the list.

f0ee54 No.8097

>>8095
>I respect the more 'rational' view you have put forth.
Could you explain why I am not really rational?

>

Being a traditional type doesn't necessitate a path for an individual. It places the Will of the reader to his own devices. If your Will is to make a change in the modern world
You do realise that your basically using a post-kantian concept of Will here, which is ironic.

>You cannot expect that everyone to have the will to fight or leave their slave-morality.

Now your using Nietzschean concepts, which is doubly ironic.

No doubt, if I read some more about your traditionalism, I would discover it to be an enlightenment construct, like conservatism.

At the end of the day everything you claim doesn't matter, because traditional societies do not exist, all those ancient societies where different from each other and had different rules.

To say otherwise is likely a form of modern universalism.

3d0861 No.8109

>>8097
I didn't say you weren't rational. You seem to reject spiritual/esoteric concepts which is fine.

Also, I'm using the line of thinking that was espoused in Ride the Tiger, which covers Kant and Nietzsche extensively. This displays more to me that you haven't actually read any of the body of work put out by Traditionalists. Again, to claim traditionalism is an enlightenment concept is antithetical to the entire idea of tradition which is staunchly against any form of modernity, including the enlightenment.

Moreover, to claim impugning your own morality and ideas to your 'will to power' is post-kantian is incorrect. There is no moral imperative to act in a certain way, it is up to the individual.

Finally, it is not universalism although it has some universal concepts. There are clearly stated ideas within the body of work of what is, and is not, traditional.

f0ee54 No.8111

>>8109
>I didn't say you weren't rational. You seem to reject spiritual/esoteric concepts which is fine.
No you suggested it by putting rational between "-", I am an highly esoteric thinking, just in a more authentic way.

>Also, I'm using the line of thinking that was espoused in Ride the Tiger, which covers Kant and Nietzsche extensively.

Why? Why does someone who is a traditionalist, use enlightenment thinkers?

>This displays more to me that you haven't actually read any of the body of work put out by Traditionalists.

No it doesn't.

>Again, to claim traditionalism is an enlightenment concept is antithetical to the entire idea of tradition which is staunchly against any form of modernity, including the enlightenment.

But Evola uses Kant and Nietzsche, what is it, you either reject the modern world, or you embrace it under the guise of rejecting the modern world.

>There is no moral imperative to act in a certain way, it is up to the individual.

Existenstialism, another enlightenment philosophy.

>Finally, it is not universalism although it has some universal concepts.

Then why does it claim several different societies in the past where traditionalistical?

The more I read about this, the more I get the idea that traditionalism is some kind of existential philosophy, where some kind of universal past is always present and we can get into this traditionalism, by just being…

Have you ever read Swedenborg?

3d0724 No.8115

I am immediately skeptical because those names are quite odd, from a proper European standpoint.

Also Evola mentions Osiris as sun-diety and suggests examination of Egyptian godlets
>the only Ancient Egpytian diety worth contemplation is ATON, all others are rotten shit until the Hellenic conquest of Egypt

gives me a certain feeling…..

3d0861 No.8119

>>8111
Ride the Tiger is positioned as a survival manual for the modern world. It would make sense that it would discuss modern ideas in a critical manner to show how a more traditional perspective perceives them.

Rejecting the moral imperative isn't existential it is a Nietzschean and Evolian concept. In fact, Ride the Tiger has a section called "Part 3: The Dead End of Existentialism."

It is debated whether or not Nietzsche is a modern thinker in many circles.

I haven't read swedenborg, but if the point is that "no one can every truly understand my unique philosophy that will never happen" then fair enough, but you might want to read the books before you judge them.

f0ee54 No.8123

>>8119
>>8119

>Ride the Tiger is positioned as a survival manual for the modern world. It would make sense that it would discuss modern ideas in a critical manner to show how a more traditional perspective perceives them.

Then, Ride the Tiger is an enlightenment piece and not traditionalism.

> In fact, Ride the Tiger has a section called "Part 3: The Dead End of Existentialism."

Post-existentialism

>It is debated whether or not Nietzsche is a modern thinker in many circles.

It is debated if Little Wayne is a good musician in many circles too.

>but if the point is that "no one can every truly understand my unique philosophy that will never happen"

I was just asking, stop being a pissy queer.

1af94b No.8127

The salient point that I took from his talk was this: It is not important that you believe in the traditions of your ancestors, only that you respect and honor them - and if they are not worthy of being respected or honored then they were never that good in the first place.

I think our traditions are without doubt worthy of honor and respect.

3d0861 No.8129

>>8123
Any discussion of ideas that are modern is inherently non-traditional? What are you even saying? The book shows the traditional path and the mistakes, from the traditional perspective, that modern thinkers are making. It's a critique from a traditional perspective and guide to living traditionally. If you want the explanation of the traditional societies without modern critique read Revolt Against the Modern World. Your reference point for these claims is illogical.

f0ee54 No.8137

>>8129
>The book shows the traditional path and the mistakes, from the traditional perspective, that modern thinkers are making.
I don't care about Islam, I don't try to critique it as a western system, because it isn't, I just see it as something foreign.

Evola, clearly doesn't see modernity as something foreign, if he did he would simply give his own teachings and ignore modernity.

3d0861 No.8141

>>8137
Traditionalism != Islam

If you read about Evola's life you may reconsider your posts, but I'll leave it there.

f0ee54 No.8147

>>8141
>Traditionalism != Islam
Islam is basically a Middle Eastern form of communism, it rejects centuries (even millenia) of religious tradition, it destroyed the Zurvan state religion in Iran, it almost destroyed two thousand years of history in the name of Islam, it did the same with the Christian sects (younger but still old), it continued the destruction of the ancient world, in India it destroyed an even older religion.

But your comparison now makes it clear that you are more a nihilist who is waging war against history, tradition and the past.

3d0861 No.8149

>>8147
!= means doesn't equal right?

oh well

f0ee54 No.8150

>>8149
>!= means doesn't equal right?
No, that's =/=

f0ee54 No.8152

>>8149
I see, your using a symbol from programming languages, which very few people would know. While I would use something from algebra, which most educated people would know.

950492 No.8157

>>8111

I don't understand why you are even posting in this thread. You started out by saying that you will reject Guenon for your idiosyncratic reason when the thread is about Evola.

You then conflate Evola and Guenon and derail the thread by trolling about Islamic Egypt.

Then you strawman what 3d0861 is saying.

Then you claim to have read the books in question but exhibit no understanding of their contents.

Then you decide that there is only one ingroup of possible philosophers, and if someone "uses" and idea from a philosopher outside this group you dismiss the idea out of hand without considering its content.

Then you engage in an all or nothing fallacy.

Then you again accuse someone of "using" thinkers and thereby reject everything being said without addressing what has been said.

Then you again inaccurately paraphrase the ideas forwarded in the books you claim to have read.

Then you again create an inaccurate strawman of what has been said, while accusing people of being "pissy queers."

Then you again inaccurately paraphrase ideas from books you say you have read.

Every single post you have contributed to this thread has been carcinogenic. You are polluting what could otherwise be an interesting discussion and I would like to politely ask you to stop doing so.

Thanks,

OP

f0ee54 No.8162

>>8157
>I don't understand why you are even posting in this thread. You started out by saying that you will reject Guenon for your idiosyncratic reason when the thread is about Evola.
Wrong, you clearly mentioned Guenon.
>
>You then conflate Evola and Guenon and derail the thread by trolling about Islamic Egypt.
No, an Anon did that.
>
>Then you strawman what 3d0861 is saying.
Where?
>Then you claim to have read the books in question but exhibit no understanding of their contents.
You are right, I have no idea what those books are supposed to be about. Thats why I am talking to you.
>Then you decide that there is only one ingroup of possible philosophers, and if someone "uses" and idea from a philosopher outside this group you dismiss the idea out of hand without considering its content.
Never said or did that,
>Then you engage in an all or nothing fallacy.
Never did that.
>Then you again accuse someone of "using" thinkers and thereby reject everything being said without addressing what has been said.
Never did that, I just wanted to know why someone who uses modernist writers, can possibly reject modernity.
>Then you again inaccurately paraphrase the ideas forwarded in the books you claim to have read.
Books that I think are meaningles and bizar.
>Then you again create an inaccurate strawman of what has been said, while accusing people of being "pissy queers."
Please give examples of the strawman
>Then you again inaccurately paraphrase ideas from books you say you have read.
Examples please.
>Every single post you have contributed to this thread has been carcinogenic. You are polluting what could otherwise be an interesting discussion and I would like to politely ask you to stop doing so.
Your entire ideology is incoherent and full of meaningless buzzwords like traditionalism, I haven't had a single orderly awnser to any of my questions and I still have no idea what traditionalism is supposed to be, so I will continue talking until I find out.

950492 No.8167

>>8162

I am not interested in engaging you in any way. All you have done so far is degrade the thread. I understand that we are currently undergoing a crisis in moderation and that deliberate attempts to degrade the content of this board will go unchecked. I asked you politely to stop, you chose to continue, I've done my part.

3d0861 No.8169

>>8162

Here:
>6569

3d0861 No.8170


f0ee54 No.8172

>>8167
>All you have done so far is degrade the thread
But that is a lie isn't it, if anything I am upgrading this thread by asking you to try and explain what this Traditionalism is and all I get is "nothing".

Your using a word that has no intrinsic meaning, that has no home. And I find it very sad that you try to picture me as some deviant, when all I am trying is to get to the bottom of what Traditionalism means.

186a80 No.8206

>>8172
You have been treated with great respect and understanding; you have demonstrated an utter lack of interest in rational debate. All that remains to be said is that you're a massive faggot.

950492 No.8337

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>7907

Here's a five minute video of Evola quotes from Ride the Tiger if folks want a taste of where he is coming from before investing an hour in the original video for a more in depth exposition.

eff7fd No.8341

>>7976
> In this case, if he found a woman suited to him, and I mean in the Traditional sense, her being Egyptian does not matter at that point.
Except that it does, you could rationalize marrying anyone with that sort of philosophy. You're on /pol/, don't try to push that bullshit here.

3040dd No.8707

Amazing. The complete destruction of what (to my mind, at least) was an appropriate and potentially valuable thread for /polpol/ was brought about by a single shitposter.

Did /polpol/ peak with the Ukraine threads?

f0ee54 No.8721

>>8206
>You have been treated with great respect and understanding; you have demonstrated an utter lack of interest in rational debate. All that remains to be said is that you're a massive faggot.
Stop playing games, I asked question you weren't able to awnser and now you pretend I was being rude, while you end your response with faggot.

3d0861 No.8774

>>8721
That's not the anon you were talking with.

950492 No.8882

>>8774

Dude, he's not here to talk with people. He's here to prevent people from talking with each other.

8de150 No.9475

>>8337
Thank you. Evola is the real deal. Feudalism were great times.

0d7be1 No.9483

>>8070
You clearly did not understand or never red Guénon at all.

>What Europe? Why?

Tere's nothing traditionnal left in Europe that can be salvaged. Guénon tried to but gave up in the end, saying that islam was the closest we could get to in term of traditions.

>No, it ends in a ism, making it automatically an ideology, not some esoteric whishwash.

Traditionnalism was never used or mentionned by Guénon, he was, as his islamic name suggests, giving us access to the truth and nothing else, he was not the father of some theories, he didnt invent anything new.

>If becoming a traditionalist leads white people to abandon their race, culture and ancestors, then yes, it's anti-white.

If one can say Guénon abandonned his race and etc, what can then be said about you or me, we do not do a 1/100000000 of what he did and, in your case, you still seem to think that your illusionnary traditionnal way of life / culture is truely traditionnal, while in fact its a monstruous try to copy, a joke from A to Z.

>I bet non of those societies have much in common besides being mostly bronze age and having wizards?

This is the final proof you never read Guénon or you just touched the cover for bragging rights. They have roots that link the Traditionnal societies to the Primordial Tradition.

f0ee54 No.9493

>>9483
>You clearly did not understand or never red Guénon at all.
I have read Evola and short pieces by and about Guenon.

>Tere's nothing traditionnal left in Europe that can be salvaged. Guénon tried to but gave up in the end, saying that islam was the closest we could get to in term of traditions.

What the hell are you even talking about, Islam isn't traditional in any sense of the word. It's a kind of desert communism, it destroyed real traditions.

Anyway, Europe is full of tradition: art, music, architecture, science, folkore, tradition. Any person who has visited a few cultural cities of Europe, or been to a concert can tell you that.

>Traditionnalism was never used or mentionned by Guénon

Alright, never claimed that he did, just assumes that his view was called traditionalism.

>giving us access to the truth and nothing else

How can he give use truth by abandoning Europe and his race? Seems more like he is abandoning truth to life a fantasy.

> what can then be said about you or me, we do not do a 1/100000000 of what he did

That's right, I am not a criminal and a sexual deviant. So I am proud I haven't achieved half of what he achieved.

>you still seem to think that your illusionnary traditionnal way of life / culture is truely traditionnal,

This is coming from someone who thinks ISLAM is traditional!! I have a question, do you think Communism is also traditional, because that is what Islam is in the scope of Middle Eastern history.

>This is the final proof you never read Guénon or you just touched the cover for bragging rights.

I haven't wasted my life studying the man, if that's what you are saying.

> They have roots that link the Traditionnal societies to the Primordial Tradition.

There is no promordial tradition, only RACE.

It seems that what you call "traditionalism" is just another form of liberalism, it's essentially abandoning your race and culture for some vague and meaningless universalism.

f0ee54 No.9502

File: 1428446298220.png (857.47 KB, 1409x714, 1409:714, traditionalismracetraitors.png)

>>9493
I made an image to make this much clearer.

f0ee54 No.9511

File: 1428447262744.jpg (29.71 KB, 300x374, 150:187, FS_cachecol.jpg)

>>9502
I am going to continue with some more observations, first Frithjof Schuon, notice the nose and the face, looks like a Jew or an Arab.

f0ee54 No.9513

File: 1428447356643.jpg (9.33 KB, 199x296, 199:296, guenon.jpg)

>>9511
Now, another picture of Guenon, notice how his eyes and face aren't correctly spaced out, this is usually caused when two different ethnic groups mix.

f0ee54 No.9515

File: 1428447628047.jpg (121.26 KB, 600x727, 600:727, Evola1969.jpg)

>>9513
A picture of Evola when he is older, notice the sinister Sicilian typelook, why would anyone who is white and loves his race take any of this guys serious.

What I know of Evola was that he was critical of both fascism and nationalsocialism, he most likely lacked the purity of blood for both worldviews.

Traditionalism seems to be another attempt by Jewlike forces to undermine the racial strenght of the White race, it promises tradition but delivers the nihilistic liberalism of Islam.

Gone are culture, art, science and great works, to be replaced with dirty men, getting on both knees, kneeling in front of some pagan Arabic God.

3a0f32 No.9522

I love Evola, but I doubt /pol/ will, if not just because he doesn't toe the "party line" when it comes to the Jews. Basically while he acknowledges the role the Jews play in the sickness of modernity, he points out that the real problem is an intangible, spiritual one (Moldbug would later re-frame it as a memetic complex called the cathedral) and that you can't oven your way to a better western society.

Evola's main beef with the Nazis and the fascists is that they focused too much on worldly, material affairs. No effort was put into addressing the intangible, immaterial issues of culture. His criticisms of the supposed "Far right" are similar to the present-day works of Varg Vikernes. It is more important that we personally strive for healthy, traditional spiritualism than any petty, materialistic concerns about our society. Certainly Vikernes would differ from Evola on the spiritual ideal, but in that sense they are both similar. We should care less for petty matters of public politics and focus more on personal spiritual transcendence. To change the world, you must first change yourself, and strive for spiritual fulfillment by embracing the spirit of tradition. We have to embrace the idea of something greater than any man, any race, any religion. We need to find the highest of all powers, the power of tradition.

4dd5b8 No.9523

File: 1428448602333.png (605.31 KB, 564x918, 94:153, constantine_statue.PNG)

>>9502
>>9511
>>9513
>>9515

>being this ignorant about Mediterranean phenotypes

>divide and conquer bullshit even though Hitler considered the Italians and other Mediterranean people to be part of the Aryan race

Is this shitposting or not, I can't tell.

Get your Nordicist crap out of here.

f0ee54 No.9524

>>9522
>
>Evola's main beef with the Nazis and the fascists is that they focused too much on worldly, material affairs.
That's an often made mistake, it assumes the world of the spirit is different from the world of the flesh, it isn't.

"as above, so below"

What we do on this earth is just a reflection of a greater continuum.

f0ee54 No.9532

>>9523
I have been to Italy and I can tell you that most Italians are pretty handsome looking people and I have no problem with the Italian people and yes, most of them are white.

But if you seriously think we should follow the teachings of someone who looks like a full-blown Jew, then I would advice you to reconsider.

e8ed2b No.9534

>>9532
>22 posts ITT

3a0f32 No.9537

>>9524

And Evola believed that the world of the flesh was a product of the world of the spirit. If you want to fix the former, start with the latter.

f0ee54 No.9538

>>9534

>>22 posts ITT

I will continue to have this discussion, "traditionalism" is anti-race, anti-culture, it promotes Islam, it promotes the destruction of our way of life.


4dd5b8 No.9540

File: 1428449130056.jpg (633.34 KB, 1600x1025, 64:41, julius.jpg)

>>9532

Then why did you said Evola looks like a shitskin even though his phenotype is pretty common through all of Italy? Not all Sicilians are mixed with Arabs.

f0ee54 No.9541

>>9540
>Then why did you said Evola looks like a shitskin even though his phenotype is pretty common through all of Italy?
Never called him a shitskin, called him a mixblood, what most southern Italians are. I have no problem if Evola was a single person amongst different white people, but when he get's paired with a possible Jew and he attacks race, then it's clear to me that he is a part of the racial chaos and the foreign elements are stronger in him.

e8ed2b No.9558

>>9538
>all traditions are islamic traditions

0d7be1 No.9587

File: 1428451795855.jpg (69.3 KB, 485x348, 485:348, main-qimg-645febce31c49bf7….jpg)

>>9493
You should stay away from any of Guénon's works, it's really easy to see when one understand Guénon and when one do not understand it at all.

>This is coming from someone who thinks ISLAM is traditional!! I have a question, do you think Communism is also traditional, because that is what Islam is in the scope of Middle Eastern history.

Guénon's traditionnal society/doctrin by excellence (when he wrote his books, more or less from 1920 to 1950) was Hinduism. So if you think Islam isn't traditionnal in any way, you clearly missed the big-ass parts where he talks about hinduism.

>What the hell are you even talking about, Islam isn't traditional in any sense of the word. It's a kind of desert communism, it destroyed real traditions.

The sacred symbolism and sacred sciences are not the property of a single religion or civilizational model (exemple: the holy grail legend that's of celtic origins and that was later christianized; the swastikas thats around the world; the pyramid; symbols about a sacred moutain, cavern or island; etc.) so Islam in that sense, like christianism and many more, is a (many) old tradition(s) that changed skin like a snake to be able to survive, as degenerate or reduced it may, be but it's still considered traditionnal and not yet a profane science like the modern sciences are (psychology, sociology, physics, modern maths etc).

>There is no promordial tradition, only RACE.

Races is a fact. A traditionnal society is considered to be an adaptation of the primordial tradition to a particular race so it can fit it's temperament and attitude like a glove. Exemple: monotheism (judaism, christianism, islam) for the races considered too sentimental who had to follow a moral kind of divine law; Hinduism or taoism on the other hand is more metaphysical and therefore really alien to us europeans and americans.

d046a9 No.9831

>>9541
One of the defining characteristics of the aristocracy in areas of Europe that had ever come under Islamic was an emphasis on having NEVER intermarried with the Arabs. You know the term "blueblood", right? It comes from the Spanish concept "sangre de azul"–nobility prided themselves on having skin pale enough that you could see the blue veins around the wrists and such. No Arab blood, no Jewish blood; intermarriage was seen as sacrilege.

Point being, you're right that a lot of Southern Italians probably have a some mixed blood, but amongst nobles such as Baron Julius Evola that is exceedingly unlikely.

4b436a No.9883

>>9831
>I'm an Evola fan, so I hamfistedly try to defend anything about him

4b436a No.9890

>>9523
He is more or less correct. The whole traditionalist movement was, from the beginning, full of Jews and Freemasons. That's where their anti-Christian standpoint comes from, for example.

Evola: Occultist
Guenon: Freemason
Schuon: Freemason, possible Jew

You can also see this influence in modern traditionalists like Varg (Jew, Freemason) and de Benoist (Jew).

They don't tell 100% lies, but that's what makes them so dangerous. In my opinion, the coopted a fledgling traditionalist trend to keep control of it.

d046a9 No.9918

>>9883
You didn't even fucking address my point, you're literally just saying "Hurr durr you like Evola so of course you're defending him." No shit, shylock. Were you dropped on your fucking head as a child or were you born this stupid? Now get your hand out of your kike ass and actually try to make an argument next time.

f0ee54 No.10050

>>9587
>You should stay away from any of Guénon's works, it's really easy to see when one understand Guénon and when one do not understand it at all.
Actually, I think I understand him perfectly well, he is an idealist loser who can't make it in society, he feels lonely and isolated so he invents a doctrine that goes against everything he was taught, he then breakes with his ancestors in smug superiority.

>Guénon's traditionnal society/doctrin by excellence (when he wrote his books, more or less from 1920 to 1950) was Hinduism. So if you think Islam isn't traditionnal in any way, you clearly missed the big-ass parts where he talks about hinduism.

Wait a minute, I get told that it is Islam that is the most traditional, but now all of a sudden it's Hinduism, then my question is, why didn't he move ot India like so many intellectuals did at that time?

>The sacred symbolism and sacred sciences are not the property of a single religion or civilizational model (exemple: the holy grail legend that's of celtic origins and that was later christianized; the swastikas thats around the world; the pyramid; symbols about a sacred moutain, cavern or island; etc.)

No, they are usually the product of a RACE, that is why the swastika is most often found in area's with a large haplogroup R presence, this includes even some area's in China.

>so Islam in that sense, like christianism and many more, is a (many) old tradition(s) that changed skin like a snake to be able to survive, as degenerate or reduced it may,

But then Islam is anti-traditional, it's to hostile towards traditional elements, so they have to be hidden in strange sufisects and what not.

>but it's still considered traditionnal and not yet a profane science like the modern sciences are (psychology, sociology, physics, modern maths etc).

I don't think you completely understand, modern science is the product of RACE, so it's one of the best example of tradition we have. Now there are whiter (and therefor more traditional) aspects of western civilization, but science is very white and therefor very traditional.

>aces is a fact. A traditionnal society is considered to be an adaptation of the primordial tradition to a particular race so it can fit it's temperament and attitude like a glove.

No, tradition can not evolve outside of race, that is impossible, so your traditionalism is just the raceconsciousness of a particulair race.

>Hinduism or taoism on the other hand is more metaphysical and therefore really alien to us europeans and americans.

I have no idea what you are talking about the great metaphysical civilizations are from less to more metaphysical: Semitic, Chinese, Mesopotamian, Greeks, Western, Indian. etc.

Metaphysics is such an important part of Western philosophy, the fact that you think otherwise means you are unaware of our traditions.

f0ee54 No.10053

>>9831
>Point being, you're right that a lot of Southern Italians probably have a some mixed blood, but amongst nobles such as Baron Julius Evola that is exceedingly unlikely.
If he is a noble, remember that people tried to get into the nobility all the time, where I am from we have a whole bunch of fake nobility.

f0ee54 No.10054

>>9890
>Varg (Jew, Freemason)
Varg is not a Jew or Freemason.

0a8968 No.13468

File: 1429630500539.webm (6.86 MB, 400x226, 200:113, 1429517471225.webm)

>>7907

Evola's too difficult to digest for most people, Americans especially. To the Mass Men of Modernity, anything outside the realm of economics is beyond the pale. Even most NatSocs find Evola too convoluted and nonsensical. I'm not saying he's not, only that the 50% of superfluous bullshit he spouts turns people off and they ignore the other half which is, incidentally, pure gold.

I'm not trying to sound like an esoteric wanker, but Evola grounded his views in the heroic, the noble, the Promethean. What we have today has numbed us to such a degree that even 'redpilled' individuals can't see far enough through the obfuscating fog to grasp what lies beyond it.

For anyone who might be puzzled, watch Leon Degrelle explain it in the attached webm.


0a8968 No.13471

File: 1429633953323.jpg (135.82 KB, 707x900, 707:900, 1427857941895.jpg)

>>8095

>Being a traditional type doesn't necessitate a path for an individual. It places the Will of the reader to his own devices. If your Will is to make a change in the modern world, that is your choice, but Evola will remind you of the hardship he faced along the way. You cannot expect that everyone to have the will to fight or leave their slave-morality.

There are so many parallels between this and Nietzsche's prophesied path to the Overman that it's uncanny.

Anon, do you think it's possible to flay all weakness from oneself, to the point that what's left is nothing but an empty shell, devoid of all human frailty and want? But instead of succumbing to ennui and nihilism of the Eastern religions and their many-faceted mental traps (the Abrahamic ones especially, what with their lack of life-affirming passion and solipsistic focus on the post-mortem), one takes advantage of this newly-developed hollow state and fills it with a burning desire, a striving for apotheosis, using the energy of the latter to push the now-weightless husk to distances it never could have gone otherwise, burdened as it was with everything that weighs Man down and prevents him from self-actualizing. I'd compare it to a ghost shedding his flesh and allowing ephemeral winds to carry him forward, but unlike so many of the surrounding, weeping specters who get that far, this ghost would bring to bear his willpower and against all reasonable odds steer himself along a predetermined path.

Is this the true, achievable path to the Overman? The complete self-actualization of one's purposefully-emaciated spirit-body?

A sort of profound nudity devoid of protective mental frameworks, their renunciation the necessary prerequisite in a guided process through the thorny garden of Modernity by the Promethean flames of longing? Can it even be done? Such a profound detachment would necessitate a violently belligerent trichotomy of the self employed *against* the self, an almost sadistic sundering of the unified spirit into pieces, each at war with the other two: one, which flays; one, which enrages; and one, which ennobles, but with all three working in unison to drag the man through a hellacious torment of his own making. It would be almost barbaric in its inhumane disregard for the happiness we all strive for.

This is beyond stoicism, beyond nihilism, beyond even human nature, as an Aspirant on such a path would have to fight not only against the degeneration of the modern world, but also against his own nature (in essence, defying his very genes and their unending howls of protest while pushing against biological imperatives that crouch lurking in the darkest reaches of our simian cerebellum). It's a monstrously simple concept, the barbarity of it matched only by the arrogance of the Aspirant and his profound masochism in service of ennoblement, of perfection.

Nietzsche laid the groundwork by carving the final piece of the mosaic, yet his own human frailties kept him from the ultimate prize.

I have immense respect for the man, but he was a simpering beta. His beloved Overman would have moved beyond such trivialities.

As far as I know, no one's come even close to synthesizing all this into a single, unifying doctrine, and attempting the climb.

Am I grasping at straws, or is this actually feasible?

Can a human being ever ascend to such a height?

Can mere men be purified to such a degree?

The final result would be… magnificent.

sorry if I'm not making much sense but I'm depressed as fuck, and have a light alcohol-induced buzz going on…


950492 No.13486

>>13485

Two weeks pass and you're still shitting up a thread and making sure no meaningful conversation can take place.

/polpol/ peaked and died with the Ukraine threads.


215827 No.13501

>>7918

Evola and the other right-wing traditionalists are pretty different from Guenon


b0aa3b No.13507

File: 1429722854223.jpg (29.99 KB, 456x351, 152:117, a_true_hero.jpg)

>>13468

Leon Degrelle really got it.

This man has redeemed the Walloons in my eyes. They were not always the slobs they are now.

And to think that among them there must be some as redpilled as degrelle, stuck in that socialist hellhole.


0df05d No.13508

>>13507

>And to think that among them there must be some as redpilled as degrelle, stuck in that socialist hellhole.

I'm not familiar with modern-day Belgium. What's the situation there nowadays? We hear about France, Britain, German, and the US all day erry day, but nary a peep about the smaller nations.

Can any other Anons weigh in?


b0aa3b No.13509

File: 1429727348515.jpg (35.02 KB, 250x425, 10:17, Ssvlaanderen.jpg)

>>13508

In terms of immigration certain parts of the country can be deemed lost. Brussels has about 25% muslims and an unholy amount of foreigners. It goes without saying the crime rate there is off the charts.

The same is true for most of the big cities in Belgium. But the smaller cities are still firmly Flemish.

But there is still hope in Flanders because the mentality of the people here is conservative as fuck. Dutch people coming here describe us as "extremely racist" and we really have no shame about it.

I'm not sure if you heard about the "Zwarte Piet" scandal in the Netherlands? It's a dutch/flemish tradition where some people dress up in blackface and deliver candy to kids. In the Netherlands it became this racist issue and the controversy is still raging. Here in Flanders they tried it too and everyone laughed them off.

There's only two real things stopping us from going full nationalist.

1. The socialists have lots of power after 30 years of being part of the government, but that's slowly but surely slipping.

2. Nationalism in Flanders is usually channeled into Flemish Independance nationalism, which doesn't really directly adress our issues.

But I have hope for this region. Every day I hear people saying this they wouldn't dare say 5 years ago.

I'm not really well informed on the Walloons. There's a huge rift between us and the Walloons. The socialists reign in their part of the country and in Flanders they're usually thought of as lazy leeching bums. But as I said, hearing Leon Degrelle speak makes me wonder if there's not some gems amongst the rabble. During WW2 Walloons sent as much people to the SS as the Flemish, so maybe we're not so different after all.


e47a88 No.13577

>>13509

>I'm not sure if you heard about the "Zwarte Piet" scandal in the Netherlands?

I have. Funny and sad at the same time.


85a694 No.13582

>>13509

I heard that the border between Flanders and Wallonia was set by Julius Caesar himself to mark the boundary between Roman and Barbarian land. Everyone south of Caesars lime-line border was Romanised while everyone north was allowed to remain Barbarian.

Very fascinating


b0aa3b No.13585

File: 1429822068980.png (351.92 KB, 787x799, 787:799, Map_Gallia_Tribes_Towns.png)

>>13582

I'm not sure that's true.

Caesar most definitely defeated the Belgae and the border between Belgica of the Empire and Germania was further north.

Caesar did deem the Belgian tribes as more Germanic in origin but influenced by the Celts.

And certainly everyone who has ever heard Dutch will know it's very similar to German.

So wether Caesar marked a lime-line border there or not, there's a definite ethnic and German/Roman border there.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]