a3d3f7 No.9873[View All]
well /polpol/ its officially happening, i am sure you've heard about it, this is going to be another media shitstorm and no doubt innocent white people will suffer as a result.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/us/south-carolina-officer-is-charged-with-murder-in-black-mans-death.html?_r=0i dont see him being convicted of murder, nigger grabbed for the taser.
also, anyone else think the video looks fake? i mean, i doubt that this is an orchestrated event, but the person filming is so nonchalant, and just so happens to turn on camera at the exact time to catch the nig running but not early enough to film the struggle.
also the cops seem so indifferent to his presence.
idk, probably not a false flag, but it crossed my mind.
00855f No.10232
>>10231Sorry to say anon but It won't stop for a while.
People want to get their 'justice' their payback,
compensation, relief, return on their investment.
What investment you may ask?
Why, the investment of white guilt, this downward-spiral
will only stop when there's mass movements against it
or when they win.
57adb1 No.10237
>>10232Its the left wing consolidating the black vote for next years elections 74% of blacks vote democrat so they need a very polar political issue to get them to the polls
eaacfb No.10238
>>10210There was a passenger in the vehicle who could have been armed
b8a981 No.10239
>>9904It's a taser, you can see the wires.
0ae371 No.10246
>>10190Don't run away from a cop like that unless you're ready to die.
eaacfb No.10248
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner>If an officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious bodily harm either to fellow officers or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. 00855f No.10253
>>10237Honestly it's sad that they have to do this so often to keep
Black voters caring about any 'issues' no matter how
meager the importance is, it's like how some of the
Republican party have started appealing to Latino
voters because they know no one is really taking actions to change immigration seriously as long as the Democrats take hold of the majority immigrant voters
86c0d7 No.10265
>>9884Not a USfag, would the prior records possibly mean he would do time for something like a taillight? Would explain his freaking out and running at least.
There is certainly a tazer there, I can't tell for sure if cop or black dude use it though.
>man Dodger doesn't age well. 57adb1 No.10269
>>10253To appeal to latinos all you have to do is speak spanish they might gravitate more to the Dems over immigration but a pol that understands the language and culture can sway them
6e0fd7 No.10282
>>10142Brings to mind the Vietnam vet shooting a cop.
Dude is all goofy and dancing and shit, runs off to his car door then turns around with a M1 carbine and goes full "VIETCONG FUCKING EVERYWHERE" on the cop.
Just because someone moves or runs away from you doesn't mean you're out of the woods.
6e0fd7 No.10283
>>10148This too is a possibility. And it doesn't just happen to niggers alone.
eaacfb No.10288
>>10265>Would explain his freaking out and running at leastBrother owed back child support.
e99890 No.10291
>>10282He had an AR not a m1 carbine.
6e0fd7 No.10294
>>10291No he didn't. He had an M1 carbine. You can see the rifle clearly, you can count the shots, you can see the mag.
6e0fd7 No.10324
>>10307More like the screams of false authority.
I hate the death of a husband and father-to-be as much as the next guy, but this is one of those clear examples where the Stanford experiment meets a combat-hardened warrior. 9999 people move back in line when you yell at them because they're afraid of abuse, and then you meet that last one that has seen more human suffering that you could ever imagine.
Let's not fool ourselves into thinking that this officer was thorough, mature or tactful; it was just another one of those young power trippers happening to run into the wrong person who doesn't comply just because you yell the same thing in their face over and over.
And don't forget that the cop shot first. Hit the vet in the stomach.
dd98bb No.10349
>>10324Oh shit he shot first? Don't feel so bad now. If he was a decent cop he would have unloaded center mass till the vet was dead. If he was a good cop it probably wouldn't have happened at all.
e46752 No.10401
>>10222>Get ready for another chimpout.Are they wrong to?
We all know if this video didn't exist, the cop and his two buddies would have had a narrative nobody would question. The cops planted evidence after using lethal force like it was NOTHING. They would have just lied to the public, on the witness stand, etc; painted the victim as the aggressor, just to cover their own murder.
Who is to say this isn't the norm, and cops aren't doing this shit all the time and have been for the last 100 years? We would never know. And the only reason we know NOW is that everybody has an iPhone.
Maybe this is just how cops always are, and have always been. Just murdering people like it was nothing, and lying about it. I would say if anything gives the blacks a right to chimpout, it's this realization.
e6beef No.10441
>>10401Thanks for the speculation.
2940ce No.10564
>>10441I mean, I agree with the messages therein, but what the hell video was THAT?
sensible chuckle/10
19273e No.10565
060976 No.10576
>The guy either grabs the Officer's taser and manages to hit him, or fails and runs away
>Either way, the Officer isn't fazed by it
>The guy runs away from the Officer, getting at least 12 feet away from him
>Instead of realizing that this guy didn't pose a serious threat without a weapon and immediately going in pursuit, the Officer decides instead to shoot an unarmed guy in the back 8 times
>8 fucking times, not 3, not 4, 8 fucking times. As if years of training in the police academy didn't give him enough knowledge on how to incapacitate a person who is running in a straight line by, oh I don't know, shooting him in the leg instead?
>Casually strolls on over to the body
>"PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!", he says to the person he just shot 8 times
>Handcuffs him. Because you gotta make sure that person you just shot 8 times in the back won't get up and run, or reach for a non-existent weapon
>People will defend this
40a183 No.10577
>>10576>>10576>oh I don't know, shooting him in the leg instead?i dont totally disagree with your overall stance but this is reddit tier stupidity. they're trained to shoot to kill.
060976 No.10582
>>10577>they're trained to shoot to killAnd my point was that he didn't have a reason to shoot in the first place.
40a183 No.10586
>>10582so dont weaken your point by spouting reddit tier aphorisms about shooting perps in the leg
e83f76 No.10591
>>10576>8 fucking times, not 3, not 4, 8 fucking timesYou're being a bit disingenuous here. You're acting as if shooting him 3 or 4 times would be magically acceptable, but the fact that it was 8 times is arbitrarily unacceptable.
It's not like the extra bullets made him extra dead. You shoot to kill, whether it takes 1 or 10 bullets.
073a41 No.10614
>>10576>don't cuff him! It's not like it's standard procedure and pavement apes aren't have a precedent of feigning only to shoot you when you are lax>shoot him in the leg!>into_the_trash_it_goes.jpgLook, this isn't even to defend the cop but you making libtard/plebbbit arguments is disgusting to read.
073a41 No.10618
>>10401>>10565The cop did not plant fucking evidence, he dropped his taser when talking to his partner and picked it up again not even a fucking minute later. It's not like cops are supposed to drop their guns every time they shoot a coon, they holster their weapons.
The video editing was biased as fuck. There was a slomo of the cop dropping the taser exclaiming "OMG PLANTING EVIDENCE HE DINDUNUFFIN" and casually doesn't focus on the cop picking up the "planted evidence" again. It isn't planted evidence if you don't leave it there.
c02daa No.10726
>>10349You should see how that vet operated with a gunshot wound.
4506bc No.10868
>>10220Correct. The thing that's so scary about this situation is that all the leftists have found their smoking gun, their "evidence" of an epidemic of white cops killing black men (even though statistics say otherwise). The cop definitely shouldn't have shot him and now he has potentially undone the position of authority non-SJWs had over the issue.
My guess is that the cop got tired of dealing with blacks and snapped in a fit of rage. Then he realized he murdered someone and knew he was fucked.
Interestingly enough, when I first read the NYTimes article about the shooting, they mentioned the officer could face the death penalty. I've seen countless articles on the NYT about how the death penalty is wrong, how it kills more minorities, how it has killed innocents, etc. Now all of the sudden it seems like they're almost implying that the death penalty is what this officer deserves. It seems like a "dog whistle" tactic; saying to whites "you're time is coming".
I just looked through the article and it seems like the death penalty reference was removed.
>>10401Chomping out is never justified.
490f1a No.10871
>>10564I think we're seeing a growing number of blacks who are so fucking disgusted with what their own culture has become. Tommy Sotomayor is one of the best examples, but you see other blacks like him in the Youtube comments agreeing with him.
>>10577>>10586>>10614In partial defense of him, that's not necessarily liberal ignorance. I have noticed that people in places where guns are rare
hint: Europe often don't have a clue about them, even if they are pretty sharp otherwise.
Their knowledge of guns revolves around things like spaghetti Westerns and Hong Kong cop movies.
>>10726The vet was not shot in the stomach immediately. The first shots from the cop missed.
3668b6 No.10874
>>10871>I have noticed that people in places where guns are rare hint: Europe Actually, guns are very common in most countries of Europe compared to the rest of the world, it's just that America has a lot of guns.
490f1a No.10875
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>10868>The cop definitely shouldn't have shot him and now he has potentially undone the position of authority non-SJWs had over the issue.The important thing is not to defend the cop
barring some insane evidence that comes to light which exonerates his actionsI think it would be good to get stuff like this out there, showing an innocent white guy killed by cops.
This is primarily an irresponsible cop issue, not a race one.
4506bc No.10966
>>10875It would be nice if the debate was framed around police irresponsibility and accountability, but the media will never push that. The powers that be definitely have an agenda with the police vs blacks narrative. I'm pretty sure more whites get killed by police every year, but the people who are the most vocal are the leftists and the black community (and the media gives them the most airtime).
Also, didn't the Alburquerque PD kill almost 100 people in a year? I remember there being an outcry about their PD but it never received the level of attention Ferguson did.
490f1a No.11014
>>10966You're completely right in terms of the media, my only point was to bring it up in online debates and discussion. Don't let the notion that blacks are uniquely singled out for police brutality go unchallenged.
>Also, didn't the Alburquerque PD kill almost 100 people in a year? I remember there being an outcry about their PD but it never received the level of attention Ferguson did.Yeah, they have one of the worst records in the United States, and the crime there is trivial compared to real hellholes like Detroit, where you'd be a lot more forgiving of officers being on edge.
http://krqe.com/2014/04/10/comparison-apd-shoots-kills-more-than-other-agencies/ 71ddf1 No.11022
>>10966>It would be nice if the debate was framed around police irresponsibility and accountability, but the media will never push thatIt's termed 'selective outrage' and its the media simply attempting to position the narrative in a certain way to evoke a particular response.
fc4912 No.11027
>>9881I've seen this everywhere, and one of the most common reactions is exactly that…and it's not just /pol/ shilling. People are ceasing to give a fuck.
64dbe0 No.11154
>>9904there's two things flying out as the officer pulls his gun. something behind and one at the victim's feet.
Another thought is that the officer tried to tase him and he just deflected it and ran. Scott is swinging away at something just as the video begins.
This is why I avoid cops like they carry the plague.
a59199 No.11189
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/apr/09/florida-police-shoot-mentally-ill-man-videoI really have trouble keeping all of these stories straight lately there's been such a spike in reported cop vs citizen killings. I feel like we had another "black schizo with broomstick" within the past year.
Why is the cop wearing a white mask/hood?
2b2233 No.11210
I think the aspect of this whole thing is that he freaked out because he didn't want to go back to jail for unpaid child support. I know Tyrones don't like to raise their kids and whatever, but you people have to realize some shit.
You can get slapped with child support and you have ZERO RECOURSE once you get it. If you lose your job and don't pay, you can lose your license. Now you can't drive to go find a job, so you can't pay your child support, they issue a warrant for your arrest, so now you're in jail. Different states keep you in for various amounts of time, but it doesn't matter because you can't get a job while you're in jail so you can't pay your child support. Now you're homeless because you can't find a job, so you can't pay your child support etc etc.
This story is an extreme but it's not unheard of.
Now you're in a never ending hamster wheel of poverty and incarceration, and if you're like 75% of men, SHE LEFT YOU and took your kids.
In Hilary's America, this is probably the future for us all. And they'll tell us it's our privilege.
254050 No.11215
>>9881After the Trayvon and Mike Brown debacle, I really just don't give a shit anymore. The media decided to cry wolf at the wrong times for their own interests and they can accept the grave they've dug as more and more whites throw up their hands and say "fuck this, I don't care"
a59199 No.11289
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Man-on-Stolen-Horse-Stunned-by-Sheriffs-Deputies-in-IE-299250951.html
>The man did not appear to move from his position lying on the ground for more than 45 minutes. He did not appear to receive medical attention while deputies stood around him during that time.
>The man, identified as Francis Jared Pusok, 30, of Apple Valley, was hospitalized with unknown injuries, authorities said.
>In the two minutes after the man was stunned with a Taser, it appeared deputies kicked him 17 times, punched him 37 times and struck him with batons four times. Thirteen blows appeared to be to the head. The allegedly stolen horse stood idly nearby. f9c7c8 No.11291
>>10248This is the relevant law for this case.
Whatever people are arguing about the nignog tasing the cop and all that, there was no probable cause to indicate that his ESCAPING would result in harm to the cop or anybody else.
US "fleeing felon" rules are decisive on the illegality of shooting that guy in the back in a situation like this.
a59199 No.11292
>>11289On that link if you follow through to the story they threw a random gallery in with a black guy as the first picture. So like halfway down the article there's a picture of a black guy even though he has nothing to do with the beating. Of course the average tard will scroll past and assume it's the person beaten (in front of a US flag too lol)
61394d No.11296
>>9927Blacks are so funny
258b93 No.11343
>>10874By our standard your guns are rare, also though the total number is fairly high their distribution in Europe is very narrow. In the US the ATF now claims that 80% of households have a gun and that is merely what is suspected. In rural America you won't find a house without a gun. The numbers they give out regarding our rates of ownership are very conservative, there are probably 400-900 million guns in the US not 300 million.
eaacfb No.11348
>>11291>grappling with a cop for a weapon>not a danger to the copThe presumption is that he would use the weapon on the cop first had he gotten it. Guy was then a felon and cop could use deadly force to restrain him from leaving. Did you read the case at all?
8978cb No.11480
Meh i dont really care, just another dead erectus.
thats good news for me
05d01b No.11482
This shit is going to keep repeating itself all the time, isn't it. It has become very uninteresting at this point. It's common occurrence. Niggers gonna nig.
f9c7c8 No.11484
>>11348Yo, dumbass, if he'd got shot while grappling with the cop, the cop would never have been arrested.
He get shot while obviously fleeing.
And why are you gonna assume that because its called a "fleeing felon law" that it means "open season on shooting felons"?
That's just a name.
The rule means what I just fucking said it means. Wrestling for that taser, even if that took place, would only mean the guy was maybe "unarmed and dangerous", it does NOT mean "there was probable cause to believe that his escape would have resulted in death or serious injury to the officer or others"
There are NO OTHER acceptable circumstances for shooting a fleeing, unarmed suspect under US law. Period.
You should try reading then case, THEN reading the relevant laws. Cuz y'know, that helps.
Even on a common sense level, have all these other cases taught you nothing? Cops don't charge their own with murder lightly.